Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0013362 (dysarthria)
 3,768 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Thirty adult aphasic subjects without apraxia of speech or dysarthria were tested for their ability to produce phonemes in single test words and in spontaneous contextual speech. Results indicated that 75% of the total phonemic errors were due to a whole-word phenomenon apparently associated with faulty processing of the word rather than faulty production of the phoneme. True phonemic errors comprised 25% of the total errors or about 2% of all responses. Phoneme substitutions were by far the most frequent error (61%). Of the 30 subjects, 28 made no phonemic errors in spontaneous contextual speech. Aphasic behavior is not characterized by significant breakdown of articulatory performance. Observed patterns of error do not clearly support a phonemic regression hypothesis.
 ...
PMID:Phonemic behavior of aphasic subjects without dysarthria or apraxia of speech. 100 73

A dichotic-listening procedure was used to investigate the role of the right hemisphere in recovery from aphasia following left-hemisphere stroke. Thirty-one stroke patients were divided into three groups: (a) patients who were recovering from aphasia (Aphasic group, n = 11), (b) patients who had experienced mild strokes with only transient dysarthria (Dysarthric group, n = 10), and (c) patients who had sustained right-hemisphere stroke with no language disturbance (Nonaphasic group, n = 10). In addition, a group of normal, healthy volunteers served as a control group (n = 11). Results show that, like the Control subjects, the Dysarthrics and Nonaphasics showed a strong right-ear advantage (REA) for dichotically presented consonant-vowel (CV) syllables. This is usually thought to be an indication of left-hemisphere dominance (Kimura, 1961). By contrast, the Aphasic group showed left-ear advantage (LEA) suggesting a shift in cerebral dominance for language. The possibility that the results were due to sensory degradation of the auditory messages (lesion effect) was explored. This idea was rejected in favor of an explanation based on increased right-hemisphere mediation of language following left-hemisphere aphasiogenic lesions.
 ...
PMID:Dichotic-listening evidence of right-hemisphere involvement in recovery from aphasia following stroke. 340 1

We studied three right-handed patients with small, lacunar infarcts localized by CT to the posterior and lateral putamen and the posterior limb of the internal capsule. All had moderate or severe right hemiparesis and mild aphasia that was not characteristic of any traditional aphasia syndrome. Two had mild dysarthria. Aphasic abnormalities included mild, nonfluent, telegraphic speech and mild, fluent aphasia with impaired repetition, naming, and comprehension. All three had severely impaired writing. Unlike previously reported patients with subcortical infarcts, these cases indicate that small lesions limited to the posterior capsuloputaminal area can cause aphasia and agraphia as well as dysarthria.
 ...
PMID:Aphasia and agraphia in lesions of the posterior internal capsule and putamen. 406 77

BACKGROUND: Previous work indicates that single word intelligibility tests developed for dysarthria are sensitive to segmental production errors in aphasic individuals with and without apraxia of speech. However, potential listener learning effects and difficulties adapting elicitation procedures to coexisting language impairments limit their applicability to left hemisphere stroke survivors. AIMS: The main purpose of this study was to examine basic psychometric properties for a new monosyllabic intelligibility test developed for individuals with aphasia and/or AOS. A related purpose was to examine clinical feasibility and potential to standardize a computer-mediated administration approach. METHODS #ENTITYSTARTX00026; PROCEDURES: A 600-item monosyllabic single word intelligibility test was constructed by assembling sets of phonetically similar words. Custom software was used to select 50 target words from this test in a pseudo-random fashion and to elicit and record production of these words by 23 speakers with aphasia and 20 neurologically healthy participants. To evaluate test-retest reliability, two identical sets of 50-word lists were elicited by requesting repetition after a live speaker model. To examine the effect of a different word set and auditory model, an additional set of 50 different words was elicited with a pre-recorded model. The recorded words were presented to normal-hearing listeners for identification via orthographic and multiple-choice response formats. To examine construct validity, production accuracy for each speaker was estimated via phonetic transcription and rating of overall articulation. OUTCOMES #ENTITYSTARTX00026; RESULTS: Recording and listening tasks were completed in less than six minutes for all speakers and listeners. Aphasic speakers were significantly less intelligible than neurologically healthy speakers and displayed a wide range of intelligibility scores. Test-retest and inter-listener reliability estimates were strong. No significant difference was found in scores based on recordings from a live model versus a pre-recorded model, but some individual speakers favored the live model. Intelligibility test scores correlated highly with segmental accuracy derived from broad phonetic transcription of the same speech sample and a motor speech evaluation. Scores correlated moderately with rated articulation difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a computerized, single-word intelligibility test that yields clinically feasible, reliable, and valid measures of segmental speech production in adults with aphasia. This tool can be used in clinical research to facilitate appropriate participant selection and to establish matching across comparison groups. For a majority of speakers, elicitation procedures can be standardized by using a pre-recorded auditory model for repetition. This assessment tool has potential utility for both clinical assessment and outcomes research.
 ...
PMID:Computer-Mediated Assessment of Intelligibility in Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech. 2221 33