Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0013395 (
dyspepsia
)
4,879
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Strontium ranelate (SR) is a new drug for osteoporosis that has a unique effect profile, being antiresorptive as well as anabolic. In postmenopausal women with spinal osteoporosis pretreated with calcium and vitamin D, SR reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures after 1 year by 49% and after 3 years by 41% (
NNT
= 9). The numbers of clinical fractures were in the same periods reduced by 52% and 38%, respectively. The number of patients with more than one new spinal fracture was reduced by 36%. Height reduction was less among the patients so treated, and there was a tendency towards less lumbar pain. Measured lumbar BMD increased 14.4% over three years, corresponding to an increase of 6.8% after adjustment for bone strontium content, compared with a decrease in the placebo group of 1.3%. The risk of new non-vertebral fractures was reduced by 16%. Among elderly women with a hip T-score <-3, SR decreased the risk of hip fractures by 36% over three years (
NNT
= 48). In patients with osteopenia and at least one clinical risk factor, SR reduced the risk of first vertebral fracture by 72% over three years (
NNT
= 12). In patients over 80 years of age, the risk of new vertebral fractures was reduced by 32% (
NNT
= 14). There were few side effects. SR is thus suitable for reducing the risk of vertebral and hip fractures from postmenopausal osteoporosis, especially among patients with upper abdominal
dyspepsia
and the elderly.
...
PMID:[Strontium ranelate: a new therapeutic principle for postmenopausal osteoporosis]. 1615 55
The available evidence from randomized clinical trials or meta-analyses on the therapeutic efficacy of psychotropic drugs and, specifically, of antidepressants, in functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGD), are recent and still fairly limited. The use of these drugs is based on the frequent association of anxiety and depression or neurosis in patients with FGD who seek medical care and on the demonstrated efficacy of these drugs in relieving chronic pain, whatever its origin or localization, for more than 30 years. Antidepressants, even in doses under the antidepressant range, are antinociceptive due to their central and peripheral neuromodulatory effect, which is completely independent of anticholinergic, spasmolytic or antidepressant effects. This has been demonstrated in both animals and humans and, as occurs with another antinociceptive drugs such as clonidine, is mediated by alpha-adrenoreceptors. The choice of antidepressant depends both on the evidence of its analgesic activity (in general greater with tricyclic antidepressants than with the more modern selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) and on the presence of drug-related adverse effects, which include not only anticholinergic adverse effects but also the possibility of hypotension or cardiotoxicity, which should be avoided. The main selection criteria are demonstrated efficacy and safety. Antidepressants have been shown to be effective in the specific field of non-coronary chest pain probably originating in the esophagus unrelated to gastroesophageal reflux disease, especially mianserin and trazodone, and the effect is maintained in the long term in nearly three-quarters of treated patients. Tricyclic antidepressants have also been shown to be effective in the treatment of abdominal pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, with an OR of 4.2 and an
NNT
of 3.2 in comparison with placebo. In contrast, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of antidepressants in functional
dyspepsia
.
...
PMID:[Antidepressant therapy in functional gastrointestinal disorders]. 1618 84
H. pylori infection remains a worldwide spread disease with a definite morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, no current therapy regimen is able to cure the infection in all treated patients. The efficacy of the widely recommended triple therapies is decreasing, and a novel 10-day sequential therapy has been proposed. Data of 3 previous meta-analyses showed a significantly higher eradication rate following the sequential as compared to the 7-10 days triple therapies. The sequential therapy achieved significantly better results than triple therapies in children, elderly patients, non-ulcer
dyspepsia
patients, and in those infected with resistant strains towards either clarithromycin or metronidazole. We identified further 10 randomized trials. By pooling data, H. pylori infection was cured in 2,454 (86%; 95% CI: 84.7-87.3) out of 2,853 patients with the sequential therapy and in 2,320 (75.3%; 95% CI: 73.8-76.9) out of 3,079 patients treated with standard triple therapies (p<0.001), corresponding to a number to treat (
NNT
) of 9. The comparison between the 10-day sequential regimen and 14-day triple therapies deserves further investigations.
...
PMID:Standard triple and sequential therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication: an update. 2287 93