Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The safety and tolerability of lisinopril (1.25-160 mg daily) were assessed in 3,270 patients (2,688 hypertensives and 582 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF] and 280 healthy subjects. The duration of therapy ranged from a single dose to 43 months; 438 patients received lisinopril for at least 12 months (mean 20 months). In the hypertensive population, the most frequent adverse events reported were headache, dizziness, cough, nausea, diarrhoea and fatigue, although not all of these events were thought to be related to lisinopril; 6.1% discontinued lisinopril due to adverse clinical events, most commonly cough and nausea. Twelve hypertensive patients died (0.45%), but most of these were not receiving lisinopril at the time of death and none was considered to be drug-related. In CHF patients, the most frequently reported adverse events were dizziness, dyspnoea, diarrhoea, hypotension and fatigue. Again, not all of these reports were considered to be drug-related. Therapy was withdrawn in 9.6% of patients--hypotension, dizziness, diarrhoea and rash being the most frequent reasons. Fifty-three CHF patients died (9.1%) and in three cases death was considered to be related to lisinopril therapy. Hypotension, orthostatic effects or dizziness following the initial dose of lisinopril occurred infrequently (in 1.3% of the hypertensive group, including those receiving hydrochlorothiazide, and in 4.8% of CHF patients). Changes in laboratory parameters were generally minor and seldom resulted in discontinuation of therapy. Long-term treatment of hypertension and CHF with lisinopril for at least 3 years confirms that the drug is well tolerated. Overall, the side-effect profile is very similar to that of other ACE inhibitors with regard to class-specific effects. However, taste disturbance was rarely observed.
 ...
PMID:Clinical experience with lisinopril. Observations on safety and tolerability. 255 Jun 41

Pharmacotherapy of hypertension in the aged does not differ qualitatively but only quantitatively from that in use for younger patients. Adjusted, usually lower doses of diuretics, beta-blocking agents, ACE-inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers are the basic drugs. Individual aging processes and concomitant diseases determine the choice of drugs in the elderly (individualized therapy). All substances are initially prescribed at very low dose. The increasing infirmity of the aged often associated with tiredness, dyspnea and dizziness even without treatment requires careful instruction of the patient about effects and side effects of the prescribed medication. The old WHO-guidelines (systolic BP greater than or equal to 160, diastolic BP greater than or equal to 95 mm mercury) should be maintained for diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. However antihypertensive therapy in patients over 80 years of age and in those with marginally elevated diastolic or solely elevated systolic pressure is controversial today.
 ...
PMID:[Hypertension and old age]. 268 25

To identify and measure the incidence of adverse effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril 13,713 patients were studied for one year by prescription-event monitoring. Precise information about the duration of treatment was available for 12,543 patients. The frequency of many events was calculated, including dizziness (483 patients; 3.9%), persistent dry cough (360; 2.9%), headache (310; 2.5%) hypotension (218; 1.7%), and syncope (155; 1.2%). Less common reactions included angioedema, urticaria, and muscle cramps. Altogether 1098 (8%) patients died and the notes of 913 of them (83%) were obtained for detailed scrutiny. With the exception of a few patients with renal failure who deteriorated during treatment (reported on separately), no death was attributed to enalapril. Enalapril was considered to be effective, even in patients with advanced cardiac failure. These results for enalapril are reassuring and provide further evidence of the value of prescription-event monitoring.
 ...
PMID:Postmarketing surveillance of enalapril. I: Results of prescription-event monitoring. 284 1

1 Captopril, an orally active angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, was compared with hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) in the treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension. 2 Twenty outpatients received no antihypertensive therapy for 2 weeks, after which they were given placebo for 8 weeks. Since their diastolic blood pressure remained above 100 mm Hg, they were then randomized to receive either captopril (twelve patients) or HCT (eight patients) for a 4-week titration period. If the supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) was normalized, (less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) by the end of titration period, the established regimen was continued for an 8-week maintenance period; if not, the alternate drug was added in increasing doses for up to 4 weeks and the combined therapy was maintained for the remaining 4 weeks. 3 After the first 4 weeks of therapy, both groups showed a statistically significant decrease in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Normalization of SDBP occurred in 75% of patients treated with captopril alone, and the addition of HCT produced normalization in the remainder. HCT alone resulted in normalization of SDBP in 50% of patients and the blood pressure of the remaining patients was normalized after the addition of captopril. 4 Captopril given orally, either alone or in conjunction with HCT, is an effective agent for the control of mild and moderate essential hypertension. 5 In our series the main side effects encountered were vertigo and dizziness, transient eosinophilia, a rise of BUN and or/a rise of SGPT or SGOT.
 ...
PMID:Control of essential hypertension with captopril, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. 702 22

The efficacy, tolerability and impact on quality of life of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril were evaluated in a 12-week open, multicenter post-marketing surveillance study. 233 patients, 45 years and over with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95-105 mm Hg were followed after a washout period of 7 days. 22 withdrew due either to adverse reactions, mainly cough (4.3%) and dizziness (3%), or noncompliance. DBP of 90 mm Hg or less was achieved in 50.7% with once-a-day 10 mg lisinopril, in 26.1% with 20 mg and in 16.1% with 20 mg plus addition of hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5 mg; in only 7.1% was BP not controlled. Adverse reactions other than cough or dizziness were experienced by fewer than 1%. Dartmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts/WONCA were used to evaluate quality of life and were found useful in the study. Compared to baseline assessments, all functional status indicators (physical fitness, feelings, daily activities, social activities, change in health and overall health) scored significantly better in all treated patients after 12 weeks. Thus, in more than 90% of patients lisinopril was well-tolerated, highly effective in lowering blood pressure and possibly (no control group) improved the quality of life of all patients.
 ...
PMID:[A multicenter study of lisinopril in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension]. 755 4

We compared the response of the oral angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor antagonist (ARA) UP 269-6 with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) enalapril 20 mg or placebo, during salt depletion in normal men. We also evaluated safety and tolerability. Sixteen healthy, normotensive male volunteers followed a standardised salt-depletion regimen for 3 days before each study day. Seven different doses of UP 269-6 (5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 120 and 180 mg) were administered double blind in a four-panel dose escalation, with enalapril and placebo randomised within each panel. Supine and erect blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR); serum and urinary electrolytes; plasma active renin (PAR), aldosterone, and Ang II were measured at intervals. Urinary electrolytes and aldosterone were measured for the 24 h before dosing and for 24 h after dosing. Dizziness and light-headedness on standing were reported after UP 269-6 at higher doses. Enalapril caused one episode of symptomatic postural hypotension. No other drug-related adverse events (AE) were noted. There was a dose-related decrease in supine and erect systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP) with UP 269-6 at > or = 40 mg, with no change in HR. Based on the maximal decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP), UP 269-6 at 180 mg had an effect largely comparable to that of enalapril 20 mg. There was a dose-related increase in PAR with UP 269-6. Although this was greater with UP 269-6 180 mg than with enalapril, serum and 24-h urinary aldosterone suppression was greater with enalapril than with any dose of UP 269-6.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Comparison of the oral angiotensin II receptor antagonist UP 269-6 or enalapril 20 mg on blood pressure and neurohormonal effects in salt-deplete man. 756 47

A 50-year-old very obese man had suffered from hypertension for more than 20 years and had undergone various treatment regimens, the last being with an ACE inhibitor. Since his hypertension had nevertheless increased, and he developed dizziness and headaches, a combination of ACE-inhibitor and calcium antagonist was now tried, followed--when this treatment proved unsuccessful--by the fixed-combination preparation containing enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide. This at last led to a reduction in his blood pressure to approaching normal values, and his subjective symptoms cleared up.
 ...
PMID:[Lowering blood pressure in an obese patient with long-term hypertension. Using a fixed combination of enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide]. 760 92

Ramipril is a long-acting nonsulfhydryl angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor introduced for clinical use about a decade ago. Ramipril is a prodrug that undergoes de-esterification in the liver to form ramiprilat, its active metabolite. Ramipril rapidly distributes to all tissues, with the liver, kidneys and lungs showing markedly higher concentrations of the drug than the blood. After absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, rapid hydrolysis of ramipril occurs in the liver. In the therapeutic concentration range, protein binding of ramipril and ramiprilat is 73 and 56%, respectively. Ramiprilat binds to ACE with high affinity at concentrations similar to that of the enzyme and establishes equilibrium slowly. Although ramipril is metabolised by hepatic and renal mechanisms to both a glucuronate conjugate and a diketopiperazine derivative, most of the drug is excreted in the urine as ramiprilat and the glucuronate conjugate of ramiprilat. Elimination from the body is characterised by a relatively rapid initial phase with a half-life of 7 hours and a late phase with a half-life of about 120 hours. No clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between ramipril and other drugs have been reported. The drug has been generally well tolerated with the most prevalent adverse effects being dizziness (3.4%), headache (3.2%), weakness (1.9%) and nausea (1.7%). Ramipril is an effective and well tolerated drug for the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure in all patients, including those with renal or hepatic dysfunction, and the elderly.
 ...
PMID:Clinical pharmacokinetics of ramipril. 813 99

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the ACE inhibitor quinaprilat have been studied in six chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients and in six patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) after a single oral dose of 2.5 mg quinapril. Mean tmax and Cmax values (SEM) for quinaprilat in interdialytic HD patients were 4.0 (0) h and 84 (8.4) ng.ml-1 respectively, and they did not differ significantly from those in CAPD patients (4.7 (0.7) h and 64 (5.7) ng.ml-1). Elimination half lives were 30 (10.1) h (HD) and 34 (7.3) h (CAPD). Cmax, tmax, t1/2, and AUC were increased and CL was decreased compared to data reported previously after giving 2.5 mg to healthy subjects. Peritoneal clearance was calculated as 0.1 (0.1) ml.min-1, thus less than 0.5% of the dose were removed within 24 h by CAPD. ACE activity was suppressed by more than 93% between 4 and 24 h postdose (P < 0.001). It decreased in both groups with increasing plasma quinaprilat levels. Angiotensin II concentration compared to baseline was significantly decreased at 4 hours (-30.4 +/- 10%) and 24 h (-30 +/- 9.9%) (P < 0.05, n = 11), while active plasma renin concentration was still significantly increased at 48 h postdose (+ 60.2 +/- 14.5%, P < 0.01). Mean arterial pressure 24 h postdose was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased in HD (-12 mmHg) and CAPD patients (-20 mm Hg). Only two patients reported unwanted effects (fatigue, dizziness, nausea, and weakness). In conclusion, due to its long lasting effect on ACE activity and on blood pressure in terminal renal failure a starting dose of quinapril 2.5 mg o.d. may be used in hypertensive HD and CAPD patients.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of quinaprilat after low dose quinapril in patients with terminal renal failure. 838 27

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of moexipril, a non-sulphydryl angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in older patients with hypertension. One hundred and seventy two hypertensive men and women, 65-80 years old, with seated DBP between 95 and 114 mm Hg were studied. The study was a 2 year, multicentre (12 centres), open-label protocol of moexipril monotherapy or combination therapy (with hydrochlorothiazide). Blood pressure, pulse rate, weight, adverse effects and laboratory studies were assessed following moexipril at 7.5 or 15 mg once daily or 7.5 or 15 mg daily in combination with 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide if the seated DBP remained > or = 90 mm Hg on moexipril monotherapy. The primary measure of efficacy was a change from baseline in seated DBP. Secondary outcome measures included changes in seated DBP, pulse rate, laboratory parameters and adverse side-effects. Following 1 year of therapy in 135 patients, the BP fell 16/14 mm Hg among patients receiving moexipril monotherapy and 27/17 mm Hg for those receiving combined therapy compared with baseline (P < 0.001 for both). After 2 years of treatment, reductions were similar in 120 patients. Nineteen patients (11%) were prematurely withdrawn from the study because of inadequate therapeutic response and 28 (16%) because of adverse experiences. There were no significant changes in pulse rate or postural reductions in BP on either moexipril monotherapy or combination treatment. Three adverse side-effects occurred at a frequency exceeding 2% that were possibly or probably attributable to moexipril or combination therapy: hypotension (2%), dizziness (6%) and increased cough (12%). There were no clinically relevant mean group changes from baseline laboratory values in the treatment groups. In conclusion, these long-term data demonstrate that moexipril, either alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, has long-term anti-hypertensive efficacy and is generally well tolerated in elderly patients with hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Long-term safety and efficacy of moexipril alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with hypertension. 858 66


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>