Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

To examine the clinical usefulness of selective and non-selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists, we compared a selective (tamsulosin) and non-selective (terazosin) alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists in the treatment of Chinese patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The study was a single-blind, randomized, multicenter design to compare a fixed dose of tamsulosin (0.2 mg) or terazosin (2 mg) given once daily after breakfast for four weeks. A total of 212 patients were enrolled with 201 patients included in the analysis. The primary variables assessed were changes in total International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and average urinary flow rate (AFR) four weeks after dosing. Adverse events were recorded through the treatment period. Both tamsulosin and terazosin produced significant improvements in total IPSS (total score of 11.8 +/- 4.5; decrease in 45.1% and total score of 13.3 +/- 5.3; decrease in 39.0%, respectively) (p < 0.001), Qmax (13.2 +/- 4.1 mL/s, 37.5% increase and 13.6 +/- 3.6 mL/s, 30.8% increase, respectively) (p < 0.001) and AFR (7.7 +/- 3.3 mL/s, 37.5% increase and 7.8 +/- 3.1 mL/s, 25.8% increase, respectively) (p < 0.001) at endpoint. Tamsulosin was superior to terazosin in improvement of total IPSS (p < 0.05) and AFR (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events by administration of tamsulosin was less than that by terazosin (13 and 50, respectively; p < 0.01). Among the adverse event, incidence of dizziness (p < 0.001) and hypotension (p < 0.01) by administration of terazosin were significantly greater than that by tamsulosin. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure of sitting position decreased significantly in patients treated with terazosin (p < 0.01). These results suggest that tamsulosin, a selective alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonist, was superior to terazosin, a non-selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist, in efficacy and adverse events in patients with symptomatic BPH.
...
PMID:Clinical comparison of selective and non-selective alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonists for bladder outlet obstruction associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: studies on tamsulosin and terazosin in Chinese patients. The Chinese Tamsulosin Study Group. 1050 65

A 20-day, nonrandomized, open-label, placebo-controlled study was performed to investigate whether concomitant administration of tamsulosin (0.8 mg) affects the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of intravenous digoxin (0.5 mg) in healthy subjects. Ten healthy subjects aged 21-39 years received a single oral dose of placebo on study days 1-8 and tamsulosin on days 9-18. Tamsulosin was initiated at 0.4 mg/day and the dose was increased to 0.8 mg/day from day 11. On days 2 and 15, subjects received a single intravenous dose of digoxin (0.5 mg). Safety monitoring was carried out throughout the study. Following digoxin administration, blood was drawn and urine collected over a 96-h period for pharmacokinetic determinations. Plasma tamsulosin concentrations were measured at regular intervals after dosing on day 15. The digoxin pharmacokinetic parameters with and without concomitant tamsulosin were compared. No significant difference was observed, and no irregularity was found in the plasma tamsulosin concentration data. Six subjects experienced adverse events while receiving placebo and seven while on tamsulosin. The most frequent adverse event was mild dizziness reported by four subjects. Moderate chest pain was reported in two subjects, but this was not considered to be related to the administration of the study medications. Some significant changes in vital signs were observed; however, none was accompanied by symptoms of medical concern. These changes were not temporally related to the administration of study drugs. Thus, concurrent administration of digoxin with tamsulosin did not produce any change in the pharmacokinetics of digoxin and the safety profile was acceptable. As reflected in the prescribing information for tamsulosin, no adjustment in tamsulosin dosing is required when it is administered concomitantly with digoxin.
...
PMID:Effects of the concomitant administration of tamsulosin (0.8 mg) on the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of intravenous digoxin (Lanoxin) in normal healthy subjects: a placebo-controlled evaluation. 1184 56

alpha(1)-Adrenoceptor antagonists are now well established as the most common treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of bladder outflow obstruction associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Both alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists and 5alpha-reductase inhibitors are accepted treatments for LUTS, but with finasteride this applies only to patients with clinically enlarged prostates, whereas alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists are considered to be appropriate treatment for all patients, irrespective of prostate size. Systematic analyses of placebo-controlled studies show that commonly used alpha(1)-blockers are significantly superior to placebo in improving urinary flow and reducing symptoms. Efficacy of alpha-blockers appears to be well maintained over time, and there is no evidence of tolerance or tachyphylaxis to alpha(1)-blockade after 6-12 months' usage. Direct comparative trials show that, in the short term, alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists are more effective than finasteride in reducing symptom score. For alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists, the most commonly reported adverse effects are dizziness, asthenia, postural hypotension, and syncope. Alfuzosin has a more pronounced effect on blood pressure than does tamsulosin, especially in elderly patients. Tamsulosin is well tolerated and has minimal effects on blood pressure; tamsulosin 0.4 mg has the lowest potential to reduce blood pressure and causes less symptomatic orthostatic hypotension than terazosin.
...
PMID:A Comparison of Varying alpha-Blockers and Other Pharmacotherapy Options for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. 1698 51

Alpha-adrenergic blockers are an established form of medical treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Several medications of the class are available, each with its own characteristics. The authors attempted to define the differences between the currently available medications (Terazosin, Doxazosin, Alfuzosin, and Tamsulosin), and to present an evidence-based recommendation for choosing the best treatment option. A literature search was conducted, using Medline queries and the references of review papers, in search of pertinent studies. These included controlled studies comparing the results of treatment with alpha blockers to placebo, or direct comparative studies of alpha blockers, and real life practice, community studies of each of the medications. A similar efficacy emerged from the reviewed articles, but with a different adverse events profile. A higher rate of vasodilatatory, cardiovascular side effects (dizziness, fatigue, and hypotension) was observed with terazosin and doxazosin, when compared with the uroselective alfuzosin and tamsulosin. Of the latter two, hypotension was more frequent with alfuzosin, while ejaculatory dysfunction was more frequent with tamsulosin. In conclusion, each of the four medications is a possible treatment option for BPH, but we believe alfuzosin and tamsulosin are the better choice. In light of an identical efficacy, these medications offer better tolerability, and ease of use of a once daily treatment without dose titration. The choice between the two should be tailored to the individual patient, with alfuzosin associated with hypotensive side effects, and tamsulosin causing ejaculatory dysfunction.
...
PMID:[Alpha blockers in use for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia--are all drugs born equal?]. 1869 28

The efficacy of tamsulosin at the cost of a relatively benign side effect profile has been attributed to receptor selectivity directed at the alpha(1a) and alpha(1d) adrenergic receptor subtypes. The oral-controlled absorption system (OCAS((R))) represents a drug delivery refinement that incorporates a matrix of gel-forming and gel-enhancing agents to promote a constant drug release independent of environmental food or fluid. There are clinical data to support the concept that drug peaks are lessened and that drug release continues throughout the alimentary tract due to the OCAS formulation. Furthermore this equates with less adverse effects on physiologic parameters. To date however improvements in cardiovascular symptoms such as dizziness, headache and syncope have not been demonstrated in healthy men. Ejaculatory dysfunction appears less problematic with the OCAS preparation. Tamsulosin OCAS may be of greatest benefit to men with cardiovascular co-morbidities taking anti-hypertensive medications that might predispose them to symptomatic hypotensive episodes. It will be necessary to evaluate this group of men more closely in further trials to determine what they stand to gain from changing medications, and then relate this to drug costs to draw a final conclusion as to the place of tamsulosin OCAS in contemporary urological practice.
...
PMID:Tamsulosin oral controlled absorption system (OCAS) in the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy. 1872

The tolerability of dapoxetine, a short-acting selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor being developed for premature ejaculation, was evaluated when coadministered with tamsulosin. Adult men on a stable dose of tamsulosin were randomized to also receive dapoxetine 30 or 60 mg, or placebo, in a crossover design. Supine and standing vital signs were measured on days 1 and 7. Plasma samples were collected for measurement of tamsulosin, dapoxetine, and dapoxetine metabolites. Coadministration of dapoxetine with tamsulosin did not alter orthostatic profiles or affect the incidence of orthostatic hypotension. Tamsulosin and dapoxetine pharmacokinetics were not altered. Adverse events were reported by 5.4%, 10.9%, and 23.2% of participants receiving tamsulosin with placebo, dapoxetine 30 mg, and dapoxetine 60 mg, respectively. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, dizziness, headache, and nausea. Therefore, dapoxetine had no clinically important effects on the pharmacokinetics or orthostatic profile of tamsulosin in men on a stable tamsulosin regimen.
...
PMID:Effect of dapoxetine on the pharmacokinetics and hemodynamic effects of tamsulosin in men on a stable dose of tamsulosin. 1883 88

We evaluated the therapeutic effects of tamsulosin for women with non-neurogenic voiding dysfunction. Women who had voiding dysfunctions for at least 3 months were included. Inclusion criteria were age > or =18 yr, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of > or =15, and maximum flow rate (Q(max)) of > or =12 mL/sec and/or postvoid residuals (PVR) of > or =150 mL. Patients with neurogenic voiding dysfunction or anatomical bladder outlet obstruction were excluded. All patients were classified according to the Blaivas-Groutz nomogram as having no or mild obstruction (group A) or moderate or severe obstruction (group B). After 8 weeks of treatment, treatment outcomes and adverse effects were evaluated. One hundred and six patients were evaluable (70 in group A, 36 in group B). After treatments, mean IPSS, bother scores, Q(max), PVR, diurnal and nocturnal micturition frequencies and scored form of the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire (BFLUTS-SF) were changed significantly. Eighty-nine patients (84%) reported that the treatment was beneficial. The proportion of patients reported that their bladder symptoms caused "moderate to many severe problems" were significantly decreased. No significant difference were observed between the groups in terms of IPSS, bother score, Q(max), PVR, micturition frequency, and BFLUTS-SF changes. Adverse effects related to medication were dizziness (n=3), de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (n=3), aggravation of underlying SUI (n=1), fatigue (n=1). Tamsulosin was found to be effective in female patients with voiding dysfunction regardless of obstruction grade.
...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin for the treatment of non-neurogenic voiding dysfunction in females: a 8-week prospective study. 2005 56