Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0013395 (dyspepsia)
 4,879 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Most esophageal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) express T-cell markers. Increased numbers of esophageal IELs have been shown in reflux esophagitis. The cytotoxic potential and activity of esophageal IELs have not as yet been examined. Our objectives were to determine whether esophageal IELs express the recently described cytotoxic T-cell (CTLs) markers, TIA-1 and granzyme-B, and whether the number of CTLs correlates with well-defined endoscopic, clinical, and histological features of esophagitis. In this study, most CD-3+ esophageal IELs exhibit the CD-8+/TIA-1+ T cell with cytotoxic potential phenotype in both histologically normal biopsy specimens and in biopsy specimens with esophagitis. A subpopulation of esophageal IELs that express cytotoxic activity was identified by granzyme-B immunostaining. A significant positive association was found between the number of esophageal IELs seen by light microscopy in biopsy specimens with histological features of reflux (21 IELs/HPF) and Candida esophagitis (31 IELs/HPF) as compared with normal-appearing biopsy specimens (10 IELs/HPF) (P< or =.05). Furthermore, the number of TIA-1 or granzyme-B-positive IELs were significantly increased in biopsy specimens with reflux esophagitis (34 and 15 cells/HPF) and Candida esophagitis (44 and 18 cells/HPF) as compared with normal (11 and 2 cells/HPF) (P< or =.05). Granzyme-B and CD-3-positive IELs were also significantly elevated in biopsy specimens with reflux-associated squamous hyperplasia (P< or =.05). Finally, biopsy specimens of patients with dysphagia and to a lesser extent dyspepsia/heartburn exhibited increased numbers of IELs bearing the cytotoxic phenotype when compared with asymptomatic patients. In conclusion, we provide immunohistochemical evidence that most esophageal IELs exhibit the cytotoxic phenotype and that activated cytotoxic IELs are increased in reflux and Candida esophagitis.
 ...
PMID:Assessment and diagnostic utility of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte phenotype using the specific markers granzyme-B and TIA-1 in esophageal mucosal biopsies. 1020 60

Antacids are commonly used self-prescribed medications. They consist of calcium carbonate and magnesium and aluminum salts in various compounds or combinations. The effect of antacids on the stomach is due to partial neutralisation of gastric hydrochloric acid and inhibition of the proteolytic enzyme, pepsin. Each cation salt has its own pharmacological characteristics that are important for determination of which product can be used for certain indications. Antacids have been used for duodenal and gastric ulcers, stress gastritis, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, pancreatic insufficiency, non-ulcer dyspepsia, bile acid mediated diarrhoea, biliary reflux, constipation, osteoporosis, urinary alkalinisation and chronic renal failure as a dietary phosphate binder. The development of histamine H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors has significantly reduced usage for duodenal and gastric ulcers and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, antacids can still be useful for stress gastritis and non-ulcer dyspepsia. The recent release of proprietary H2 antagonists has likely further reduced antacid use for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Other indications are still valid but represent minor uses. Antacid drug interactions are well noted, but can be avoided by rescheduling medication administration times. This can be inconvenient and discourage compliance with other medications. All antacids can produce drug interactions by changing gastric pH, thus altering drug dissolution of dosage forms, reduction of gastric acid hydrolysis of drugs, or alter drug elimination by changing urinary pH. Most antacids, except sodium bicarbonate, may decrease drug absorption by adsorption or chelation of other drugs. Most adverse effects from antacids are minor with periodic use of small amounts. However, when large doses are taken for long periods of time, significant adverse effects may occur especially patients with underlying diseases such as chronic renal failure. These adverse effects can be reduced by monitoring of electrolyte status and avoiding aluminum-containing antacids to bind dietary phosphate in chronic renal failure. Antacids, although effective for discussed indications of duodenal and gastric ulcer and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, have been replaced by newer, more effective agents that are more palatable to patients. Antacids are likely to continue to be used for non-ulcer dyspepsia, minor episodes of heartburn (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease) and other clear indications. Although their wide-spread use may decline, these drugs will still be used, and clinicians should be aware of their potential drug interactions and adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:Antacids revisited: a review of their clinical pharmacology and recommended therapeutic use. 1040 Apr 1

Self-medication with antacids is very common in patients with less severe forms of dyspepsia, but we know very little about the users of antacids and their incentive to take them. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between self-reported use of antacids and health-related variables, lifestyle, and sociodemographic characteristics in order to characterize the use of antacids in a general population. The use of antacids was assessed by a questionnaire answered by men and women aged 20-62 years (n = 15,986; response rate 75.9%). Logistic regression analysis was used to quantify the relationships between the use of antacids and health-related variables, lifestyle, and sociodemographic characteristics. Approximately 10% of the population had used antacids during the preceding 14 days. There was no overall gender difference. Among those who had no dyspeptic symptoms, 1.5% reported use of antacids, whereas among those who had all three dyspeptic symptoms (heartburn, epigastric pain, peptic ulcer), 46.5% had used antacids. Heartburn was the most important predictor for antacid use in both men (odds ratio [OR] = 8.57 [6.65-11.04]) and women (OR = 9.35 [7.16-12.221) followed by self-reported epigastric pain and peptic ulcer (both: OR = approximately 2). The importance of these self-reported health conditions remained unchanged after adjusting for lifestyle and sociodemographic variables. There were fewer antacid users among unmarried women than married women, and coffee-drinking was inversely associated with antacid use. These findings were consistent in both bivariate and multivariate analysis. The present study provides population-based information showing that self-medication with antacids in Norway appeared to be appropriate. Because dyspeptic symptoms play a major role in the consumption of antacids, this study shows the importance of including information about specific clinical variables in the analysis and interpretation of patterns of drug use.
 ...
PMID:Use of antacids in a general population: the impact of health-related variables, lifestyle and sociodemographic characteristics. 1040 89

The meaning and definition of dyspepsia continues to challenge clinical investigators and has led to the setting up of several international working teams. However, confusion continues to reign around this term. The effort to classify patients with dyspepsia into subgroups according to their most predominant symptoms has failed to provide clues to the underlying disease, or even to discriminate between functional and organic dyspepsia. With these limitations in mind, the question arises: is there any reason for putting further effort into developing a world-wide definition of dyspepsia when, in addition to the aforementioned shortcomings, further variables such as geographical region, ethnic background, culture and sanitary resources come into play? The answer is that only by establishing a reproducible methodology for individual symptom assessment using a well-defined protocol will comparisons of the prevalence of dyspepsia and the impact of different therapeutic interventions become possible around the world. The data on dyspepsia prevalence, nearly all arising from studies in a few developed geographical areas and countries, are of the order of 1-4% of all consultations in all primary care medicine. However, estimates of adults affected by dyspepsia are as high as 20-40%. The magnitude of these statistics underlines the necessity for further work on the concept of dyspepsia and its major functional subgroups, following the exclusion of any organic causes. Issues such as 'investigate dyspepsia before starting with any kind of treatment or treat dyspepsia before further investigation' or the debate about whether to 'eradicate or ignore Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia' will remain unresolved unless studies performed throughout the world use widely comparable and acceptable definitions and criteria for these conditions. Since the first international working party report in 1988, definitions of dyspepsia have included the description of 'upper abdominal pain or discomfort' and, more recently, have specified 'pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen' in order to emphasise further the site of origin as the upper alimentary tract (stomach-duodenum). However, a major change was evident in the more recent Rome I and Rome II reports, in which the symptoms heartburn, acid regurgitation, and belching were excluded from the definition of dyspepsia because of their relation to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and aerophagia. The intention to define a set of symptoms for dyspepsia is good, but we continue to be faced with overlaps. How should the patient with epigastric pain and heartburn after endoscopic exclusion of duodenal ulcer and reflux esophagitis be classified: dyspepsia or GERD? In cases of abnormal gastroesophageal reflux, 24-h pH monitoring could help to resolve this dilemma, but what if this investigation turns out to be normal? In this field, we need to perform careful studies. In addition, we need to consider the lifestyle and cultural habits of people around the world when translating upper gastrointestinal symptoms into dyspepsia. A step forward in the definition of dyspepsia was attempted by the recent working party for the Rome II consensus on functional gastrointestinal disorders (N. Talley et al.). In this project, the symptoms of dyspepsia were individually described not by a single term, but by painting a 'word picture', to make it easier for patients to express their symptoms, and give doctors and clinical investigators a better understanding of the 'dyspeptic problem' of each individual. It is advisable to follow this approach, since a clear picture of a patient's symptoms, including their duration and intensity, in association with the modern technical approaches that allow investigation beyond organic causes of dyspepsia, will lead to progress in our understanding and better communication about this problem within the medical community, and ultimately to better treatment.
 ...
PMID:Current concepts in dyspepsia: a world perspective. 1044 9

Dyspepsia, according to the internationally accepted Rome criteria, refers to pain or discomfort centred in the upper abdomen; patients with predominant heartburn are excluded from this group, although minor or infrequent heartburn is commonly associated with dyspepsia. It is an important condition not only because it is common and costly, but because it may indicate the presence of serious disease such as peptic ulcer or gastric cancer. However, the most frequent causes of dyspepsia are functional dyspepsia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. The discovery of Helicobacter pylori has resulted in important advances in the management of dyspepsia. The clinician faced with a patient who has persistent or recurrent dyspepsia needs to differentiate clearly those patients who have not been previously investigated from patients documented to have functional dyspepsia after investigation (fig 1). Here, the management of H pylori positive dyspeptic patients who have and have not been fully investigated will be reviewed.
 ...
PMID:How should Helicobacter pylori positive dyspeptic patients be managed? 1045 33

Dyspepsia and heartburn are the two cardinal symptoms of foregut dysfunction. When confronting such a problem, that physician must first learn to discern between the two, because treatment can be quite different for the conditions presenting with these symptoms. This article details the approach to work-up and treatment of patients presenting with dyspepsia or heartburn.
 ...
PMID:Dyspepsia and heartburn. 1046 36

Subtypes of functional dyspepsia (FD), including refluxlike dyspepsia, ulcerlike dyspepsia, dysmotility-like dyspepsia, and nonspecific dyspepsia, have been described and are widely used clinically. However, these symptom patterns often overlap, and the terms are insufficient for indicating all FD symptoms. In this study, we divided 71 FD patients into two groups: patients with or without pain. Group I, the pain dyspepsia group, included patients in whom the main symptoms were epigastralgia and/or chest pain. Group II, the painless dyspepsia group, included patients without pain, in whom the symptoms were nausea, vomiting, and heartburn. We examined the relationship between esophageal function and psychiatric factors in the test groups and compared them with a control group. Of the FD patients, 19.7% [8 (25%) of 32 group I patients, 6 (15.4%) of 39 group II patients] had esophageal motility disorders, such as nutcracker esophagus and diffuse esophageal spasm. The LES pressure of group I was higher than that of group II by esophageal manometry (P < 0.05). In 17 (53.1%) of 32 group I patients and 31 (79.5%) of 39 group II patients, psychiatric disorders (38.0% had depressive disorder and 21.1% had an anxiety disorder) were diagnosed following DSM III-R criteria. Group II tended to be more depressive than group I (P = 0.0508). Psychological assessment scores, STAI-I and STAI-II, were higher in groups I and II than in the control group (P < 0.001). Long-term distress, anxiety, and depression seem to influence the symptoms of FD patients. Esophageal dysmotility may be an important functional abnormality of FD.
 ...
PMID:Esophageal motility and psychiatric factors in functional dyspepsia patients with or without pain. 1054 63

Clinicians are familiar with the concepts of sensitivity and specificity to describe the accuracy of a diagnostic test. These measures do not always express the probability that a patient has a disease with a given test result as this will vary with the prevalence of the disorder in the population. The likelihood ratio is a more clinically relevant method of reporting accuracy, and the probability of having a disease after a positive or negative test can be calculated. The likelihood ratio can be applied to the clinical problem of dyspepsia management. This suggests that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) test and treat will detect and treat most peptic ulcers with only 0.5% of H. pylori-negative patients having peptic ulcer disease. Serology is possibly acceptable in populations with an H. pylori prevalence of approximately 50%. The urea breath tests are more appropriate in more extreme prevalence ranges. Once the prevalence of H. pylori falls below 10%, then the urea breath test becomes inaccurate, and screening and treatment may be less appropriate. The absolute probability of having peptic ulcer disease in a largely H. pylori-negative population will be very small, however, and the appropriateness of performing any investigation in these circumstances is debatable. Finally, likelihood ratios indicate that the clinical diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is not straightforward. Traditionally, it is believed that patients with dominant heartburn are likely to have GERD. Likelihood ratios predict, however, that patients with these symptoms have a little over 50% chance of having GERD as defined by 24-h esophageal pH studies.
 ...
PMID:The usefulness of the likelihood ratio in the diagnosis of dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux disease. 1056 1

This study examined the prevalence of functional gastrointestinal (FGI) disorders, and the association between FGI disorders and measures of affective distress, among a sample of 127 university students. Subjects completed a questionnaire battery including Research Diagnostic Questions for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Anxiety Sensitivity Index, the Beck Depression Inventory, and a medical utilization questionnaire. FGI disorders were diagnosed in 51.2% of the sample. Functional dyspepsia (22.8%), dyschezia (20.5%), functional heartburn (19.7%), functional chest pain (18.1%), and globus (12.6%) were the most frequently diagnosed disorders. Participants experiencing globus, functional dyspepsia, or functional heartburn showed significant differences in terms of anxiety, anxiety sensitivity, depression, and/or physician visits, when compared with participants without these disorders. Our results suggest that FGI disorders are strikingly prevalent among young adults, and specific FGI disorders are associated with affective distress. Implications of the observed association between psychological factors and FGI disorders are discussed.
 ...
PMID:Neurotic butterflies in my stomach: the role of anxiety, anxiety sensitivity and depression in functional gastrointestinal disorders. 1057 72

Indigestion and heartburn have been described for thousands of years, but it was only in the 16th century that the disease peptic ulcer was established by autopsy. At first, only gastric ulcers were identified. In the 18th century, duodenal ulcers, most of which were fatal cases after perforation or hemorrhage, were seen. In the 19th century, when autopsy became a common, even routine, hospital procedure, uncomplicated acute and chronic ulcers were found and then correlated with symptoms. Thus, our current clinical understanding dates from the 1820s, by which time peptic ulcers were being reported in the U.S. It is unclear why gastric ulcers were not diagnosed at The Mount Sinai Hospital until 1873 and duodenal ulcers until 1885. However, after that time both conditions were diagnosed frequently, and they rapidly became common and were treated medically and surgically.
 ...
PMID:Peptic ulcer. 1067 83


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>