Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0013395 (dyspepsia)
 4,879 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Erectile dysfunction (ED) (impotence) is a widespread, age-related problem, which affects 52% of men between 40 and 70 years of age. It is classified as psychogenic, organic, or mixed psychogenic and organic. ED is not a problem only of men, because the relationship between partners can also be disturbed. Therefore, adequate treatment of ED is needed and the most convenient and simplest way is oral drug therapy. Sildenafil, phosphodiesterase-(PDE)-5-selective inhibitor has been the drug of choice for patients with ED since it has been launched in March 1998. The results of various studies have confirmed the efficacy of the drug in men with ED of various etiologies, as well as the positive effect of sildenafil on the quality of a partnership. The most frequent adverse effects documented with sildenafil usage are headache, flushes, dyspepsia, visual disturbances and nasal congestion/rhinitis. These adverse effects are dose-related, usually transient and mild, with low withdrawal rate. Several studies performed recently have shown that sildenafil is a safe and effective treatment of ED in patients with cardiovascular disease, who do not take nitrates or nitrate donors concomitantly. Other oral medications for ED include apomorphine, phentolamine, yohimbine, trazodone, testosterone and new PDE-5 inhibitors in Phase III clinical trials, such as vardenafil and tadalafil. It is obvious, according to recent data, that the concept of PDE-5 inhibition has a central position in oral pharmacotherapy of ED. However, larger clinical studies of efficacy and safety should be carried out using most of the other above-mentioned oral agents and these may also gain a place in the therapy of ED. There are no studies directly comparing sildenafil and other treatments of ED or assessing its role in combination with other therapies. According to the present knowledge, the quality of life, not only of patients but also of their sexual partners, will be improved significantly with sildenafil usage and this is an important precondition for overall health ofboth. Sildenafil is thus a highly effective peroral treatment for ED in patients without contraindications for its use, which can be considered as the firstline therapy with an acceptable risk-benefit ratio.
 ...
PMID:Erectile dysfunction: oral pharmacotherapy options. 1235 56

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil to treat erectile dysfunction (ED) in chronic renal failure in patients on hemodialysis (HD). A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of oral sildenafil (50 mg) administered as required in HD patients with ED was designed. Patients on HD for at least 6 mo and who had a stable relationship with a female sexual partner were included. Patients older than 70 yr with penile anatomic abnormalities, cirrhosis, diabetes, angina, severe anemia, and those who were on nitrate treatment or with a recent history of stroke or myocardial infarction were not included. The International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) was employed to evaluate ED and treatment response. Forty-one patients were evaluated (21 received placebo, and 20 sildenafil). Baseline clinical and demographic parameters were similar in both groups. Sildenafil was associated with improvement in the score of all questions and domains of the IIEF, except those related to sexual desire. Using the erectile function domain to evaluate primary efficacy, improvement was observed in 85% of the sildenafil patients compared with 9.5% of placebo patients. Sildenafil use resulted in normal EF scores in 35% of sildenafil patients. Sildenafil was well tolerated. Headaches and flushing occurred in both groups. Dyspepsia was reported by two patients in the sildenafil group. In conclusion, oral sildenafil seems to be an effective and safe treatment for ED in selected patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of oral sildenafil in hemodialysis patients with erectile dysfunction. 1239 48

This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study of the efficacy and safety of sildenafil in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and clinically stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients were randomized to receive sildenafil or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were questions 3 and 4 of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Secondary outcomes included the other IIEF questions and functional domains, the Life Satisfaction Checklist, the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction, 2 global efficacy assessment questions, and intercourse success rate. By week 12, sildenafil-treated patients (n = 70) showed significant improvements on questions 3 and 4 compared with placebo-treated patients (n = 72; p <0.01). Larger percentages of sildenafil-treated patients reported improved erections (64%) and improved intercourse (65%) compared with placebo-treated patients (21% and 19%, respectively). Sildenafil-treated patients were highly satisfied with treatment and their sexual life compared with placebo-treated patients. Forty-seven percent of sildenafil- and 32% of placebo-treated patients experienced adverse events, including transient headache, hypertension, flushing, and dyspepsia. There were no serious drug-related cardiovascular effects. Thus, sildenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED in men with CAD. Sildenafil was not associated with additional safety risks in this patient population.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in men with erectile dysfunction and stable coronary artery disease. 1471 38

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common medical disorder affecting elderly men. Sildenafil citrate has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated oral agent for treating ED in the general population of adult men with ED of broad-spectrum etiology. Elderly men are more likely to have concomitant medical problems than the general population of men with ED. In this study, we examined the efficacy and safety of sildenafil administration in elderly patients with ED. Forty-four elderly men with ED (> or = 60 years old) of broad-spectrum etiology were treated with 25 mg or 50 mg doses of sildenafil citrate. Age ranged from 60 to 78 years (65 +/- 4.5; means +/- S.D.). Mean follow-up period was 12.3 +/- 6.5 months, with a range of 1 to 25 months. Primary efficacy assessments were performed using the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF5) before their first dose of sildenafil and after at least 4 weeks of therapy. Serum testosterone was measured before treatment. The mean IIEF5 among all patients increased from 8.5 +/- 3.9 to 20 +/- 4.2 after sildenafil use (P < 0.0001). In patients younger than 70 years, the IIEF5 score increased from 9.5 +/- 5.0 to 17 +/- 4.3 while in patients 70 years and older, the score increased from 8.2 +/- 3.6 to 21 +/- 3.9, a near normalization. The rate of improvement in younger men was higher than in older men. Serum testosterone before treatment was similar in the two groups. The most commonly experienced adverse events were flushing and dyspepsia, which occurred in 6.8% and 2.3%, respectively. No patients discontinued sildenafil treatment due to adverse events. In conclusion, oral sildenafil is efficacious and well tolerated by elderly men with ED, even among those older than 70 years.
 ...
PMID:Clinical efficacy and safety of sildenafil in elderly patients with erectile dysfunction. 1527 3

Erection is a neurovascular event that involves spinal and supra spinal pathways. The final common pathway involves the release of nitric oxide (NO) from both endothelial cells and neurons, which acts as a vasodilator causing penile engorgement and erection. NO is degraded by the enzyme phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 5 in the penis. Erectile dysfunction (ED), defined as the persistent inability to achieve and/or maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance, results when the neurovascular pathway is interrupted by medical conditions or drugs. A 15-item self-administered questionnaire, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), is one of the most useful tools to evaluate erectile function (EF) in clinical trials, although of much less use in routine clinical practice. The MMAS (Massachusetts Male Aging Study) was the first major epidemiological investigation to study the prevalence of ED. The study found that ED was three times more common in patients with diabetes mellitus. The aetiopathogenesis of ED in diabetes is multifactorial, with vascular and neural factors being equally implicated. Hyperglycaemia is believed to give rise to biochemical perturbations that lead to these microvascular changes. In the MMAS, ED in diabetes was strongly correlated with glycaemic control, duration of disease and diabetic complications. The incidence increased with increasing age, duration of diabetes and deteriorating metabolic control, and was higher in individuals with type 2 diabetes than those with type 1.ED in men with diabetes often affects their quality of life and, as patients are often reluctant to come forward with their symptoms, a carefully taken history is one of the most useful approaches in identifying affected individuals. The PDE inhibitors have revolutionised the management of ED and oral drug therapy is currently first-line therapy for the condition. These agents act by potentiating the action of intracavernosal NO, thereby leading to a more sustained erection. Sildenafil was the first PDE5 inhibitor to undergo evaluation and has been studied extensively. More recently two other agents, vardenafil and tadalafil, have been introduced. All the drugs have been shown to be effective across a wide range of aetiologies of ED, including diabetes. The drugs have been shown to improve EF domain scores, penetration and maintenance of erection, resulting in more successful intercourse. Their effects are greater at higher doses. Sildenafil and vardenafil are shorter-acting agents, while tadalafil has a longer half-life allowing the user more flexibility in sexual activity. Common adverse effects include headache, nasal congestion and dyspepsia, all actions related to inhibition of PDE5. The drugs are generally well tolerated and withdrawal from the clinical studies as a result of drug-related adverse effects were rare. The use of PDE5 inhibitors in the presence of oral nitrates is absolutely contraindicated. The clinical studies to date have not evaluated the use of one drug in the case of treatment failure with another agent. Sublingual apomorphine, which stimulates central neurogenic pathways, is a new agent and may be a suitable alternative in those patients in whom PDE5 inhibitors are ineffective or contraindicated. In clinical trials, all IIEF domains except sexual desire were found to have improved after apomorphine. The median times to erection in these studies were 18.9 and 18.8 minutes for the 2 and 3mg doses, respectively. Intraurethral and intracavernosal alprostadil may be a useful alternative when oral drug therapy is ineffective or contraindicated. The management of ED in the diabetic patient may often involve a multidisciplinary approach where psychosexual counselling and specialist urologist advice is required in addition to the skills and expertise of the diabetologist. Finally, the introduction of the new oral agents have completely revolutionised the management of ED and allowed more individuals to come forward for treatment.
 ...
PMID:New treatment options for erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus. 1553 69

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects up to 50% of men, between 40 and 70 years of age. In the first major trial of sildenafil in ED, at 24 weeks, improved erections were reported by 77 and 84% of men taking sildenafil 50 and 100mg, respectively. Subsequently, sildenafil has been reported to be effective in men with ED associated with diabetes and prostate cancer, and in psychogenic ED. Sildenafil is safe in men with coronary artery disease, provided it is not used with the nitrates (a contraindication). The most commonly reported adverse effects with sildenafil are headache, flushing and dyspepsia. Vardenafil is more potent and more selective than sildenafil at inhibiting phosphodiesterase-5. Vardenafil is similarly effective to sildenafil in the treatment of ED. The only advantage that vardenafil has over sildenafil is that it does not inhibit phosphodiesterase-6 to alter colour perception, a rare side effect which sometimes occurs with sildenafil. Tadalafil has a longer duration of action than sildenafil and vardenafil. Tadalafil is similarly effective as sildenafil in the treatment of ED. In comparison studies, tadalafil is preferred to sildenafil (50/100mg) by men with ED, possibly because of its longer duration of action. Of the phosphodiesterase inhibitors, tadalafil may displace sildenafil as the drug of choice among men with ED.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of clinical trials with sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil in erectile dysfunction. 1570 77

Inhibition of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) reduces the degradation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate, which allows erectile function to occur by relaxation of penile smooth muscle. Three PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil) in a range of doses are available. PDE5 therapy, compared with placebo, significantly improves scores on the International Index of Erectile Function and has been found to be effective in special clinical populations, such as those with prostate cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Sildenafil and vardenafil show some interaction with food intake. Time to onset of action is usually 30-120 minutes, but there are reports of shorter times to onset of action. The duration of action of sildenafil and vardenafil is about 4 hours, whereas that of tadalafil is about 36 hours. The overall safety of the treatments is good, even in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease. However, there is a risk of hypotension if nitrates are given concurrently. Increased QTc intervals have been reported, the longest with vardenafil, shortest with tadalafil, and intermediate with sildenafil. Priapism and prolonged erection are rare adverse events. Common side-effects include headache, facial flushing, nasal congestion, and dyspepsia. There may be interactions with other medications metabolized in a similar way, such as erythromycin and HIV protease inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:The efficacy and safety of PDE5 inhibitors. 1615 23

There are no published controlled clinical trials of regular phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor therapy as a long-term treatment of hypertension. In a randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover study, 25 otherwise untreated hypertensive subjects were administered 50 mg of sildenafil or matched placebo 3 times daily for 16 days, and the effects on ambulatory blood pressure (BP), clinic BP, arterial wave reflection, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, and brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation were assessed. Three subjects were withdrawn because of adverse effects, and the data from the remaining 22 subjects were analyzed. Sildenafil reduced ambulatory BP (mean [SE] change from baseline for average daytime BP: systolic -8 [2] mm Hg versus 2 [2] mm Hg with placebo, P<0.01; diastolic -6 [1] mm Hg versus 0 [1] mm Hg, P<0.01) and clinic BP (change from baseline to 1 hour after drug administration on day 16: systolic -5 [2] mm Hg versus 4 [2] mm Hg, P<0.01; diastolic -5 [1] mm Hg versus 2 [2] mm Hg, P<0.01). Compared with baseline, sildenafil, but not placebo, reduced arterial wave reflection both acutely and after chronic treatment, but the chronic change in arterial wave reflection was not statistically different from the chronic change with placebo. Sildenafil did not affect pulse wave velocity or flow-mediated dilatation. The main adverse effects of sildenafil, which were generally transient and rated as mild or moderate in severity, were dyspepsia, headache, and myalgia. In conclusion, regular sildenafil constitutes effective antihypertensive therapy. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of longer-acting phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors as antihypertensive agents in clinical practice.
 ...
PMID:Effect of regular phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition in hypertension. 1744 22

Sildenafil (Viagra) is a selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5-I) approved for treatment of erectile dysfunction. Although relatively well-tolerated, sildenafil is associated with undesired effects including headache, flushing, dyspepsia, nasal congestion, and visual disturbances. In the present study we explored the impact of sildenafil on nasal airway parameters in young potent men. Eleven men (age 26.0 +/- 1.8 years) with normal BMI (25.7 +/- 0.5) and without nasal respiratory disorders were enrolled in a double-blind, crossover study. All men underwent evaluation of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), SpO2%, acoustic rhinometry, and nasal endoscopy before and after placebo or sildenafil (50 mg) plus visual sexual stimulation (VSS). Nasal examination was performed using 0 degrees rigid telescopes, 4 mm in diameter. A Student's t test was used for direct comparisons, while the Kruskal-Wallis test (K-W) was utilized for multiple comparisons. After administration of sildenafil plus VSS, the minimum cross sectional area (MCA) was significantly lower that observed with either placebo (P = 0.03) or sildenafil alone (P = 0.003). However, the post-stimulation values did not demonstrate any significant differences among the different treatment arms (P = 0.48; DF = 2; K-W test). In contrast, endonasal volume (VOL) was significantly lower after sildenafil + VSS (P = 0.01), but not after placebo + VSS (P = 0.18). None of the other parameters monitored showed any significant variations. Rhinoscopy showed a characteristic increase of the volume of the inferior turbinates, with subjective differences between placebo and sildenafil. These preliminary results suggest that sildenafil reduces nasal volume, and that sexual stimulation may decrease nasal airflow by itself.
 ...
PMID:Nasal congestion after visual sexual stimulation with and without sildenafil (Viagra): a randomized placebo-controlled study. 1790 71

Sildenafil is widely used in the treatment of male erectile disorder and is generally well-tolerated. Its adverse effects are reported to be mild and include flushing, headache, dyspepsia and visual disturbances. We document a case of recurrent haemoptysis observed soon after self administration of sildenafil in a 38-year-old male with no other causative factors. The episodes of haemoptysis stopped following stoppage of sildenafil.
 ...
PMID:Recurrent haemoptysis following sildenafil administration. 1944 50


<< Previous 1 2 3 Next >>