Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0013421 (dystonia)
 8,418 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Although the relative potency measured by the number of units per nanogram of the toxin is different for the three preparations (BOTOX = 20 U/ng; Dysport = 40 U/ng, and CS-BOT = 15.2 U/ng), the effective dose for CS-BOT is similar to that of BOTOX (Allergan, Irvine, CA). Despite the twofold difference in potency per nanogram, it appears that the clinically observable activity of 1 U of BOTOX is roughly equivalent to 3 U of the Dysport (Inamed, Santa Barbara, CA) product. Using quantitative analysis of regional paralysis produced by local injections into the gastrocnemius muscles of mice, prior studies estimated the potency ratio between Dysport and BOTOX to be 4.2 to 1. In a single-blind, randomized comparison study of Dysport and BOTOX in 91 patients with blepharospasm or hemifacial spasm, it was found that 4:1 dose ratio produced similar benefits. A similar 4:1 Dysport:BOTOX ratio was found to produce equivalent beneficial effects in a double-blind study in patients with blepharospasm, but the frequency of side effects, particularly of ptosis, was lower in the BOTOX group. In a study of 73 patients with cervical dystonia treated either with Dysport or BOTOX, it was concluded that a 3:1 ratio provides equivalent results. But a recent study concluded that the appropriate conversion factor between BOTOX and Dysport is less than 3. Therefore, there is some controversy about the relative potencies of the two preparations, with one study proposing that 1 unit of BOTOX corresponds to 1 unit of Dysport.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetic properties of different formulations of botulinum neurotoxin type A. 1502 57

Short-term studies of cervical dystonia (CD) have demonstrated botulinum toxin type B (Bot B) to be safe and efficacious at doses of 5,000 to 10,000 units, but few long-term studies have been published and the safety and efficacy of higher doses has not been established. Additionally, there are few studies describing the development of resistance to Bot B in those with and without prior resistance to botulinum toxin type A (Bot A). We reviewed our experience with 24 patients treated with Bot B for up to 64 months. Patients were treated with Bot B for 26.2 +/- 20.4 months (range, 3-64 months) with a mean treatment dose of 14,828 +/- 6,824 units (range, 2,500-28,000 units). At last follow-up, 12 patients demonstrated ongoing benefit, 8 patients had become secondarily resistant, and 4 patients were primary nonresponders possibly due to the severity and nature of their CD. Nine of the 12 continued responders and 7 of the 8 secondary nonresponders to Bot B had prior probable or definite clinical resistance to Bot A. No severe adverse events related to Bot B were seen. Treatment of patients with severe CD who continue to show a beneficial response to Bot B injections commonly requires doses of 15,000 units and rarely greater than 20,000 units. Patients may continue to respond for up to 64 months. Prior Bot A resistance may be a risk factor for the development of resistance to Bot B; nevertheless, Bot B can be a useful long-term alternative in some Bot A-resistant CD patients.
 ...
PMID:Long-term safety, efficacy, dosing, and development of resistance with botulinum toxin type B in cervical dystonia. 1545 49

Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BTX-A) weakens voluntary muscle strength and is an effective therapy for focal dystonia, including cervical dystonia (CD) and benign essential blepharospasm (BEB). It is also known to relieve hemifacial spasm and focal spasticity in children and adults. In addition, BTX-A has been shown to be effective in a wide range of other indications, such as gastrointestinal disorders, hyperhidrosis and cosmetic wrinkle correction (e.g. glabellar frown lines). A new formulation of BTX-A, NT 201 (XEOMIN((R))) has been developed. NT 201 is a formulation of pure BTX-A free of complexing proteins and, therefore, may have a reduced immunogenic potential compared with other BTX-A preparations. The pre-clinical and clinical development of NT 201 is reviewed in this article.A total of five clinical trials were completed in Europe and Israel. Two studies were conducted in 46 healthy volunteers. A further three studies in 816 patients were conducted to provide data on the safety and efficacy of NT 201 in the treatment of CD and BEB. NT 201 was found to provide non-inferior efficacy and safety profiles in the treatment of CD and BEB compared with a BTX-A preparation containing complexing proteins (BOT [BOTOX((R))]). The clinical development programme of NT 201 showed a 1 : 1 NT 201 to BOT dose ratio. The pre-clinical studies conducted with NT 201 showed an acceptable safety profile and support the use of NT 201 in an intramuscular administration regimen for patients with CD and BEB. NT 201 was effective, well tolerated and non-inferior to BOT in the treatment of both CD and BEB. In addition, there were no differences between the two therapies in terms of onset of action, duration and waning of effect. Further research is required to determine the long-term efficacy and safety profile of NT 201.
 ...
PMID:Botulinum neurotoxin type A free of complexing proteins (XEOMIN) in focal dystonia. 1738 40