Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

An illness characterized by weakness, dizziness, and gastrointestinal symtoms was identified among a crew of 30 migrant field-workers employed by a grape grower in Madera County, California, during August 1987. The onset of symptoms occurred between August 24 and August 30 and a median of 9 days from the date of first employment. The first crew member sought medical treatment on August 26, and 10 crew members were admitted to hospital between August 27 and August 30. For most workers, gastrointestinal and constitutional symptoms resolved shortly after admission, but 4 patients had episodes of severe sinus bradycardia persisting for several days. On the day of admission, transient atrioventricular dissociation developed in 2 persons. Interviews with 16 crew members not admitted to the hospital identified only 1 additional worker ill with gastrointestinal symptoms, but all 16 had moderate to severe inhibition of both plasma and red blood cell cholinesterase. Four other workers who were tested but not interviewed also had cholinesterase depression. The crew had had exposure since August 19 to the organophosphate insecticide phosalone, which was last applied to the vineyard on July 21, or 29 days earlier. Although this is the first report unequivocally linking phosalone to field-worker poisoning, the delayed onset and nonspecific nature of the symptoms associated with subacute poisoning may have hindered the recognition of previous similar episodes.
West J Med 1990 Dec
PMID:Subacute poisoning with phosalone, an organophosphate insecticide. 229 66

In this double-blind study in general practice, 444 patients were randomized to ketanserin (K, 40 mg b.i.d.) and 229 patients were randomized to propranolol (P, 80 mg b.i.d.). After 3 months, more patients on K (15%) than on P (9%) had been withdrawn (p less than 0.02). Although at 3 months the falls in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were similar in both groups, the reduction in SBP was slower on K, and up to 2 months SBP was higher on K than on P (p less than 0.04 or less). At randomization and after 3 months, average weights were similar in both groups. However, during the first month of the study, patients on K gained weight, and this change in weight differed (p less than 0.02) from the unchanged weight on P. On K, BP lowering was greater when weight gain was less. Multiple regression analysis showed that after adjusting for BP at randomization and subsequent weight changes, DBP at 1 month on K was lower with advancing age, whereas SBP and DBP at 1 and 3 months on P were higher with age. Severe adverse effects were absent. However, dry mouth, edema, fatigue, and dizziness occurred more frequently with K (p less than 0.04 or less).
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1988 Dec
PMID:Double-blind comparison of ketanserin and propranolol in hypertensive patients. 246 91

The effect of cilazapril, a new inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme, in a dosage of 2.5 or 5 mg once daily, was compared with that of hydrochlorothiazide 25 or 50 mg in 169 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Blood pressure at entry was 158/103 mm Hg (cilazapril) and 160/103 mm Hg (hydrochlorothiazide). Cilazapril 2.5 mg caused a decrease in blood pressure of 14.7 +/- 2.3/12.6 +/- 1.2 mm Hg compared with a decrease of 12.6 +/- 2.2/10.2 +/- 1.2 mm Hg with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg. Those patients who required an increase of dosage to the higher level then showed decreases of 15.0 +/- 2.1/14.3 +/- 1.2 (cilazapril) and 19.7 +/- 1.9/13.3 +/- 1.2 hydrochlorothiazide. All decreases in blood pressure were statistically significant but were not statistically different from each other. Fifty-one percent of patients reached a sitting diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or less receiving 2.5 mg of cilazapril and an additional 28 percent of patients reached this goal receiving 5 mg. The figures for patients receiving hydrochlorothiazide were comparable: 36 and 35 percent. Twenty-one adverse events remotely, possibly, or probably related to therapy were reported with cilazapril and 32 with hydrochlorothiazide. Three patients withdrew from cilazapril because of mild angioedema, headaches, and chest pain, respectively, and three patients withdrew from hydrochlorothiazide treatment because of fatigue, dizziness, and gastric hemorrhage. Hydrochlorothiazide caused a decrease in potassium levels and an increase in levels of cholesterol, uric acid, urea and - gamma cilazapril had no adverse biochemical effects. Cilazapril lowered blood pressure to the same extent as hydrochlorothiazide. Young patients had better responses to cilazapril than to hydrochlorothiazide. It is concluded that cilazapril is an effective and safe drug for patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
Am J Med 1989 Dec 26
PMID:Efficacy of cilazapril compared with hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Multicentre Study Group. 253 59

Cilazapril is a structurally new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor that lacks a sulfhydryl moiety. Its duration of action is consistent with a once-daily regimen. Cilazapril was studied in multiple-dose trials that included more than 4,500 hypertensive patients worldwide. Approximately 450 patients received cilazapril as monotherapy for more than one year, and another 430 patients were treated with cilazapril in combination with hydrochlorothiazide for more than six months. Cilazapril at doses of 2.5 to 5 mg once daily is clinically and statistically significantly more effective than placebo and as effective after eight weeks of therapy as hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, propranolol sustained release, captopril, and enalapril at the doses recommended by the manufacturers. The overall incidence of adverse events observed during cilazapril therapy is comparable with that seen with placebo in double-blind studies. Cilazapril 2.5 to 5 mg once daily seems to be better tolerated than hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol. Only five adverse events were reported at an incidence of 1 percent or more in controlled trials; these were headache, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, and chest pain, which all occurred at a frequency similar to that with placebo. Overall, cilazapril is effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of patients with hypertension.
Am J Med 1989 Dec 26
PMID:Cilazapril: a new non-thiol-containing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Worldwide clinical experience in hypertension. 253 61

Although calcium antagonists may impair insulin release in vitro, clinical studies have produced conflicting results. Felodipine is a highly selective dihydropyridine calcium antagonist effective in the treatment of hypertension. The efficacy of felodipine was assessed in a double-blind randomized placebo cross-over study of 21 Type 2 diabetic patients with primary hypertension, 13 men and 8 women, with an age of 61 (range 46-73) years. Thirteen were controlled on oral hypoglycaemic therapy and 8 on diet alone. Mean (SD) blood pressure (mmHg) was 176(20)/102(8) after a 2-4 week placebo run-in period, 169(21)/101(8) during the subsequent placebo period compared with 151(15)/88(9) after 4 weeks felodipine therapy (p less than 0.001). Nineteen patients required 5 mg twice daily and 2 patients 10 mg twice daily to achieve a target diastolic pressure of 95 mmHg. Side-effects seen with felodipine included ankle oedema, facial flushing, headache, and dizziness. During oral glucose tolerance tests performed after the felodipine and placebo phases, mean (SD) fasting blood glucose was 9.5(3.1) and 9.0(3.0) mmol l-1, respectively (NS), and the 90 min (peak) blood glucose was 19.1(4.8) and 18.1(4.8) mmol l-1, respectively (NS). Glycosylated haemoglobin and fructosamine concentrations likewise showed no significant changes.
Diabet Med 1989 Dec
PMID:A trial of the calcium antagonist felodipine in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. 253 42

Fifteen hundred randomly chosen Finnish children aged 0-15 years were studied by a questionnaire about their sauna habits and possible abnormal symptoms during or immediately after the sauna. A total of 1247 families (83%) answered. Almost all children visited the sauna (98.5%), most of them "with pleasure" (83%). Nearly half of the children were in the sauna as often as 2-3 times a week, and over 90% at least once a week. The children's sauna visits began quite early, in 70% during infancy. The time spent in a hot steam bath increased with age. Symptoms were rare and were not serious. Transient symptoms (dizziness, nausea etc.) were the most common. Of the children, 17% had some chronic or recurring disorder, most commonly atopic dermatitis or middle ear infections. In half of the cases of atopic dermatitis it became worse in the sauna. Sauna is a very common practice in Finland, also among children. It does not seem to cause any significant immediate harm to healthy children.
Eur J Pediatr 1989 Dec
PMID:Sauna habits and related symptoms in Finnish children. 261 14

Electronystagmography was used to examine 103 elderly patients complaining of dizziness. This series of tests included tests for pathologic nystagmus, saccades, smooth pursuit, and optokinetic nystagmus, as well as bithermal caloric testing and rotational testing. One or more specific diagnoses were identified in 100 patients (86.2%), with the two most common diagnoses being benign positional vertigo (30 patients, or 25.9%) and cerebrovascular disorders (25 patients, or 21.6%). An abnormality was found on ENG in 75 (65%) of the patients tested, the most common of these being a unilateral hypoexcitability to caloric stimulation. In most cases, the ENG data was used to support a presumptive diagnosis that was based on the patient's history and examination, although in 4 cases ENG provided the critical diagnostic information by identifying decreased caloric and rotational responses in patients with nonspecific dizziness and dysequilibrium.
Ear Nose Throat J 1989 Dec
PMID:Quantitative vestibular function testing in elderly patients with dizziness. 262 Jun 43

The three best-described genetic polymorphisms of drug metabolism--the debrisoquin/sparteine type of oxidative polymorphism (hereafter referred to as the debrisoquin polymorphism), the polymorphism of N-acetylation, and the mephenytoin type of oxidative polymorphism--are reviewed. For all three polymorphisms, the poor-metabolizer phenotype is inherited as an autosomal recessive trait. The debrisoquin and mephenytoin oxidative polymorphisms involve defects in two separate cytochrome P450 enzymes. The prevalence of the poor-metabolizer phenotype for debrisoquin ranges between 2% and 10% for groups of various ethnic origins. The poor-metabolizer phenotype for mephenytoin comprises about 5% of the Caucasian population and about 20% of the Japanese population. N-acetyltransferase is a cytosolic enzyme whose clinical polymorphism was discovered using isoniazid as the substrate probe. The prevalence of the slow-acetylator phenotype among American and European Caucasian and American black groups is about 50%; among the Japanese it is about 10%. More than 20 agents are substrates for debrisoquin hydroxylase, about 15 for N-acetyltransferase, and 3-5 for mephenytoin. In poor metabolizers, debrisoquin can cause hypotension, and sparteine can cause blurred vision, headache, and dizziness. Clinical consequences of the slow-acetylator phenotype include increased susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus induced by procainamide and hydralazine, peripheral neuropathy induced by isoniazid, hydralazine, and dapsone, and sulfasalazine-induced dose-related leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, headache, and vertigo. After administration of mephenytoin, poor metabolizers have increased somnolence and intellectual impairment. Awareness of genetic polymorphisms of drug metabolism should improve understanding of interindividual variability in drug disposition and response.
Clin Pharm 1989 Dec
PMID:Polymorphic drug metabolism. 268 60

The safety profile of ofloxacin was evaluated on the basis of adverse reactions and abnormal laboratory values seen in United States clinical trials and phase I studies addressing specific issues. The most frequently reported adverse reactions occurring in 2,197 patients who received three to 10 days of ofloxacin in United States clinical trials were nausea (3.5 percent), insomnia (1.8 percent), headache (1.4 percent), and dizziness (1.2 percent). Adverse reactions were not serious and usually rapidly reversible. The incidence of adverse reactions did not increase with increasing age. There is no clinically significant interaction with methylxanthines (caffeine or theophylline). Crystalluria was not observed. Ofloxacin is a well-tolerated fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent.
Am J Med 1989 Dec 29
PMID:The safety profile of ofloxacin. 269 Jun 23

Urapidil is a postsynaptic alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist with a pharmacodynamic profile similar to prazosin. Unlike prazosin, however, urapidil also has some central activity which may explain the apparent improved tolerability of urapidil, including the absence of first-dose syncope. In clinical trials urapidil therapy resulted in significant reductions in blood pressure in patients with mild to severe essential hypertension, with little influence on heart rate. It is an effective antihypertensive when administered as monotherapy or in combination with beta-blockers and thiazide diuretics. In the few patients with cardiac dysfunction who have been studied to date, urapidil has improved myocardial oxygen consumption, systemic vascular resistance, left ventricular function, cardiac output and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; however, further study is needed to assess the full therapeutic potential of urapidil in these patients. Urapidil has also been used successfully in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies, including eclampsia and pre-eclampsia, hypertensive crisis and hypertension occurring during general and cardiac surgery, rapidly lowering blood pressure without altering heart rate. Urapidil does not affect lipid or glucose metabolism, nor does it impair renal function. In addition, urapidil may be beneficial to patients with pulmonary hypertension, in whom it dilates pulmonary vascular beds to a greater extent than systemic vasculature, although therapeutic trials have not examined this effect. The most common adverse effects associated with urapidil therapy are dizziness, nausea, headache, fatigue and palpitations; however, these tend to be mild and transient and usually do not require discontinuation of treatment. Thus, urapidil offers a useful alternative to currently available drugs for the treatment of mild to severe hypertension, either as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs.
Drugs 1989 Dec
PMID:Urapidil. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the treatment of hypertension. 269 46


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>