Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Amlodipine, a potent long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, was compared with placebo in a parallel, randomized, double-blind study in 134 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris maintained on beta-adrenergic blocking agents. After a single-blind, two-week placebo period, patients were randomized to receive either amlodipine (2.5, 5, and 10 mg) or placebo once daily for four weeks. The effects of amlodipine on maximal exercise time, work, time to angina onset, and subjective indices including angina frequency, nitroglycerin tablet consumption, and patient and investigator ratings were assessed. Each dose of amlodipine produced increases in exercise time and calculated total work accomplished compared to baseline. Improvements at 5 and 10 mg were significantly greater than placebo which produced no significant change (p less than 0.05). Qualitative improvements in the severity of angina were produced by amlodipine at 5 and 10 mg daily assessed by patient-rating questionnaires (p less than 0.05). Reductions in angina frequency attacks per week and weekly nitroglycerin tablet consumption occurred but were not statistically significant when compared with placebo. Adverse effects observed during amlodipine treatment prompted discontinuation of treatment in only 2 out of 100 patients. Three patients discontinued treatment for reported lack of efficacy. No laboratory abnormalities prompted treatment discontinuation and minor side effects of dizziness, nausea, headache, and fatigue were observed infrequently. The results of this controlled, large-scale multicenter trial suggest that amlodipine significantly increased exercise capacity and was well tolerated when added to the antianginal regimen of patients remaining symptomatic while receiving beta-blocking agents.
 ...
PMID:Amlodipine combined with beta blockade for chronic angina: results of a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized double-blind study. 135 85

The frequency and severity of adverse effects during the first 14 days of treatment with amlodipine (5 mg once daily), nifedipine retard (20 mg twice daily) or placebo were compared in a multicentre, three-way, cross-over study involving 97 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. All three groups of patients were well matched for age, sex and baseline blood pressure. Amlodipine and nifedipine retard produced highly significant and comparable reductions in blood pressure, indicating that the doses were therapeutically equivalent. The incidence of adverse effects considered to be definitely or probably related to nifedipine retard treatment (41%) was significantly higher than for placebo (16%, p less than 0.01) or amlodipine (27%, p less than 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of vasodilator-related adverse effects between amlodipine and placebo. In contrast, headache, flushing and dizziness were reported more frequently by patients while on nifedipine retard than on placebo or amlodipine. The convenience of once-daily dosing, together with a lower incidence of adverse effects, with consequently fewer withdrawals from therapy, suggests that amlodipine has clinical advantages over nifedipine retard in the treatment of hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of early side effects with amlodipine and nifedipine retard in hypertension. 153 16

We designed a study to determine the efficacy and safety of amlodipine given once daily in the pediatric population. Twenty-one patients (mean age 13.1 years) with either essential (n=160) or renal (n=5) hypertension, and newly diagnosed (n=15) or poorly controlled or intolerant on existing antihypertensive therapy (n=6), were included. Patients received amlodipine once daily at a starting mean dose of 0.07+/-0.04 mg/kg per day. The total daily dose of amlodipine was increased 25%-50% every 5-7 days if the mean home blood pressure measurements (HBPM) were above the 95th percentile for age and gender. A baseline followed by a repeat 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitor study (ABPM) was performed in 20 patients when the mean HBPM was below the 95th percentile goal. The mean titrated dose required to control BP was 0.29+/-0.11 mg/kg per day for those < 13 years, 0.16+/-0.11 mg/kg per day for those > or = 13 years, 0.23+/-0.14 mg/kg per day for essential, hypertension and 0.24+/-0.13 mg/kg per day for renal hypertension. The ABPM demonstrated that amlodipine provided effective BP control as primary therapy in 14 essential patients. Adverse effects included fatigue (n=6), headache (n=5), facial flushing (n=4), dizziness (n=3), edema (n=3), abdominal pain (n=3), chest pain (n=2), nausea (n=1), and vomiting (n=1). Quality of life appeared to improve during therapy. Amlodipine was an effective once daily antihypertensive agent with an acceptable safety profile. Higher doses of amlodipine were required for younger patients, and monotherapy was effective in patients with essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of amlodipine in pediatric patients with hypertension. 1045 79

Amlodipine as a monotherapy was evaluated in 20 patients with mild, moderate, and severe hypertension over a 10 week period. After a washout period of 4 weeks, Amlodipine was administered at a dose of 5 mg once daily for 2 weeks and increased to 10 mg once daily if diastolic blood pressure did not fall to below 90 mmHg. At the end of the trial, diastolic blood pressure was reduced to below 90 mmHg in all but four patients. However, these four patients had greater than 20 mmHg reduction in diastolic blood pressure. There was a slight, but insignificant increase in heart rate. Dizziness and weakness occurred in one patient, otherwise, the drug was well tolerated. Laboratory tests, including plasma lipids done at the start and end of the trial, remained unchanged.
 ...
PMID:Amlodipine as monotherapy in hypertensive Africans: clinical efficacy and safety studies. 1045 92

The safety and efficacy of Amlodipine (AML) for mild to moderate hypertension was evaluated in a "real life" setting. This open non-comparative trial included 123 men and 143 women (age 30-91 years, mean 59.4). All had sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 115 mmHg, confirmed in most by 2 baseline measurements, 2 weeks apart. Eligible patients were given AML 5 mg daily as add-on or monotherapy and were evaluated 4 weeks later. If DBP was then > 90 mmHg, the daily dose was raised to 10 mg; those with < 90 mmHg remained on 5 mg. AML was continued for 8 weeks. Other BP-lowering drugs were unchanged. Of the original 266 patients 22 (8.2%) withdrew due to adverse events (AE), and others were protocol violators, lost to follow-up or withdrew, leaving 211 available for efficacy analysis. In this major group BP was reduced from 165 +/- 15/101 +/- 4 to 139 +/- 11/83 +/- 5 after 12 weeks of AML (p < 0.05). The reduction was greater in those under 70 years, from 173 +/- 12/100 +/- 5 to 142 +/- 12/80 +/- 4 (p < 0.05). In those with BMI > 30 kg/m2, BP decreased from 165 +/- 15/101 +/- 5 to 140 +/- 12/83 +/- 5 (p < 0.05). Mean change in heart rate was -1.5 bpm (p < 0.05). Mean final AML dose was 5.5 mg/day. The most common AML-related AE requiring cessation of the drug was pedal edema in 2.6% of the 266 patients; in 3.7% it persisted during therapy. Other AE occurring in > 1% were dizziness in 1.8%, headache 1.5%, flushing 1.1% and fatigue 1.1%. We conclude that AML is an effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive suitable for most hypertensive patients.
 ...
PMID:[Multicenter community-based trial of amlodipine in hypertension in Israel]. 1095 90

Amlodipine, a long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocking agent, was administered to 55 children (age: 11.5 +/- 5.4 years) with hypertension, 49 of whom (89%) had secondary hypertension. Efficacy was assessed by comparing pretreatment blood pressure (BP) to follow-up BP obtained in our outpatient Pediatric Nephrology clinic. Thirty-two (58%) patients achieved BP control with amlodipine alone, and 31 (55%) patients received amlodipine twice daily. Eleven patients received amlodipine as a suspension. Mean amlodipine dose was 0.16 +/- 0.12 mg/kg/day; there was an inverse relationship between patient age and amlodipine dose. Follow-up BP were significantly lower than pretreatment BP: systolic BP fell from 129 +/- 12 to 122 +/- 12 mm Hg (P = .004), and diastolic BP fell from 78 +/- 13 to 70 +/- 19 mm Hg (P = .003). A small, clinically insignificant increase in heart rate (from 91 +/- 19 beats/min to 99 +/- 26 beats/min; P = .02) occurred during amlodipine treatment. Adverse effects reported included dizziness (three patients), fatigue (two patients), flushing (two patients), and leg edema (one patient). All improved with dose reduction. We conclude that amlodipine provides effective BP control without significant adverse effects in children with hypertension, and can be used as monotherapy in most children. Young children appear to require significantly higher doses per kilogram of body weight than older children. Twice-daily dosing may be required in many children to achieve BP control. Detailed pharmacokinetic studies are needed to confirm these observations.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of hypertensive children with amlodipine. 1104 Nov 59

Blood pressure and headache frequency were evaluated in normotensive male and female cocaine-dependent patients (N=43) participating in a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of amlodipine for the treatment of cocaine dependence. Amlodipine produced a significant reduction in both systolic (p=0.04) and diastolic (p=0.01) blood pressures without producing dizziness or faintness. Placebo subjects had about three times the frequency of headaches compared to the amlodipine-treated subjects (p=0.004). The high frequency of headaches reported by cocaine-dependent individuals was significantly reduced by amlodipine and may reflect improved cerebrovascular tone.
 ...
PMID:Amlodipine reduces blood pressure and headache frequency in cocaine-dependent outpatients. 1256 10

A previous article on the safety of amlodipine reviewed data from over 4,000 subjects who participated in clinical trials sponsored by Pfizer Central Research. Once-daily amlodipine was shown to be a well-tolerated treatment of hypertension and myocardial ischemia. Although amlodipine is a potent vasodilator, there was a low incidence of side effects such as headache, flushing, and dizziness. Amlodipine was not associated with adverse effects on hematologic or biochemical safety parameters nor on serum cholesterol or triglyceride levels. Amlodipine did not alter electrical conduction in the heart. Amlodipine had a favorable safety profile in comparative trials vs. beta-blockers. The data base of comparative trials vs. other calcium antagonists was small but the toleration of amlodipine was similar to that of verapamil and diltiazem. No data from comparative trials vs. another calcium antagonist of the dihydropyridine class have been available. This article reviews data from recently completed trials vs. nitrendipine and from trials in which amlodipine was used in combination with other agents. Amlodipine was better tolerated than nitrendipine and had a much lower incidence of side effects usually related to vasodilatation. This difference in side-effect profile was especially marked during the first days of treatment. Amlodipine was well tolerated when used in combination with beta-blockers, diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and nitrates. The gradual onset of action and relatively long half-life of amlodipine are the probable cause for the improved toleration in comparison with other dihydropyridines. Besides the low incidence of trivial side effects, increasing clinical experience with amlodipine provides no evidence that amlodipine is a cause of rare but serious adverse effects. It is concluded that amlodipine is an antihypertensive and anti-ischemic agent that has the combined advantages of a good safety profile with once-daily dosage and a smooth onset and long duration of action.
 ...
PMID:An update on the safety of amlodipine. 1629 14

The authors retrospectively examined their experience with amlodipine in the treatment of hypertension in 32 pediatric-aged patients, ranging in age from 4 to 26 years, with blood pressure (BP) readings greater than the 90th percentile for age. Amlodipine was used as the sole therapy in 9 patients and with other antihypertensive therapy in 23 patients. Additional antihypertensive drugs used in combination with amlodipine included beta-adrenergic antagonists, ACE inhibitors, and diuretics. The starting dose of amlodipine was 0.13+/-0.09 mg/kg/d. The dose was increased in 20 of 32 patients to 0.23+/-0.13 mg/kg/d. Amlodipine was administered once daily to 26 patients and twice daily to 6 patients. After therapy with amlodipine was initiated, the systolic BP decreased from 141+/-15 to 132+/-9 mm Hg (P=0.01) and the diastolic BP decreased from 84+/-16 to 77+/-8 mmHg (P=0,03). There were a total of 2145 follow-up BP readings. The follow-up systolic BP was lower than the initial BP prior to starting amlodipine 59% of the time and the diastolic BP was lower than the initial BP 61% of the time. The follow-up systolic BP was lower than the 90th percentile predicted for age 33% of the time after starting amlodipine and the diastolic BF was lower than the 90th percentile for age 52% of the time. Adverse effects were noted in 4 of the 32 patients (12.5%). These included fatigue (n=2), dizziness (n=1), and ankle edema (n=1). Amlodipine therapy was discontinued in only 1 patient (the patient with ankle edema). Given its efficacy, the low incidence of adverse effects, and availability as a suspension, amlodipine is an effective agent for the treatment of hypertension in the pediatric-aged patient.
 ...
PMID:Preliminary experience with amlodipine in the pediatric population. 1677 60

Amlodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker that is used in the management of both hypertension and angina. Amlodipine induced side effects are headache, dizziness, edema, flushing, palpitations, and rarely gingival hyperplasia. The exact reason of amlodipine-induced gingival hyperplasia is not known. We presented a case with chronic renal failure (CRF) that developed gingival hyperplasia due to amlodipine use, which improved after ceasing the drug.
 ...
PMID:Amlodipine-induced gingival hyperplasia in chronic renal failure: a case report. 2351 9


1