Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a double-blind multi-centre study of general practice patients with DSM-III-R major depressive disorder, sertraline (50 or 100 mg/day) was compared with dothiepin (75 or 150 mg/day) and with placebo. There were 83, 96 and 90 patients evaluated in the respective treatment groups; treatment lasted 6 weeks. Patients were assessed on the MADRS, CGI, and Leeds Self-rating Scales. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between sertraline and placebo were found on MADRS and CGI but not the Leeds Scales. In the mild subgroup analyses, there were no significant differences between sertraline and placebo. However, clear significant differences (p < 0.05) between sertraline and placebo were present in the severe subgroup. Dothiepin failed to achieve a statistically significant difference from placebo on any analyses. Seventy-six per cent of patients were treated with 50 mg sertraline and 81% of patients received 150 mg dothiepin. Both sertraline and dothiepin were generally well tolerated; the most frequent side effects with sertraline were nausea, dizziness and headache; with dothiepin the most frequent side effects were dry mouth, somnolence and headache.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of sertraline and dothiepin in the treatment of major depression in general practice. 805

Approximately 20 million patients suffer from major depressive disorder each year, indicating a need for antidepressant agents that are synonymous with effectiveness, tolerability and patient compliance. The authors examined the effects of fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, in the treatment of outpatients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo- and imipramine-controlled single center study was conducted in 150 outpatients. Patients were randomized to receive up to 150 mg/day of fluvoxamine as a single bedtime dose, 240 mg/day of imipramine on a twice-daily (BID) schedule, or placebo for six weeks. Efficacy measurements included HAM-D, MADRS, CGI, Raskin-Covi and SCL-56 scales. The HAM-D total score indicated that both active treatment groups showed significantly (p < or = 0.05) greater therapeutic benefit than did placebo. Severely depressed patients (HAM-D > or = 30) responded better to fluvoxamine in five of six measures. Side-effects from fluvoxamine were similar to those reported for other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (nausea, somnolence) and were well tolerated. Imipramine was associated with anticholinergic effects such as dry mouth and dizziness. The pharmacokinetic properties of fluvoxamine which allow the drug to be administered as a single daily dose should aid in the maintenance of patient compliance, while offering significant clinical benefit in the improvement of depressive symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Fluvoxamine versus imipramine and placebo: a double-blind comparison in depressed patients. 880 49

The results of an open tolerability and exploratory efficacy study of bretazenil, a partial benzodiazepine-receptor agonist in hospitalized schizophrenic patients with an acute psychotic episode (DSM-III-R criteria), are presented. The duration of the study was 6 weeks, with a mandatory titration (ascending doses of 3-18 mg/day) period of 14 days. The assessment criteria for tolerability were the frequency of adverse events (including EPS), vital signs and laboratory tests. The efficacy criteria, which were only descriptively analysed, were: (a) Clinical Global Impression (CGI, percentage of "very much" and "much" improvement); and (b) change in BPRS total score (e.g. percentage of patients showing > or = 40% decrease of BPRS score at the end of the treatment). Sixty-six patients (aged 21-62 years) with acute episodes of schizophrenia of moderate to marked severity (mean BPRS score = 46.3, range 26-76) were included in the study. Of these 66 patients (68%) were reportedly non-responders (n = 10) or partial responders (n = 35) to previous neuroleptic therapy. Twenty patients (30%) terminated the trial prematurely due to therapeutic failure (no improvement or worsening after 2 weeks of treatment), 17% of patients dropped out due to other reasons (transfer to other hospitals, withdrawal of consent, intercurrent diseases) and 4.5% of patients stopped the treatment due to adverse reactions. Four patients (6%) showed early complete remission and refused to be further treated. The analysis of efficacy (intention-to-treat) revealed a sustained decrease of BPRS scores with 49% of patients showing > or = 40% BPRS score change by the end of the treatment. Forty-four per cent of patients improved "very much" or "much". Eleven patients (17%) were full responders (BPRS score decrease 75-100%) and 21 patients (32%) showed at least 40% reduction of BPRS score. The reduction of BPRS scores in completers only was 60%. All BPRS factor scores decreased in parallel and, particularly, no preferential decrease of anxiety/depression subscores was found. The analysis of tolerability showed that 59% of patients presented no complaints at all. The most frequent treatment-related adverse reactions in the remaining patients were: sedation (n = 14), dizziness (n = 4) and headache (n = 3). The results of this study suggest moderate antipsychotic efficacy of bretazenil in schizophrenic patients. They encourage further investigations of partial benzodiazepine-receptor agonists in this indication, particularly because of the excellent tolerability and lack of extrapyramidal side-effects.
 ...
PMID:Antipsychotic effects of bretazenil, a partial benzodiazepine agonist in acute schizophrenia--a study group report. 890 33

In this double-blind study, patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomized to receive either ziprasidone 80 mg/day (n = 106) or 160 mg/day (n = 104) or placebo (n = 92), for 6 weeks. Both doses of ziprasidone were statistically significantly more effective than placebo in improving the PANSS total, BPRS total, BPRS core items, CGI-S, and PANSS negative subscale scores (p < .05). Ziprasidone 160 mg/day significantly improved depressive symptoms in patients with clinically significant depression at baseline (MADRS > or = 14, over-all mean 23.5) (p < .05) as compared with placebo. The percentage of patients experiencing adverse events was similar in each treatment group, and resultant discontinuation was rare. The most frequent adverse events associated with ziprasidone were generally mild dyspepsia, nausea, dizziness, and transient somnolence. Ziprasidone was shown to have a very low liability for inducing movement disorders and weight gain. The results indicate that ziprasidone is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of the positive, negative, and depressive symptoms of an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
 ...
PMID:Ziprasidone 80 mg/day and 160 mg/day in the acute exacerbation of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a 6-week placebo-controlled trial. Ziprasidone Study Group. 1019 29

The aim of the reported trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of memantine in mild to moderate vascular dementia (VaD). This was a 28-week, double-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial of memantine 20 mg daily versus placebo which was conducted in 54 centres in the UK. Memantine is a uncompetitive, moderate affinity N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist. Patients with a diagnosis of probable VaD and Mini Mental State Examination total scores between 10 and 22 were eligible for inclusion. Primary efficacy parameters were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) and the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C). A total of 579 patients were randomized and 548 patients with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment qualified for the intent-to-treat analysis. At endpoint, memantine was shown to improve cognition relative to placebo in VaD: the change of ADAS-cog from baseline differed by a mean of -1.75 points (95% confidence intervals -3.023 to -0.49) and a median of 2 points between the two groups, while CGI-C ratings showed no significant differences between treatment groups. A total of 77% of all memantine-treated patients experienced adverse event, versus 75% of the placebo-treated patients, dizziness being the most frequent adverse event (11% versus 8%, respectively). Memantine was well tolerated and safe.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study of memantine in mild to moderate vascular dementia (MMM500). 1240 83

Elderly psychiatric patients often present with psychotic symptoms that need antipsychotic treatment. Olanzapine is one of the atypical antipsychotics with efficacy for psychotic symptoms and a safer side-effect profile than typical antipsychotics. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of olanzapine for treatment of geriatric psychosis. The sample population comprised 94 acute-ward patients who were 65 years of age or older. Clinical assessment was conducted at baseline and also at 4 weeks after commencement of olanzapine treatment, with use of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) instruments. A 4-week therapeutic evaluation was completed for 80 patients, 73 of whom (91.3%) experienced mild to substantial improvement as determined from the CGI-I. A mean 52.6% reduction from baseline was also determined from the BPRS. The mean daily dosage of olanzapine in the fourth week was 10.1 +/- 5.3 mg/d (range, 2.5-20.0). Higher olanzapine dosages were administered for patients with functional psychoses than for an analogous group with organic mental disorders. Adverse effects were monitored for all 94 patients, the most common of which were somnolence (18.1%), dizziness (18.1%), and weakness of legs or bradykinesia (16.0%). Body weight and fasting triglyceride and sugar levels were significantly elevated after olanzapine treatment (2.2, 39.9, and 8.9% from baseline, respectively). It seems reasonable to suggest that olanzapine is efficacious for geriatric patients with psychosis and that the dosage should be diagnosis-dependent.
 ...
PMID:The efficacy and safety of olanzapine for the treatment of geriatric psychosis. 1264 Feb 11

Despite therapeutic treatment with lithium or valproate, patients with bipolar I disorder often require adjunctive therapy to treat persistent symptoms. In order to evaluate the effects of quetiapine for bipolar symptoms inadequately responsive to mood stabilizers, a retrospective chart review was undertaken at the Veterans Affairs (VA) Long Beach Mood Disorders Clinic for all bipolar I outpatients who had been prescribed adjunctive quetiapine during an 18-month study period. Among 75 lithium- or valproate-treated patients receiving quetiapine, 16 were identified in whom therapeutic treatment with lithium (> or =0.8 meq/l) or valproate (> or =75 microg/ml) could be verified during the 2-month period prior to quetiapine initiation. Chart notes were utilized by the principal investigator to assign Clinical Global Impression Bipolar ratings (CGI-BP) before and after 30-120 days of quetiapine treatment (mean=173+/-157 mg). Nine of 16 lithium- or valproate-stabilized bipolar patients (56%) were judged much or very much improved in CGI-BP overall ratings following adjunctive quetiapine. In addition, for the entire sample, quetiapine augmentation resulted in significant improvements in clinician-rated bipolar severity scores (CGI-BP) for mania, depression, and overall bipolar illness. The majority of quetiapine-related symptomatic improvement was due to diminished insomnia, agitation, irritability, and mood disturbance. Side effects were mild and transitory including sedation and dizziness. Low-dose quetiapine may be a useful and well-tolerated adjunct for some bipolar patients with incomplete response to lithium or valproate.
 ...
PMID:Adjunctive quetiapine in bipolar patients partially responsive to lithium or valproate. 1292 20

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy of gepirone immediate-release (gepirone-IR) for relapse prevention in outpatients with MDD who had responded to initial gepirone-IR therapy. Patients with MDD and a HAM-D(25) score > or = 20 were treated with open-label gepirone-IR 20 to 90 mg/day for 6 weeks. Responders with a HAM-D(17) total score < or = 12 or with a > or = 50% reduction in total HAM-D(17) score and at least a "much improved" or "very much improved" CGI improvement score, were randomized to gepirone-IR or placebo for six additional weeks. Time to relapse was defined in six ways [(1) return to > or = 75% of baseline HAM-D(17) total score; (2) CGI improvement score of "no change" or "minimally worse," "much worse" or "very much worse" than baseline (> or = 4); and four more definitions combining the HAM-D(17) or CGI criteria with discontinuation, or discontinuation due to lack of efficacy] and analyzed for the ITT population using the LOCF method. Of 134 patients in the open-label phase, 70 were responders. In the double-blind phase, the relapse rate was significantly lower with gepirone-IR than with placebo (P < or = 0.05) for four of the six definitions of relapse. Discontinuations of gepirone-IR due to adverse events were observed for 26.9% of patients in the open-label phase, and four patients (6%) during the double-blind phase. The most frequent adverse events with gepirone-IR were dizziness, nausea, headache, and somnolence, and with placebo were headache and paresthesia. A relapse-prevention study of longer duration is needed to confirm these preliminary results. Gepirone-IR was significantly more effective than placebo for relapse prevention and demonstrated acceptable tolerability in outpatient responders with MDD.
 ...
PMID:Sustained efficacy of gepirone-IR in major depressive disorder: a double-blind placebo substitution trial. 1500 31

Chinese herbal medicines possess the therapeutic potential for mood disorders. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of the herbal medicine called Free and Easy Wanderer Plus (FEWP) as an adjunct to carbamazepine (CBZ) in patients with bipolar disorders. One hundred and twenty-four bipolar depressed and 111 manic patients were randomized to treatment with CBZ alone, CBZ plus FEWP, or equivalent placebo for 12 weeks. CBZ was initiated at 300mg/day and FEWP was given at a fixed dose of 36g/day. Efficacy measures included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale , Young Mania Rating Scale, Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S). CBZ monotherapy produced significantly greater improvement on manic measures at week 2 through endpoint and CGI-S of depression at endpoint compared to placebo. CBZ monotherapy also yielded significantly higher clinical response rates than placebo on bipolar depression (63.8% vs. 34.8%, p=0.044) and mania (87.8% vs. 57.1%, p=0.012). Compared to CBZ monotherapy, adjunctive FEWP with CBZ resulted in significantly better outcomes on the three measures of depression at week 4 and week 8 and significantly greater clinical response rate in depressed subjects (84.8% vs. 63.8%, p=0.032), but failed to produce significantly greater improvement on manic measures and the response rate in manic subjects. There was a lesser incidence of dizziness and fatigue in the combination therapy compared to CBZ monotherapy. These results suggest that adjunctive FEWP has additive beneficial effects in bipolar patients, particularly for those in depressive phase.
 ...
PMID:Adjunctive herbal medicine with carbamazepine for bipolar disorders: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. 1608 Nov 6

Quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic, is effective for psychosis in younger patients, with limited adverse effects reported. This open-label naturalistic study was conducted to assess the 4-week efficacy and safety of quetiapine for treatment of geriatric psychosis. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) instruments before and after 4 weeks of quetiapine treatment. The sample population consisted of 100 geropsychiatric inpatients with psychosis, with the therapeutic evaluation completed by 91. Eighty-one of these 91 patients (89.0%) experienced mild-to-substantial improvement, as determined from the CGI-I. Further, a mean reduction in BPRS score of 39.5% (from baseline) was also determined. The mean daily dose of quetiapine for the fourth week was 276.1 177.2mg/day (range 50-800). Higher quetiapine dosages were administered for patients with functional psychoses compared to an analogous group with organic mental disorders. The most common adverse effects were somnolence (30.0%), lower-limb weakness (28.0%) and dizziness (27.0%). Body weight and fasting triglyceride were significantly elevated after quetiapine treatment (2.2% and 8.9% from baseline, respectively). Based on the results of this study, it appears that quetiapine is an efficacious and safe treatment for geriatric inpatients with psychosis, however, there is a wide dosing range and optimal dosage is diagnosis-dependent.
 ...
PMID:The efficacy and safety of quetiapine for treatment of geriatric psychosis. 1627 89


1 2 Next >>