Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The safety profile of alfuzosin, a selective alpha 1-adrenergic antagonist, was assessed in a total of 13,389 patients (mean age 66.9 +/- 8.5 years) with symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy in two open, noncontrolled, multicentre, post-marketing surveillance studies, both conducted in France. Alfuzosin was prescribed at the recommended dose of 2.5 mg t.i.d., according to the current labelling recommendations, for a 3-month period. Clinical safety was assessed using spontaneous reporting of adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment. Overall, 89.7% of the patients completed the treatment period. Drop outs were recorded in 10.3% of patients: 3.7% for intolerance; 1.5% for resolution of urinary symptoms; 2.1% for lack of efficacy, and 3.0% for loss to follow-up, noncompliance, and miscellaneous reasons. Two thirds of the adverse events leading to discontinuation were vasodilatory and occurred in 2.7% of the patients: vertigo/dizziness (1.4%); malaise (0.6%); hypotension (0.4%), and headache (0.4%). Other adverse events (predominantly gastrointestinal disorders) were recorded in < 1.2% of the patients. Three quarters of the adverse events occurred during the first week of therapy. As expected, adverse events were more frequent in the elderly (aged over 75 years) and in patients taking cardiovascular drugs or with concomitant cardiovascular disease. Overall, alfuzosin was very well tolerated and the adverse event profile was consistent with the cumulative experience of the drug. No unexpected or serious adverse events considered to be related to alfuzosin were recorded. Particular care must be taken when prescribing for very elderly patients and/or those with concomitant cardiovascular disease for which they are receiving therapy.
 ...
PMID:Safety profile of 3 months' therapy with alfuzosin in 13,389 patients suffering from benign prostatic hypertrophy. 882 87

Approximately 25% of men over 40 or 50 suffer from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The bothersomeness of the symptoms varies considerably from one individual to the other and can fluctuate with time. Symptoms tend to gradually worsen as time goes on through. Surprisingly, there appears to be no particular relationship between symptoms and the overall prostate size and weight. Symptoms of BPH are divided in obstructive (voiding) and irritative (storage) symptoms, of which the irritative are the most bothersome. Until recently, surgery (open or transurethral resection) was the only treatment option. Nowadays, a range of less invasive treatments and pharmacological therapies are available to relieve BPH symptoms. Finasteride, for instance, reduces the prostate size by blocking 5-alpha-reductase, the enzyme which plays a role in the growth of the prostate. It takes however a long time before a clinically significant effect is noticed: +/- 6 to 12 months. Then, there are alpha 1-blockers. These agents result in relaxation of prostatic and bladder neck smooth muscle. alpha 1-blockers act relatively fast. Most alpha 1-blockers used in the treatment of symptomatic BPH were originally developed to treat hypertension. The adverse events most commonly associated with alpha 1-blockers, such as dizziness, headache, asthenia, tachycardia/palpitation, postural hypotension and syncope are possibly related to the blood pressure lowering effect. This stimulated the search for more selective alpha-blockers which act predominantly on the prostate and have less effect on the blood levels (afluzosin: Xatral and tamsulosin: Omic). Presently, alpha-blockers have become the first-line drugs in the medical treatment of symptomatic BPH. Surgery (open or TURP) is limited to patients with recurrent infections, large residue (> 200 ml), recurrent hematuria, bladder stones. New alternative and minimally invasive treatment such as TUNA generate necrotic lesions within the prostate through needle introduced endoscopically. This leads also to marked improvement in patients symptomatology.
 ...
PMID:[Benign hypertrophy of the prostate: which treatment, for whom?]. 1052 95

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide the best available external evidence for the use of alpha1-blockers in treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Placebo-controlled and actively-controlled RCTs evidenced the efficacy of alpha1-blockers in augmenting urine flow, relieving symptoms, reducing bother and improving quality of life in patients with LUTS. This improvement involves both filling (irritative) and voiding (obstructive) symptoms, occurs promptly and is well-maintained over time. Treatment benefit is independent of prostate size and baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA). There is no evidence of relevant differences between the different alpha1-blockers in this regard and all alpha1-blockers can be accepted as appropriately efficacious at the presently recommended doses. The best available external evidence for relevant differential properties of alpha1-blockers relates to their clinical selectivity in terms of the absence/presence of ancillary cardiovascular, i.e. anti-hypertensive effects. Anti-hypertensive alpha1-blockers (terazosin and doxazosin in particular) are more likely to cause dizziness and other cardiovascular untoward effects, eventually leading to premature treatment discontinuation. Alfuzosin (although primarily developed as an anti-hypertensive agent) and tamsulosin in contrast, are better tolerated; the former nevertheless carries a more distinct risk of symptomatic impairment of blood pressure control. Although indirect comparisons between different studies suggest a higher risk of retrograde ejaculation with tamsulosin, this hypothesis failed to be confirmed in direct comparative RCTs.
 ...
PMID:Alpha1-blocker therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction: what are the relevant differences in randomised controlled trials? 1111 Dec 6

Objectives: To investigate (a) the magnitude and durability of symptom score reduction and HRQL score improvement (including sexual drive); (b) adverse outcomes; and (c) progression to acute urinary retention and prostate surgery up to three years of treatment with alfuzosin. Methods: Three thousand two hundred and twenty-eight BPH-patients out of 812 centers were included in a prospective three-year open-labelled study and treated with alfuzosin (immediate release formulation) at the recommended dosage. A symptom score (Boyarsky modified) and a 20-item BPH specific HRQL score including three questions of sexuality (Urolife(TM) BPH QoL 20) were self-administered at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months. Results: Two thousand five hundred and seventy-nine patients (79.9%) completed the study at the end of three years. Symptom score was significantly reduced by 54% at 3 months and this reduction was maintained up to 36 months (-48.4%); HRQL score was significantly improved by 45.4% at 12 months and this improvement was maintained up to 36 months (+43.4%). Alfuzosin was well tolerated: the quantitative and qualitative distribution of adverse events was similar to that previously observed in placebo-controlled studies (vertigo/dizziness: 2.1%). Adverse events accounted for 4.2% of the drop-outs. 120 patients (3.7%) were operated on for BPH and nine patients (0.3%) experienced acute urinary retention. Conclusion: This medical outcomes study confirms the long-term safety profile of alfuzosin in the naturalistic conditions of general practice and highlights the need to measure HRQL in the context of patient's preferences.
 ...
PMID:Three-year prospective study of 3228 clinical BPH patients treated with alfuzosin in General Practice. 1249 88

alpha(1)-Adrenoceptor antagonists are now well established as the most common treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of bladder outflow obstruction associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Both alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists and 5alpha-reductase inhibitors are accepted treatments for LUTS, but with finasteride this applies only to patients with clinically enlarged prostates, whereas alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists are considered to be appropriate treatment for all patients, irrespective of prostate size. Systematic analyses of placebo-controlled studies show that commonly used alpha(1)-blockers are significantly superior to placebo in improving urinary flow and reducing symptoms. Efficacy of alpha-blockers appears to be well maintained over time, and there is no evidence of tolerance or tachyphylaxis to alpha(1)-blockade after 6-12 months' usage. Direct comparative trials show that, in the short term, alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists are more effective than finasteride in reducing symptom score. For alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists, the most commonly reported adverse effects are dizziness, asthenia, postural hypotension, and syncope. Alfuzosin has a more pronounced effect on blood pressure than does tamsulosin, especially in elderly patients. Tamsulosin is well tolerated and has minimal effects on blood pressure; tamsulosin 0.4 mg has the lowest potential to reduce blood pressure and causes less symptomatic orthostatic hypotension than terazosin.
 ...
PMID:A Comparison of Varying alpha-Blockers and Other Pharmacotherapy Options for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. 1698 51

Alpha-adrenergic blockers are an established form of medical treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Several medications of the class are available, each with its own characteristics. The authors attempted to define the differences between the currently available medications (Terazosin, Doxazosin, Alfuzosin, and Tamsulosin), and to present an evidence-based recommendation for choosing the best treatment option. A literature search was conducted, using Medline queries and the references of review papers, in search of pertinent studies. These included controlled studies comparing the results of treatment with alpha blockers to placebo, or direct comparative studies of alpha blockers, and real life practice, community studies of each of the medications. A similar efficacy emerged from the reviewed articles, but with a different adverse events profile. A higher rate of vasodilatatory, cardiovascular side effects (dizziness, fatigue, and hypotension) was observed with terazosin and doxazosin, when compared with the uroselective alfuzosin and tamsulosin. Of the latter two, hypotension was more frequent with alfuzosin, while ejaculatory dysfunction was more frequent with tamsulosin. In conclusion, each of the four medications is a possible treatment option for BPH, but we believe alfuzosin and tamsulosin are the better choice. In light of an identical efficacy, these medications offer better tolerability, and ease of use of a once daily treatment without dose titration. The choice between the two should be tailored to the individual patient, with alfuzosin associated with hypotensive side effects, and tamsulosin causing ejaculatory dysfunction.
 ...
PMID:[Alpha blockers in use for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia--are all drugs born equal?]. 1869 28