Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Fluoxetine and trazodone were compared in a double-blind, randomized, parallel, 6-week trial in 43 outpatients with major depression after a 1-week single-blind placebo period. Thirty-five patients completed at least 3 weeks of active medication, while 25 patients completed all 6 weeks. Response rates, whether defined by end-of-treatment Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score less than 10 or by a 50% reduction in HAM-D scores, were equivalent for the two medications. For fluoxetine, HAM-D scores were significantly lower at Weeks 1 and 2 compared with those of trazodone. Trazodone improved sleep significantly more than fluoxetine. Fluoxetine was associated more frequently with weight loss (p = .002) and less frequently with dizziness (p = .04) than trazodone.
 ...
PMID:Fluoxetine versus trazodone in the treatment of outpatients with major depression. 305 68

Fluoxetine, a selective serotonin uptake inhibitor (mean dose 73 mg each morning) was compared with amitriptyline (mean dose 122 mg at night) in a double-blind study of 64 depressed out-patients. Fifty patients completed the 6-week trial. The drugs did not differ with respect to psychiatrists' ratings, but amitriptyline was slightly superior with respect to patients' ratings. The amitriptyline-treated group had complaints of dry mouth and dizziness on standing; the fluoxetine-treated group of sleep disturbances, nausea, and headaches.
 ...
PMID:A controlled comparison of fluoxetine and amitriptyline in depressed out-patients. 332 68

Fluoxetine was compared to doxepin in geriatric out-patients with major depressive illness. At the end of the 6-week double-blind study, the mean endpoint scores for all rating scales were significantly improved over base-line in both treatment groups. A subsequent 48-week open-label study supported the finding that both drugs are efficacious for maintenance therapy in elderly depressed patients. Fluoxetine, which lacks anticholinergic effects and is nonsedating, was well-tolerated by most patients and had fewer total side effects than doxepin. Common drug-related side effects for fluoxetine included nervousness/anxiety and nausea. Common side effects of doxepin were dry mouth, drowsiness/sedation, constipation, and dizziness/lightheadedness.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind comparative trials of fluoxetine and doxepin in geriatric patients with major depressive disorder. 388 76

The efficacy of fluoxetine was evaluated in depressed patients in double-blind imipramine- and placebo-controlled clinical trials. Fluoxetine produced greater improvement than placebo on all major efficacy parameters and was comparable to imipramine with respect to the primary indicators of depression. Fluoxetine had significantly less associated anticholinergic effects, dizziness, drowsiness, somatosensory disturbance, and excessive sweating than imipramine. Although nausea occurred more frequently in fluoxetine patients, it was generally mild and well tolerated. A significantly smaller percentage of fluoxetine than imipramine patients terminated therapy because of adverse experiences.
 ...
PMID:A review of multicenter controlled studies of fluoxetine vs. imipramine and placebo in outpatients with major depressive disorder. 388 82

Cardiovascular adverse effects are amongst the most serious observed with antidepressant drugs and are often due to effects on cardiac conduction and refractoriness. However, such electrophysiologic effects may not be evident when using conventional electrocardiographic measures. Forty patients with major depressive disorder (according to DSM-III-R criteria) were enrolled in a 6-week double-blind parallel group study of fluoxetine (N = 20) or doxepin (N = 20). Cardiac conduction (QRS duration) and repolarization (corrected QT interval, QTc), were measured using signal-averaged electrocardiograms and 12-lead electrocardiogram at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 weeks of treatment. Patients taking doxepin (mean daily dosage at 6 weeks 169 +/- 42 mg) were similar to those taking fluoxetine (37 +/- 18 mg) for demographic variables and improvement in depression scores but volunteered more side effects (p = 0.011), especially dry mouth (p < 0.001) and dizziness/lightheadedness (p = 0.005). After 6 weeks, doxepin increased heart rate (69 +/- 12 to 81 +/- 13 beats per minute; p = 0.0003) and prolonged QTc (from 417 +/- 36 to 439 +/- 28 msec; p < 0.03); overall QRS duration was not prolonged but was correlated with serum doxepin concentrations (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001). Fluoxetine had no effect on QTc (428 +/- 24 msec at baseline vs. 430 +/- 24 msec at 6 weeks) or QRS duration (97 +/- 12 msec at baseline vs. 94 +/- 12 msec at 6 weeks). The standard 12-lead electrocardiogram showed no significant change in QRS or QTc for either drug. Using a sensitive measure of electrocardiographic effects, doxepin prolongs repolarization and may slow cardiac conduction. Fluoxetine has no measurable electrocardiographic effects, which suggests an increased safety margin for cardiac adverse effects. The ability of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram to resolve small changes in the electrocardiogram is useful in the assessment of drugs with subtle electrophysiologic effects.
 ...
PMID:Electrocardiographic effects of fluoxetine and doxepin in patients with major depressive disorder. 900 52

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be associated with new adverse events after abrupt discontinuation. Hypothesizing that the long half-life of fluoxetine would be protective, this study analyzed the effects of abrupt fluoxetine discontinuation during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of depression maintenance treatment. After 12 weeks of fluoxetine treatment (20 mg/day), 395 responders were abruptly randomized to placebo (N = 96) or to continued fluoxetine (N = 299). Patients were seen at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 after randomization. Reports of new or worsened adverse events were similar for both groups at each visit after randomization. Patient discontinuations related to adverse events were also similar in both groups. Mild, self-limited lightheadedness or dizziness occurred in a small percentage of patients who discontinued fluoxetine treatment but was of little clinical significance. No cluster of symptoms suggestive of a discontinuation syndrome was observed. Abrupt discontinuation of fluoxetine treatment was well tolerated and did not seem to be associated with significant clinical risk. Fluoxetine may offer a potential safety advantage over shorter-acting agents with respect to treatment interruption and/or discontinuation and may be a better choice for those patients who are likely to miss doses because of travel or forgetfulness.
 ...
PMID:Safety of abrupt discontinuation of fluoxetine: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. 961 77

There have been a large number of studies conducted investigating the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of patients with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). The 12 randomised, controlled trials with continuous dose administration of SSRIs and the eight randomised, controlled trials with luteal phase dose administration (from ovulation to menses) are reviewed. All the treatment studies on fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine and citalopram have reported positive efficacy. Fluoxetine and sertraline have the largest literature, with a smaller number of studies endorsing paroxetine and citalopram. Mixed efficacy results have been reported with fluvoxamine. In general, adverse effects from the use of SSRIs in women with PMDD are the usual mild and transient adverse effects from SSRIs including anxiety, dizziness, insomnia, sedation, nausea and headache. Sexual dysfunction and weight gain can be problematic long-term adverse effects of SSRIs, but these effects have not been systematically evaluated with long-term SSRI use in women with PMDD. Serotonergic antidepressants have differential superiority over nonserotonergic antidepressants in the treatment of PMDD. Treatments that enhance serotonergic action improve premenstrual irritability and dysphoria with a rapid onset of action, suggesting a different mechanism of action than in the treatment of depression. It is possible that neurosteroids, such as progesterone metabolites, are involved in the rapid action of serotonergic antidepressants in PMDD. Future research needs to address less frequent dose administration regimens, such as 'symptom-onset' dose administration, and the recommended length of treatment.
 ...
PMID:Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for premenstrual dysphoric disorder: the emerging gold standard? 1221 58

Anxiety states and disorders amplify the symptoms and impairment associated with vestibular dysfunction. Five patients with inner ear vestibular dysfunction and anxiety were prospectively treated with fluoxetine, 20-60 mg/day, and received an extensive battery of assessments at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Fluoxetine led to significant or near significant reductions in anxiety measures and in impairment due to dizziness; improvements in clinical balance function and vestibular function were less clear. The data add to the literature suggesting a role for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of dizziness and anxiety.
 ...
PMID:Fluoxetine for vestibular dysfunction and anxiety: a prospective pilot study. 1600 Jun 76

Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that was introduced in 1986. Certain side effects of this medication-drowsiness, dizziness, abnormal vision, diarrhea, and headache-could affect pilot performance and become a factor in an aviation accident. Our laboratory has determined the distribution of fluoxetine and its desmethyl metabolite, norfluoxetine, in various postmortem tissues and fluids from 10 fatal aviation accident cases. When available, 11 specimen types were analyzed for each case, including blood, urine, vitreous humor, bile, liver, kidney, skeletal muscle, lung, spleen, heart muscle, and brain. Blood fluoxetine concentrations in these 10 cases ranged from 21 to 1480 ng/mL. The distribution coefficients for both fluoxetine and norfluoxetine, expressed as specimen/blood ratios, were determined. The distribution coefficients for fluoxetine were determined to be 0.9 +/- 0.4 for urine, 0.10 +/- 0.03 for vitreous humor, 9 +/- 1 for bile, 38 +/- 10 for liver, 60 +/- 17 for lung, 9 +/- 3 for kidney, 20 +/- 5 for spleen, 2.2 +/- 0.3 for muscle, 15 +/- 3 for brain, and 10 +/- 2 for heart. To our knowledge, this is the first report presenting the distribution of fluoxetine in humans at therapeutic concentrations.
 ...
PMID:The distribution of fluoxetine in human fluids and tissues. 1772 89

The objective of this study was to compare, in a naturalistic setting, the efficacy and tolerability of currently available Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and venlafaxine in outpatients at a primary psychiatric care centre in Spain. The sample was composed of 194 patients with mood disorders (major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder according to the DSM-TV criteria) who began treatment either with an SSRI (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, and citalopram) or with venlafaxine. Baseline severity of the mood disorder was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and therapeutic response was measured with the Clinical Global Impression for Therapeutic Improvement. Tolerability was assessed by recording spontaneously reported adverse experiences. There were no significant differences in the efficacy of the antidepressants under study, but there were differences in the incidence and profiles of adverse events. Fluoxetine was associated with the lowest incidence of adverse effects, in a logistical regression model, but particular events seemed to be associated with certain treatments: gastrointestinal discomfort (fluvoxamine), tremor (sertraline), dry mouth and dizziness (venlafaxine) and sweating and nervousness (citalopram). We conclude that in clinical practice there are differences in the tolerability of these antidepressants. Studies with bigger samples are needed to confirm these findings.
...
PMID:Comparative efficacy and tolerability among different selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and venlafaxine in a naturalistic setting. 2492 88


1 2 Next >>