Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Valsartan competitively and selectively inhibits the actions of angiotensin II at the AT1 receptor subtype which is responsible for most of the known effects of angiotensin II. In clinical trials in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension valsartan was as effective as losartan, lisinopril, enalapril, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide. Addition of the latter reduced blood pressure in patients who did not respond sufficiently to valsartan monotherapy. Preliminary data also suggest valsartan may be effective in patients with severe essential hypertension. The drug was as effective as lisinopril as treatment for mild to moderate essential hypertension in patients with renal insufficiency and did not worsen renal function. Headache, dizziness and fatigue were the most common adverse events in placebo-controlled studies; the incidence of these adverse events was not significantly different between placebo and valsartan recipients. Compared with ACE inhibitors, valsartan was associated with a significantly lower incidence of dry cough. Thus, valsartan is an effective treatment for mild to moderate essential hypertension and may be particularly useful in patients who experience persistent cough during ACE inhibitor therapy.
 ...
PMID:Valsartan. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in essential hypertension. 925 84

We compared the angiotensin II receptor antagonist valsartan to losartan as an antihypertensive agent in an 8-week trial. Adults with uncomplicated essential hypertension (baseline seated diastolic blood pressure < 115 mm Hg and > or = 95 mm Hg) were randomized to receive 80 mg valsartan, 50 mg losartan, or placebo once daily. After 4 weeks doses of active medication and placebo were doubled. Seated systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured and the response rate evaluated. Tolerability was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. Both angiotensin II receptor antagonists produced similar significant reductions in mean blood pressures at 4 and 8 weeks compared to placebo. Valsartan produced a significantly higher number of responders (62%) than losartan (55%, P = .02) at the 8 week treatment endpoint. The incidence of adverse experiences (AE) was similar in all three groups, with headache and dizziness reported most often. Valsartan (80/160 mg) monotherapy in this trial was as effective and well tolerated as 50/100 mg losartan in treating mild to moderate essential hypertension, and at 160 mg has a significantly higher responder rate than 100 mg losartan.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of the angiotensin II antagonists valsartan and losartan in the treatment of essential hypertension. 1023 2

Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combines an angiotensin II AT1 receptor blocker with a thiazide diuretic to produce additive blood pressure reductions without major effects on heart rate. HCTZ did not significantly alter valsartan pharmacokinetics; during combination therapy, HCTZ pharmacokinetics differed from those seen with HCTZ monotherapy. In clinical trials in patients with essential hypertension, adding HCTZ 12.5 or 25 mg/day to valsartan 80 mg/day resulted in a greater blood pressure reduction than increasing the valsartan dosage from 80 to 160 mg/day. The valsartan/HCTZ combination was generally more effective than either drug given alone. Efficacy of the combination was maintained during up to 3 years of treatment. Valsartan/HCTZ was well tolerated in both short and long term trials. The most common adverse events were dizziness, headache and fatigue. The overall incidence of adverse events with the combination was similar to that with placebo. HCTZ-induced hypokalaemia was less common during combination therapy.
 ...
PMID:Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide. 1035

The study was designed to assess the antihypertensive effect of combined angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) antagonism in patients with essential hypertension. Twenty patients with uncontrolled ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (BP) after 6 weeks of ACE inhibitor monotherapy (benazepril, 20 mg, o.d.) were randomized to receive double-blind valsartan, 80 mg, o.d. (AT1 antagonist) or matching placebo for 5 weeks while continuing to receive background benazepril. Then patients crossed over to the alternative regimen for a second 5-week period. The 24-h ambulatory BP was monitored on the final day of the benazepril monotherapy period and on the final day of each double-blind treatment period. Valsartan added to benazepril produced a significant antihypertensive effect with a benefit over placebo of 6.5 +/- 12.6/4.5 +/- 8.0 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic) for average awake ambulatory BP (p < 0.05), 7.1 +/- 9.4/5.6 +/- 6.5 mm Hg for asleep BP (p < 0.01), and 6.8 +/- 9.7/4.9 +/- 6.8 mm Hg for average 24-h ambulatory BP (p < 0.01). Pulse rate was unaffected. Plasma active renin was higher on the benazepril-valsartan combination compared with benazepril-placebo (p < 0.05). There was no change in routine biochemical variables when valsartan was added to benazepril. Six patients reported mild dizziness or fatigue (three also with placebo). These data suggest that in hypertensive patients uncontrolled with an ACE inhibitor, the addition of an AT1 antagonist provides a powerful and safe antihypertensive drug combination.
 ...
PMID:Additive hypotensive effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin-receptor antagonism in essential hypertension. 1083 30

Valsartan is a second class of angiotensin II receptor antagonist, indicated for the treatment of hypertension. The objective of the study was to monitor the safety of valsartan using the technique of prescription event monitoring (PEM), in patients who were prescribed this drug by general practitioners (GPs) in England. PEM is a noninterventional observation cohort technique. Exposure data were obtained from dispensed prescriptions issued between December 1996 and November 1998. Outcome data were obtained by sending questionnaires to prescribing GPs. The cohort comprised 12881 patients. Events most frequently reported as suspected adverse drug reactions were malaise/lassitude (37; 0.3% of total cohort), dizziness (19; 0.1%), and unspecified side effects (57; 0.4%). Events with the highest incidence density (ID(1) per 1000 patient-months of treatment) in the first month of treatment were malaise/lassitude (15.6), dizziness (11.8), and headache/migraine (10.9). Most frequent reasons for stopping valsartan were not effective (847; 6.6% of total cohort), malaise/lassitude (265; 21%), and dizziness (146; 1.1%). No unexpected serious adverse events were identified. Other events assessed as possibly related to valsartan use were impotence (37), dizziness (19), cough (9), facial oedema (5), hyperkalaemia (3), and angioneurotic oedema (1). There were four reports of exposure during pregnancy and 203 deaths (1.5%) in this cohort. In conclusion, this study monitored the safety profile of valsartan in a large cohort of patients in general practice in England. No untoward features other than dizziness were identified that were not mentioned in the prescribing guidance.
 ...
PMID:The safety of valsartan: results of a postmarketing surveillance study on 12881 patients in England. 1244 41

Valsartan, an orally active nonpeptide angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonist with selectivity for the AII type I (AT(1)) receptor subtype, has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with heart failure (New York Health Association class II-IV) who are intolerant of ACE-inhibitor therapy. Results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) showed that in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) [n = 5010], valsartan 160 mg twice daily, when used in combination with conventional therapy for heart failure, reduced the risk of the combined endpoint of mortality and morbidity by 13.2% compared with placebo. However, there was no significant difference in overall mortality between the valsartan and placebo groups. Morbidity was defined as cardiac arrest with resuscitation, hospitalization for heart failure, or administration of intravenous inotropic or vasodilator drugs for > or =4 hours without hospitalization. Among patients not receiving an ACE inhibitor, irrespective of concomitant beta-blocker use, valsartan reduced the risk of mortality and the combined endpoint by 33.1% and 44% compared with placebo; total hospitalizations for heart failure were also significantly lower in the valsartan group (27.6 vs 64.6%). In the subgroup of patients who were taking an ACE inhibitor and a beta-blocker at baseline (n = 1610), mortality was significantly higher in the valsartan group than in the placebo group. The most common adverse events in the valsartan and placebo groups which led to discontinuation of treatment were dizziness, renal impairment (both of which occurred in significantly more valsartan recipients) and hypotension.
 ...
PMID:Valsartan: in chronic heart failure. 1472 72