Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0013395 (dyspepsia)
 4,879 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The treatment of peptic ulcers has been revolutionized by the discovery that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) bacteria is a causative agent for ulcer formation. However, when patients present with dyspepsia or epigastric discomfort, more than 80% of patients will not have ulcer disease and empiric treatment of H. pylori is not recommended for these patients. Eradication of H. pylori has not been demonstrated to improve the symptoms of non-ulcer dyspepsia compared with non-ulcer dyspepsia patients treated with placebo. Therefore, we recommend that patients should first be evaluated for peptic ulcers with endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal series before the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori. Generally, the treatment of H. pylori should be limited to patients with peptic ulcers, mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas, and gastric cancers. Most diagnostic tests for H. pylori, including quantitative IgG antibody, urea breath tests, rapid urease tests (CLO), tests of gastric mucosal biopsies, and staining of gastric mucosal biopsies, have equivalent diagnostic characteristics. Therefore, the choice of diagnostic test for H. pylori should be based on cost, ease of use, and lack of complications. Multiple antibiotic regimens are available for the treatment of H. pylori. Triple antibiotic therapy is the least expensive but has the highest rate of side effects and the least compliance. Combining a proton pump inhibitor with clarithromycin and another antibiotic will eradicate H. pylori with fewer side effects and better compliance but this is the most expensive antibiotic regimen.
 ...
PMID:Acid peptic diseases in the era of Helicobacter pylori. 970 81

There is international agreement that dyspepsia refers to pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen. However, the term 'discomfort' has been variably defined. While other symptoms may often be simultaneously present, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease can usually be clearly distinguished by the presence of predominant heartburn. Dyspepsia is a frequent reason for consultation in primary care and in gastrointestinal practice. With the widespread availability and utilization of endoscopy, it has become evident that a structural (or organic) explanation is found in only a minority of patients presenting with dyspepsia. Operationally, functional dyspepsia is defined as persistent or recurrent dyspepsia for 3 or more months in the absence of a clinically identifiable structural disease causing the symptoms. It has been proposed, based on symptoms, that functional dyspepsia be subdivided into symptom subgroups to promote patient homogeneity. The initially proposed 'clustering' of symptoms into ulcer-like and dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia has proved a dismal failure because of the considerable overlap observed, the lack of stability over time and the failure to identify robust pathophysiological abnormalities or responses to therapy. A subcategorization based upon the most bothersome symptom is theoretically more attractive but needs to be prospectively and rigorously tested.
 ...
PMID:Nomenclature of dyspepsia, dyspepsia subgroups and functional dyspepsia: clarifying the concepts. 989 79

While many definitions exist, dyspepsia is best considered a symptom complex (not a diagnosis) thought to arise in the upper gastrointestinal tract, unrelated to defecation. The symptom complex includes: upper abdominal/epigastric pain or discomfort, postprandial fullness, bloating, belching, early satiety, anorexia, nausea, retching, vomiting, heartburn and regurgitation. Patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux, biliary colic and irritable bowel syndrome should not be considered to have dyspepsia. After investigations, if a cause of dyspepsia is found, this is 'organic or structural' dyspepsia. If no structural cause is found, this is best called 'functional dyspepsia', subclassified into a) ulcer-like b) dysmotility-like c) reflux-like and d) unspecified dyspepsia. This symptom guided classification should be shifted to the first presentation with uninvestigated dyspepsia, prior to any investigations, to define a clinically useful guide to patient care. As there is considerable symptom overlap, it may be useful to combine together the ulcer and reflux-like groups into an acid-related dyspepsia group. In 1998, another approach would be to screen dyspeptic patients with an H. pylori test and classify them as H. pylori positive and negative dyspepsia.
 ...
PMID:Definitions of dyspepsia: time for a reappraisal. 1002 67

Functional gastrointestinal disorders are best understood by applying a bio-psycho-social model. The diseases are strongly associated with psychological factors, and in functional dyspepsia, low vagal activity might be a mediating mechanism by which psychological factors (like neuroticism and stress) influence gastrointestinal physiology and cause epigastric discomfort. Low vagal activity may be a manifestation of stress and a cause of impaired gastric accommodation to meals. Epigastric discomfort is elicited when the stomach is distended without prior (vagal) reflex relaxation. Conventional therapy for acid-related dyspepsia does not improve accommodation and hence, is ineffective. The beneficial effect of experimental therapy, like glyceryl trinitrate and sumatriptan, which improve gastric accommodation, gives very good prospects for further development. For patients with irritable bowel syndrome, today's therapy seems similarly inefficacious, but several new potentially effective drugs are at present undergoing clinical trials.
 ...
PMID:Today's therapy of functional gastrointestinal disorders--does it help? 1002 81

The diary card as a measure of the severity of pain or discomfort in the stomach on a 7 graded scale was validated using data from a randomised placebo controlled clinical trial in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD). The diary card measure was compared to two other measures: a symptom question in a gastro-intestinal symptom questionnaire and a symptom severity rating made by the investigator based on an interview with the patient at the clinical visit. The reliability coefficient for the mean of the diary card scores from 7 consecutive days was estimated to 0.71. The mean of the scores from 7 consecutive days was approximately as sensitive to change as the other two measures.
 ...
PMID:Validation of seven graded diary cards for severity of dyspeptic symptoms in patients with non ulcer dyspepsia. 1002 84

Patients with functional dyspepsia have discomfort centred in the upper abdomen in the absence of oesophagitis, ulcer, cancer or other pathology which could have explained the dyspepsia. It is generally accepted that neither endoscopy, nor other imaging modalities give any positive findings supporting the diagnosis. However, recent investigations have shown that both endoscopic and ultrasonographic imaging show changes: erosive prepyloric changes (EPC) and accommodation abnormalities, respectively, in a high percentage of the patients. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the changes are not yet known, but the fact that they are also seen in several other conditions characterised by dyspepsia, for instance in gallstone disease, may simply indicate that they are linked to epigastric discomfort in general, and not to a specific dyspeptic condition. Ultrasonographic imaging is a non-invasive, widely available, convenient, and reliable method for evaluation of gastric emptying, gastric motility, transpyloric flow and accommodation disturbances, which may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of dyspepsia.
 ...
PMID:Imaging studies in dyspepsia. 1002 64

Dyspepsia is defined as a persistent or recurrent pain or discomfort, localised in the upper abdomen, which may or may not be related to meals. Its prevalence in the general population is extraordinarily high (20-40%). Several pathological conditions can provoke dyspepsia, although non ulcer dyspepsia is the main cause. The relationships between Helicobacter pylori and non ulcer dyspepsia are discussed, namely the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and the efficacy of its eradication in non ulcer dyspepsia. The management of dyspeptic patients in the community is analysed according to the Maastricht Consensus of 1996. Our opinion is that, in Helicobacter pylori-positive dyspeptic patients, after a careful investigation with exclusion of other organic diseases, the bacterium should be eradicated.
 ...
PMID:Helicobacter pylori infection and dyspepsia. 1007 56

Since Helicobacter pylori (Hp) was first isolated in 1983, much work has been carried out on the pathogenic effects of this organism. Hp infection is common in humans and currently is the most important etiologic agent in the development of chronic active gastritis, gastric and duodenal ulcers, carcinoma and Malt-lymphoma of the stomach. Moreover Hp infection has also been associated with various extradigestive diseases. At present, a role of Hp infection in dyspepsia is discussed. Dyspepsia is defined by persistence of pain, burning or discomfort localised to the upper abdomen; some authors include in dyspepsia symptoms such as belching, bloating, alitosis, nausea, postprandial repletion, vomiting and regurgitation. In absence of any underlying pathologies, such as peptic ulcer, gastroesophageal reflux, pancreatitis, biliary tract disease or others, dyspepsia is defined as functional or idiopathic dyspepsia. Functional dyspepsia may be distinct in ulcer, reflux or dysmotility-like dyspepsia and unspecified dyspepsia. Hp infection is common in dyspeptic patients and a role of this bacterium has been postulated mostly in ulcer-like dyspepsia. Mechanisms by when Hp induces dyspeptic symptoms are uncertain; bacterial cytotoxins, phlogosis mediators, activity of chronic gastritis Helicobacter-related and host immune response probably play an important role in pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia. However, dyspepsia is not present only in infected patients; therefore other pathogenic factors may be implicated in expression of dyspeptic symptoms in uninfected subjects, such as gastric dysmotility, modifications of gastric output or altered visceral sensibility, psychological factors, gastroesophageal reflux and irritable bowel.
 ...
PMID:[Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori]. 1036 46

The meaning and definition of dyspepsia continues to challenge clinical investigators and has led to the setting up of several international working teams. However, confusion continues to reign around this term. The effort to classify patients with dyspepsia into subgroups according to their most predominant symptoms has failed to provide clues to the underlying disease, or even to discriminate between functional and organic dyspepsia. With these limitations in mind, the question arises: is there any reason for putting further effort into developing a world-wide definition of dyspepsia when, in addition to the aforementioned shortcomings, further variables such as geographical region, ethnic background, culture and sanitary resources come into play? The answer is that only by establishing a reproducible methodology for individual symptom assessment using a well-defined protocol will comparisons of the prevalence of dyspepsia and the impact of different therapeutic interventions become possible around the world. The data on dyspepsia prevalence, nearly all arising from studies in a few developed geographical areas and countries, are of the order of 1-4% of all consultations in all primary care medicine. However, estimates of adults affected by dyspepsia are as high as 20-40%. The magnitude of these statistics underlines the necessity for further work on the concept of dyspepsia and its major functional subgroups, following the exclusion of any organic causes. Issues such as 'investigate dyspepsia before starting with any kind of treatment or treat dyspepsia before further investigation' or the debate about whether to 'eradicate or ignore Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia' will remain unresolved unless studies performed throughout the world use widely comparable and acceptable definitions and criteria for these conditions. Since the first international working party report in 1988, definitions of dyspepsia have included the description of 'upper abdominal pain or discomfort' and, more recently, have specified 'pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen' in order to emphasise further the site of origin as the upper alimentary tract (stomach-duodenum). However, a major change was evident in the more recent Rome I and Rome II reports, in which the symptoms heartburn, acid regurgitation, and belching were excluded from the definition of dyspepsia because of their relation to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and aerophagia. The intention to define a set of symptoms for dyspepsia is good, but we continue to be faced with overlaps. How should the patient with epigastric pain and heartburn after endoscopic exclusion of duodenal ulcer and reflux esophagitis be classified: dyspepsia or GERD? In cases of abnormal gastroesophageal reflux, 24-h pH monitoring could help to resolve this dilemma, but what if this investigation turns out to be normal? In this field, we need to perform careful studies. In addition, we need to consider the lifestyle and cultural habits of people around the world when translating upper gastrointestinal symptoms into dyspepsia. A step forward in the definition of dyspepsia was attempted by the recent working party for the Rome II consensus on functional gastrointestinal disorders (N. Talley et al.). In this project, the symptoms of dyspepsia were individually described not by a single term, but by painting a 'word picture', to make it easier for patients to express their symptoms, and give doctors and clinical investigators a better understanding of the 'dyspeptic problem' of each individual. It is advisable to follow this approach, since a clear picture of a patient's symptoms, including their duration and intensity, in association with the modern technical approaches that allow investigation beyond organic causes of dyspepsia, will lead to progress in our understanding and better communication about this problem within the medical community, and ultimately to better treatment.
 ...
PMID:Current concepts in dyspepsia: a world perspective. 1044 9

Dyspepsia, according to the internationally accepted Rome criteria, refers to pain or discomfort centred in the upper abdomen; patients with predominant heartburn are excluded from this group, although minor or infrequent heartburn is commonly associated with dyspepsia. It is an important condition not only because it is common and costly, but because it may indicate the presence of serious disease such as peptic ulcer or gastric cancer. However, the most frequent causes of dyspepsia are functional dyspepsia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. The discovery of Helicobacter pylori has resulted in important advances in the management of dyspepsia. The clinician faced with a patient who has persistent or recurrent dyspepsia needs to differentiate clearly those patients who have not been previously investigated from patients documented to have functional dyspepsia after investigation (fig 1). Here, the management of H pylori positive dyspeptic patients who have and have not been fully investigated will be reviewed.
 ...
PMID:How should Helicobacter pylori positive dyspeptic patients be managed? 1045 33


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>