Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0013395 (
dyspepsia
)
4,879
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Fenbufen (3(4-biphenyl-carbonyl) propionic acid) (Cinopal; Lederle) was administered as a single daily dose of 1000 mg for 4 weeks to 20 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. At 2 weeks, and again at the end of the trial, patients were assessed for duration of morning stiffness, number of painful and/or
swollen joints
, grip strength, walking time, and subjective response to treatment. Four patients failed to complete the trial, 2 because of inability to control symptoms and 2 because of severe rash attributed to the drug. The remaining 16 patients showed some improvement in most of the recorded parameters, with statistically significant reduction of morning stiffness and walking time. Apart from a maculopapular rash, which occurred in 4 patients and cleared up on stopping the fenbufen, side-effects were minimal. No patient complained of
dyspepsia
or epigastric pain.
...
PMID:Fenbufen as a single daily dose in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. 702 59
The efficacy and safety of a sustained-release (SR) formulation of etodolac were compared with those of conventional etodolac in two separate, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, 6-week trials. This report presents an interim analysis of the data from these studies. One study included 174 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA): 58 received etodolac SR 400 mg once daily (q.d.), 59 received etodolac SR 600 mg q.d., and 57 received etodolac 200 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). The second study included 230 patients with osteoarthritis (OA): 80 patients received etodolac SR 400 mg q.d., 76 received etodolac SR 600 mg q.d., and 74 received etodolac 300 mg b.i.d. Efficacy was evaluated by physician's global and patient's global assessment (both studies), number of painful joints (RA study), number of
swollen joints
(RA study), pain intensity (OA study), and weight-bearing pain (OA study). The interim analyses of the data from the studies indicates that all three regimens produced significant improvements from baseline in all mean efficacy values at each assessment; there were no significant differences between the treatment groups. The incidence of study events, except for
dyspepsia
, was comparable among the treatment groups in each study;
dyspepsia
occurred at a significantly lower rate in patients treated with etodolac SR than in patients treated with the conventional formulation of etodolac. We conclude that etodolac SR is as effective and safe as conventional etodolac for the treatment of patients with RA or OA.
...
PMID:A comparison of the efficacy of etodolac SR (Lodine SR) and etodolac (Lodine) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. 821 Sep 19
We compared the longterm efficacy and safety of 2 dosages of etodolac with that of ibuprofen in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The ability of etodolac to retard, arrest, reverse, or heal joint damage due to RA was also evaluated. Patients in the early stages of RA were assigned randomly to 3 parallel groups for up to 3 years of therapy: etodolac at 150 mg bid, etodolac at 500 mg bid, and ibuprofen 600 mg qid. Concurrent disease modifying antirheumatic drugs were not permitted; established low dosage corticosteroid therapy could be continued. A total of 1446 patients was enrolled. About 50% of patients completed one year; dropout rates were comparable between groups. Both etodolac dosages provided comparable efficacy to that of ibuprofen during the first 2 months; longterm assessment showed that 1000 mg/day of etodolac produced superior improvement as assessed by patients' opinions and number of
swollen joints
. About 2% of patients in each group achieved remission, and radiographs showed no difference in disease progression between treatments. The incidences of adverse events were comparable, although
dyspepsia
and rash occurred less frequently with 300 mg/day of etodolac than with 2400 mg/day ibuprofen. A higher incidence of gastrointestinal ulcers and bleeding was seen with ibuprofen. Changes in hepatic and renal function were of minor clinical significance and were similar between the 3 groups. Both dosages of etodolac were comparable to 2400 mg/day ibuprofen in treating RA. All 3 treatment regimens were well tolerated.
...
PMID:Double blind evaluation of the long-term effects of etodolac versus ibuprofen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. 903 16