Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A double-blind controlled, randomized, parallel, multicenter 12-week study was conducted to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of lisinopril with that of metoprolol in treatment of moderate to severe hypertension. Initially, 118 patients were recruited on lisinopril and 61 on metoprolol; and for the purpose of efficacy analysis at week 8, 115 patients on lisinopril and 60 on metoprolol were included. The doses of lisinopril or metoprolol were 40-80 mg/day and 100-200 mg/day, respectively. At week 4, the pretreatment diastolic blood pressure of 111 mm Hg was decreased to 97 mm Hg (p less than 0.01) with lisinopril: metoprolol decreased the diastolic blood pressure from 110 to 99 mm Hg (p less than 0.01). Similar decreases were noted at week 8; however, the drop in blood pressure with lisinopril was not significantly different from that with metoprolol. Systolic blood pressure also demonstrated a decrease of about 18 mm Hg with lisinopril and 12 mm Hg with metoprolol (p less than 0.01). This larger decrease in systolic blood pressure with lisinopril was statistically significant at week 4 (p less than 0.05). These decreases in systolic blood pressures were maintained at week 8, again with statistical significance (p less than 0.01). Of the 118 lisinopril-treated patients, four were discontinued from lisinopril therapy because of headache, dizziness, rash, flushing, or lymphadenopathy. Four patients out of 61 (9.8%) were discontinued from metoprolol therapy because of fatigue, somnolence, asthenia, weight gain, flatulence, tremor, or bronchospasm. In conclusion, lisinopril 40-80 mg once daily is as effective as metoprolol 100-200 mg once daily in reducing diastolic blood pressure in patients with moderate to severe hypertension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of antihypertensive efficacy of lisinopril compared to metoprolol in moderate to severe hypertension. 244 53

Three hundred thirty-one patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, 182 males and 149 females with a mean age of 54 (range, 17-87 years), were studied for 1 year in a clinical trial with ramipril, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. The patients included had completed double-blind trials with ramipril vs. captopril, HCT, atenolol and ramipril plus piretanide. All cases were treated first with 5 mg ramipril and, where appropriate, also with 25 mg HCT. Adjustment of the dose in the range 1.25-20 mg ramipril was left to the investigator. Overall, a consistent reduction in blood pressure was achieved. Only small changes in mean blood pressure were noted during the 12 months (mean diastolic blood pressure 84.3-86.9 mm Hg, mean systolic blood pressure 145.6-148.2 mm Hg). Two hundred sixty-two (82%) of the 331 patients had diastolic values consistently equal to or lower than 95 mm Hg. There was a downward shift in the dosages upon which the investigators finally settled during the 12-month period in the patients receiving ramipril monotherapy. In patients also receiving HCT the initial dose was increased in most cases. Adverse events were observed in 6.7% of patients taking ramipril alone. The most frequent symptoms were dizziness, asthenia, pain in the upper abdomen and headache. Adverse effects occurred more frequently under continuous additional treatment with HCT, the same symptoms being reported. The clinical trial was prematurely terminated in six patients, in only two cases for medical reasons. The analysis of the laboratory findings revealed no general deterioration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:An open multicenter study to assess the long-term efficacy, tolerance, and safety of the oral angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. 247 9

A multicentre open study to which 229 investigators participated was carried out to demonstrate the safety of cicletanine, a new therapeutic agent, in routine clinical use. Cicletanine was administered alone for three months and normalized blood pressure (less than 160/95 mmHg) in 63 p. 100 of the 1,238 hypertensive patients who entered the study. There was a significant fall of systolic arterial pressure from 178.4 +/- 14.8 to 151.8 +/- 14.2 mmHg and a similar fall of diastolic arterial pressure from 104.0 +/- 6.7 to 86.3 +/- 6.2 mmHg. The reduction of BP values was accompanied by a significant decrease of differential BP (SBP-DBP) from 72.5 to 65.8 mmHg. The initial dosage (50 mg/day) was doubled in only one-third of the patients. The mean daily dose was 66 mg. This antihypertensive effect was paralleled by a significant and major improvement of signs (dyspnoea, oedema of the lower limbs) and symptoms (mainly dizziness, headache, visual and auditory disorders, asthenia) which existed at inclusion. A modest, but significant, reduction of heart rate from 76.7 to 73.9 beats/mn was also noted. Cicletanine produced no toxic or severe adverse events. Clinical side-effects consisted of pruritus, fatigue, headache, vertigo, lower limb oedema and gastrointestinal disorders. These effects were mild and non-specific (doubtful drug imputability); each of them occurred with an incidence ranging from 4.0 to 1.0 p. 100. They were responsible for the withdrawal of about 30 patients (2.4 p. 100). No significant alteration of biochemical or haematological values was recorded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive effectiveness and tolerance of cicletanine. Results obtained with monotherapy in a large population]. 251 75

Selective alpha 1 adrenergic receptor blocking agents lower blood pressure by reducing the increased peripheral vascular resistance that characterizes essential hypertension. Prazosin and terazosin have been shown to be well tolerated in clinical practice and seldom cause impotence or metabolic abnormalities. The most common adverse effects--dizziness, headache, and asthenia--are generally well tolerated and infrequently lead to discontinuation of therapy. First-dose syncope can usually be avoided by initiating therapy with low doses administered at bedtime. Finally, the alpha 1 receptor antagonists do not adversely affect such cardiovascular risk factors as hypokalemia, serum lipid profile, and left ventricular hypertrophy. In fact, alpha 1 antagonists reduce total cholesterol and low-density-lipoprotein plus very-low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and thus may contribute to the overall management of cardiovascular risk by blood pressure reduction and improvement of the serum lipid profile. Since the goal of treating chronic essential hypertension is to improve morbidity and mortality, the choice of therapy should be influenced by the agent's ability to modify as many risk factors as possible. Alpha 1 adrenoreceptor antagonists beneficially impact several cardiovascular risk factors and thus merit consideration as first-line antihypertensive therapy.
 ...
PMID:New perspectives on selective alpha 1 blockade. 257 43

In a multicentre open trial involving 229 investigators, cicletanine, a new antihypertensive agent, was administered orally in doses of 50 to 100 mg/day either alone (1,238 patients) or combined with another drug (430 patients). In this second group of patients with essential hypertension whose BP had not been normalized by a beta-blocker (n = 157), a calcium inhibitor (n = 67), an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (n = 134) or an alpha-blocker (n = 7), cicletanine normalized BP (less than 160/95 mmHg) in 48.8% of the patients and significantly lowered BP values which fell from 177.7 +/- 15.9/103.3 +/- 6.3 mmHg to 157.2 +/- 17.6/88.8 +/- 8.7 mmHg. The addition of cicletanine to treatments with beta-blockers, calcium inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors normalized BP in 48%, 52% and 47% of patients respectively. A significant reduction of symptoms was noted, notably as regards headache, dizziness, palpitations, lower limb oedema, asthenia, auditory disorders and dyspnoea. The side-effects reported (headache, dizziness, gastralgia, nausea, pruritus) were minor and non-specific; they accounted for the withdrawal of only 8 patients. The only significant, though moderate, biochemical variations observed were decreases in natremia and cholesterolaemia unconfirmed by qualitative analysis. Altogether, cicletanine proved to be effective and well tolerated when administered in combination with other antihypertensive drugs belonging to three main therapeutic classes.
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive effectiveness and tolerance of cicletanine. Results obtained with bitherapy]. 257 67

In order to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a new nicardipine formulation, 26 mild-to-moderate essential hypertensive patients were given slow-release nicardipine, 40 mg, twice daily for 6 weeks. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure were measured after a 1 week single-blind placebo run-in period and after 1, 2, 4 and 6 weeks of active treatment, just before the morning administration. After 1 week, nicardipine induced a significant blood pressure reduction (p less than 0.01), with a decrease in mean SBP/DBP values of -15/-11 mmHg (from baseline values of 165/104 to 150/93 mmHg) in supine and of -16/-12 mmHg (from 158/110 to 142/98 mmHg) in standing position. After 6 weeks the decrease was of -15/-12 mmHg in supine and of -15/-14 mmHg in standing position. The responder rate (DBP decrease of at least 10 mmHg) was 62% (16/26). Normalization rate (DBP less than 95 mmHg with a concomitant decrease of at least 10 mmHg) was 54% (14/26). Eleven patients reported adverse events (headache, peripheral oedema, palpitations, nausea, constipation, flush, dizziness and asthenia). Due to an improved pharmacokinetic profile, the slow-release formulation prolongs to 12 hours the antihypertensive effect of nicardipine, thus facilitating patient's compliance.
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive effect and tolerability of slow-release nicardipine]. 266 Sep 93

Fenofibrate is a fibric acid derivative with enhanced potency and specificity of action on lipids. Preclinical toxicology reveals minimal toxic effects; dose-related changes occurred seldom, with only hepatic effects in rodents (mainly enzyme changes), some renal effects in dogs, and no reactions in monkeys. Teratogenicity tests were negative, and mutagenicity was not associated with fenofibrate. Carcinogenicity was evident in rodents with liver carcinoma at doses of 12 or 40 times the human dose, but cancer has not been associated with fenofibrate in over 10 years of clinical research and use. European experience with fenofibrate involved 7,145 patients in short- and long-term clinical trials, plus 10 years of marketing experience with a patient exposure of 6 million patient-years. Adverse effects were relatively low in frequency (6%) in the European clinical trials and manifested as gastrointestinal effects, muscle pain, skin problems, and sweating or dizziness. Short- and long-term fenofibrate studies revealed basically the same scope and frequency of adverse effects. Experience in US clinical trials mirrored the European experience; three types of adverse effects occurred more commonly in fenofibrate patients versus placebo: skin reactions, neurologic effects, and musculoskeletal reactions. Laboratory tests were mildly abnormal for liver function, leukocytes, and hemoglobin; these reactions were significant enough to be considered adverse drug experiences only occasionally. Hepatobiliary tests for lithogenicity showed an increase in cholesterol saturation, but gallstones seldom have been associated with fenofibrate. Postmarketing, open experiences in Europe over 10 years have been consistent with the study results. The rate of reactions has been low (about 115/year or a 0.3% incidence rate). The reactions noted in these spontaneous reports were hepatic, renal, gallstones, cutaneous, hematologic, sexual asthenia, and weight loss. In general, fenofibrate can be considered a safe and well-tolerated lipid-lowering drug that has been scrutinized extensively for safety in clinical research and during an already long marketing period in Europe.
 ...
PMID:Safety of fenofibrate--US and worldwide experience. 267 10

51 hypertensive outpatients, whose diastolic blood pressure exceeded 100 mmHg after a 2-week period on atenolol alone (100 mg once daily) participated in this long-term study. They received, in addition to atenolol, the vasodilator cadralazine (ISF 2469; 10 to 30 mg once daily) for a standard period of 24 weeks, according to an open design. Cadralazine caused a progressive and important decrease in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, from 173/111 mmHg (end of atenolol alone) to 154/99 mmHg (12th week, p less than 0.01/p less than 0.01; mean dose, 24.5 mg/day). At this time a diuretic was added as a third-step drug in 15/51 initial patients (29%), and final blood pressure in all patients was 150/96 mmHg (p less than 0.01/p less than 0.01), with positive results in 88% of the cases. During cadralazine treatment, heart rate was always significantly lower than before atenolol alone; the most common side effects, many of which were already present during treatment with atenolol alone, included headache, asthenia, dizziness, palpitation and flushing, and tended to disappear spontaneously as therapy progressed. Routine laboratory tests did not show important changes; sodium excretion was not reduced. In conclusion, the therapeutic efficacy of cadralazine, its low or absent salt and water retention effects, its good tolerability, and the high compliance obtained with once daily administration allowed the use of this vasodilator as a second-step drug for long-term treatment of hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Cadralazine, a new vasodilator, in addition to a beta-blocker for long-term treatment of hypertension. 285 65

Multiclinic controlled studies have shown that enalapril alone 10 to 40 mg/day orally is effective in lowering blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension. Enalapril has been compared with thiazides and beta-blockers (propranolol, metoprolol and atenolol). The effect on systolic blood pressure has been greater with enalapril than with beta-blockers. The proportion of patients who respond to enalapril alone with a decrease in diastolic blood pressure (greater than or equal to 10mm Hg) is around 70%. When a thiazide is added to the treatment, the proportion is above 90%. Enalapril improves the signs and symptoms associated with congestive heart failure. Patients increased their exercise tolerance by an average of 148 sec and improved in their NYHA cardiac status and prognosis classification. The overall incidence of side effects is similar to that seen in the placebo control groups. Side effects such as agranulocytosis, taste loss, rash, proteinuria were not characteristic of enalapril. This supports the hypothesis that the improved safety profile of enalapril is the result of being a nonsulphydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. The most common side effects reported were dizziness, headache and asthenia. Abnormalities in electrolytes, uric acid, glucose or in lipids have generally not been associated with enalapril.
 ...
PMID:Enalapril in hypertension and congestive heart failure. Overall review of efficacy and safety. 286 29

The efficacy and safety of terazosin were compared with those of other antihypertensive drugs in three parallel-group, randomized, double-blind studies in which 133 patients with mild to moderate hypertension participated. In two studies, terazosin monotherapy was compared with placebo and prazosin (study M79-073), or with hydrochlorothiazide (study M80-012). In a third study (M80-013), the combination of terazosin plus hydrochlorothiazide was compared with the combination of prazosin plus hydrochlorothiazide. Doses of study medications were administered twice daily and were increased at weekly intervals until the average supine diastolic blood pressure was 90 mm Hg or less, with a decrease from baseline of at least 10 mm Hg, or until the maximum specified dosage of a given study drug was reached. In general, all active treatments resulted in significant decreases from baseline in supine and standing blood pressures. There was no significant difference between terazosin- and prazosin-treated patients for changes from baseline to the final visit in supine or standing blood pressure measurements (study M79-073). Hydrochlorothiazide had a significantly greater effect on supine diastolic blood pressure when compared with terazosin (study M80-012). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between active treatment groups. Overall, no regimen caused clinically important changes in pulse rates, body weights, laboratory test results, physical examinations, or electrocardiograms. The incidence of side effects was approximately the same for all drugs; the most common side effects were headache, dizziness, malaise, asthenia, and nasal congestion. The results of these studies suggest that terazosin exhibits antihypertensive activity that is quantitatively similar to that of prazosin in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, and that a dose of 1 to 10 mg twice daily is well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Comparative trials of terazosin with other antihypertensive agents. 287 6


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>