Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0013421 (dystonia)
 8,418 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Ondansetron, a 5HT3 antagonist, was given to 20 children aged 4 to 18 years who were undergoing treatment with the Australian and New Zealand Childhood Cancer Study Group Acute Lymphocytic Leukaemia (ALL) Study V Protocol. The study was open, dose ranging, and noncomparative, and designed to evaluate safety and efficacy of ondansetron in preventing nausea and vomiting caused by cyclophosphamide intravenous (IV) 1,000 mg/m2 day 1, and cytarabine IV subcutaneously (SC) 75 mg/m2 on days 2 to 5. Ten patients were given ondansetron 5 mg/m2 IV (group A) and subsequently another 10 patients were given ondansetron 3 mg/m2 IV (group B). Oral ondansetron was given for 14 doses, at the same dosage for both groups, commencing simultaneously with the IV infusion and continuing at 8 hourly intervals, ie, until day 5. The oral dose was based on surface area with the following schedule: 0.3 to 0.6 m2, 2 mg; 0.6 to 1 m2, 3 mg; and greater than 1 m2, 4 mg. Vomiting on the first day of chemotherapy was reported in group A by one patient and by one patient in group B. Vomiting during days 2 to 5 was reported by two group-A patients and by three group-B patients. Nausea was recorded on day 1 by one patient in group A, and two in group B, and on days 2 to 5 by three patients in group A, and by seven in group B. All patients were alert during treatment with ondansetron and there was no dystonia. There were no changes in renal function or hematology values that could be ascribed to the study drug. Transient elevations in bilirubin and liver enzymes were observed. We conclude that our results indicate that ondansetron is a safe and extremely effective single-agent antiemetic with minimal side effects, when administered both IV and orally.
 ...
PMID:Prevention of cyclophosphamide/cytarabine-induced emesis with ondansetron in children with leukemia. 214 19

In a prospective randomized and double-blind cross-over study, a new antiemetic regimen consisting of betamethasone (1 x 8 mg) and dixyrazine (a phenothiazine derivative) (4 x 10 mg) was compared with a standard high-dose metoclopramide (4 x 1 mg/kg) schedule for antiemetic treatment in doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy. 100 consecutive patients (62 without prior experience of chemotherapy and 38 with prior experience) entered the study and were followed during 1-4 courses of chemotherapy. Effect and side effect parameters were recorded on questionnaires for patients and nurses using the visual analog scale for quantification. The correlation between the two ways of recording (self-scoring versus recording by nursing staff) was very high, both for effect variables (nausea and vomiting) and the adverse reactions (sedation and extrapyramidal reactions). The median number of courses per patient was 3.0 (range 1-4) and altogether 299 courses were studied. Full emetic protection was achieved in 58% with betamethasone-dixyrazine and in 34% with high-dose metoclopramide regardless of prior patient experience or the cytostatic agents administered. With doxorubicin regimens, betamethasone-dixyrazine gave full protection in 80% compared to 40% for metoclopramide. Cisplatin regimens were a greater challenge and protection against nausea and vomiting was achieved only in 27% with betamethasone-dixyrazine and in 18% with metoclopramide. Adverse reactions were a significant problem with metoclopramide: restlessness 33%, akathisia 19%, parkinsonism 16%, and acute dystonia 3%. Sedation was the same with the two regimens (80%).
 ...
PMID:Betamethasone-dixyrazine combination versus high-dose metoclopramide as antiemetic treatment in doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy. 276 89

Sixty-four patients treated with cisplatin-containing regimens were entered into a randomized, double-blinded study examining the antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide with and without lorazepam for control of cisplatin-induced emesis. Metoclopramide was administered to all patients at 2 mg/kg, intravenously, 30 minutes before chemotherapy and 1.5, 3.5, and 5.5 hours posttreatment. Patients randomized to receive combined antiemetic therapy were administered lorazepam at 2 mg/m2 (maximum, 4 mg dose) intravenously, 30 minutes before chemotherapy. Those patients not receiving lorazepam were given normal saline placebo. Degree of nausea and number of vomiting episodes were recorded on a data flow sheet with a visual analogue scale. Drug toxicities were evaluated before each administered dose. Patients receiving both metoclopramide and lorazepam experienced significantly less vomiting episodes (P less than 0.05) and nausea (P less than 0.01) when compared to patients given metoclopramide alone. Forty-four percent of those receiving the combined therapy reported no nausea or vomiting episodes compared to only 22% receiving metoclopramide alone. Sedation was significantly more common in patients receiving lorazepam (88%) as opposed to patients receiving only metoclopramide (43%), P less than 0.01. Amnesia was seen in 25% receiving lorazepam. No significant difference in diarrhea, dystonia, or disinhibition was observed between the two arms. The authors conclude that the combination of lorazepam and metoclopramide was superior to metoclopramide alone in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting, with sedation and amnesia more commonly observed in the combined regimen.
 ...
PMID:Metoclopramide versus metoclopramide and lorazepam. Superiority of combined therapy in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis. 291 33

In a prospective randomized and double-blind cross-over study betamethasone-dixyrazine was compared with metoclopramide as antiemetic treatment in cisplatin and doxorubicin chemotherapy. Sixty-two consecutive patients without prior experience of chemotherapy entered the study and were followed during 1-4 courses of treatment. Effect parameters were recorded on questionnaires using the visual analog scale for quantification. The median number of courses per patient was 3.0 (range 1-4). Full protection against nausea and vomiting was achieved in 74% with betamethasone-dixyrazine and in 45% with metoclopramide regardless of the chemotherapy regimen employed. With doxorubicin regimens betamethasone-dixyrazine gave full protection in 94% and metoclopramide in 45%. In cisplatin regimens full emetic protection was achieved in 40% with betamethasone-dixyrazine and in 29% with metoclopramide. Adverse reactions were a significant problem with metoclopramide: restlessness 48%, akathisia 26%, parkinsonism 13%, and acute dystonia 3%. One case (3.2%) of parkinsonism was noted as the only extrapyramidal reaction in the dixyrazine group. Various degrees of sedation were noted in 84% during dixyrazine treatment compared with 71% during metoclopramide therapy. Diarrhea was encountered in 48% after high-dose metoclopramide compared with 6% after antiemetic treatment with betamethasone-dixyrazine. Betamethasone-dixyrazine appears to be a promising antiemetic combination with regard to both efficacy and side effects, but further refinement of the regimen is probably possible through dose adjustments and alternative routes of administration.
 ...
PMID:Betamethasone-dixyrazine versus metoclopramide as antiemetic treatment in cancer chemotherapy. 306 Jan 51

Nonresponders to levodopa therapy include patients with parkinsonism who fail to respond to a well-tolerated therapeutic dosage, those who lose an initially positive response, and those who develop severe and dose-limiting side effects. Initial failures may be due to inadequate dosage, drug interactions or inaccurate diagnosis. Loss of response suggests the need for a thorough medical evaluation. Severe side effects such as nausea and vomiting may be managed with adjuvant agents; dystonia and a variety of paradoxical responses may preclude the use of levodopa, and amantadine or anticholinergic agents should be considered as alternatives.
 ...
PMID:Management of patients who fail to respond to levodopa therapy. 711 42

We treated 36 patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias on chronic levodopa therapy with cabergoline (CBG) once a day for a mean period of 14.2 +/- 5.8 months. There was a significant increase in the "on" hours and a reduction in "off-period" dystonia. Ten patients continued to show a marked improvement after 28.3 months of treatment (mean dose, 11.3 +/- 4.5 mg). In 23 patients, increased dyskinesias (daily CBG dose, 11 +/- 4.3 mg) had complicated the positive effect after 17.2 +/- 4.8 months. Three patients (daily CBG dose, 14.3 mg) were therapeutic failures, and administration of CBG was stopped. Side effects leading to CBG discontinuation were visual hallucinations (n = 5), heart failure (n = 5), and nausea and vomiting (n = 1). Plasma CBG levels, measured in seven patients taking 3, 5, or 7 mg daily (po), showed fairly stable concentrations throughout the 24 hours. We concluded that CBG is an efficient dopamine agonist that can provide continuous dopaminergic stimulation when taken orally once a day.
 ...
PMID:Cabergoline in Parkinson's disease: long-term follow-up. 763 96

We report two patients who developed extrapyramidal reactions after epidural droperidol given to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. The reactions may have been related to interactions of drugs given perioperatively. One patient had been taking amlodipine and amitriptyline preoperatively, capable of causing extrapyramidal reactions, and developed akathisia after 2.5 mg of droperidol given epidurally. The other patient had received 1.5 mg of prophylactic epidural droperidol and 10 mg of metoclopramide for postoperative nausea and vomiting, and developed acute dystonia shortly after 0.5 mg of intravenous droperidol.
 ...
PMID:[Extrapyramidal reactions after epidural droperidol]. 1107 69

The novel atypical antipsychotic ziprasidone has a pharmacologic profile notable for potent agonism of serotonin (5-HT)1A receptors, antagonism at 5-HT1D receptors, and reuptake inhibition of norepinephrine. 5-HT1A receptor agonism, in particular, suggests anxiolytic activity, and ziprasidone has shown preliminary efficacy in treating the symptoms of anxiety associated with psychotic disorders. In this study, the anxiolytic efficacy of ziprasidone was evaluated in nonpsychotic subjects who were anxious before undergoing minor dental surgery. We compared a single oral dose of 20 mg ziprasidone (N = 30) with that of 10 mg diazepam (N = 30) and placebo (N = 30) in a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind study. The peak anxiolytic effect of ziprasidone compared with that of placebo was similar to that of diazepam but had a later onset. At 3 hours postdose, the anxiolytic effect of ziprasidone was significantly greater than that of placebo (p < 0.05) and somewhat greater than that of diazepam. Diazepam showed a significantly greater anxiolytic effect than placebo at 1 hour (p < 0.05) but not at 3 hours. The sedative effect of ziprasidone was never greater than that of placebo, whereas that of diazepam was significantly greater than that of placebo 1 to 1.5 hours postdose. Ziprasidone was generally well tolerated. Only one patient reported treatment-related adverse events (nausea and vomiting) and, unlike diazepam, ziprasidone did not cause reductions in blood pressure. Dystonia, extrapyramidal syndrome, akathisia, and postural hypotension were not seen with ziprasidone. Thus, ziprasidone may possess anxiolytic effects in addition to its antipsychotic properties.
 ...
PMID:The anxiolytic effect of the novel antipsychotic ziprasidone compared with diazepam in subjects anxious before dental surgery. 1191 Feb 68

Metoclopramide is a dopamine antagonist that is widely used in gastroesophageal disease and chemotherapy-induced emesis in the paediatric population. It is also prescribed in nausea and vomiting caused by respiratory tract infections and enteritis in practice. The primary side-effect of the drug is extrapyramidal reactions with incidences as high as 25% in children. We report two cases, one of which was referred to our emergency department as encephalitis and the other as tetany, but which were just acute dystonic reactions caused by metaclopramide, even though the patients had used the drug in the recommended dosages. The adverse effects of the drug can be seen at normal doses. These dystonic reactions caused by metaclopramide can easily be confused with other diseases, because dystonia is not seen frequently in paediatric practice whatever the cause.
 ...
PMID:Metoclopramide induced dystonia in children: two case reports. 1589 43

A case of a dystonic reaction is presented that occurred after the use of prochlorperazine, metoclopramide and ondansetron for the treatment of post-operative nausea and vomiting. The onset of dystonia coincided temporally with the removal of a transdermal scopolamine patch used as adjunctive antiemetic therapy. Withdrawal of concurrently administered anticholinergic medication, after recent use of antiemetic medications with dopamine receptor (D2) inhibition, can unmask a dystonic reaction. This case also suggests that transdermal scopolamine may offer an innovative therapy for the treatment of acute dystonic reactions.
 ...
PMID:Antiemetic-related dystonic reaction unmasked by removal of a scopolamine transdermal patch. 1667 82


1 2 Next >>