Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0014118 (endocarditis)
 15,629 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We report the successful treatment of infective endocarditis caused by Streptococcus mitis with linezolid in a patient with pre-existing valvular heart disease. The patient had multiple allergies to conventional antibiotics. Linezolid may provide an oral alternative in the treatment of infective endocarditis in patients with adverse drug reactions to traditional antibiotic regimens.
 ...
PMID:A case of Streptococcus mitis endocarditis successfully treated by linezolid. 1621 49

There are no experimental studies regarding the prophylactic efficacy of linezolid against infective endocarditis. Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis of the aortic valve was induced in rabbits by the insertion of a polyethylene catheter. Twenty-four hours later, animals were randomly assigned to a control group, and groups receiving either ampicillin (two doses of 40 mg/kg of body weight each, given intravenously, 2 h apart) or linezolid (a single per os dose of 75 mg/kg). The first dose of ampicillin and the single dose of linezolid were administered 0.5 and 1 h, respectively, prior to the intravenous inoculation of approximately 10(7) CFU of Streptococcus oralis or Enterococcus faecalis. Linezolid peak levels in rabbit serum were similar to the peak serum levels in humans following a 600-mg oral dose of linezolid. Linezolid prevented endocarditis in 87% of S. oralis-challenged rabbits (P < 0.001 versus controls; P = 0.026 versus ampicillin). In rabbits challenged with E. faecalis, linezolid prevented endocarditis in 73% (P = 0.003 versus controls; P = 0.049 versus ampicillin). Ampicillin prevented endocarditis due to S. oralis or due to E. faecalis in 47% (P = 0.005 versus controls) and in 30% (P = not significant versus controls) of the challenged animals, respectively. In conclusion, linezolid was effective as prophylaxis against endocarditis caused by a strain of S. oralis and to a lesser degree against that caused by a strain of E. faecalis. Its prophylactic efficacy was superior to that of ampicillin.
 ...
PMID:Linezolid in prophylaxis against experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Streptococcus oralis or Enterococcus faecalis. 1643 23

A 28-year-old female developed infective endocarditis in the tricuspid valve and multiple lung abscesses due to septic pulmonary emboli early after intensive therapy for ulcerative colitis. The pathogen was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Usual antibiotic agents and linezolid were administered. Three weeks later, she fell into cardiopulmonary arrest due to further pulmonary emboli and required mechanical circulatory assist. Fatal brain damage was suggested at first. Two days later, she fully regained consciousness and underwent tricuspid valve replacement using mechanical valve and extirpation of septic pulmonary embolus. Mechanical circulatory assist was discontinued on the next day. After strenuous administration of linezolid and other drugs for 9 weeks, she was discharged from hospital on foot. We believe that early surgical intervention should be considered in patients with infective endocarditis in the right heart and subsequent septic pulmonary emboli. Linezolid was very useful in this patient.
 ...
PMID:[Successful salvage of a patient with cardiac arrest caused by multiple pulmonary emboli and lung abscesses due to infective endocarditis of the tricuspid valve: a case report]. 1651 59

Linezolid in combination with ertapenem showed in vitro synergy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. We confirmed this interaction in vivo by using a rabbit endocarditis experimental model and simulation of the human pharmacokinetics in animals for both antibiotics. Linezolid plus ertapenem exhibited highly synergistic activity in vivo after 4 days of treatment.
 ...
PMID:In vitro and in vivo assessment of linezolid combined with ertapenem: a highly synergistic combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. 1680 42

From relative obscurity, enterococci have become a leading cause of nosocomial infection. This has been attributed, in part, to the growth in susceptible host populations, increased use of intravascular devices, prolonged hospital stay, and widespread antibiotics use. Furthermore, the facility with which enterococci acquire resistance characteristics coupled with their capacity to survive in the environment renders them uniquely suited as nosocomial opportunists and have resulted in global dissemination of resistant strains. Debate continues as to whether most serious infections arise from a person's indigenous flora or dissemination of virulent clones. Enterococci are normal inhabitants of the human gastrointestinal tract. Classically associated with endocarditis and wound and urinary tract infections, increasingly they are a cause of nosocomial bacteremia. The rise in incidence of serious enterococcal infection has been particularly evident in neonatal, paediatric intensive care, and haematology/oncology units. Spread of resistant phenotypes has posed a difficult therapeutic challenge. We have been rescued, albeit perhaps only temporarily, by the addition of newer agents, such as linezolid, to the therapeutic armamentarium. However, there is no room for complacency. Linezolid resistance already has been reported. Efforts must continue to focus on prevention of the emergence and dissemination of resistance through policies of rational antibiotic use, infection control and education.
 ...
PMID:Enterococcal infection in children. 1693 7

Advances in medical technology have led to improved survival after catastrophic illnesses. Many of the survivors require ongoing care including tracheostomy, mechanical ventilation, tube feedings, and indwelling venous catheters. Repeated hospitalizations may be necessary to treat infectious complications resulting from resistant organisms requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy. Because prolonged intravenous access may be difficult or even impossible in these patients, alternative means of therapy are necessary. Linezolid is the first of a new class of antimicrobial agents known as the oxazolidinones with activity against gram-positive bacteria similar to that of vancomycin and yet its oral bioavailability allows for enteral administration. We present our retrospective experience with oral linezolid in a cohort of pediatric intensive care unit patients. Primary infectious disease issues included endocarditis, tracheitis, pneumonia, or central line sepsis resulting from Staphylococcus epidermidis, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus. Treatment was initiated with vancomycin and changed to enteral linezolid (10 mg/kg every 12 hours). The duration of therapy with linezolid varied from 7 days to 6 weeks. All of the patients were discharged home to complete their course of enteral linezolid. No complications related to linezolid therapy were noted, and all of the patients completed their prescribed course of therapy without the need for rehospitalization. Our preliminary experience suggests that oral linezolid offers an effective alternative to intravenous vancomycin for the treatment of infections resulting from gram-positive bacteria and avoids the need for prolonged vascular access.
 ...
PMID:Preliminary experience with the use of oral linezolid in infants for the completion of antibiotic therapy in the outpatient setting after admission to the pediatric intensive care unit. 1712 26

Linezolid is not yet recognised as a standard therapy for infective endocarditis. This report describes nine patients with endocarditis treated with linezolid and 33 similar cases from the medical literature. The majority of cases involved multiresistant strains, and the reasons for administering linezolid were refractory disease (60%), intolerance (28%), sequential therapy (12%) and a resistant pathogen (1%). Linezolid was administered for a mean of 37 days, with a successful outcome in 79% of cases. Reversible adverse effects were described in ten cases. The mean follow-up period was 8.5 months. Further data from randomised controlled clinical trials are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of linezolid for treating endocarditis.
 ...
PMID:Linezolid therapy for infective endocarditis. 1732 38

Endocarditis prophylaxis following genitourinary or gastrointestinal procedures targets Enterococcus faecalis. Prophylaxis recommendations advocate oral amoxicillin (2 g in the United States and 3 g in the United Kingdom) in moderate-risk patients and intravenous amoxicillin (2 g) or vancomycin (1 g) plus gentamicin in high-risk patients. While ampicillin-resistant (or amoxicillin-resistant) E. faecalis is still rare, there is a concern that these regimens might fail against vancomycin-resistant and/or aminoglycoside-resistant isolates. The present study tested oral linezolid as an alternative. Rats with catheter-induced aortic vegetations were given prophylaxis simulating human pharmacokinetics of oral amoxicillin (2- to 3-g single dose), oral linezolid (600 mg, single or multiple oral doses every 12 h), or intravenous vancomycin (1-g single dose). Rats were then inoculated with the minimum inoculum infecting 90% of the animals (90% infective dose [ID(90)]) or with 10 times the ID(90) of the vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis strain JH2-2 or the vancomycin-resistant (VanA phenotype) E. faecalis strain UCN41. Amoxicillin was also tested with two additional vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis strains, 309 and 1209. Animals were sacrificed 3 days later. All the tested bacteria were susceptible to amoxicillin and gentamicin. Single-dose amoxicillin provided 100% protection against all four isolates at both the ID(90) and 10 times the ID(90). In contrast, linezolid required up to four consecutive doses to provide full protection against the vancomycin-resistant isolate. Vancomycin protected only against the vancomycin-susceptible strain. The high efficacy of single-dose oral amoxicillin suggests that this regimen could be used for prophylaxis in both moderate-risk and high-risk patients without additional aminoglycosides. Linezolid appears to be less reliable, at least against the vancomycin-resistant strain.
 ...
PMID:Single-dose oral amoxicillin or linezolid for prophylaxis of experimental endocarditis due to vancomycin-susceptible and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. 1735 51

Linezolid is not yet recognized as a standard therapy for infective endocarditis but its use becomes a necessity when infection is due to multidrug-resistant microorganisms. This report describes 1 patient with endocarditis treated with linezolid and 45 similar cases from the medical literature.
 ...
PMID:Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) endocarditis treated with linezolid. 1785 41

Vancomycin- and methicillin-resistant gram-positive cocci have emerged as an increasingly problematic cause of hospital-acquired infections. We conducted a literature review of newer antibiotics with activity against vancomycin-resistant and methicillin-resistant gram-positive cocci. Quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline have in vitro activity for methicillin-resistant staphylococci and are superior to vancomycin for vancomycin-resistant isolates. Dalbavancin, telavancin, and oritavancin are new glycopeptides that have superior pharmacodynamic properties compared to vancomycin. We review the antibacterial spectrum, clinical indications and contraindications, pharmacologic properties, and adverse events associated with each of these agents. Daptomycin has rapid bactericidal activity for Staphylococcus aureus and is approved for use in bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis. Linezolid is comparable to vancomycin in patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) pneumonia and has pharmacoeconomic advantages given its oral formulation. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is the drug of choice for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections but has no activity against Enterococcus faecalis. Tigecycline has activity against both enterococcus species and MRSA; it is also active against Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes which allows for use in intra-abdominal and diabetic foot infections. A review of numerous in vitro and animal model studies shows that interaction between these newer agents and other antistaphylococcal agents for S. aureus are usually indifferent (additive).
 ...
PMID:New antimicrobial agents as therapy for resistant gram-positive cocci. 1789 28


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>