Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (
dizziness
)
9,689
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
More than 1200 patients who received pindolol for the treatment of hypertension,
angina pectoris
, and various arrhythmias in studies conducted in the United States were included in the New Drug Application submitted to the FDA. Nearly 1000 of these patients received pindolol as monotherapy. The side effects reported were generally transient and of mild or moderate severity. The most frequently reported side effects seen after pindolol administration, compared to those seen after placebo, were in decreasing order of incidence: headache,
dizziness
, insomnia, muscle pain, fatigue, weakness, nervousness, joint pain, edema, nausea, and muscle cramps. Other side effects that occurred more frequently with pindolol than with placebo but at a rather low incidence induced weight gain, bizarre dreams, visual disturbances, lethargy, and diarrhea. Nasal congestion, throat discomfort, nocturia, impotence, pruritus, anxiety, hypotension, bradycardia, and heart failure occurred only rarely. Of the 323 patients who received pindolol alone for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension, only 20 (6.2%) were withdrawn from the study because of side effects. Overall, 3.4% of the patients treated with pindolol were withdrawn because of side effects, most of which involved the central nervous system, that is, insomnia, anxiety,
dizziness
, and headache. However, a few patients manifested some edema and weight gain while receiving pindolol alone. Review of the side effects data did not reveal a tendency for the incidence of side effects to be dose related. One placebo-controlled, double-blind study designed to evaluate the fixed dosages of 15, 30, and 60 mg in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension suggested that only the incidences of insomnia and nervousness increased with increasing doses. However, these side effects were generally transient and of mild or moderate severity. The evidence indicates that pindolol has an acceptable safety profile and that any side effects that appear are generally well tolerated and disappear with continued treatment.
...
PMID:Adverse reactions to pindolol administration. 704 82
In a 55-year-old man, attacks of spontaneous
angina
were associated with
dizziness
and syncope. Holter ECG monitoring disclosed evidence of sinus node dysfunction.
Dizziness
and syncope were corrected by a permanent ventricular demand pacemaker. Coronary cineangiography showed spontaneous, severe, diffuse spasm in a dominant left coronary artery and localized spasm in a nondominant right coronary artery. The patient died of pump failure shortly after cardiac catheterization. An autopsy disclosed only minimal coronary atherosclerosis. This patient's condition shows that (1) coronary spasm may cause sinus node dysfunction,
dizziness
, and syncope, (2) severe spasm that involves all the coronary artery branches may be fatal, and (3) severe spasm occur in minimally diseased coronary arteries confirmed by pathologic examination.
...
PMID:Coronary artery spasm with sinus node dysfunction and syncope. 711 92
Sumatriptan is a potent and selective agonist at a vascular serotonin1 (5-hydroxytryptamine1; 5-HT1) receptor subtype (similar to 5-HT1D) and is used in acute treatment of migraine and cluster headache. Following administration of sumatriptan 100mg orally, relief of migraine headache (at 2 hours) was achieved in 50 to 67% of patients compared with 10 to 31% with placebo in controlled clinical trials. In a comparative study, oral administration of sumatriptan 100mg consistently achieved significantly greater response rates than a fixed combination of ergotamine 2mg plus caffeine 200mg during 3 consecutive migraine attacks (66 vs 48% for first attack). Oral sumatriptan 100mg was also more effective than aspirin 900mg plus metoclopramide 10mg orally in a similar study. In the majority of controlled clinical trials, headache relief (at 1 hour after administration) was achieved in 70 to 80% of patients with migraine receiving sumatriptan 6mg subcutaneously compared with 18 to 26% of placebo recipients. Approximately 40% of patients who initially responded to oral or subcutaneous sumatriptan experienced recurrence of their headache, usually within 24 hours, but the majority of these patients responded well to a further dose of sumatriptan. Patients with cluster headache were treated for acute attacks with sumatriptan 6mg subcutaneously or placebo in 2 crossover trials. Headache relief was achieved within 15 minutes in 74 and 75% of patients receiving sumatriptan in these studies compared with 26 and 35%, respectively, with placebo. Patients receiving sumatriptan 12mg had a similar response rate as those receiving 6mg, but the higher dose was associated with an increased incidence of adverse events. Based on extensive safety data pooled from controlled clinical trials, sumatriptan is generally well tolerated and most adverse events are transient. The most frequently reported adverse events following oral administration include nausea, vomiting, malaise, fatigue and
dizziness
. Injection site reactions (minor pain and redness of brief duration) occur in approximately 40% of patients receiving subcutaneous sumatriptan, although the incidence appears to be markedly reduced when patients self-administer the drug with an auto-injector. Chest symptoms (mainly tightness and pressure) occur in 3 to 5% of sumatriptan recipients, but have not been associated with myocardial ischaemia except in a few isolated cases. Sumatriptan is contraindicated in patients with ischaemic heart disease,
angina pectoris
including Prinzmetal (variant)
angina
, previous myocardial infarction and uncontrolled hypertension, but is not contraindicated in patients with migraine and asthma. Data from long term studies in acute treatment of migraine and cluster headache suggest that sumatriptan remains effective and well tolerated over several months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
...
PMID:Sumatriptan. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine and cluster headache. 751 61
Mibefradil (Ro 40-5967) is a novel calcium antagonist from a new chemical class and is the first that selectively blocks the T-type calcium channel. In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel designed study, its antianginal and antiischemic effects were evaluated in 126 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. Exercise tests were performed after 1 week of placebo (baseline) and 2 weeks after randomization to 25, 50, 100, and 150 mg (once daily) or placebo. Highly significant dose-response relations were present across all treatment groups for exercise duration, time to
angina
, and time to ST-segment depression. They were associated with a dose-dependent decrease in heart rate and blood pressure and plasma concentrations > 300 ng/ml. Mibefradil was well tolerated. First-degree atrioventricular block (8%) and
dizziness
(7%) were the most frequently reported adverse events; however, the first-degree atrioventricular block was dose-related, and only one patient discontinued the trial because of
dizziness
. The excellent efficacy and adequate safety profile of mibefradil may be a consequence of T-type calcium-channel selectivity.
...
PMID:Effects of the new calcium antagonist mibefradil (Ro 40-5967) on exercise duration in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris: a multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Ro 40-5967 International Study Group. 757 82
The efficacy and safety of cilazapril in chronic heart failure have been extensively investigated in an international clinical program in patients with underlying chronic heart failure with ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy. Cilazapril in single doses of 1.25-5 mg produced a significant dose-dependent reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and systemic vascular resistance and a significant increase in cardiac index. In placebo-controlled studies, 1-5 mg of cilazapril once daily for 12 weeks prolonged predose exercise test duration and improved New York Heart Association classification status and signs and symptoms of chronic heart failure, including paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. Up to 86% of patients receiving these dosages had improvement, with only 12% of patients requiring the higher dose, 5 mg. These data indicate that cilazapril is effective when administered once daily to patients with chronic heart failure receiving concomitant therapy with digitalis and/or a diuretic. The safety of cilazapril in patients with chronic heart failure has been evaluated in 1,163 patients administered from 0.5 to 15 mg once daily for treatment periods ranging from 1 day to 57 months. Cilazapril was administered to 500 patients for at least 6 months, 264 patients for at least 1 year, and 101 patients for at least 2 years. The most frequently occurring adverse events were
dizziness
, coughing, dyspnea, fatigue,
angina pectoris
, and headache. Cilazapril was equally well tolerated by young and elderly patients. Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 12.9% of patients, mainly as a result of coughing (1.7%) and
dizziness
(1%). Forty-four patients (3.8%) died during cilazapril therapy or during a period without treatment. Of these deaths, 93% were due to cardiac causes, especially rhythm disturbances.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Heart failure therapy with cilazapril: an overview. 770 63
This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new controlled-onset, extended-release formulation of verapamil hydrochloride called physiologic pattern release (PPR) verapamil. The study was conducted at 24 sites (13 United States, 5 Canada, 6 overseas; see Appendix). Following a 1- to 3-week single-blind placebo lead-in period, 278 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris (247 males, 31 females, mean age 60.8 years, range 32 to 78) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 once-daily, fixed-dose treatment groups: verapamil 180, 360, or 540 mg, or placebo. PPR verapamil at all doses significantly increased (p < 0.05) time to moderate
angina
and symptom-limited exercise duration, and verapamil 360 mg significantly increased (p < 0.05) time to > or = 1 mm ST-segment depression, after 4 weeks of treatment when assessed 24 hour after the previous dose. Larger doses of verapamil were associated with proportionately greater improvements in exercise tolerance. Frequency of anginal attacks was also reduced by verapamil. The most frequently observed adverse events were
dizziness
, headache, constipation, and nausea. The incidence of constipation was high (20.9%) within the 540 mg treatment group. This verapamil formulation can be clinically titrated within a 180 to 540 mg dosing range, permitting effective once-daily administration for the treatment of chronic stable angina.
...
PMID:Placebo-controlled evaluation of three doses of a controlled-onset, extended-release formulation of verapamil in the treatment of stable angina pectoris. 776 93
The most important symptoms in bradycardia are vertigo,
dizziness
and syncopy due to diminished cerebral blood sypply. Cardial symptoms are cardiac insufficiency and
angina pectoris
. By means of ECG, especially Holter-ECG, carotid sinus massage, atropin test and invasive methods (atrial stimulation, His-bundle ECG) sinu-nodal dysfunction, carotid sinus syndrome, bradyarrhythmia absoluta and AV-block can be diagnosed. Pharmacological treatment is only useful in acute situations. For symptomatic bradyarrhythmias the implantation of a Pacemaker is the therapy of choice. Individual treatment of the various types of bradyarrhythmia and the patients special needs is possible through the evolution of pacemaker technology.
...
PMID:[Differential diagnosis and therapy of bradycardic arrhythmias]. 782 27
Carvedilol is a nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking vasodilator drug that may be a promising new agent in the management of cardiovascular disease. The rationale for the development of agents of this type is that the alpha-blocking component may overcome the direct vasoconstrictor consequence of beta 2-blockade, whilst the beta-blocker component may inhibit the reflex tachycardia that occurs following alpha-blockade. In clinical trials published to date, carvedilol has been demonstrated to be effective as an antihypertensive agent as monotherapy and also as additional therapy in those patients whose blood pressure cannot be controlled on other standard agents. It is also effective in the management of
angina
. Carvedilol has beneficial haemodynamic effects in patients with congestive heart failure. beta-Blocker vasodilator drugs of this type may be particularly useful in this condition as the vasodilator component of the drug may overcome the initial negative inotropy of the beta-blocker. In addition, carvedilol possess potentially useful pharmacological actions. In particular, the drug has antimitogenic and free radical scavenging effects that may make it a useful therapy in the long term management of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Its metabolic profile is also favourable, presumably on the basis of its alpha-blocking properties. Thus, beta 2-mediated adverse effects on peripheral vascular tone, glycaemic control and lipid status appear to be offset by the alpha-blocking property of the drug. Carvedilol thus far appears to be well tolerated, with postural
dizziness
the major adverse effect, especially in the elderly. As with nonselective beta-blockers, carvedilol is contraindicated in patients with asthma.
...
PMID:A risk-benefit assessment of carvedilol in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders. 794 2
A postal questionnaire was sent to 1000 subjects aged over 65 years randomly selected from the age/sex register of five group practices, 90% of subjects returning adequate information. Thirty per cent of responders reported
dizziness
; 27% of these had symptoms more than once per month and 37% had symptoms which lasted longer than 1 minute.
Dizziness
was most commonly provoked by postural change and head and neck movement. The prevalence of
dizziness
increased with age and was higher in women but these differences were not statistically significant. The prevalence of symptoms occurring more than once per month was significantly greater with increasing age (p = 0.0003).
Dizziness
was significantly associated with
angina
and previous myocardial infarction (p < 0.001) and antihypertensive therapy (p < 0.05) but not with current smoking, diabetes mellitus or previous stroke.
...
PMID:The prevalence and characteristics of dizziness in an elderly community. 802 18
We conducted a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial in order to evaluate the long-term effects of captopril (50 mg/day), digoxin (0.25 mg/day) and placebo on quality of life, cardiovascular events, clinical symptoms and exercise tolerance in patients with documented myocardial infarction, resulting in regional wall motion abnormalities, and with mild heart failure (NYHA class II to III without treatment) and exercise not limited by
angina
. 222 patients were studied, 63 were randomized to captopril, 66 to digoxin, 67 to placebo. Follow-up was conducted for two years. Base line characteristics in the three treatment groups were similar. After one year of therapy, digoxin had significantly improved general well-being (p < 0.01 vs captopril), symptom score (p < 0.05 vs captopril and placebo), and vitality (p < 0.05 vs captopril). Digoxin improved NYHA class in 45% as compared to placebo (28%, p < 0.05). Worsening of
angina
was more frequent with captopril as compared to digoxin (p < 0.05). However, cardiovascular events during follow-up were lower in the captopril group as compared to placebo and digoxin (p < 0.01 captopril vs placebo). No differences between groups were observed in baseline and follow-up exercise tolerance between the three groups.
Dizziness
during upright tilt and cough were more frequent with captopril as compared to digoxin or placebo. After two years of follow-up (captopril n = 32, digoxin n = 29, placebo n = 27) general well-being was improved with both digoxin and captopril (p < 0.004 and p < 0.03 vs placebo).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Captopril versus digoxin in patients with coronary artery disease and mild heart failure. A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study. The CADS Study Group. 812 24
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>