Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a 16 weeks open label therapeutic trial, studies were performed on isradipine (Lomir) to evaluate its haematological and biochemical safety and hypotensive capacity in the management of adult black hypertensive patients. The mean sitting diastolic blood pressure decreased from 105.5 +/- 9.66 mm hg at the end of the washout period to 92.1 +/- 7.59 mm hg at the end of the study, p less than 0.0001; while the mean standing diastolic blood pressure was 108.0 +/- 7.10 mm hg and 93.9 +/- 8.4 mm hg at the end of the washout phase and at the completion of the therapy respectively, p less than 0.0001. The corresponding mean sitting systolic blood pressures were 155.4 +/- 9.91 mm hg and 140.6 +/- 9.47 mm hg, p less than 0.001 while the corresponding mean standing systolic blood pressures were 156.6 +/- 12.50 mm hg and 142.6 +/- 9.15 mm hg, p less than 0.001. There were negligible changes in the mean heart rate; from 79.5 +/- 9.23 beats per minute (bpm) at the end of the placebo phase to 78.2 +/- 9.15 bpm at the end of the study in the sitting position, p greater than 0.1. The corresponding mean standing values of heart rate were 82.5 +/- 11.33 and 78.6 +/- 8.76, p greater than 0.5. The haematological, biochemical and electrocardiographic parameters remained within normal limits during the study. Side effects were mild, transitory, improved with therapy and consisted of dizziness, palpitations, headache, nocturia, tiredness and fainting attacks. The study achieved 96% good-to-excellent results with respect to both efficacy and tolerability. Isradipine (Lomir) is therefore an efficacious and safe antihypertensive agent in the management of black adult patients with mild to moderate primary arterial hypertension when administered in the dose of upto 2.5 mg twice daily alone or in combination with a beta-blocker.
 ...
PMID:Clinical studies on isradipine in the management of adult hypertensive patients at Moi University Teaching Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya. 138 77

The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the new calcium antagonist isradipine was assessed in 86 hypertensive patients who had pretreatment diastolic blood pressures (DBP) greater than or equal to 105 mm Hg and who were randomly allocated to a double-blind comparison of three different dosage regimens: 1.25 mg, 2.5 mg, and 5 mg b.i.d., and placebo. A 2-week run-in period was followed by a 4-week course of treatment. Isradipine reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressures dose-dependently; the normalization rate (DBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) was 5% with placebo and 29, 55, and 64% with isradipine 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg b.i.d., respectively. The proportion of patients experiencing at least a 10 mm Hg reduction in sitting DBP was 29, 67, 86, and 91%, respectively. All three dosages proved to be significantly effective compared to placebo. Neither heart rate nor blood pressure regulation in orthostasis were influenced. The main side effects were headache, dizziness, and flushing; isradipine 1.25 and 2.5 mg b.i.d. were well tolerated (not significantly different from placebo). In conclusion, isradipine 2.5 mg b.i.d. appears to be the potential dose of first choice, exhibiting a favorable benefit-risk profile.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of the new calcium antagonist isradipine in essential hypertension. 169 4

This multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of isradipine and enalapril in 160 patients with essential hypertension. Patients received isradipine or enalapril for 10 weeks after a placebo wash-out period of three to five weeks. Dosage was titrated for six weeks on the basis of blood pressure (BP) response and was then maintained for the remainder of the study. Isradipine reduced systolic and diastolic BP by 12 and 9 mm Hg, respectively, and enalapril by 10 and 7 mm Hg, respectively (between-treatment difference P less than .05 for diastolic BP). Overall, isradipine resulted in a higher responder rate, particularly among patients who had higher entry BPs. Fifteen enalapril-treated patients and four isradipine-treated patients discontinued treatment (four taking enalapril and none taking isradipine withdrew because of lack of efficacy). The most frequently reported adverse reactions were headache, dizziness, and edema in the isradipine group, and cough, headache, and chest pain in the enalapril group. Both drugs produced significant reductions in BP, but, in this study isradipine was more effective. The drugs were similarly well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:A multicenter comparison of the safety and efficacy of isradipine and enalapril in the treatment of hypertension. 182 8

Isradipine is a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist with a high degree of selectivity for the coronary, cerebral, and skeletal muscle vasculature. The drug has minimal depressant activity on sinoatrial node automaticity and negligible negative chronotropic, dromotropic, and inotropic actions. Isradipine reduces blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance without changes in cardiac output and stroke volume. Renal blood flow is maintained while renal vascular resistance is reduced; this is accompanied by both short- and long-term diuretic and natriuretic effects. Doses of 1.25 to 5 mg twice daily lowers blood pressure effectively over 24 h. In open as well as placebo-controlled trials, 2.5 to 10 mg isradipine twice daily was safe and well tolerated, and reduced systolic and diastolic values in up to 85% of patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Efficacy is similar to those of nifedipine and nitrendipine, and potentially superior to those of propranolol, atenolol, prazosin, hydrochlorothiazide, and diltiazem. The drug can be safely combined with beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and diuretics. Adverse effects are dose-dependent and secondary to arterial vasodilatation, such as headache, flushing, ankle edema, dizziness, palpitations, and tachycardia. At the recommended dose of 2.5 mg twice daily, the total incidence of side effects does not differ from that with placebo. The antiatherosclerotic, antitrophic, and cerebroprotective effects seen in experimental animal models are promising for the drug in the treatment of human hypertension. Isradipine may not only reduce blood pressure, but may also reduce the risk for the consequences of this peril, namely, cerebral stroke and myocardial infarction.
 ...
PMID:The place of isradipine in the treatment of hypertension. 182 26

Isradipine is a dihydropyridine calcium-entry blocking agent with pronounced vasodilator activity and no significant cardiac effects at clinical doses, a desirable profile for an antihypertensive drug. Prazosin, a post-junctional alpha-adrenoceptor blocking agent, may produce a similar hemodynamic pattern. Therefore, we compared the effects of isradipine (2.5-10 mg bid) with those of prazosin (2-8 mg bid) in 83 patients with established essential hypertension, using a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design. Patients received a placebo for 3-5 weeks, then either isradipine or prazosin over a 6-week titration period, followed by a 4-week plateau phase. During the plateau period, isradipine therapy lowered sitting blood pressure more effectively than did the administration of prazosin: Mean systolic BP fell 16.7 versus 8.1 mmHg (p less than 0.001) and mean diastolic BP was reduced 15.6 versus 12.6 mmHg (p less than 0.01). In the dosing range used (while also noting that prazosin is occasionally titrated up to doses of 30 mg qd), 83% of isradipine-treated patients had at least a 10 mmHg reduction in diastolic BP, compared with 64% of prazosin-treated patients (p = 0.05, FET). Tachyphylaxis did not occur with either drug. The rate of occurrence of side effects was similar in both treatment groups; the most common adverse event seen with isradipine was headache (20%) and with prazosin, dizziness (19%).
 ...
PMID:A multicenter comparison of isradipine and prazosin for treatment of essential hypertension. 214 12

The aim of this study was to compare the tolerability and efficacy of isradipine and felodipine in the treatment of mild-moderate hypertension. After a 4 week placebo period, 143 patients entered a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study of 12 weeks duration. Patients received either isradipine (n = 72) or felodipine (n = 71) 2.5 mg twice daily. Doubling of this dose and the addition of enalapril (2.5 mg once daily) was permitted if DBP was > 90 mmHg at weeks 4 and 8, respectively. Isradipine monotherapy reduced BP from 165/104 +/- 13/6 mmHg at baseline to 149/91 +/- 14/10 mmHg at week 8 (p < 0.001), while felodipine alone reduced BP from 171/104 +/- 17/6 at baseline to 151/92 +/- 19/9 (p < 0.001). Following the addition of enalapril to 35% of patients in the isradipine group BP was further reduced to 144/88 +/- 13/8 mmHg at week 12 (p < 0.001). The addition of enalapril to 24% of the felodipine group further reduced BP to 150/92 +/- 19/9 mmHg at week 12 (p < 0.001). No differences in BP were found between the 2 groups while on monotherapy. However, the isradipine group had a significantly lower DBP than the felodipine group at the conclusion of the study (p = 0.008; 95% CI 0.7 to 6.9 mmHg). Similar incidences of headache, flushing, dizziness and tachycardia were reported in both groups. However, the incidence of ankle oedema was significantly lower in the isradipine group (p = 0.028). Overall, ankle oedema was reported more often by female patients and was not associated with an increase in weight.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A comparison of isradipine and felodipine in Australian patients with hypertension: focus on ankle oedema. The Physician's Study Group. 820 14

The objective of this study was to compare the tolerability of isradipine and felodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Following a 4-week placebo run-in, 143 patients entered a 12-week double-blind multicenter study. Patients were randomized to receive either isradipine (n = 72) or felodipine (n = 71) at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily. Dose-doubling and the addition of enalapril (2.5 mg once daily) was permitted if diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was > 90 mm Hg at weeks 4 and 8, respectively. Isradipine reduced blood pressure from 165/104 +/- 13/6 mm Hg at baseline to 144/88 +/- 13/8 mm Hg at week 12 (P < .001) whereas felodipine reduced blood pressure from 171/104 +/- 17/6 mm Hg at baseline to 150/92 +/- 19/9 mm Hg at week 12 (P < .001). Similar incidences of headache, flushing, dizziness and tachycardia were reported in both groups. However, the incidence of ankle edema was significantly lower in the isradipine group (14% v 30%) (P = .028). It is concluded that isradipine represents a practical improvement over felodipine in the treatment of hypertension.
 ...
PMID:A multicenter comparison of isradipine and felodipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. The Physician's Study Group. 846 25

In order to assess the effective dose, tolerability, and safety of isradipine as a monotherapeutic antihypertensive agent for Chinese patients in Taiwan, an open trial was carried out. This study consisted of a 2-week, placebo, run-in period and an 8-week active treatment period, starting with isradipine 1.25 mg twice daily (bid) for the first 4 weeks, followed by 2.5 mg bid if the blood pressure was not normalized (diastole < 90 mmHg). One hundred and one patients (M/F = 48:53) were valid for efficacy analysis. Their age ranged from 30 to 64 years (mean +/- SD, 52 +/- 8). The blood pressure before active treatment was 160 +/- 2/104 +/- 1 mmHg. At the end of treatment period I (week 4), 12-14 hours after the last dose, 38 (37.6%) patients were normalized and 47 (46.5%) subjects responded (diastolic blood pressure reduction > or = 10 mmHg). At week 8, 68 (67.3%) patients were normalized and 79 (78.2%) subjects responded. Isradipine reduced both systolic and diastolic blood pressures within 2 weeks of treatment. There were no significant differences in blood pressure reduction between both genders and among age groups. Safety analysis showed two subjects with severe flushing, dizziness, and palpitation who used the dose of 1.25 mg bid. They withdrew from the study. The adverse reactions of other patients were transient, mild, and tolerable. Most of the side effects were related to vasodilatation, but edema was not found. There was no change in body weight or heart rate, nor any atrioventricular conduction disturbances.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Dose titration study of isradipine in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. 848 68

Many children with hypertension, particularly those with new-onset hypertension related to glomerulonephritis, organ transplantation, or other forms of secondary hypertension, require treatment with a short-acting antihypertensive in order to quickly achieve blood pressure (BP) control. We administered isradipine, a short-acting, second-generation calcium antagonist, to 72 such children. Retrospective data collection was undertaken to determine the effects of isradipine treatment. The mean age of children treated with isradipine was 74+/-55 months (mean+/-SD). Nearly all of these children had secondary hypertension and were initially treated as hospital inpatients for newly diagnosed hypertension. Mean isradipine dose was 0.36+/-0.17 mg/kg per day, with no significant variation in dose according to patient age. Isradipine was administered three times per day in most instances, but 21% of the time it was administered four times per day. An extemporaneous isradipine suspension was used in 62% of treatment courses. BP control was achieved with isradipine alone in 38 children; the remainder received isradipine in combination with additional antihypertensives. Comparison of pre-treatment BP with BP obtained 8+/-9 days later demonstrated a significant BP reduction with isradipine treatment, with a mean reduction of 14+/-13 mmHg for systolic BP and 13+/-15 mmHg for diastolic BP. There was no effect of isradipine treatment on heart rate. Adverse effects occurred in 9.5% of treatment courses, and included headache, flushing, dizziness, and tachycardia. We conclude that isradipine successfully lowers BP in hypertensive children with secondary forms of hypertension. Use of isradipine suspension allows infants and young children to be treated as readily as older children.
 ...
PMID:Isradipine treatment of hypertension in children: a single-center experience. 1221 29

Recent data suggests that isradipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, is neuroprotective in preclinical models of parkinsonism. Isradipine has not been systematically studied in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and tolerability of isradipine controlled release (CR) in patients with early PD. Qualified subjects (n = 31) received isradipine CR, titrated from 5 to 20 mg daily dose over 8 weeks as tolerated. Eighty-one percent of subjects completed the study. Tolerability of isradipine CR was dose dependent: 94% for 5 mg dose; 87% for 10 mg; 68% for 15 mg; and 52% for 20 mg. Isradipine had no significant effect on blood pressure or PD motor disability. The two most common reasons for dose reduction were leg edema (7) and dizziness (3). There was no difference in isradipine tolerability between subjects with and without dopaminergic treatment, or with and without hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Tolerability of isradipine in early Parkinson's disease: a pilot dose escalation study. 2081 67


1 2 Next >>