Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Carvedilol, a novel beta-blocker with a vasodilating action, was given either alone (monotherapy) or with diuretics (combination therapy) to 42 patients with renal hypertension. The hypotensive effect, safety, and optimal dose were investigated. In all, 23 untreated patients (16 men and 7 women; average age, 56.4 +/- 2.5 years) made up the monotherapy group and 19 diuretic-treated patients (11 men and 8 women; average age, 56.4 +/- 2.5 years) comprised the combined therapy group. All subjects had an initial blood pressure (BP) of greater than 160/95 mmHg and were started on 5 mg/day oral carvedilol. The dose was gradually increased to a maximum of 20 mg/day, or until either the BP was reduced to less than 149/89 mmHg or the reduction in mean BP was greater than 13 mmHg compared with baseline levels. The total study period was 8 weeks. With monotherapy, the BP and heart rate decreased significantly from 167/102 to 150/94 mmHg and from 81 to 74 beats/min, respectively. With combined therapy, the BP and heart rate fell significantly from 176/103 to 142/85 mmHg and from 81 to 70 beats/min, respectively. Responders were defined as subjects with a BP of less than or equal to 149/89 mmHg or those showing a fall of greater than or equal to 13 mmHg in mean BP. Responders accounted for 52.2% of the monotherapy group and 73.6% of the combination therapy group. Orthostatic hypotension was not seen in either group. Serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels were not altered by administration of carvedilol. Dizziness was noted by 1 of the 23 subjects in the monotherapy group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of carvedilol in renal hypertension. A multicenter open trial. 197 8

The efficacy and side-effects of megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer were compared in a prospectively randomized study. The dosage of MA was 2 X 80 mg p.o. or MPA 2 X 500 mg p.o. daily, given as a secondary hormonal treatment, mostly after previous treatment with tamoxifen. Ninety-eight patients entered the study and 92 were evaluable for effect, 48 patients on MA and 44 on MPA. Age, main tumor site and prior treatment were not different, but there was a preponderance of ER-negative tumors in the MA group. Responses appeared to be more frequent in the MPA-treated group (25% vs. 43%), predominantly in bone lesions, 12% for MA and 45% for MPA. Median progression-free survival was comparable, 15 vs. 10 months, and overall survival was not different (20 vs. 16 months). Toxicity was frequent, occurring in 83% vs. 74% of patients: increased appetite, nausea and dizziness in more than 20%, and a preponderance of pyrosis and breathlessness on MA and hot flashes, sweating and tremors on MPA. Cushingoid symptoms were present in about a quarter of the patients treated for more than 3 months. The occurrence of thrombo-embolic episodes and cardiovascular events was evenly distributed. Patients on MPA had more often increase in body weight, systolic blood pressure and serum creatinine than those treated with MA. It is concluded that MPA may be more effective for treatment of bone metastases, at the expense of more progestational side-effects. The occurrence of Cushingoid effects is frequent but similar in both arms, while the incidence of cardiovascular or thrombo-embolic events cannot be related to the use of either compound.
 ...
PMID:A randomized comparison of megestrol acetate (MA) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in patients with advanced breast cancer. 214 91

In a multicenter study in general practice, the tolerability and safety of ramipril alone and in combination with a low dose of furosemide were assessed in moderate hypertension. After a placebo run-in period involving 770 patients, 661 were included in the active treatment period and received ramipril alone (2.5-5 mg/day). After 6 weeks, the nonresponders entered in a double-blind period and they received daily ramipril 10 mg or ramipril 5 mg in combination with furosemide 20 mg. In this hypertensive population, the adverse events more commonly reported were headache, cough, dizziness, asthenia, cramps diarrhea and nausea, but not all these events were related to ramipril. There was seemingly a relation between cough prevalence and rampiril dosage; an increased incidence was also observed during the outbreaks of flu-syndrome in our country. 38 patients discontinued the active treatment due to non-serious adverse events, mainly cough, dizziness or diarrhea. No serious adverse drug reaction was observed. Laboratory data (blood cells count, electrolytes, serum creatinine, fasting blood glucose, apolipoproteins AI and B) remained most commonly unaffected. In moderate hypertension in general practice, this study confirms that ramipril is well tolerated, especially with regard to the class effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:[Tolerance to Triatec in monotherapy and in combination with Lasilix in a French multicenter study]. 214 97

In this study, local and systemic tolerance and pharmacokinetics of trospectomycin sulfate in human beings were evaluated for the first time. Trospectomycin sulfate (U-63,366F; trospectomycin) or sterile saline was administered to 96 healthy male volunteers in doses ranging from 0.25 ml (75 mg) to 3.3 ml (1,000 mg) in a single intramuscular injection in a double-blind, randomized design. Volunteers were screened to establish baseline vital signs and laboratory test values. Pain and tenderness at the injection site, which occurred at doses of 450 mg and above, were the most common side effects; they were mild in severity and transient. Adverse drug experiences reported by subjects included nausea, dizziness, light-headedness, diaphoresis, costal pain, and perioral numbness. The perioral numbness (paresthesia) experienced at doses of 750, 900, and 1,000 mg was probably drug related. No Clostridium difficile toxin was detected in fecal samples. Pharmacokinetic calculations based on data obtained by high-performance liquid chromatography showed that after a 1,000-mg intramuscular dose of trospectomycin (3.3 ml), the serum mean half-life was 1.85 h (1.70 to 2.02 h), mean area under the serum concentration-time curve was 140.2 micrograms.h/ml and was linear with dose, mean peak concentration was 28.3 micrograms/ml (20.4 to 34.7 micrograms/ml), mean time to maximum concentration was 71 min (30 to 120 min), and the elimination rate constant was 0.307 h-1. The elimination rate constant and half-life did not vary with dose. Little trospectomycin was detected in 2-day fecal collections. A few randomly occurring abnormal clinical laboratory test values and vital signs were observed. For the trospectomycin-treated group, creatinine phosphokinase increased substantially for 24 h after injection and then decrease through day 5, while serum glutamic oxalacetic transaminase and lactate dehydrogenase increased slightly.
 ...
PMID:Human safety and pharmacokinetics of a single intramuscular dose of a novel spectinomycin analog, trospectomycin (U-63,366F). 215 Sep 7

In a double-blind 3-month study in mild-to-moderate essential hypertensive patients over 50 years of age, ketanserin, a selective S2-serotoninergic antagonist with additional alpha 1-adrenergic blocking properties, has been compared with enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Supine and upright blood pressures and heart rates were recorded for placebo and during active treatment (-4, -2, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks). Metabolic profile (plasma glucose, creatinine, sodium, potassium, total and HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid) was monitored during treatment with placebo and at the end of the study. Mean blood pressure was equally and significantly (p less than 0.001) lowered by both drugs from 2 weeks of treatment, whereas no changes occurred in mean heart rate or in biochemical variables. Dizziness was observed in three patients on ketanserin and in one patient on enalapril, whereas headache occurred in only one patient on enalapril. These data indicate that ketanserin is as effective and well tolerated as enalapril in hypertensive patients over 50 years of age.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of ketanserin and enalapril in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. 228 42

Throughout the developed world, populations are growing older. Blood pressure, especially systolic blood pressure, increases with aging, and this increase leads to increased risks of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials demonstrate that treatment of hypertension in the elderly reduces overall cardiovascular mortality, cardiac mortality, nonfatal cardiovascular events, congestive heart failure, progression to severe hypertension, and strokes. Drug treatment has been well tolerated, but diuretic therapy has been known to increase plasma glucose, uric acid, and creatinine. Therapeutic trials of nonpharmacologic treatment may be indicated in those with mild elevation in blood pressure and no serious end organ disease. However, most people up to age 80 will require drug treatment. Many drugs are effective in the elderly, but, some like beta-blockers, may not be as effective as in younger patients. Controlled clinical trials demonstrate that nitrendipine, a calcium channel blocking drug, significantly reduced mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure in older hypertensive patients, (successfully controlling pressure in a high percentage) and was well tolerated. Drug effects persist for 12 h or more. The drug decreased the exercise-induced rise in the rate-pressure product. Although there is a temporary increase in heart rate, this returns to baseline after a short time. Side effects include headache, flushing, dizziness, edema, and palpitations. Therefore, nitrendipine offers a reasonable and useful alternative to many other drugs in the treatment of combined systolic and diastolic hypertension in the elderly.
 ...
PMID:Epidemiologic aspects of elderly hypertensive patients and the results of treatment with nitrendipine. 248 68

This report reviews the tolerability profile of enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, in the treatment of patients with congestive heart failure. Data have been collected from 546 patients treated with enalapril for up to 9 months in clinical trials other than the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study. Results in patients treated with enalapril (n = 193) or placebo (n = 195) in double-blind, controlled clinical trials show that the incidences of death, serious adverse experiences, and adverse experiences requiring discontinuation of double-blind therapy, as well as the overall incidence of such experiences, were similar in the 2 groups. However, certain adverse experiences that are related to the mechanism of action of ACE inhibitors were seen more often after enalapril than after placebo treatment. Dizziness and hypotension were the most frequent adverse experiences reported in patients with heart failure treated with enalapril. The most frequent laboratory adverse experiences were increases in blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels. hyperkalemia was also seen in patients receiving enalapril. It is possible to identify patients at risk of these experiences before initiating treatment with enalapril and to take certain measures (such as withholding or reducing the dose of diuretic drugs and discontinuing potassium supplements or potassium-sparing diuretic drugs) to reduce the likelihood that hypotension, increases in blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels, or hyperkalemia will occur. Angioedema, a recognized adverse effect of ACE inhibitors, was not seen in the clinical trials reviewed here. Cough , another recognized adverse effect of these agents, was seen infrequently and rarely resulted in the discontinuation of enalapril.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Tolerability of enalapril in congestive heart failure. 253 64

Central nervous system (CNS) toxicity from low-dose methotrexate (MTX) has been reported rarely, and reported symptoms consist primarily of dizziness and headache. We reviewed the records of 25 consecutive patients treated with low-dose MTX, and found 5 who had spontaneously reported unpleasant cranial sensations, mood alteration, or memory impairment. Rechallenge with MTX on 5 occasions in 3 patients led to recurrent CNS symptoms in all cases. CNS toxicity was the sole reason for discontinuation of MTX in 2 patients. These 5 patients differed from the 20 without CNS toxicity in age (mean 68 versus 50) and baseline serum creatinine level (1.3 mg/dl versus 0.9 mg/dl), but not in weekly dosage of MTX (12 mg versus 16 mg). These results suggest that CNS toxicity is more common than previously reported, particularly in older patients with mild renal insufficiency.
 ...
PMID:Central nervous system toxicity associated with weekly low-dose methotrexate treatment. 273 64

The effectiveness of enalapril 10-40 mg/day as first choice treatment of mild (90-104 mmHg, n = 37), moderate (105-114 mmHg, n = 21), or severe (115-130 mmHg excluding accelerated hypertension, n = 16) essential hypertension was studied in an open multicentre trial. Enalapril alone controlled the hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 90 mmHg or less) in 25 patients (34%). Of these, 20 had mild and 5 had moderate hypertension. The remaining patients required either enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 or 25 mg/day (n = 30), or a third drug of the physician's choice (n = 9). A relationship was present between baseline blood pressure and the number of drugs required to achieve blood pressure control. Plasma creatinine increased beyond the limits of laboratory error in 3 patients, and from 100-108 mumol/l (p less than 0.05) on enalapril alone in a subgroup of patients who ultimately required a diuretic. Enalapril was well tolerated; 60 (73%) had no drug related side effects during active treatment. Tiredness (n = 5), headache (n = 4), dizziness (n = 4) and palpitations (n = 3) were the most frequent side effects. Cough was a feature in 3 patients and 1 patient had a rash. This study suggests that enalapril is an effective and well tolerated anti-hypertensive agent in mild, moderate or severe hypertension, but that caution may be required in patients with impaired renal function.
 ...
PMID:Enalapril as first choice treatment of mild, moderate and severe essential hypertension: results of an open multicentre clinical trial. New Zealand Hypertension Study Group. 283 97

Lisinopril is a new, nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor approved for the treatment of hypertension. After oral administration, 25-29 percent of the dose is absorbed intact; biotransformation is not required for pharmacological activity. Onset of action occurs one to two hours after administration, with effects still present 24 hours later. The major route of elimination is through renal excretion and an elimination half-life of 12.6 hours has been reported in normotensive individuals. In patients with impaired renal function (creatinine clearance less than or equal to 30 ml/min) a longer half-life and accumulation have been observed. Lisinopril 20-80 mg/d has been shown to be as effective as hydrochlorothiazide, nifedipine, and beta-blocking agents in the treatment of essential hypertension. Its efficacy in renovascular hypertension has also been demonstrated. In congestive heart failure (CHF) doses of 2.5-20 mg/d appear to provide hemodynamic effects comparable to those of captopril. Dizziness and cough have been the most frequently reported side effects; rash and proteinuria have also been reported in a small number of patients. Interactions with diuretics, potassium supplements, and possibly with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents may occur. Lisinopril appears to be similar in efficacy to other antihypertensive agents in the treatment of essential hypertension and to captopril in the treatment of CHF. Whether lisinopril is safer or more effective than captopril or enalapril in the treatment of hypertension or CHF requires further investigation. Prolonged duration of action of lisinopril allows once daily dosing, unlike captopril for which dosing is required every 8-12 hours or enalapril which may necessitate twice daily dosing.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril: a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. 283 26


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>