Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The thalamic pain syndrome, a rare sequelae of cerebrovascular event, is a severe and disabling form of central pain which treatment remains a major clinical problem. We present our results of a preliminary open label study using mexiletine, an orally active antiarrhythmic agent, in the management of thalamic pain in 9 patients. Using a dose of 10 mg/kg/day over a 4-week period, mexiletine produced improvement in pain in 8 of the 9 patients. Mexiletine was generally well tolerated with only two patients experiencing transient nausea and dizziness. Our findings suggest that mexiletine may be a safe and effective agent in the management of thalamic pain and possibly other paroxysmal pain syndromes of central origin.
 ...
PMID:Mexiletine for thalamic pain syndrome. 208 39

Mexiletine is a Class IB antiarrhythmic which has basic and clinical electrophysiologic properties similar to lidocaine. Like other Class I antiarrhythmic agents, mexiletine blocks the rapid inward sodium current responsible for phase 0 of the action potential. It has been noted in the clinical electrophysiology laboratory to have minimal effect on sinus node function and AV nodal and His-Purkinje system conduction. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that oral absorption is rapid with bioavailability of 80-90%. Mexiletine is predominantly metabolized by the liver with elimination half-life of 9 to 12 hours. The antiarrhythmic effects of the primary drug's metabolites remain to be defined. Hemodynamic studies have shown mexiletine to have a lesser negative inotropic effect than procainamide or disopyramide. Although mexiletine as a single agent successfully suppresses 60 to 80% of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias, it has lower efficacy in suppression of induced ventricular arrhythmias. Multiple studies have shown that as monotherapy mexiletine is effective in preventing the induction of ventricular tachycardia in approximately 20% of patients. When used in combination with a Class IA antiarrhythmic drug for suppression of induced ventricular arrhythmias, multiple investigators have reported greater efficacy. Neurological side effects (tremor, dizziness, memory loss) occur in approximately 10% of patients while gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, anorexia, gastric irritation) occur in up to 40% of patients. Proarrhythmia or other serious toxicity from the drug is uncommon.
 ...
PMID:Mexiletine: pharmacology and therapeutic use. 218 14

Since most of the toxicity associated with class 1B antiarrhythmic drugs is dose-related, this review examines adverse effects seen in both therapeutic practice and accidental or premeditated overdose. Toxicity is very common with these agents and can be life-threatening. A high percentage of patients must discontinue therapy because of adverse effects. Mexiletine and tocainide are structural analogues of lignocaine (lidocaine) and toxicity is similar with all 3 drugs. With gradual intoxication (the most common form) central nervous system effects such as lightheadedness, dizziness, drowsiness and confusion are seen first. Seizures and respiratory arrest can occur. Cardiovascular toxicity is manifested by progressive heart block, reduced cardiac contraction, hypotension and asystole. Both mexiletine and tocainide may have proarrhythmic effects. Gastrointestinal toxicity is also common. Shock, hypotension, cardiac failure and beta-blocker therapy reduce lignocaine clearance and enhance the risk of intoxication during routine therapy. Both lignocaine and mexiletine elimination is impaired in severe liver disease while tocainide clearance is reduced in renal failure. Management of toxicity is largely supportive and symptomatic. Lignocaine infusion must be discontinued and decontamination of the gut in the case of oral preparations is recommended. Serious intoxication requires intensive care unit admission. Haemodialysis or haemoperfusion may be helpful in serious lignocaine and tocainide poisoning. In institutions where extracorporeal circulatory assistance is available, massive lignocaine poisoning has been successfully treated with this intervention. In the therapeutic setting serious toxicity can be prevented by close clinical surveillance and appropriate dose reduction in patients with reduced drug clearance. Because of the large interindividual variation in lignocaine pharmacokinetic parameters, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended if results can be reported quickly. Mexiletine and tocainide have stereoselective metabolism and assays do not distinguish the more active isomers. Therapeutic drug monitoring is less useful in this situation.
 ...
PMID:Poisoning due to class 1B antiarrhythmic drugs. Lignocaine, mexiletine and tocainide. 251 64

We studied the antiarrhythmic effect of oral Mexiletine in 20 patients with stable high-frequency ventricular arrhythmias refractory to therapeutic doses of conventional antiarrhythmic therapy. Arrhythmias were classified according to modified grading system of Lown and Wolf. The efficacy of Mexiletine was assessed with use of both the arrhythmic modified classification of Lown and Wolf and count of premature ventricular beats (PVB) from 24 hours ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings. The dose of Mexiletine was 300 mg every 8 hours; 24 hours ECG recordings were obtained in each patient on days 5,15 and 20 during Mexiletine therapy. The worst of tracings before and during Mexiletine therapy was compared. Mean decrease in PVB was 57% (P less than 0.001). The decrease in PVB was more than 80% in 11 patients. Comparison of the grade of arrhythmias disclosed a favorable effect of Mexiletine in 13 patients, a worsening in 1, and no effect in 6. Classification of the most severe arrhythmia revealed a significant decrease from an average grade of 3.05 to 1.75 (P less than 0.01). Before Mexiletine therapy, 40% of our patients were in Class 0 to II and 60% were in Class III or V, whereas during Mexiletine therapy the corresponding proportions were 75% and 25% respectively. Side effects (confusion, tremors, gastro-intestinal complaints) prompted reduction of the dose in 3 patients. Three additional patients had transient minor side effects (dizziness, nystagmus and gastrointestinal disorders) that did not necessitate a change in therapy and 14 patients reported no side effects. In conclusion our data suggest that Mexiletine is an effective agent in the long-term treatment of serious ventricular arrhythmias refractory to other agents. Since Mexiletine therapy is not associated with severe long-term side effects, it should now be possible to determine its role as a first-line drug for treating ventricular arrhythmias.
 ...
PMID:[Mexiletine in treatment of chronic ventricular refractary arrhythmias (author's transl)]. 616 80

Mexiletine is an antiarrhythmic drug that has been reported to exert antidystonic properties. We performed an open-label study to collect further evidence of the antidystonic effect of mexiletine in spasmodic torticollis (ST) and to evaluate its possible use in generalized dystonia. We administered mexiletine to six patients with dystonia (three with generalized dystonia and three with ST) who had failed to respond to previous pharmacotherapy. The drug was started at a dose of 200 mg/d by mouth and increased up to a maximum dose of 800 mg/d. Patients were evaluated at regular intervals over a 6-week period with use of the Fahn & Marsden Dystonia Scale and the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and videotaped. At the end of the trial, the videotapes were reviewed and scored by a blind observer. Patients were then followed for at least 1 year and evaluated every 3 months at the dose reached during the study period. No adverse effects were reported in five patients; in one patient, dizziness developed at the dosage of 800 mg/d, requiring a reduction of the dose. At the end of a 6-week period, a significant improvement in the rating scale for dystonia and in videotape ratings was observed after mexiletine treatment (p < 0.01). Our data indicate that mexiletine is a useful drug in dystonia treatment.
 ...
PMID:Mexiletine in the treatment of torticollis and generalized dystonia. 1102 Jan 21

Adjuvant analgesics are drugs that are not primarily used as analgesics but can produce analgesia in certain types of pain. Adjuvant analgesics can be administered together with non-opioid and opioid analgesics on each step of the WHO analgesic ladder. They should be given when an additional or specific indication exists, but should not be used as a substitute for a thorough treatment with opioids and nonopioids. Adjuvant analgesics can be classified into groups according to the type of pain to be treated: continuous neuropathic pain or lancinating neuropathic pain, sympathetically maintained pain, bone pain and those for multipurpose use. Adjuvant drugs used for continuous neuropathic pain include local anaesthetics, clonidine, capsaicin, and antidepressants. Tricyclic antidepressants are the group that have been best investigated, and are therefore the drugs of choice. An analgesic effect is probably produced via enhancement of transmitter concentrations in pain-modulating pathways. This occurs at lower doses than those necessary to treat depression. Anticholinergic actions, acute glaucoma, constipation, orthostatic hypotension and cardiac arrhythmias are adverse effects that are seen predominantly with teritiary amine drugs and less often with secondary amine compounds. Initial doses should be small to avoid these adverse effects. Local anaesthetics are used less often, because of the high incidence of side effects (especially with tocainide, flecainide). An analgesic effect has been described in neuropathic pain, however, probably due to membrane stabilization and reduction of aberrant signal conduction. Mexiletine is considered to be the safest local anaesthetic, and should be used initially in small doses (100-150 mg/d). If side effects do not occur, doses can be increased step-wise up to 900 mg/d. Local anaesthetics are indicated for the treatment of severe neuropathic pain; this treatment is contraindicated in patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Systemic or intrathecal clonidine can be tried in neuropathic pain refractory to opioid therapy. The same stands for the topical application of capsaicin in certain types of pain. Lancinating neuropathic pain is an indication for anticonvulsant drugs. Carbamazepine, clonazepam, valproate and phenytoin seem to reduce aberrant signal conduction in damaged nerves in a manner similar to the supression of epileptiform activities in the brain. Common side effects include sedation, dizziness and nausea. Of greater concern are the more severe side effects, such as bone marrow depression (carbamazepine) and hepatotoxicity (phenytoin, valproate). Low initial doses and stepwise increases in dosage, repeated blood counts, and monitoring of plasma levels are helpful in recognizing and avoiding these adverse effects. Baclofen, a GABA agonist primarily used for spasticity, is effective in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia and is often used in the management of lancinating pain of unspecific origin. The initial dosage is 10-15 mg/d, increasing to 30-90 mg/d, or higher. If neural blockade fails to reduce sympathetically maintained pain sufficiently specific adjuvants can be used. Sympatholytic drugs, e.g. phenoxybenzamine (60-120 mg/d) or prazosin, can be administered to patients without major cardiovascular dysfunction. There is experimental evidence of the involvement of calcium channels in nociception, and a beneficial clinical effect of nifidepine in reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RDS) has been demonstrated. Bone pain is common in tumor patients and can often be treated effectively with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Biphosphonates (etidronate, clodronate, pamidronate derivates) also produce analgesic effects in patients with bone metastases. However, differences among the various compounds have not been clearly evaluated yet. Potent and specific radioisotopes are still under development and the use of calcitonin in bone pain is considered controversial.
 ...
PMID:[Pharmacotherapy of cancer pain. 3. Adjuvant drugs.]. 1841 35