Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0013395 (dyspepsia)
 4,879 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

One hundred and eighty-five patients were perforated duodenal ulcer were treated at one hospital over the 21-year period which straddled the introduction of H2-receptor antagonists. Of these 107 had simple closure, 58 simple closure with immediate H2-receptor antagonists and 20 immediate definitive surgery. The overall operative mortality rate was 5.4%. The rate of subsequent definitive surgery declined significantly in the years after the introduction of H2-receptor antagonists. Only a minority of those who came to subsequent definitive surgery had done so within the first year, the percentage rising from 16% at 1 year to 43.7% at 10 years. Of the patients treated by simple closure alone, 44.3% had subsequent definitive surgery compared with 24.1% having H2-receptor antagonists in addition, but this difference was not statistically significant using life table analysis. Review of the 104 patients available in 1989 showed no significant differences in symptoms between the treatment groups. The only preoperative predictor of subsequent definitive operation was non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug consumption which showed a negative correlation. A 3-month history of dyspepsia before perforation did not predict the need for subsequent surgery. The symptomatic results in a different group of patients who had undergone highly selective vagotomy subsequent to a previous perforation were no different from patients treated by simple closure alone or with immediate prescription of H2-receptor antagonists. Bloating, however, was significantly more common after highly selective vagotomy. We believe that perforated duodenal ulcer should be treated by simple closure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Impact of H2-receptor antagonists on the outcome of treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. 198 17

One hundred and thirteen consecutive patients admitted with a perforated duodenal ulcer over a 5-year period (1978-82) and treated by simple closure have been followed prospectively over a median period of 43 months. Patients were divided into two categories according to their previous history of dyspepsia; group 1 (66 patients) with a chronic history of more than 3 months and group 2 (47 patients) where there was no history of dyspepsia or a history of less than 3 months duration. The follow-up periods were similar (group 1, 44 months; group 2, 43 months). The overall recurrence rate was 42 per cent and to date only 14 per cent of the total group of 113 patients have required a definitive operation. The incidence of ulcer recurrence was higher in group 1 than in group 2 in terms of total recurrence (group 1, 50 per cent; group 2, 32 per cent) and patients requiring further surgery (group 1, n = 14, 21 per cent; group 2, n = 7, 15 per cent). Five of these 21 patients required an emergency procedure for haemorrhage or reperforation (group 1, n = 2; group 2, n = 3). There were no significant differences between the 5-year predictive recurrence rate or the requirement for definitive surgery between the groups. Five of the 27 patients currently on medical treatment have required maintenance treatment while the remaining patients receive active treatment for a mean of 20 per cent of the time since they developed recurrent ulceration. These results support continuation of our 'wait and see' policy following simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer, even in patients with a history of chronic dyspepsia.
 ...
PMID:Simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer: a prospective evaluation of a conservative management policy. 230 18