Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0013395 (dyspepsia)
 4,879 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Trials of the efficacy and safety of vardenafil in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction (ED) were meta-analysed. All available databases were searched (January 1, 2001-November 30, 2003). Trials were eligible if they included men with ED, compared vardenafil with placebo, were randomized, were at least of 12 weeks duration, and assessed clinically relevant outcomes. Two reviewers independently evaluated study quality and extracted data in a standardized fashion. Nine trials (6809 men) met the inclusion criteria. In results pooled from seven fixed-dose trials, vardenafil increases the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire by 6.18 units (weighted mean difference (WMD)). Vardenafil also increases the percentage of erections firm enough to allow vaginal penetration (WMD: 26) and the percentage of sexual attempts that were successful per participant (WMD: 29.8). The percentage of men agreeing with the statement that 'the treatment they have been taking over the past 4 weeks improved their erections', is also in favour of vardenafil (relative risk (RR): 3). These efficacy variables appeared greater at higher doses, although there are no significant differences between 10 and 20 mg dose. The same results were extracted for the two flexible 'as needed' dosing trials. Discontinuations are greater at the vardenafil groups compared to placebo (RR: 2.25). Specific adverse events with vardenafil included flushing, dyspepsia, headache, and rhinitis. Vardenafil was not significantly associated with serious cardiovascular events or death. Vardenafil, in all treatment regimens, shows to possess superior efficacy to placebo in the treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction. More data is needed on patients' subgroups.
 ...
PMID:Vardenafil (Levitra) for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trial reports. 1522 25

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common medical disorder affecting elderly men. Sildenafil citrate has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated oral agent for treating ED in the general population of adult men with ED of broad-spectrum etiology. Elderly men are more likely to have concomitant medical problems than the general population of men with ED. In this study, we examined the efficacy and safety of sildenafil administration in elderly patients with ED. Forty-four elderly men with ED (> or = 60 years old) of broad-spectrum etiology were treated with 25 mg or 50 mg doses of sildenafil citrate. Age ranged from 60 to 78 years (65 +/- 4.5; means +/- S.D.). Mean follow-up period was 12.3 +/- 6.5 months, with a range of 1 to 25 months. Primary efficacy assessments were performed using the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF5) before their first dose of sildenafil and after at least 4 weeks of therapy. Serum testosterone was measured before treatment. The mean IIEF5 among all patients increased from 8.5 +/- 3.9 to 20 +/- 4.2 after sildenafil use (P < 0.0001). In patients younger than 70 years, the IIEF5 score increased from 9.5 +/- 5.0 to 17 +/- 4.3 while in patients 70 years and older, the score increased from 8.2 +/- 3.6 to 21 +/- 3.9, a near normalization. The rate of improvement in younger men was higher than in older men. Serum testosterone before treatment was similar in the two groups. The most commonly experienced adverse events were flushing and dyspepsia, which occurred in 6.8% and 2.3%, respectively. No patients discontinued sildenafil treatment due to adverse events. In conclusion, oral sildenafil is efficacious and well tolerated by elderly men with ED, even among those older than 70 years.
 ...
PMID:Clinical efficacy and safety of sildenafil in elderly patients with erectile dysfunction. 1527 3

Erection is a neurovascular event that involves spinal and supra spinal pathways. The final common pathway involves the release of nitric oxide (NO) from both endothelial cells and neurons, which acts as a vasodilator causing penile engorgement and erection. NO is degraded by the enzyme phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 5 in the penis. Erectile dysfunction (ED), defined as the persistent inability to achieve and/or maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance, results when the neurovascular pathway is interrupted by medical conditions or drugs. A 15-item self-administered questionnaire, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), is one of the most useful tools to evaluate erectile function (EF) in clinical trials, although of much less use in routine clinical practice. The MMAS (Massachusetts Male Aging Study) was the first major epidemiological investigation to study the prevalence of ED. The study found that ED was three times more common in patients with diabetes mellitus. The aetiopathogenesis of ED in diabetes is multifactorial, with vascular and neural factors being equally implicated. Hyperglycaemia is believed to give rise to biochemical perturbations that lead to these microvascular changes. In the MMAS, ED in diabetes was strongly correlated with glycaemic control, duration of disease and diabetic complications. The incidence increased with increasing age, duration of diabetes and deteriorating metabolic control, and was higher in individuals with type 2 diabetes than those with type 1.ED in men with diabetes often affects their quality of life and, as patients are often reluctant to come forward with their symptoms, a carefully taken history is one of the most useful approaches in identifying affected individuals. The PDE inhibitors have revolutionised the management of ED and oral drug therapy is currently first-line therapy for the condition. These agents act by potentiating the action of intracavernosal NO, thereby leading to a more sustained erection. Sildenafil was the first PDE5 inhibitor to undergo evaluation and has been studied extensively. More recently two other agents, vardenafil and tadalafil, have been introduced. All the drugs have been shown to be effective across a wide range of aetiologies of ED, including diabetes. The drugs have been shown to improve EF domain scores, penetration and maintenance of erection, resulting in more successful intercourse. Their effects are greater at higher doses. Sildenafil and vardenafil are shorter-acting agents, while tadalafil has a longer half-life allowing the user more flexibility in sexual activity. Common adverse effects include headache, nasal congestion and dyspepsia, all actions related to inhibition of PDE5. The drugs are generally well tolerated and withdrawal from the clinical studies as a result of drug-related adverse effects were rare. The use of PDE5 inhibitors in the presence of oral nitrates is absolutely contraindicated. The clinical studies to date have not evaluated the use of one drug in the case of treatment failure with another agent. Sublingual apomorphine, which stimulates central neurogenic pathways, is a new agent and may be a suitable alternative in those patients in whom PDE5 inhibitors are ineffective or contraindicated. In clinical trials, all IIEF domains except sexual desire were found to have improved after apomorphine. The median times to erection in these studies were 18.9 and 18.8 minutes for the 2 and 3mg doses, respectively. Intraurethral and intracavernosal alprostadil may be a useful alternative when oral drug therapy is ineffective or contraindicated. The management of ED in the diabetic patient may often involve a multidisciplinary approach where psychosexual counselling and specialist urologist advice is required in addition to the skills and expertise of the diabetologist. Finally, the introduction of the new oral agents have completely revolutionised the management of ED and allowed more individuals to come forward for treatment.
 ...
PMID:New treatment options for erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus. 1553 69

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects up to 50% of men, between 40 and 70 years of age. In the first major trial of sildenafil in ED, at 24 weeks, improved erections were reported by 77 and 84% of men taking sildenafil 50 and 100mg, respectively. Subsequently, sildenafil has been reported to be effective in men with ED associated with diabetes and prostate cancer, and in psychogenic ED. Sildenafil is safe in men with coronary artery disease, provided it is not used with the nitrates (a contraindication). The most commonly reported adverse effects with sildenafil are headache, flushing and dyspepsia. Vardenafil is more potent and more selective than sildenafil at inhibiting phosphodiesterase-5. Vardenafil is similarly effective to sildenafil in the treatment of ED. The only advantage that vardenafil has over sildenafil is that it does not inhibit phosphodiesterase-6 to alter colour perception, a rare side effect which sometimes occurs with sildenafil. Tadalafil has a longer duration of action than sildenafil and vardenafil. Tadalafil is similarly effective as sildenafil in the treatment of ED. In comparison studies, tadalafil is preferred to sildenafil (50/100mg) by men with ED, possibly because of its longer duration of action. Of the phosphodiesterase inhibitors, tadalafil may displace sildenafil as the drug of choice among men with ED.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of clinical trials with sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil in erectile dysfunction. 1570 77

The efficacy and safety of tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) were assessed in a 6-month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Australian men with mild, moderate or severe ED of organic, psychogenic or mixed aetiology were randomised to tadalafil 20 mg as needed (n = 93) or placebo (n = 47). Efficacy assessments included the international index of erectile function (IIEF) and the sexual encounter profile (SEP) diary. Tadalafil significantly improved erectile function compared with placebo (p < 0.001, all measures). At the end of the study, the mean per-patient proportion of successful sexual intercourse attempts (SEP question three) was 73.5% for patients treated with tadalafil and 26.8% for placebo-treated patients. Improved erections were reported by 78% of tadalafil-treated patients compared to 12.8% of placebo-treated patients. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events--headache and dyspepsia--were generally mild or moderate. Tadalafil was effective and well tolerated in Australian men with mild to severe ED.
 ...
PMID:A 6-month study of the efficacy and safety of tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study in Australian men. 1585 88

In a previous study assessing tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), tadalafil 20 mg was shown to improve erectile function for up to 36 hours vs placebo. This study sought to demonstrate the effectiveness of both 10- and 20-mg tadalafil vs placebo at 2 prespecified assigned times of 24 and 36 hours postdosing. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study randomized 483 men with ED into 6 groups according to a combination of treatment (placebo, tadalafil 10 or 20 mg) and assigned time (24 or 36 hours) for intercourse attempts. Patients were stratified by baseline ED severity based on Erectile Function Domain scores. The study had 4 phases: a 4-week run-in (no ED medication taken); a 2- to 4-week equilibration (dosing as needed); a 4- to 6-week assessment; and a 6-month open-label extension. During the assessment phase, men took a total of 4 doses of study medication, each dose separated by more than or equal to 7 days. Efficacy was measured as the mean per-patient percentage of successful intercourse attempts (Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3: SEP3) during the assessment phase. Men taking either 10- or 20-mg tadalafil had a significant increase in SEP3 from baseline scores vs placebo at both 24 hours (P = .038 and <.001 for 10 and 20 mg, respectively) and 36 hours (P < .001 for both doses) postdose. The mean per-patient percentages of successful intercourse attempts for the 24-hour time point were 41.8%, 55.8%, and 67.3% for placebo and tadalafil 10 and 20 mg, respectively; for the 36-hour time point, the mean per-patient percentages were 32.8%, 56.2%, and 61.9% for placebo and tadalafil 10 and 20 mg, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, back pain, dyspepsia, and nasopharyngitis. Both 10- and 20-mg tadalafil improved erectile function for up to 36 hours postdosing in men with ED of varied severity.
 ...
PMID:Tadalafil improved erectile function at twenty-four and thirty-six hours after dosing in men with erectile dysfunction: US trial. 1586 97

This meeting underscored advances in the exploitation of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) as drug targets. One highlight of the meeting was the disclosure of a new PDE isozyme, bringing to 11 the total number of genetically distinct isozyme families thus far identified. Also reported was the phenotypic characterization of a PDE4D murine genetic knockout. With respect to drug discovery and development, the most encouraging information presented centered on advances in targeting PDE4 with therapeutically useful inhibitors. Historically, the therapeutic utility of isozyme-selective PDE4 inhibitors has been limited by class-associated side effects, namely nausea and dyspepsia. New PDE4 inhibitors are being designed with the specific intent of improving upon the therapeutic ratio of first-generation agents. The profiles of two second-generation PDE4 inhibitors, SB-207499 (Ariflo; Smithkline Beecham plc) and PD-189659, were presented. SB-207499 demonstrated marked efficacy in phase II clinical trials in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a disease of very high unmet medical need. PD-189659 has yet to enter clinical trials, but its preclinical profile indicates that this agent can produce substantial anti-inflammatory effects without producing class-associated side effects in animal models. A number of presentations were also given on the utility of PDE5 inhibitors in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction (MED). The widespread use of Viagra (sildenafil; Pfizer Inc) over the last year has reinforced the perception that PDE5 inhibitors are safe and effective agents for the treatment of MED. The overall tenor of the meeting was distinctly upbeat, with most participants believing that PDE isozymes are becoming ever more accessible as targets for drug discovery in a variety of therapeutic areas.
 ...
PMID:PDE inhibitors--Second William Harvey Research Conference. Drugs with an expanding range of therapeutic uses. 1-3 December 1999, Nice, France. 1610 32

Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors are recommended as first-line treatment of erectile dysfunction in many guidelines, because of their convenience, higher efficacy, and less side-effects. Since its first launch in 1998, sildenafil has been currently the best investigated phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor with respect to long-term trails and quantity. Clinical trials showed the efficacy of sildenafil compared with placebo in many of the groups of patients who have ED, including those with cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, depression, radical prostatectomy and dialysis. Typically the adverse effects reported in patients from clinical trials of sildenafil have been mild to moderate, and commonly include flushing and dyspepsia and transient visual disturbances. This article summarized recent reports on efficacy and safety of phosphodiesters 5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
 ...
PMID:[Efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction]. 1613 88

Erectile dysfunction (ED) profoundly affects the quality of life. The prevalence of ED in renal transplant recipients is reported by high as 50% to 60%. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of vardenafil in these patients with ED as well as its effects on graft function and on cylosporine or tacrolimus concentrations. Thirty-nine recipients with ED and serum creatinine values<2 mg/dL were treated with vardenafil. ED was assessed using the self-administered International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). ED was diagnosed by using penile color-Doppler ultrasonography and intracavernosal injection. Vardenafil efficacy was assessed by readministering the IIEF questionnaire after 4 weeks of therapy. Serum creatinine levels, creatinine clearances, and cyclosporine/tacrolimus concentrations were measured before and after vardenafil therapy. Twenty-one recipients with ED served as placebo controls and 15 without ED as another control group. The IIEF scores improved from 12.80+/-3.5 to 26.46+/-2.4 in vardenafil-treated patients with ED (P<.001). Renal function and cyclosporine/tacrolimus concentrations did not change with vardenafil therapy. Side effects were observed in 7 (18%) patients: headache in three, palpitations in one, flushing in two, and dyspepsia in one. This study demonstrated that ED improved with vardenafil in renal transplant recipients with ED. For 4 weeks vardenafil therapy was free of side effects. Renal function tests did not change. Also, no dose change in immunosuppressive drugs was required during 4 weeks of verdanafil therapy.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of vardenafil in renal transplant recipients with erectile dysfunction. 1679 9

The discovery that inhibition of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) reduces the degradation of cGMP, allowing erectile function to occur by relaxation of penile smooth muscle, represents a revolutionary approach or the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Three PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil) are clinically available at this time, and extensive drug design efforts are registered for finding agents with a better activity, enhanced selectivity and reduced side effects. Many classes of such compounds have been reported, belonging to diverse chemical entities. The drug design has been very much facilitated after the report of the X-ray crystal structure of the PDE5 catalytic domain in complex with the three clinically used derivatives. PDE5 inhibitor therapy, has been found to be effective in special clinical populations, such as those with prostate cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The duration of action of sildenafil and vardenafil is of about 4 hours, whereas that of tadalafil is of about 36 hours, and the overall safety of the treatments is good. There is a risk of hypotension if nitrates are given concurrently with the PDE5 inhibitors. Common side-effects include headache, facial flushing, nasal congestion, dyspepsia and transient visual impairment. There are pharmacological interactions between these drugs and other medications metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (P3A4 isoform), such as the azole antifungals, erythromycin and the HIV protease inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors--drug design and differentiation based on selectivity, pharmacokinetic and efficacy profiles. 1701 39


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>