Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Propofol is associated with a low incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we investigated the possible direct antiemetic properties of a subhypnotic dose of propofol. Fifty-two ASA physical status I or II patients, aged 15-60 yr with nausea and vomiting after minor gynecologic, orthopedic, or digestive tract surgery, were included in the study and received either propofol (10 mg = 1 mL) or placebo (1 mL Intralipid) intravenously in the postanesthesia care unit. Patients treated with propofol experienced a larger reduction in nausea and vomiting than patients treated with placebo (81% vs 35% success rate; P less than 0.05). Patients successfully treated had a similar incidence of relapse (propofol 28%; placebo 22%) within the first 30 min after therapy. Thirty-three percent of the propofol-treated patients and 44% of the placebo-treated patients showed a minor increase in sedation. The level of postoperative pain did not change in either group. Hemodynamic values remained unchanged in both groups. Pain on injection (7.6%) or dizziness (3.6%) only occurred in the propofol group. We conclude that propofol has significant direct antiemetic properties.
 ...
PMID:Subhypnotic doses of propofol possess direct antiemetic properties. 831 40

Under study were thirty patients of ASA class I-II scheduled for lower abdominal and lower extremities surgery. Premedication included intramuscular injection of pethidine, atropine and prochlorperazine. Epidural anesthesia was accomplished with 12-15 ml 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000). Thirty minutes later, when blood pressure returned to control value, patients were put to sleep by 2 mg/kg propofol and the sleep was maintained with continuous infusion of propofol at a rate of 6 mg/kg/h. Infusion rate was adjusted when necessary. Patients breathed room air spontaneously through the whole course of anesthesia. The results showed that all patients fell to sleep within 28.3 +/- 2.7 s after intravenous injection of propofol 2 mg/kg. Sleeping dose was satisfactorily achieved using a mean infusion rate of 6.1 +/- 1.7 mg/kg/h. The mean time from the end of the infusion of propofol to opening of the eyes on command and telling the correct date of birth were 7.9 +/- 2.8 min and 9.9 +/- 3.8 min respectively. Two minutes after injection, there were significant decrease in systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, cardiac output, and stroke volume with a mean of 17.9 +/- 3.8%, 18.8 +/- 3.3%, 7.6 +/- 0.5% and 11.1 +/- 1.9% respectively. Two patients (7%) developed apnea after 2 mg/kg propofol which was considered to be the most serious side effect. Propofol infusion had to be stopped in 13% patients due to a 30% fall of arterial blood pressure during maintenance. In the recovery stage, no other complications were noted except one patient who felt dizziness. Propofol, used as the supplementary sedative, provides satisfactory result for surgery under epidural anesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Intravenous propofol as a supplement in epidural anesthesia]. 175 43

The success of out-patients laparoscopic surgery depends on a careful selection of patients and the ability of anesthetic technique to ensure a rapid emergence from anesthesia, with a satisfactory control of postoperative pain and the absence of side effects. This study was undertaken to investigate the influence of a total intravenous anesthetic management on the recovery process after laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Fifty-three ASA 1 patients aged 12-41 yrs (mean 26.02) scheduled to undergo laparoscopic varicocelectomy as day surgery procedure were included in this study. Propofol was used as inductor agent and in variable-rate infusion (170-100 mcg/Kg/min) to maintain anesthesia supplemented with Fentanyl (FNT) before endotracheal intubation, incision surgery and if the patient manifested clinical signs of inadequate analgesia. Local anesthesia was infiltrated into the skin before incision. Tramadol 100 mg and Ketorolac 30 mg were administered before the end of surgery to delay the onset of the postoperative pain. Pain was evaluated using a self-rating visual analoque scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 at 0-0.5 hrs postoperatively and every 2 hrs until discharge. At the same time nausea was clinically evaluated using a scale ranging from 0 to 3. Postoperative pain and nausea (PONV) treatment were standardized. Patients were discharged by Post-Anesthesia Discharge Scoring System (PADS). Mean operating time was 34.2 min and mean estubation time was 11.6 min. At time 0 all patients had VAS pain score < 3, on the same time 2 of patients was treated for mild PONV; mean time to first request for postoperative analgesia treatment in 89% of patients was more than 6 hrs, 5 patients required pain treatment before discharge in a mean time 216' +/- 156'. Using the PADS system, 64% of patients were discharged at 4 hrs and 89% at 6 hrs after surgery. One patient was admitted to hospital for an overnight stay for walking dizziness; another was readmitted for surgical complications. This results suggest that the proposed anesthetic management provided adequate pain control with minimun postoperative nausea and a good recovery rate. This permitted a short postoperative hospital stay without compromising in safety, efficacy, or patient satisfaction.
 ...
PMID:[Laparoscopic surgery of varicocele. Role of total endovenous anesthesia in same-day discharge]. 1112 41

This prospective study evaluated the 95% effective dose (ED95 ) of nalbuphine in inhibiting body movement during outpatient-induced abortion and its clinical efficacy versus the equivalent of sufentanil. The study was divided into two parts. For the first part, voluntary first-trimester patients who needed induced abortions were recruited to measure the ED95 of nalbuphine in inhibiting body movement during induced abortion using the sequential method (the Dixon up-and-down method). In the second part, this was a double-blind, randomized study. Sixty cases of first-trimester patients were recruited and were randomly divided into two groups (n = 30), including group N (nalbuphine at the ED95 dose) and group S (sufentanil at an equivalent dose). Propofol was given to both groups as the sedative. The circulation, respiration and body movement of the two groups in surgery were observed. The amount of propofol, the awakening time, the time to leave the hospital and the analgesic effect were recorded. The ED95 of nalbuphine in inhibiting body movement during painless surgical abortion was 0.128 mg/kg (95% confidence intervals 0.098-0.483 mg/kg). Both nalbuphine and the equivalent dose of sufentanil provided a good intraoperative and post-operative analgesic effect in outpatient-induced abortion. However, the post-operative morbidity of dizziness for nalbuphine was less than for sufentanil (p < 0.05), and the awakening time and the time to leave the hospital were significantly shorter than those of sufentanil (p < 0.05). Nalbuphine at 0.128 mg/kg was used in outpatient-induced abortion as an intraoperative and post-operative analgesic and showed a better effect compared with sufentanil.
 ...
PMID:The ED95 of Nalbuphine in Outpatient-Induced Abortion Compared to Equivalent Sufentanil. 2962 49