Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0013395 (dyspepsia)
 4,879 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Panic disorder, a psychiatric disorder characterised by frequent panic attacks, is the most common anxiety disorder, affecting 2 to 6% of the general population. No one line of treatment has been found to be superior, making a risk-benefit assessment of the treatments available useful for treating patients. Choice of treatment depends on a number of issues, including the adverse effect profile, efficacy and the presence of concomitant syndromes. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are beneficial in the treatment of panic disorder. They have a proven efficacy, are affordable and are conveniently administered. Adverse effects, including jitteriness syndrome, bodyweight gain, anticholinergic effects and orthostatic hypotension are commonly associated with TCAs, but can be managed successfully. Selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5HT) reuptake inhibitors are also potential first line agents and are well tolerated and effective, with a favourable adverse effects profile. There is little risk in overdose or of anticholinergic effects. Adverse effects include sedation, dyspepsia and headache early in treatment, and sexual dysfunction and increased anxiety, but these can be effectively managed with proper dosage escalation and management. Benzodiazepines are an effective treatment, providing short-term relief of panic-related symptoms. Patients respond to treatment quickly, providing rapid relief of symptoms. Adverse effects include ataxia and drowsiness, and cognitive and psycho-motor impairment. There are reservations over their first-line use because of concerns regarding abuse and dependence. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors, because of their adverse effects profile, potential drug interactions, dietary restrictions, gradual onset of effect and overdose risk, are not considered to be first-line agents. They are effective however, and should be considered for patients with refractory disease. Valproic acid (valproate sodium), while not intensively studied, shows potential for use in panic disorder. More studies are needed in this area before the available data can be confirmed. As a supplement to drug therapy, cognitive behavioural therapy is effective. It is well tolerated, and may be beneficial in certain clinical situations. Its main drawback is the time commitment and effort needed to be made by the patient.
 ...
PMID:A risk-benefit assessment of pharmacological treatments for panic disorder. 963 87

Sildenafil citrate has been shown to be effective in a wide range of patients with erectile dysfunction and has been approved in the United States for this indication. The overall clinical safety of oral sildenafil, a potent inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, in the treatment of erectile dysfunction was evaluated in more than 3700 patients (with a total of 1631 years of exposure worldwide). Safety and tolerability data were analysed from a series of double-blind, placebo-controlled studies and from 10 open-label extension studies of sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. A total of 4274 patients (2722 sildenafil, 1552 placebo; age range 19-87 y) received double-blind treatment over a period of up to six months' duration, and 2199 received long-term, open-label sildenafil for up to 1 y. The most commonly reported adverse events (all causes) were headache (16% sildenafil, 4% placebo), flushing (10% sildenafil, 1% placebo), and dyspepsia (7% sildenafil, 2% placebo) and they were predominantly transient and mild or moderate in nature. These adverse events reflect the pharmacology of sildenafil as a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. No cases of priapism were reported. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events (all causes) was comparable for patients treated with sildenafil (2.5%) and placebo (2.3%). In open-label extension studies, 90% of patients completed long-term sildenafil treatment, with only 2% withdrawing due to adverse events. Sildenafil is a well-tolerated oral treatment for erectile dysfunction.
 ...
PMID:Clinical safety of oral sildenafil citrate (VIAGRA) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. 964 40

Erectile dysfunction may have psychological as well as a variety of organic causes. This necessitates in each case a careful medical evaluation. Various commonly used drugs, as well as alcohol and narcotics, may interfere with erection and should, whenever possible, be discontinued before starting treatment. Organic diseases should be identified and, if feasible, specially treated. In the remaining majority of afflicted men, psychological treatment and partner counseling may produce an improvement, but ultimately what is necessary remains an effective and safe medication. The drug, Sildenafil, introduces a new therapeutic principle. During sexual nerve stimulation, nitric oxide (NO) is released from nerves into the cells of the penile erectile bodies. NO activates in turn its "second messenger", the substance cyclic GMP, and the latter induces the vasorelaxation and blood filling of the erectile bodies. Orally administered Sildenafil competitively inhibits phosphodiesterase type 5, which physiologically inactivates cyclic GMP in the erectile bodies. Thus, Sildenafil increases in men with erectile dysfunction the NO-stimulated cyclic GMP concentration and, thereby, improves erection. This new therapy is attractive because 1. Sildenafil is the first pill (for oral use) with established efficacy that benefits most men with insufficient erection; 2. compared with previous therapeutic approaches (such as drug injections in the penis, instillations into the urinary duct, vacuum pumps or even prostheses), Sildenafil is at least as effective, is easy to take and appears well tolerated with no risk of a prolonged erection; 3. remarkably, this medication stimulates erection only during sexual arousal and, thus, has a rather "natural" effect, and 4. side effects (including headache, facial flushing and dyspepsia or epigastric discomfort) were mostly of mild degree and transient, so that only 4% of men interrupted treatment for this reason. Sildenafil does not need to be taken daily, but may be taken, when needed, 1 hour before a planned sexual activity. The new pill has the potential to enliven the boys "wunder horn" with fresh sound.
 ...
PMID:[New principle in therapy of erectile dysfunction: sildenafil]. 965 82

The efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil, a potent inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, were evaluated in men with diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction (ED). Twenty-one men (aged 42-65 years) were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study conducted in two parts. In part I, the effect of a single dose (25 mg or 50 mg) of sildenafil or placebo on penile rigidity was assessed by penile plethysmography during visual sexual stimulation. In part II, daily diary records of erectile activity and a global efficacy question were used to evaluate once-daily dosing with 25 mg or 50 mg of sildenafil or placebo for 10 days. After a single 50 mg dose of sildenafil, the adjusted geometric mean duration (min) of penile rigidity >60% at the base of the penis during visual sexual stimulation was significantly increased (10.1 min) compared with placebo (2.8 min; p = 0.0053). In part II, sildenafil significantly increased the number of erections considered sufficiently hard for vaginal penetration compared with placebo (p = 0.0005). Improved erections were reported by 50% and 52% of patients treated with 25 mg and 50 mg of sildenafil, respectively, compared with 10% of those receiving placebo (p values < 0.05). Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in nature and included muscular pains, headache, and dyspepsia. Sildenafil is a well-tolerated and potentially efficacious oral treatment for ED in men with diabetes mellitus.
 ...
PMID:Sildenafil: study of a novel oral treatment for erectile dysfunction in diabetic men. 979 81

The efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil citrate for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) were assessed in a 12-week placebo-controlled study. Men with ED of organic, psychogenic, or mixed aetiology were randomised to placebo (n = 166) or 50 mg sildenafil (n = 163), with adjustment to 100 mg or 25 mg based on efficacy and tolerability. Efficacy assessments included a global efficacy question, event log data, and an optional partner questionnaire. At the end of the study, improved erections were reported by 74% of patients receiving sildenafil versus 16% for placebo (p < 0.0001). In the final 4 weeks of treatment, 65% of all attempts at sexual intercourse were successful for all patients (responders and non-responders) receiving sildenafil versus 20% for placebo (p < 0.001). The mean number of successful attempts per month was 5.9 for patients receiving sildenafil versus 1.5 for those receiving placebo (p < 0.0001). The most common adverse events--headache, flushing, and dyspepsia--were generally mild to moderate in nature and rarely (< 1%) a reason for discontinuation of treatment. Oral sildenafil is an effective, reliable and well-tolerated treatment for ED of organic, psychogenic or mixed aetiology.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 329 patients. Sildenafil Study Group. 989 70

Sildenafil citrate, an oral therapy for erectile dysfunction, is a selective inhibitor of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), the predominant isozyme metabolizing cGMP in the corpus cavernosum. Chemically, it is a compound of the pyrazolo-pyrimidinyl-methylpiperazine class. Sildenafil has no direct relaxant effect on human corpus cavernosum but enhances the relaxant effect of nitric oxide (NO) on the corpus cavernosum by inhibiting PDE5, which is responsible for degradation of cGMP in this tissue. When sexual stimulation causes local release of NO, inhibition of PDE5 by sildenafil increases concentrations of cGMP in the corpus cavernosum, causing smooth muscle relaxation and blood flow into the penis, resulting in an erection. Sildenafil at recommended doses has no effect in the absence of sexual stimulation. The drug is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with absolute bioavailability of 40%. Its pharmacokinetics are dose proportional over the recommended dosage range. Maximum plasma concentrations are reached within 30 to 120 minutes after oral dosing in the fasting state. Sildenafil is cleared predominantly by the hepatic microsomal isoenzymes CYP3A4 (major route) and CYP2C9 (minor route). Clinical studies assessed the effect of sildenafil on the ability of men with erectile dysfunction to engage in sexual activity and, specifically, to achieve and maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual intercourse. Sildenafil was evaluated at doses of 25, 50, and 100 mg in randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trials of up to 6 months' duration. The drug was administered to hundreds of patients aged 19 to 87 years having erectile dysfunction of various etiologies for a mean duration of 5 years. Sildenafil was associated with statistically significant improvement in erectile function compared with placebo. Adverse effects reported at a rate of >2% were headache, flushing, dyspepsia, nasal congestion, urinary tract infection, abnormal vision, diarrhea, dizziness, and rash. No cases of priapism were reported. The use of sildenafil is contraindicated in men who are taking organic nitrates, because of the potential for a precipitous decrease in blood pressure. Postmarketing reports and surveillance have revealed at least 39 deaths with sildenafil use in men having a history of heart disease, men taking nitrate medications, and men in poor physical health due to lack of exercise. Many of the men who experienced serious adverse effects or death had a variety of concomitant diseases and were taking multiple medications.
 ...
PMID:Safety and efficacy of sildenafil citrate in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction. 991 1

Abacavir (1592U89) is a nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor that has been demonstrated to have selective activity against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in vitro and favorable safety profiles in mice and monkeys. A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of abacavir following oral administration of single escalating doses (100, 300, 600, 900, and 1,200 mg) to HIV-infected adults. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, subjects with baseline CD4+ cell counts ranging from < 50 to 713 cells per mm3 (median, 315 cells per mm3) were randomly assigned to receive abacavir (n = 12) or placebo (n = 6). The bioavailability of the caplet formulation relative to that of the oral solution was also assessed with the 300-mg dose. Abacavir was well tolerated by all subjects; mild to moderate asthenia, abdominal pain, headache, diarrhea, and dyspepsia were the most frequently reported adverse events, and these were not dose related. No significant clinical or laboratory abnormalities were observed throughout the study. All doses resulted in mean abacavir concentrations in plasma that exceeded the mean 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) for clinical HIV isolates in vitro (0.07 microgram/ml) for almost 3 h. Abacavir was rapidly absorbed following oral administration, with the time to the peak concentration in plasma occurring at 1.0 to 1.7 h postdosing. Mean maximum concentrations in plasma (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) increased slightly more than proportionally from 100 to 600 mg (from 0.6 to 4.7 micrograms/ml for Cmax; from 1.0 to 15.7 micrograms.h/ml for AUC0-infinity) but increased proportionally from 600 to 1,200 mg (from 4.7 to 9.6 micrograms/ml for Cmax; from 15.7 to 32.8 micrograms.h/ml for AUC0-infinity. The elimination of abacavir from plasma was rapid, with an apparent elimination half-life of 0.9 to 1.7 h. Abacavir was well absorbed, with a relative bioavailability of the caplet formulation of 96% versus that of an oral solution (drug substance in water). In conclusion, this study showed that abacavir is safe and is well tolerated by HIV-infected subjects and demonstrated predictable pharmacokinetic characteristics when it was administered as single oral doses ranging from 100 to 1,200 mg.
 ...
PMID:Safety and pharmacokinetics of abacavir (1592U89) following oral administration of escalating single doses in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected adults. 1004 74

Sildenafil, a selective inhibitor of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), is a well-tolerated and highly effective treatment for erectile dysfunction. The mechanism of action of sildenafil depends on activation of the nitric oxide (NO)-cGMP pathway during sexual stimulation, which results in corpus cavernosal smooth muscle relaxation and penile erection. Endogenously derived NO is also involved in blood pressure regulation through its effect on basal vascular tone, which is mediated by cGMP levels. Organic nitrates and NO donors exert their therapeutic effects on blood pressure and vascular smooth muscle by the same mechanism as endogenous NO. Since both sildenafil and organic nitrates exert their pharmacologic effects via increases in cGMP concentrations, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was undertaken to investigate the effects of sildenafil coadministered with glyceryl trinitrate on blood pressure and heart rate in healthy male subjects. The hemodynamic effects of sildenafil were also evaluated in a second placebo-controlled crossover study in men with hypertension who were taking the calcium antagonist amlodipine, which has a mechanism of action that does not involve the cGMP pathway. In the first crossover study, subjects were treated with oral sildenafil (25 mg, 3 times a day for 4 days) or placebo and then challenged on day 4 with a 40-minute, stepwise, intravenous infusion of glyceryl trinitrate (0.5 mg/mL in 5% dextrose at an initial infusion rate of 2.5 microg/min and doubling every 5 minutes to a maximum rate of 40 microg/min) 1 hour after taking sildenafil or placebo. On day 5, subjects received a sublingual glyceryl trinitrate tablet (500 microg) 1 hour after taking 25 mg of sildenafil or placebo. During sildenafil treatment, the subjects were significantly less tolerant of intravenously administered glyceryl trinitrate than during placebo treatment, based on the occurrence of a >25 mm Hg decrease in blood pressure or the incidence of symptomatic hypotension (p <0.01). When a sublingual glyceryl trinitrate tablet was administered on day 5, a 4-fold greater decrease in systolic blood pressure was observed for the subjects during the sildenafil treatment period than during the placebo treatment period. The changes in heart rate were negligible during both glyceryl trinitrate challenges. In conclusion, sildenafil potentiated the hypotensive effects of glyceryl trinitrate, an organic nitrate. Thus, sildenafil administration to patients who are using organic nitrates, either regularly and/or intermittently, in any form is contraindicated. In the second crossover study, men with hypertension, who were taking 5 or 10 mg/day of amlodipine, received a single oral dose of 100 mg sildenafil or placebo. Coadministration of sildenafil did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine. In the 4 hours after dosing, differences in the mean maximum change from baseline in supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures between the sildenafil plus amlodipine and the placebo plus amlodipine treatment periods were -8 mm Hg and -7 mm Hg, respectively (p < or =0.002). The mean maximum supine heart rate increased 2.1 beats/min during sildenafil plus amlodipine treatment and decreased 1.5 beats/min during placebo plus amlodipine treatment (p <0.02). The adverse events in this study were predominantly mild or moderate and did not cause discontinuation of treatment. Adverse events considered to be related to sildenafil treatment included headache, nausea, and dyspepsia. In patients with hypertension who were taking amlodipine therapy, sildenafil produced additive, but not synergistic, reductions in blood pressure. The difference in the mean maximum change from baseline in blood pressure between sildenafil plus amlodipine and placebo plus amlodipine was comparable to the decrease in blood pressure reported for healthy men taking sildenafil alone. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
 ...
PMID:Sildenafil citrate and blood-pressure-lowering drugs: results of drug interaction studies with an organic nitrate and a calcium antagonist. 1007 39

Erectile dysfunction is a common condition in men with cardiovascular disease, probably as a result of shared factors that impair hemodynamic mechanisms in the penile and ischemic vasculature. Sildenafil citrate, an orally active, selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), has demonstrated excellent efficacy and safety profiles in men with erectile dysfunction of various etiologies. Sildenafil administration is contraindicated in patients who are taking nitrates or nitric oxide donors. This retrospective subanalysis of data from double-blind, placebo-controlled studies assessed the efficacy (9 studies) and safety (11 studies) of sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction and ischemic heart disease who were not taking nitrates. Of 3,672 patients randomized to receive sildenafil (5-200 mg) or placebo for 4-24 weeks in 11 double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, 357 (10%) reported a history (past or present) of ischemic heart disease and were not taking nitrates. Efficacy was assessed using end-of-treatment responses to Question 3 (ability to achieve an erection) and Question 4 (ability to maintain an erection) of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), scores for the 5 domains of male sexual function assessed by the IIEF (erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction), and responses to a global efficacy question ("Did the treatment improve your erections?"). The responses to the 2 IIEF questions were graded on a scale of 1 (almost never or never) to 5 (almost always or always), with a score of 0 indicating no attempt at sexual intercourse. At the end of treatment, the mean scores for Question 3 and Question 4 of the IIEF for patients with erectile dysfunction and ischemic heart disease were significantly higher for the sildenafil group than for the placebo group (p <0.0001). Mean end-of-treatment scores for the IIEF domains also demonstrated significant increases for sildenafil-treated patients compared with those receiving placebo (p <0.05). At the end of treatment, improved erections were reported by 70% of patients who received sildenafil and by 20% of those in the placebo group p <0.0001). For the sildenafil group, the incidences of the most common adverse events (headache 25%, flushing 14%, and dyspepsia 12%) for patients with ischemic heart disease were similar to those in patients without this concomitant illness (21%, 15%, and 10%, respectively). Moreover, the overall incidence of cardiovascular adverse events other than flushing was comparable in patients with and without ischemic heart disease for both treatment groups. Since there is a degree of cardiac risk associated with sexual activity, clinicians should consider the patient's cardiovascular status before initiating any treatment for erectile dysfunction. Physicians should be aware that patients with underlying cardiovascular disease could be adversely affected by the vasodilator effects of sildenafil, especially in combination with sexual activity. The results of the present subanalysis indicate that oral sildenafil significantly improves erectile function and is well tolerated in patients with erectile dysfunction and ischemic heart disease who are not taking nitrate therapy.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients with ischemic heart disease. 1007 40

When clinicians label a child as having a functional disorder, there is often a pejorative connotation that the symptoms are psychological, imagined, or faked. These symptoms range from chronic abdominal pain to recurrent headaches to fatigue. We say the complaints are functional because we are unable to demonstrate any structural or biochemical abnormality causing them. The degree to which we go searching for these abnormalities varies from case to case and often depends on our own clinical experience, insecurities, and demands of the patient's family. Labeling a child as having a functional complaint can put a tremendous burden on the child and family, because if this concept is presented improperly (as implied above), it can suggest that it is their fault there are symptoms and that if they "got their act together" the symptoms would melt away. Functional gastrointestinal disorders are defined as conditions in which a variable combination of chronic or recurrent gastrointestinal symptoms are present in the absence of demonstrable disease. There may indeed be physiologic abnormalities underlying the symptoms, but at the present time we are unable to detect them. We make a diagnosis based on symptoms, not on demonstrable abnormalities in physical examination or laboratory tests. A number of common pediatric diagnoses fall into this category, including infant regurgitation, chronic nonspecific diarrhea, irritable bowel syndrome, non-ulcer dyspepsia, infant dyschezia, and functional constipation. This paper presents a brief review of our current understanding of each diagnosis and gives suggestions for management.
 ...
PMID:Functional gastrointestinal disorders. 1055 86


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>