Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We audited and analysed the adverse effects and safety of postoperative pain management on 2509 consecutive patients under care of the Acute Pain Service at a tertiary referral teaching hospital over a 32-month period. Our standard respiratory monitoring consisted of continuous pulse oximetry, hourly respiratory rate counting, sedation scoring and intermittent arterial blood gas sampling. This protocol was reliable and detected six episodes of bradypnoea, 13 of hypercapnia and 23 of oxygen desaturation occurring in 39 patients (1.8% of all spontaneously breathing patients). Two patients required naloxone injection and none had long-term sequelae. Hypotension due to epidural bupivacaine 0.0625% and fentanyl 3.3 micrograms.ml-1 infusion occurred in four patients (1.2%), all with a sensory block higher than T5. They readily responded to fluid infusion and ephedrine (two patients). Postoperative nausea or vomiting occurred in 723 (28.8%) and 380 (15.1%) patients, respectively. Odds ratio analysis showed that the risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting were: female gender, gynaecological operations, nongeriatric patients and systemic analgesia. Postoperative nausea and vomiting decreased analgesic efficacy by discouraging the use of patient-controlled analgesia and was regarded as equally distressing as pain. Other side-effects included: pruritus in 182 patients; dizziness in 333 and lower limb weakness in 73 (21.2% of patients receiving epidural local anaesthetics). It is concluded that a standard monitoring and management protocol, an experienced nursing team and reliable Acute Pain Service coverage is mandatory for the safe use of modern analgesic techniques.
 ...
PMID:An audit of the safety of an acute pain service. 940 64

Day case surgery is increasing to improve health care cost efficiency. The economic benefits of day surgery depend on how many patients accept same day discharge. This study aims to investigate what proportion of adults undergoing tonsillectomy would accept same day discharge and reasons for refusal. Fifty consecutive adults undergoing in-patient tonsillectomy who satisfied criteria for day surgery were prospectively studied. All patients had the same day case; anaesthetic, tonsillectomy technique, analgesia and antiemetic. Eight hours after surgery patients were given discharge information and asked whether they would accept discharge. Those patients who refused discharge were asked to specify why. Additional morphine requirements were noted. Fifty-two percent of patients would accept same day discharge. Reasons for refusal were; pain 46%, nausea 33%, dizziness 13% and pain and nausea 8%. Those refusing discharge were three times more likely to have received additional morphine. These results compare unfavourably with oversees studies and this may be due to sampling bias. Further studies are required.
 ...
PMID:Adult tonsillectomy: what proportion would accept same day discharge? 999 Aug

Thirty-eight ASA I-III patients undergoing lower abdominal operations were randomly allocated to receive either morphine (group M, patient-controlled analgesia bolus = 1 mg of morphine) or tramadol (group T, patient-controlled analgesia bolus = 10 mg of tramadol) for post-operative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after receiving morphine intraoperatively. There were no between-group differences in the pain, sedation or vomit scores. The nausea scores were significantly higher in group T in the initial 20 h and between 32 and 36 h (P < 0.01, 0-4 and 8-12 h; P < 0.05, 4-8, 12-16, 16-20 and 32-36 h). The incidence of dizziness was also significantly higher in group T (68.4% vs. 31.6%, group T vs. group M, P < 0.05). There was no difference in the overall satisfaction. We conclude that the use of tramadol, compared with morphine, for post-operative PCA after intraoperative loading with morphine is associated with more nausea and dizziness, but with similar sedation, quality of analgesia and patient satisfaction.
 ...
PMID:Increased nausea and dizziness when using tramadol for post-operative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) compared with morphine after intraoperative loading with morphine. 978 72

Effective postoperative analgesia with minimal side effects remains an important goal in enabling increasingly complex surgical procedures to be performed on an outpatient basis. In this study, we examined the efficacy of postoperative analgesia in 90 patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a patellar tendon autograft, with a 24-hour hospital stay. Patients were randomized to receive either intramuscular ketorolac supplemented by oral oxycodone, or intravenous morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, for postoperative analgesia. Patients were monitored for 2 hours in the recovery room, then every 4 hours until discharge, for the presence of complications of nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, pruritus, and dizziness. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) on the morning of postoperative day one. All patients were discharged by 24 hours after surgery. Ten (20%) of the patients receiving ketorolac/oxycodone versus 31 (79%) of those receiving PCA morphine experienced postoperative complications (P < .05). Postoperative nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention were each significantly more common in the PCA morphine group (P < .05). The incidence of pruritus and dizziness was low overall. There was no significant difference between groups in the severity of postoperative pain as assessed using a VAS. We conclude that ketorolac/oxycodone may provide comparable analgesia with fewer undesirable side effects than PCA morphine in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients receiving ketorolac/oxymorphone may have a better quality recovery and more rapid discharge.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of ketorolac tromethamine/oxycodone versus patient-controlled analgesia with morphine in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients. 984 91

Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) is a novel opioid formulation in which the potent synthetic mu-agonist fentanyl is embedded in a sweetened matrix that is dissolved in the mouth. It is undergoing investigation as a treatment for cancer-related breakthrough pain, a prevalent phenomenon defined as a transitory flare of moderate to severe pain that interrupts otherwise controlled persistent pain. There have been no controlled trials of other treatments for this condition. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ascending doses of OTFC, a novel controlled dose titration methodology was developed that applied blinding and randomization procedures to the evaluation of recurrent pains in the home environment. The study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind dose titration study in ambulatory cancer patients. The sample comprised adult patients receiving a scheduled oral opioid regimen equivalent to 60-1000 mg oral morphine per day, who were experiencing at least one episode per day of breakthrough pain and had achieved at least partial relief of this pain by use of an oral opioid rescue dose. After collection of 2 days of baseline data concerning the efficacy of the usual rescue drug, patients were randomly treated with either 200 or 400 microg OTFC unit doses in double-blind fashion. Up to two breakthrough pains each day could be treated with up to four OTFC unit doses per pain. OTFC in unit doses containing 200, 400, 600, 800, 1200 or 1600 microg of fentanyl citrate were available for the study. The unit dose was titrated upward in steps until the patient had 2 consecutive days on which breakthrough pain could be treated with the single unit dose, titration was ineffective at a 1600 microg unit dose, or 20 days elapsed. To maintain the double-blind, orders to titrate up were ignored one-third of the time according to a pre-defined randomization schedule accessible only to an unblinded study pharmacist. Main outcome measures included, numeric or categorical measures of pain intensity, pain relief, and global assessment of drug performance. Dose response relationships were found suggesting that the methodology was sensitive to opioid effects. Seventy-four percent of patients were successfully titrated. There was no relationship between the total daily dose of the fixed schedule opioid regimen and the dose of OTFC required to manage the breakthrough pain. Although the study was not designed to provide a definitive comparison between OTFC and the usual rescue drug, exploratory analyses found that OTFC provided significantly greater analgesic effect at 15, 30 and 60 min, and a more rapid onset of effect, than the usual rescue drug. Adverse effects of the OTFC were typically opioid-related, specifically somnolence, nausea and dizziness. Very few adverse events were severe or serious. This study demonstrated the feasibility of controlled trial methodology in studies of breakthrough pain. OTFC appears to be a safe and effective therapy for breakthrough pain, and dose titration can usually identify a unit dose capable of providing adequate analgesia. If the lack of a relationship between the effective OTFC dose and fixed schedule opioid regimen is confirmed, dose titration may be needed in the clinical use of this formulation. Further investigation of OTFC as a specific treatment for breakthrough pain is warranted.
 ...
PMID:Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) for the treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients: a controlled dose titration study. 1006 76

This single-dose, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study compared the analgesic efficacy and safety of MS Contin (MSC) and Oramorph SR (OSR), two controlled-release preparations of oral morphine sulfate, in patients following orthopedic surgery. One hundred patients received MSC 30 mg, MSC 60 mg, or OSR 60 mg (two 30-mg tablets) when postoperative pain became moderate or severe. Patients self-rated pain intensity and relief on categorical (CAT) and visual analogue scales (VAS) hourly for up to 12 hours. MSC 60 mg produced the greatest peak analgesic effect and was more efficacious than OSR 60 mg through the sixth hour, with statistical significance achieved at 1, 2, and 3 hours postdosage. Compared with OSR 60 mg, both MSC dosages provided significantly more rapid times to peak effect by CAT and VAS ratings. The OSR group experienced almost twice as many adverse events as did the two MSC groups and also reported somnolence and dizziness more frequently. MSC 60 mg provided more rapid and greater peak analgesia with fewer adverse effects than did OSR 60 mg.
 ...
PMID:Analgesic efficacy and safety of two oral controlled-release morphine preparations in orthopedic postoperative pain. 1015 Feb 66

An oral solution available as ethanol-free droplets of the fixed drug combination tilidine-HCl 50 mg/naloxone-HCl 4 mg (CAS 27107-79-5 and CAS 465-65-6, respectively; Tilidin-ratiopharm plus Tropfen) was investigated in 12 healthy volunteers together with an ethanol-containing reference preparation for comparable bioavailability. The study was conducted in an open, randomized, two-way cross-over design applying single doses of 20 droplets (equivalent to 50 mg tilidine-HCl/4 mg naloxone-HCl) of either formulation in the fasting state. The drug plasma profiles were monitored for a period of 48 h by means of LC-MS/MS for tilidine and its active metabolite nortilidine, whereas GC-MS was employed in order to determine naloxone and its phase I metabolite, 6-beta-naloxole. Maximum concentrations (Cmax) achieved were 22.28 ng/ml (tilidine) and 92.78 ng/ml (nortilidine) for the test preparation. Corresponding values for the reference preparation were 24.95 ng/ml (tilidine) and 100.73 ng/ml (nortilidine). The extent of drug absorption (AUC0-infinity) amounted to 38.83 ng h/ml and 467.63 ng h/ml for the prodrug tilidine and the metabolite nortilidine of the test preparation and corresponded well to 43.81 ng h/ml and 493.85 ng h/ml of the reference. Regarding the rate of drug absorption, essentially identical tmax and Rabs values for both tilidine and nortilidine of either preparation in addition pointed to well comparable liquid formulations and equipotent analgesia may be inferred from opioid pharmakokinetic profiles. Pharmacokinetics of the opioid antagonist naloxone and 6-beta-naloxole were also determined and resulted in well coinciding profiles for both preparations. Thus despite the fact that only minimum oral naloxone bioavailabilities were observed, plasma level monitoring of naloxone and 6-beta-naloxole allowed for demonstration of systemic exposure of opioid antagonistic compounds throughout a period of 2-3 h after oral drug administration. Due to the limited number of subjects involved, the primary aim of the study did not consist in demonstration of drug bioequivalence. Rather a comparable bioavailability between preparations was assumed if AUC and Cmax point estimators of 90% confidence intervals would be contained within a 0.80-1.20 range. The study outcome revealed that all four investigated analytes met this requirement, whilst nortilidine pharmacokinetic parameters even fulfilled commonly accepted bioequivalence criteria, i.e. inclusion of 90% confidence intervals of AUC- and Cmax-ratios within acceptance limits of 80% and 125%. Increased data variation observed with bioavailability parameters of tilidine, naloxone and 6-beta-naloxole prevented their bioequivalence demonstration based on only 12 study participants. In conclusion, single doses of two different tilidine/naloxone 50 mg/4 mg liquid formulations revealed well comparable bioavailability for all 4 analytes investigated. Both treatments were fairly well tolerated. Most frequently reported adverse events were dizziness, headache and nausea, which all recovered without sequelae and necessity of concomitant treatment.
 ...
PMID:Bioavailability investigation of a new tilidine/naloxone liquid formulation compared to a reference formulation. 1044 8

Intramuscular (i.m.) injection with meperidine is the most common analgesic approach to treat postoperative pain in Taiwan. Hydromorphone (Dilaudid) can provide very potent and rapid analgesic effect through subcutaneous (s.c.) injection. Although hydromorphone is widely used in North America, no study has compared the analgesic efficacy, side effect profiles and patients' satisfaction with the method of injection of hydromorphone s.c. and meperidine i.m. for the immediate post-operative analgesia. In this randomized and double-blind study, 60 female patients scheduled for abdominal total hysterectomy were treated either with 1 mg hydromorphone s.c. (n = 30) or 50 mg meperidine i.m. (n = 30) when they regained consciousness and asked for analgesic treatment in the recovery room. Visual analogue score (VAS) of wound pain was obtained at 0, 10 and 30 min after injection by a blinded observer. The occurrence and severity of nausea, vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, flatus passage and respiratory depression were recorded. Post-operative analgesia in the ward was maintained by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine. Time to first PCA demand, the number of demands, delivery, delivery/demand ratio and 24 h morphine consumption were documented. We found that VAS was reduced at 10 min and, to a greater extent, at 30 min postinjection in both groups but with no significant difference between the two groups. The occurrence and severity of side effect profiles were similar in both groups except that dizziness was more frequently observed after meperidine injection. Delivery, demand, delivery/demand ratio and 24 hr morphine consumption by PCA were not significantly different between the two groups. Time to first PCA trigger was also similar. Patients receiving hydromorphone s.c. injection exhibited higher satisfactory score than those receiving meperidine i.m. injection. Hydromorphone 1 mg, injected subcutaneously, was as effective as intramuscular meperidine 50 mg while permitting more favorable injection technique and fewer side effects. We suggest that subcutaneous hydromorphone is a good alternative to intramuscular meperidine for postoperative analgesia in the recovery room.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of subcutaneous hydromorphone with intramuscular meperidine for immediate postoperative analgesia. 1046 24

Anecdotal reports suggest that the general anaesthetic drug ketamine, taken orally in low doses, can give rise to some extra analgesia in patients with refractory neuropathic pain. This study was designed to determine the proportion of patients with chronic neuropathic pain responding to oral ketamine, and then to separate the true treatment effect from non-specific effects by means of an n of 1 randomised controlled trial. Twenty-one patients gave informed consent and completed daily pain diaries and continued on their usual treatments (drug and non-drug) for the duration of the study. After a 'baseline' week, oral ketamine was taken once a day for 1 week. The dose of 20 mg was increased each day until an analgesic effect was noticed or adverse effects occurred, or until a maximum of 100 mg was reached. Those patients responding to oral ketamine were then entered into the n of 1 randomised trial which consisted of three treatment/placebo week pairs. Twelve patients did not progress to the n of 1 trial because of no benefit and/or intolerable adverse effects (dizziness, drowsiness etc.). Nine patients completed the n of 1 trial; there was no difference between the ketamine and placebo weeks in six patients; one patient demonstrated effective analgesia with ketamine, but it was of short duration and marred by unpleasant adverse effects; two patients showed some evidence of a beneficial response to ketamine, and continued with the oral ketamine after the trial. We conclude that oral ketamine only gave rise to an extra analgesic response in three out of 21 patients with chronic neuropathic pain (14%). Adverse effects limited the use of the drug in almost half of the patients. The n of 1 trial was useful in demonstrating no true therapeutic effect for the ketamine in two thirds of the patients progressing to that part of the trial.
 ...
PMID:N of 1 randomised controlled trials of oral ketamine in patients with chronic pain. 1053

Two separate trials compared controlled-release (CR) oral oxycodone (administered every 12 hours) with immediate-release (IR) oxycodone (4 times a day) to determine whether patients with chronic pain could be titrated to stable pain control as readily with the CR as with the IR formulation. In one study, 48 patients with cancer pain were randomized to open-label titration with either CR or IR oxycodone (maximum dose, 400 mg/day) for a period of up to 21 days. In a study of similar design, 57 patients with low back pain were titrated with either CR or IR oxycodone (maximum dose, 80 mg/day) for a period of up to 10 days. The majority of patients in both studies were converted to oxycodone from other opioid analgesics. Results of both studies showed no difference between CR and IR oxycodone with respect to both the percentage of patients achieving stable pain control, the time to achieve stable pain control, and the degree of pain control achieved. Among cancer patients, 85% achieved stable analgesia, 92% with the CR formulation and 79% with the IR formulation. Among noncancer patients, 91% achieved stable pain control, 87% with the CR formulation and 96% with the IR formulation. The most commonly reported adverse effects in both studies were similar for the two formulations and were those anticipated with opioids: nausea, vomiting, constipation, somnolence, dizziness, and pruritus. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently cited reasons for treatment discontinuations. These studies suggest that dose titration can be accomplished as readily with oral CR oxycodone as with IR oxycodone in patients with chronic, moderate to severe pain.
 ...
PMID:Can a controlled-release oral dose form of oxycodone be used as readily as an immediate-release form for the purpose of titrating to stable pain control? 1053 67


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>