Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Ftorafur, a furanyl analog of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), is reported to be five to six times less toxic and possibly more effective in cancer of the breast and colon than 5-FU. The drug was synthesized, formulated, and utilized in toxicologic studies, and then in 24 patients with advanced incurable malignancies. When Ftorafur is given by intravenous push, it results in immediate flushing, dizziness, nausea, retching, and in some cases transient hypotension. These immediate side effects are largely eliminated by administering the drug slowly by infusion. In patients, 60 mg/kg of Ftorafur given i.v. daily for up to 10 days resulted in mild toxicity. However, 80 mg/kg given i.v. daily for 7 days resulted in severe toxicity, with nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. These studies confirm those of the Russian investigators as to toxicity and dosage, even with a different method of administration more convenient for therapy. Phase II studies are presently being carried out to compare the effectiveness of Ftorafur and 5-FU.
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of ftorafur, an analog of 5-fluorouracil. 120 38

In a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, nabilone was compared to prochlorperazine for control of cancer chemotherapy-induced emesis in 30 children 3.5 to 17.8 years of age. All subjects received two consecutive identical cycles of chemotherapy with the trial antiemetics given in accordance to a body weight-based dosage schedule beginning eight to 12 hours before treatment. The overall rate of improvement of retching and emesis was 70% during the nabilone and 30% during the prochlorperazine treatment cycles (P = .003, chi 2 test). On completion of the trial, 66% of the children stated that they preferred nabilone, 17% preferred prochlorperazine, and 17% had no preference (P = .015, chi 2 test). Major side effects (dizziness, drowsiness, and mood alteration) were more common (11% v 3%) during the nabilone treatment cycles. CNS side effects appeared to be dose related and were most likely to occur when the nabilone dosage exceeded 60 micrograms/kg/d, but individual tolerance to nabilone varied considerably. Lower dosages of nabilone were associated with equivalent efficacy and no major side effects. Nabilone appears to be a safe, effective, and well-tolerated antiemetic drug for children receiving cancer chemotherapy. Although major side effects may occur at higher dosages, nabilone is preferable to prochlorperazine because of improved efficacy.
 ...
PMID:Nabilone versus prochlorperazine for control of cancer chemotherapy-induced emesis in children: a double-blind, crossover trial. 303 79

Nabilone, a synthetic cannabinoid, and Prochlorperazine were compared in a double-blind crossover study of 34 patients with lung cancer undergoing a 3-day schedule of chemotherapy with Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin and Etoposide. Symptom scores were significantly better for patients on nabilone for nausea, retching and vomiting (P less than 0.05). Fewer subjects vomited with nabilone (P = 0.05) and the number of vomiting episodes was lower (P less than 0.05); no patients on nabilone required additional parenteral anti-emetic. More patients preferred nabilone for anti-emetic control (P less than 0.005). Adverse effects common with nabilone were drowsiness (57%), postural dizziness (35%) and lightheadedness (18%). Euphoria was seen in 14% and a "high" in 7%. Erect systolic blood pressure was lower in nabilone patients on Day 1 (P = 0.05) but postural hypotension was a major problem in only 7%. Nabilone is an effective oral anti-emetic drug for moderately toxic chemotherapy, but the range and unpredictability of its side-effects warrant caution in its use.
 ...
PMID:Anti-emetic efficacy and toxicity of nabilone, a synthetic cannabinoid, in lung cancer chemotherapy. 631 40

Treatment with St John's wort extract tablets (hypericum Ze 117) and the commonly used slow serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine was compared in patients with mild-moderate depression with entry Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) (21-item) in the range 16-24, in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparison in 240 subjects; fluoxetine: 114 (48%), hypericum: 126 (52%). After 6 weeks' treatment, mean HAM-D at endpoint decreased to 11.54 on hypericum and to 12.20 on fluoxetine (P < 0.09), while mean Clinical Global Impression (CGI) item I (severity) was significantly (P < 0.03) superior on hypericum, as was the responder rate (P = 0.005). Hypericum safety was substantially superior to fluoxetine, with the incidence of adverse events being 23% on fluoxetine and 8% on hypericum. The commonest events on fluoxetine were agitation (8%), GI disturbances (6%), retching (4%), dizziness (4%), tiredness, anxiety/nervousness and erectile dysfunction (3% each), while on hypericum only GI disturbances (5%) had an incidence greater than 2%. We concluded that hypericum and fluoxetine are equipotent with respect to all main parameters used to investigate antidepressants in this population. Although hypericum may be superior in improving the responder rate, the main difference between the two treatments is safety. Hypericum was superior to fluoxetine in overall incidence of side-effects, number of patients with side-effects and the type of side-effect reported.
 ...
PMID:Equivalence of St John's wort extract (Ze 117) and fluoxetine: a randomized, controlled study in mild-moderate depression. 1075 36

To compare a novel controlled-release formulation of metoclopramide with placebo in patients with cancer-associated dyspepsia syndrome, 26 adult patients with a >/=1 month history of cancer-associated dyspepsia syndrome were randomized to receive either controlled-release metoclopramide 40 mg every 12 hours or matching placebo for a period of 4 days. On day 5, patients crossed over to the alternate treatment for a further period of 4 days. Dose adjustments and rescue antiemetics were permitted during both phases. Nausea, anorexia, bloating, vomiting/retching, and drowsiness were assessed on a 100-mm VAS scale in a daily diary. On the last day of treatment of each phase, nausea was significantly lower in the controlled-release metoclopramide group compared to placebo (17 +/- 12 mm versus 12 +/- 10 mm). Nausea scores tended to increase across days during the placebo phase and to decrease during the controlled-release metoclopramide phase. There was a trend for improvement in the intensity of all symptoms on controlled-release metoclopramide with the exception of appetite, but this trend only reached statistical significance for nausea. The frequency and severity of elicited adverse events did not differ significantly between treatments, although drowsiness, dizziness, and poor sleep were somewhat higher in the placebo group. In no case was it necessary to discontinue controlled-release metoclopramide because of toxicity. These results indicate that controlled-release metoclopramide reduces gastrointestinal symptoms in this population of advanced cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind, crossover study of controlled-release metoclopramide and placebo for the chronic nausea and dyspepsia of advanced cancer. 1090 23

Women undergoing general anesthesia for breast surgery are at particular risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 90 patients scheduled for breast surgery, aged 33-63 years, received intravenously placebo, 3 mg granisetron, or 0.3 mg ramosetron (n = 30 of each) at the end of surgical procedure. A standard general anesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia were used. Emetic episodes and safety assessment were performed during 0-24 hours and 24-48 hours after anesthesia. The rate of patients experiencing emetic symptoms (nausea, retching, vomiting) 0-24 hours after anesthesia was 17% with granisetron (P = 0.013) and 10% with ramosetron (P = 0.002) compared with placebo (47%); the corresponding rate 24-48 hours after anesthesia was 27% (P = 0.032) and 7% (P = 0.001), compared with placebo (53%). In the 24-48 hours after anesthesia, there were fewer emetic episodes in patients who had received ramosetron than in those who had received granisetron (P = 0.039). The severity of nausea was less in patients receiving ramosetron than in those receiving granisetron (P = 0.044). Zero to 24 hours after anesthesia, no difference in the rate of patients having emetic symptoms and the severity of nausea was observed between the granisetron and ramosetron groups. The most common reported adverse events were headache and dizziness, and there were no difference in the incidence of adverse events due to the study drug among the 3 groups. In conclusion, prophylactic therapy with ramosetron is more effective than that with granisetron for the long-term prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing general anesthesia for breast surgery.
 ...
PMID:Benefits and risks of granisetron versus ramosetron for nausea and vomiting after breast surgery: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. 1526 19