Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are useful first-line drugs in the therapy of mild and moderate hypertension. Adverse reactions to this drug class are rarely serious. Hypotension, cough, rash, and taste disturbance are uncommon; reduced glomerular filtration and hyperkalemia occur infrequently; angioedema is rare and neutropenia is extremely rare. Quinapril is a new ACE inhibitor that is converted to biologically active quinaprilat in the liver. This ACE inhibitor has a rapid onset of action and inhibits local tissue converting enzyme systems in kidney, heart, and brain, as well as in the circulating renin-angiotensin system. Clinically significant adverse effects of quinapril occur at low rates. In 1,771 patients receiving quinapril, the reported incidence of the first occurrence of orthostatic hypotension was comparable to that seen in patients receiving placebo. In other studies, headache was reported by up to 4.7% of patients receiving quinapril, which is comparable to reported incidences of headache in patients receiving other ACE inhibitors. Other adverse events reported at rates greater than 1% include cough with associated rhinitis and bronchitis, dizziness, and somnolence. Such adverse events have only rarely led to the withdrawal of patients from clinical studies of quinapril.
 ...
PMID:Adverse effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in antihypertensive therapy with focus on quinapril. 154 39

The acceptability of perindopril in the long-term treatment of patients with mild to severe essential hypertension was assessed in a large European multicenter trial including 856 patients. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at inclusion was 95-125 mm Hg after 1 month of placebo. Normalization of blood pressure was defined as a DBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Treatment was started with perindopril 4 mg once daily and increased when necessary to 8 mg daily. If DBP was not controlled, a second drug (hydrochlorothiazide) and finally a third drug were added. After 1 year of treatment in all 690 evaluable patients, supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 29 mm Hg (from 172 +/- 1 to 143 +/- 1 mm Hg, p less than 0.001) and 19 mm Hg (from 105 +/- 1 to 86 +/- 1 mm Hg, p less than 0.001), respectively. Perindopril monotherapy normalized blood pressure in 55% of patients and total percentage of normalization was 78%. The overall incidence of withdrawals for side effects was 6.8%, the most common side effect being cough (2.2%). The most frequent complaints reported were cough (7.0%), headache (5.6%), asthenia (5.1%), mood and/or sleep disturbance (5.1%), and dizziness (3.2%). The small changes observed in hematologic and biochemical parameters were not clinically relevant.
 ...
PMID:Long-term acceptability of perindopril: European multicenter trial on 856 patients. 158 Feb 87

A comprehensive review of our series of surgical perilymphatic fistula (PLF) repairs, as well as a review of published results from other otologists, suggested an unacceptably high rate of postoperative PLF recurrence. Some recurrences were related to specific events (i.e., coughing, strenuous activity, Valsalva-type maneuvers). However many cases had no apparent cause. Rather, the patients' symptoms recurred spontaneously, and at reoperation the graft was seen to have not "taken," suggesting graft failure rather than "patient failure." After a critical evaluation of current PLF surgical procedures and state-of-the-art concepts of wound healing, we developed a new surgical technique for PLF closure. Combining the use of laser graft-site preparation, an autologous fibrin glue "buttress," and a program of postoperative activity restriction, the new procedure allowed us to achieve statistically significant improvements in graft retention and surgical outcome, with recurrences dropping from 27 percent to 8 percent. In addition, complete resolution or significant symptomatic improvement occurred in 89 percent of patients with vertigo and/or dizziness and in 84 percent with disequilibrium. We conclude that this new surgical technique is an important addition to the otologic surgeon's arsenal for PLF management.
 ...
PMID:Surgical management of perilymphatic fistulas: a Portland experience. 160 55

The delayed health effects from accidental exposure to bromine vapors in a group of six people were evaluated. During the acute exposure, they had only some respiratory symptoms and skin burns of first to second degree involving small areas. All were treated in one hospital and released within 1-4 d. Six to 8 wk later, some still had health complaints such as cough, shortness of breath, chest tightness, eye irritation, headache, dizziness, fatigue, and memory, sleep, and sexual disturbances, but no objective laboratory or clinical evidence of effects. Mechanisms that might have led to manifestations of such complaints 1-2 mo after the accident are discussed and possible ways to alleviate similar situations are suggested.
 ...
PMID:Delayed health sequelae of accidental exposure to bromine gas. 162 37

In a randomized, parallel, double-blind study, lisinopril (n = 412; average dose 18.8 mg) reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure (change = 20.2/13.8 mmHg; P less than 0.01/P less than 0.01) more than nifedipine (n = 416; average dose 37.4 mg; change = 13.3/11.2 mmHg) after 10-week treatment in patients, aged 40-70 years, with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Lisinopril was better tolerated than nifedipine. The withdrawals from treatment were fewer in the lisinopril-treated group (11 versus 46; P less than 0.01). The frequency of adverse experiences reported after a general question of discomfort was significantly lower for lisinopril than for nifedipine (P less than 0.01). When questioned on specific symptoms, frequency of coughing was higher with lisinopril (P less than 0.01), while flushing, edema, palpitations, dizziness, tiredness and rash were reported more frequently (P less than 0.01, for all) in the nifedipine-treated group. Quality of life was assessed by both patients and spouses. No significant changes in wellbeing were observed for either drug, except for the highest dose level of nifedipine which caused a deterioration.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril or nifedipine in essential hypertension? A Norwegian multicenter study on efficacy, tolerability and quality of life in 828 patients. 166 65

A total of 930 patients have been evaluated for safety in a programme of clinical trials for lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination treatment. Combination therapy with these two agents is generally well tolerated. In clinical trials, adverse experiences in patients treated with a lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination were dizziness (7.5%), headache (5.2%), cough (3.9%), fatigue (3.7%), orthostatic effects (3.2%), diarrhoea (2.5%), nausea (2.2%) and upper respiratory tract infection (2.2%). Withdrawals from treatment have been relatively infrequent comprising dizziness (0.8%), headache (0.3%), cough (0.6%), fatigue (0.4%), diarrhoea (0.2%), orthostatic effects and nausea (0.1% each). The most common laboratory adverse experiences in patients on therapy with the lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination are: increases in serum glucose, triglycerides, uric acid, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen and blood urea; and decreases in serum potassium. However, in individual controlled studies, the addition of lisinopril to treatment with hydrochlorothiazide results in attenuation of some of the potentially adverse metabolic affects of the diuretic. Adverse experiences in the patients treated for periods of 50 weeks or more, the elderly and the renally impaired are similar to those seen in the total population. Overall the available data indicate that a fixed dose combination of lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide is a well-tolerated therapeutic option in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Review of international safety data for lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination treatment. 166 80

Although the purported incidence of pacemaker syndrome according to the literature is only 5%-15%, this is based on a series of patients with VVI pacing. Increasing numbers of studies are being reported in which patients prefer the dual chamber mode despite little benefit being demonstrated on objective testing, suggesting that pacemaker syndrome may be more common than is generally reported. This study was designed to evaluate the reported symptoms in a series of patients programmed to both the VVI and one or more dual chamber modes. Forty unselected patients with dual chamber pacemakers were entered into a blind, randomized trial comparing the symptoms associated with VVI pacing to those associated with dual chamber pacing. Patients were randomized to either VVI or dual chamber pacing. At the end of 1 week, questionnaires rating 16 different symptoms were completed. Blood pressure, LV function, presence of ventriculoatrial conduction, and ability to override the pacemaker were evaluated. The pacemaker was then programmed to the other mode. Overall, 12 of 16 symptoms were significantly worse in the VVI as compared to dual chamber mode. The most highly significant (P less than 0.005) were shortness of breath, dizziness, fatigue, pulsations in the neck or abdomen, cough, and apprehension. Pacemaker syndrome was clinically recognized in 83% of patients paced in the VVI mode with 65% of patients experiencing moderate to severe symptoms. There were no readily identified clinical, hemodynamic, or electrophysiological parameters that predicted which patients would develop pacemaker syndrome. Thus, when patients have an opportunity to experience both pacing modes in close proximity to one another, there is a high incidence of pacemaker syndrome in the VVI mode.
 ...
PMID:True incidence of pacemaker syndrome. 170 34

A total of 555 hypertensive patients took part in a 2-year multicenter, open-label study to determine the efficacy, tolerance, and safety of long-term therapy with ramipril. In the beginning, all patients were to receive 5 mg of ramipril/day. The dosage was then adjusted in accordance with response to treatment and ranged from 1.25-20 mg of ramipril daily. Of these patients, 129 also received 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide daily at some point during the trial. To evaluate whether tolerance to ramipril developed during long-term treatment, a subgroup of 202 patients was analyzed for efficacy maintenance. Prior to enrolling in the 2-year study, these patients had received ramipril monotherapy in a short-term, double-blind study and had been classified as responders, i.e., their diastolic blood pressure had been maintained at less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. At the end of 104 weeks of treatment, 45.9% of patients were on 2.5 mg of ramipril alone and 43.6% were on 5 mg of ramipril alone. Only four patients required the addition of 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide. No clinically important changes occurred, and kidney function was well maintained. The most frequently reported adverse events excluding intercurrent illnesses were dizziness/vertigo (6%), asthenia (4%), nausea (3%), headache (2%), and abdominal pain, gastrointestinal disorder, rash, and increased cough (1% each). Ramipril was safe, effective, and well tolerated in the long-term treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Antihypertensive efficacy, tolerance, and safety of long-term treatment with ramipril in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. 172 24

In this study, the tolerability and safety of ramipril, as monotherapy and in combination with a low dose of furosemide, were assessed in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in general practice. After a placebo run-in phase, patients received ramipril as monotherapy in a dose of 2.5 to 5 mg daily for 6 weeks. Nonresponders (diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg) entered a double-blind treatment period, and received either 10 mg of ramipril daily, or 5 mg of ramipril in combination with 20 mg of furosemide daily. The tolerability of the study medication was assessed by reported adverse events, and by monitoring blood cell count, electrolytes, serum creatinine, fasting blood glucose, and apolipoproteins AI and B. Of a total of 770 patients who entered the placebo run-in phase, 661 patients were enrolled in the first active treatment period. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache, cough, dizziness, asthenia, cramps, diarrhea, and nausea, but not all of these events were related to ramipril treatment. A total of 38 patients discontinued active treatment due to nonserious adverse events, mainly cough, dizziness, or diarrhea. There appeared to be a relationship between the prevalence of cough and ramipril dosage; however, an increased incidence of cough was also observed during outbreaks of influenza in France. There were no significant changes in laboratory variables during the study.
 ...
PMID:Tolerability of ramipril in a multicenter study of mild-to-moderate hypertension in general practice. 172 26

This multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of isradipine and enalapril in 160 patients with essential hypertension. Patients received isradipine or enalapril for 10 weeks after a placebo wash-out period of three to five weeks. Dosage was titrated for six weeks on the basis of blood pressure (BP) response and was then maintained for the remainder of the study. Isradipine reduced systolic and diastolic BP by 12 and 9 mm Hg, respectively, and enalapril by 10 and 7 mm Hg, respectively (between-treatment difference P less than .05 for diastolic BP). Overall, isradipine resulted in a higher responder rate, particularly among patients who had higher entry BPs. Fifteen enalapril-treated patients and four isradipine-treated patients discontinued treatment (four taking enalapril and none taking isradipine withdrew because of lack of efficacy). The most frequently reported adverse reactions were headache, dizziness, and edema in the isradipine group, and cough, headache, and chest pain in the enalapril group. Both drugs produced significant reductions in BP, but, in this study isradipine was more effective. The drugs were similarly well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:A multicenter comparison of the safety and efficacy of isradipine and enalapril in the treatment of hypertension. 182 8


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>