Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We conducted a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial in order to evaluate the long-term effects of captopril (50 mg/day), digoxin (0.25 mg/day) and placebo on quality of life, cardiovascular events, clinical symptoms and exercise tolerance in patients with documented myocardial infarction, resulting in regional wall motion abnormalities, and with mild heart failure (NYHA class II to III without treatment) and exercise not limited by angina. 222 patients were studied, 63 were randomized to captopril, 66 to digoxin, 67 to placebo. Follow-up was conducted for two years. Base line characteristics in the three treatment groups were similar. After one year of therapy, digoxin had significantly improved general well-being (p < 0.01 vs captopril), symptom score (p < 0.05 vs captopril and placebo), and vitality (p < 0.05 vs captopril). Digoxin improved NYHA class in 45% as compared to placebo (28%, p < 0.05). Worsening of angina was more frequent with captopril as compared to digoxin (p < 0.05). However, cardiovascular events during follow-up were lower in the captopril group as compared to placebo and digoxin (p < 0.01 captopril vs placebo). No differences between groups were observed in baseline and follow-up exercise tolerance between the three groups. Dizziness during upright tilt and cough were more frequent with captopril as compared to digoxin or placebo. After two years of follow-up (captopril n = 32, digoxin n = 29, placebo n = 27) general well-being was improved with both digoxin and captopril (p < 0.004 and p < 0.03 vs placebo).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Captopril versus digoxin in patients with coronary artery disease and mild heart failure. A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study. The CADS Study Group. 812 24

The long-term acceptability of perindopril in mild-to-moderate chronic heart failure (CHF) was evaluated in a multicenter open study. A total of 320 patients with a mean age of 62 +/- 1 years and CHF of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I (2 patients), II (204 patients), or III (114 patients) were included after a 2-week run-in period during which time vasodilators were stopped and diuretic and/or digoxin therapy stabilized. Perindopril treatment was started at 2 mg, increasing to 4 mg once daily after 2 weeks if supine systolic blood pressure remained > 100 mm Hg. After this dose titration period, follow-up visits were scheduled at monthly intervals for the first 3 months, then at 3-month intervals with a maximum period of follow-up being 30 months. At the time of analysis, mean duration of treatment was 276 days and 208 patients were treated > or = 6 months. Of the 320 patients, 10 (3.1%) died, 9 (2.8%) were withdrawn for worsening heart failure, and 38 (11.9%) for nonfatal adverse events, including cough (2.8%), dizziness or orthostatic discomfort (1.9%), angina pectoris (1.6%), and cutaneous signs (1.3%). Exercise test duration increased from 516 +/- 14 to 659 +/- 19 sec after 6 months of treatment (p < 0.01). At 6 months, 55.6% of patients improved by at least 1 NYHA class. Supine systolic blood pressure decreased slightly from 137 +/- 2 to 132 +/- 1 mm Hg (p < 0.01) and plasma creatinine levels remained stable from 100 +/- 2 to 102 +/- 2 mumol/liter after 6 months of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Acceptability of perindopril in mild-to-moderate chronic congestive heart failure. Results of a long-term open study in 320 patients. 832 69

It has been difficult to confirm that a given building is responsible for allergic symptomatology, exacerbation of asthma, or immunological dysfunction. In fact, in most studies, few objective immunological parameters have been studied and only rarely has there been any quantitation of IgE or secondary mediators. Furthermore, although many studies deal with rhinitis or respiratory tract irritation, there is a misconception that all such symptoms are allergic in nature, and studies attempting to prove that allergies are caused by buildings frequently neglect to prove that these are indeed true allergic responses. In addition, many of the symptoms that people attribute to sick building syndrome (SBS) or building-related illness, such as headaches, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, cough, and eye irritation, are subjective, and studies often fail to take into account other possible causes that may be inherent in the subjects, such as sinusitis, hyperventilation syndrome, or psychosomatic illness. Unfortunately, most clinical studies on SBS pay little attention to the preexisting conditions that a subject may have and discount the possibility that the inciting agent does not cause symptoms, but merely exacerbates a preexisting condition. Moreover, they offer no information about the nature of the mechanisms of action or pathophysiological relationships. Clearly, further studies are necessary to further explain the complexity of complaints that currently exist. Indeed, SBS might properly be paraphrased as "what is it?--if it is!"
 ...
PMID:The sick building syndrome. I. Definition and epidemiological considerations. 833 Oct 40

A postmarketing surveillance study in 2273 Canadian office practices provided the largest body of clinical experience to date with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor lisinopril in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. The principal emphasis in this uncontrolled study was safety, assessed in 10,289 patients. Patients with a diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg were considered for the study. Both previously untreated patients and those who were experiencing adverse effects from their current antihypertensive regimen were included. Lisinopril was begun at a dose of 10 mg/day. Subsequent dose adjustments, to a maximum of 40 mg/day, were made to achieve optimal blood pressure control (diastolic blood pressure < or = 90 mmHg or > or = 10 mmHg below baseline for > or = 4 weeks at the same dose). Therapy was continued for a minimum of 4 weeks to a maximum of 12 weeks, with patients examined every 2 weeks. The frequencies of adverse effects and laboratory abnormalities were analyzed in all treated patients. All 10,289 patients enrolled were considered in the analysis of safety. One or more adverse effects were reported for 1593 (15.5%) patients, and 802 (7.8%) withdrew from the study because of adverse effects. The most frequent adverse effects were cough (4.0%), dizziness (2.3%), headache (2.1%), asthenia (1.7%), and nausea (1.0%). The physicians' global assessment rated overall tolerability as very good or good for 77.1% of the patients. Antihypertensive effect was evaluated in 5886 patients who met the criteria for efficacy analysis. The criterion response was attained in 5141 (87.3%) patients, with 68.6% responding to 10 mg/day of lisinopril, 26.3% to 20 mg/day, and 3.2% to 40 mg/day (the other 1.9% responded at nonstandard doses). Lisinopril was safe and well-tolerated. Except for cough, class effects of ACE inhibitors were rarely encountered. The results of the efficacy analysis confirm the established efficacy of lisinopril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril in the treatment of hypertension: a Canadian postmarketing surveillance study. 839 Sep 18

Twelve people working next to a chemical plant noted an emission of 2 h. Nine patients complained of a variety of symptoms, including 3 who had pleuritic chest pain, 2 with chest tightness, 2 with vague chest discomfort, 3 with eye irritation, 2 with dizziness, 1 with light-headedness, 1 with cough and 1 with an acidic taste in the mouth associated with nasal irritation. Pulmonary function was 100% of predicted in 5; 77.4, 85.7, 95.7, and 96.7% of predicted in the other 4. Three of the 4 with initial decreased FEV1's (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec) improved. At follow-up, 1 had burning sensation of the tongue and mouth; a second noted burning sensation of his throat, tip of his tongue, and nostrils; and a third had superficial exfoliative-type lesions at the junction of her forehead and scalp. Two complained of continuous pleuritic chest pain. Sulfur trioxide exposure caused self-limited irritant effects.
 ...
PMID:A hazardous material episode: sulfur trioxide. 843 50

The main purpose of the present study was to define and understand more clearly the headache, and in particular the long-lasting attacks or continuous pain associated with the Chiari type I malformation. Of 34 patients with the malformation, the 20 patients who had or had had headache problems were interviewed according to a standardized questionnaire. Many patients had several headache types. Ten patients had shortlasting "cough headache" attacks lasting less than 5 minutes, 14 patients had relatively long-lasting attacks lasting from 3 hours to several days, and 8 patients had continuous headache. Unlike the short-lasting cough headache attacks, long-lasting attacks were usually not precipitated by Valsalva-like maneuvers. With discriminant analysis, this headache could rather well be differentiated from that of migraine and cervicogenic headache patients. In many respects, however, this headache resembled cervicogenic headache with occipital and neck pain, pain in the arm, restriction of neck movement, and dizziness often accompanying the headache. Dizziness was the most distinguishing feature in the Chiari patients. These features, together with a beneficial effect of surgical treatment in some patients, suggest a causal relationship between the malformation and headache. From the histories of a few illustrative cases, it is suggested that the malformation may cause long-lasting headache attacks or continuous head pain by compression of the brainstem, central cord degeneration or intracranial hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Headache associated with the Chiari type I malformation. 849 55

To elucidate the early clinical characteristics of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS), we compared the clinical features of 24 cases of HPS with those of cases of bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia (n = 30), influenza (n = 33), or unexplained adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS, n = 21). On admission, patients with HPS were less likely than outpatients with influenza to have reported sore throat (OR = 0.02, P < .01) and cough (OR = 0.1, P = .01) and were less likely than patients with pneumococcal pneumonia to have lobar infiltrates detected by chest roentgenography (OR = 0, P < .01). Multivariate discriminant analysis revealed that three clinical characteristics at admission (dizziness, nausea or vomiting, and absence of cough) and three initial laboratory abnormalities (low platelet count, low serum bicarbonate level, and elevated hematocrit level) served to identify all patients with HPS and to exclude HPS in at least 80% of patients with unexplained ARDS. These findings warrant further study and should facilitate the early recognition of patients with HPS, who may benefit from early critical-care intervention.
 ...
PMID:Clinical features that differentiate hantavirus pulmonary syndrome from three other acute respiratory illnesses. 852 58

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of moexipril, a non-sulphydryl angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in older patients with hypertension. One hundred and seventy two hypertensive men and women, 65-80 years old, with seated DBP between 95 and 114 mm Hg were studied. The study was a 2 year, multicentre (12 centres), open-label protocol of moexipril monotherapy or combination therapy (with hydrochlorothiazide). Blood pressure, pulse rate, weight, adverse effects and laboratory studies were assessed following moexipril at 7.5 or 15 mg once daily or 7.5 or 15 mg daily in combination with 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide if the seated DBP remained > or = 90 mm Hg on moexipril monotherapy. The primary measure of efficacy was a change from baseline in seated DBP. Secondary outcome measures included changes in seated DBP, pulse rate, laboratory parameters and adverse side-effects. Following 1 year of therapy in 135 patients, the BP fell 16/14 mm Hg among patients receiving moexipril monotherapy and 27/17 mm Hg for those receiving combined therapy compared with baseline (P < 0.001 for both). After 2 years of treatment, reductions were similar in 120 patients. Nineteen patients (11%) were prematurely withdrawn from the study because of inadequate therapeutic response and 28 (16%) because of adverse experiences. There were no significant changes in pulse rate or postural reductions in BP on either moexipril monotherapy or combination treatment. Three adverse side-effects occurred at a frequency exceeding 2% that were possibly or probably attributable to moexipril or combination therapy: hypotension (2%), dizziness (6%) and increased cough (12%). There were no clinically relevant mean group changes from baseline laboratory values in the treatment groups. In conclusion, these long-term data demonstrate that moexipril, either alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, has long-term anti-hypertensive efficacy and is generally well tolerated in elderly patients with hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Long-term safety and efficacy of moexipril alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with hypertension. 858 66

Losartan potassium is an orally active, nonpeptide angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonist. It is the first of a new class of drugs to be introduced for clinical use in hypertension. This novel agent binds competitively and selectively to the AII subtype 1 (AT(1)) receptor, thereby blocking AII-induced physiological effects. An active metabolite, E3174, contributes substantially to its antihypertensive effect, which persists throughout 24 hours after once-daily administration. In patients with mild to moderate hypertension, losartan potassium 50 to 100mg once daily as monotherapy lowers blood pressure to a similar degree to enalapril, atenolol and felodipine extended release (ER). Losartan potassium combined with hydrochlorothiazide reduces blood pressure further than either drug given separately. About one-third of patients with severe hypertension have responded to the combination product. Losartan potassium appears to be effective in elderly patients. Losartan potassium is very well tolerated. In clinical trials, dizziness was the only drug-related event reported more frequently with losartan potassium monotherapy than with placebo. First-dose hypotension is uncommon. An aspect of the drug's tolerability profile which may prove to be particularly advantageous is that it is associated with a similar incidence of cough to placebo in patients with a history of ACE inhibitor-related cough. Additionally, clinically relevant adverse metabolic effects or laboratory abnormalities have not been documented during losartan potassium therapy and renal function is preserved in patients with or without renal insufficiency. The adverse effect profile of the losartan potassium-hydrochlorothiazide combination resembles those for losartan potassium monotherapy and placebo. Long term tolerability data are limited (<2 years) but support the very good tolerability profile in shorter studies. Elements of the drug's profile yet to be assessed or reported fully in the literature include long term efficacy; potential to favourably influence cardiovascular and renovascular systems (and ultimately mortality) in patients with hypertension and, lastly, cost effectiveness and influence on quality of life. In summary, losartan potassium is the first AT(1)+ receptor antagonist to become available for the management of hypertension and, as such, it is an important new antihypertensive agent. Pending long term data as outlined above, it is likely to find initial use in patients with mild to severe hypertension who are unresponsive to, or intolerant of their current therapy. However, with its novel mechanism of action, good efficacy and favourable tolerability profile, losartan potassium is well placed to claim a prominent position in the management of patients with essential hypertension in the future.
 ...
PMID:Losartan potassium: a review of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy and tolerability in the management of hypertension. 886 49

The common cold is characterized by symptoms of rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, sneezing, throat clearing, postnasal drip, and cough. Some of the many viruses that cause colds may cause mild additional symptoms such as sore throat, weakness, dizziness, and tearing. This article presents data concerning the cause, pathogenesis, and treatment of the common cold as well as discussion of the available diagnostic tests and their use in formulating differential diagnoses.
 ...
PMID:The common cold. 889 Jan 37


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>