Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine as first-line therapy for the treatment of major depression and major depression associated with anxiety in 384 adult outpatients. Fixed total daily dosages of 75, 150, and 200 mg of venlafaxine were administered in a twice-a-day regimen. Primary efficacy parameters were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total score, the HAM-D Depressed Mood Item, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score, and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale. Overall, a higher percentage of patients responded to venlafaxine than to placebo. Efficacy data indicated a dose-related response, most evident in the onset of clinical improvement; statistically significant improvements in some primary parameters were seen as early as 1 to 2 weeks after initiation of treatment, especially in the 150-and 200-mg/day groups. These dose-related clinical improvements continued through week 12. Venlafaxine-treated patients who had depression associated with anxiety showed significant dose-related improvements compared with placebo-treated patients; improvement was noted by scores on the HAM-D Anxiety-Psychic Item and Anxiety-Somatization Factor. Few clinically significant changes were observed in laboratory values, vital signs, or electrocardiogram tracings. Venlafaxine was generally well tolerated at all dosages. The most common study events included nausea, dizziness, somnolence, insomnia, dry mouth, and asthenia, which are consistent with findings of previous studies. The current study demonstrated that 75 to 200 mg/day of venlafaxine twice daily produced a dose-related improvement in the primary efficacy parameters and in the onset of significant antidepressant effects, which was noted at weeks 1 to 2 with the highest dosage tested (200 mg/day). The study also demonstrated that these dosages of venlafaxine were safe and effective as first-line therapy for major depression and depression associated with anxiety.
 ...
PMID:The use of venlafaxine in the treatment of major depression and major depression associated with anxiety: a dose-response study. Venlafaxine Investigator Study Group. 947 38

The effects of once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) 75-225 mg/day on symptoms of anxiety in depressed outpatients were assessed in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. In study 1, venlafaxine XR was significantly (p < or = 0.05) more effective than placebo by week 4 in relieving anxiety symptoms among patients with moderate or greater anxiety (anxiety-psychic item score > or = 2) at baseline. Among patients with severe (anxiety-psychic item score > or = 3) anxiety, venlafaxine XR was significantly (p < or = 0.05) more effective than placebo beginning at week 6. In study 2, among patients with moderate or greater anxiety (score > or = 2) at baseline, a significant reduction (p < or = 0.05- < or = 0.001) in HAM-D anxiety-psychic item scores was noted with venlafaxine XR compared with placebo from weeks 1 to 8. Among patients with severe anxiety (score > or = 3) at baseline, venlafaxine XR produced a significant reduction (p < or = 0.05- < or = 0.001) in the anxiety-psychic item score compared with placebo from weeks 1 to 8. Discontinuation for adverse events occurred in 11% of patients on venlafaxine XR, and the most common adverse events were nausea, dizziness, insomnia, somnolence and dry mouth. These results indicate that once-daily venlafaxine XR is effective for the treatment of anxiety symptoms associated with major depression in doses ranging from 75 to 225 mg/day.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) for symptoms of anxiety in depressed outpatients. 947 44

The traditional analysis of clinical trial data for antidepressants separately evaluates the results of efficacy and tolerability. The present analysis simultaneously evaluated these outcome criteria in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of outpatients with major depression. Patients received either once-daily extended release (XR) venlafaxine or immediate release (IR) venlafaxine. Individual patient data on efficacy and treatment-emergent study events (TESE) for venlafaxine XR and venlafaxine IR were grouped into five categories. Efficacy was defined as a final on-therapy Clinical Global Impressions improvement score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved). A TESE was defined as any new adverse event or any adverse event that existed at baseline and increased in severity during treatment. Benefit/risk was evaluated using a linear measure and a ratio measure for dizziness, Insomnia, nausea, nervousness, somnolence, and a composite of anticholinergic events. This analysis demonstrated a superior benefit/risk ratio for the once-daily venlafaxine XR compared with venlafaxine IR, and a statistically significant benefit-to-risk ratio of at least 2:1 for venlafaxine XR over venlafaxine IR was demonstrated for nausea and dizziness. This approach to the statistical analysis of clinical trial data represents an advancement in addressing treatment outcome by incorporating clinically relevant measures of both efficacy and safety.
 ...
PMID:A benefit-risk analysis of once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) and venlafaxine immediate release (IR) in outpatients with major depression. 949 78

To date, the quantitative psychopathology of panic disorder (PD) has been less well studied than that of other psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia or major depression. The aim of the present study was to assess the frequency and factorial grouping of symptoms in a naturalistic sample of PD patients. A total of 274 consecutive cases of PD who contacted an out-patient clinic in Barcelona, Spain were assessed by two experienced interviewers. The assessment instruments included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Upjohn version (SCID-UP-R) and an inventory of panic attack symptoms based on DSM-III-R. Of the patients who presented at the unit during the assessment period, 8.5% presented with PD. Palpitations, shortness of breath, fear of dying and dizziness were the most frequent and intense symptoms reported by the PD patients. Principal-component analysis revealed four factors which accounted for 57% of the variance, including 'cardiorespiratory' (26.1%) and 'vestibular' (15.1%) factors, and two additional factors with mixed symptoms. The frequency of presentation of symptoms was similar to that reported in other studies. However, some discrepancies were observed that may be attributed to transcultural differences as well as to terminological problems and the range of symptoms assessed. These factors may also explain some of the differences found in factor analysis groupings in previous studies. Our findings support the symptom subtyping of PD.
 ...
PMID:Semiology and subtyping of panic disorders. 957 Apr 87

In this randomized, open-label, 8-week comparative study, the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine and fluoxetine were assessed in outpatients with major depression. One hundred forty-five patients were assigned to receive venlafaxine 37.5 mg twice daily or fluoxetine 20 mg once daily. On day 15, if clinically indicated to improve patient response, the dosage could be increased at the investigator's discretion to venlafaxine 75 mg twice daily or fluoxetine 40 mg once daily. One hundred forty-five patients were evaluated for safety and 110, for efficacy. The mean age was 37 years, and 70% of the patients were female. In both treatment groups, mean scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale decreased significantly between baseline (27.8, venlafaxine; 29.2, fluoxetine) and the end of the study (8.7, venlafaxine; 8.2, fluoxetine). Similarly, mean scores on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale decreased significantly between baseline (31.4, venlafaxine; 31.6, fluoxetine) and the end of the study (8.3, venlafaxine; 7.6, fluoxetine). In venlafaxine patients, the most common adverse events were nausea (44.3%), headache (40.0%), insomnia (31.4%), dizziness (30.0%), and dry mouth (22.9%); in fluoxetine patients, they were headache (32.0%), nausea (28.0%), insomnia (24.0%), anxiety (21.3%), sleepiness (20.0%), and generalized tremor (20.0%). The results of this study indicate that venlafaxine is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of major depression at doses of 37.5 or 75 mg twice daily and not significantly different from fluoxetine 20 or 40 mg once daily.
 ...
PMID:A randomized, open-label comparison of venlafaxine and fluoxetine in depressed outpatients. 966 62

Ipsapirone, an azapirone with 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT1A) partial agonist activity, has been shown in preliminary studies to be effective in the treatment of major depressive disorder. This 8-week, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of three fixed doses of controlled-release ipsapirone (10-, 30-, and 50-mg dose once daily) with placebo in 410 patients with moderate to severe major depression (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] score > or = 20). The 10-mg ipsapirone treatment arm was discontinued early in the study. A total of 390 patients were eligible for evaluation in the intent-to-treat sample. The primary efficacy variable was the change in HAM-D total score from baseline to visit 8. There was no significant difference in efficacy in the two treatment groups versus the placebo group. The overall treatment response, defined as a 50% decrease in the HAM-D total score from baseline, was 43% with ipsapirone 50 mg given once daily, 34% with ipsapirone 30 mg given once daily, and 35% with placebo. In subanalyses, ipsapirone 50 mg given once daily was superior to placebo according to the HAM-D Core Depression (mood, guilt, interest, psychomotor activity) subtotal (p = 0.0453) and Melancholic item (p = 0.0225). Ipsapirone 30 mg given once daily was superior to placebo only in patients with moderate depression (baseline HAM-D total score < or = 25; p = 0.0100). The most common adverse effect in all groups was headache. The only dose-dependent adverse effects were dizziness and nausea.
 ...
PMID:A Canadian multicenter study of three fixed doses of controlled-release ipsapirone in outpatients with moderate to severe major depression. 969 Jun 91

This multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of citalopram and placebo in a population of moderately to severely depressed patients with melancholia. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared citalopram (flexible dose; 20-80 mg/day) with placebo in 180 psychiatric outpatients with a DSM-III diagnosis of major depression or bipolar disorder, depressed, who also met DSM-III criteria for melancholia. Following a 1-week placebo washout period, patients meeting study entry criteria were randomized to 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with either citalopram or placebo. Efficacy measures included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale, and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale. Patients treated with citalopram showed significantly greater improvement at endpoint than placebo patients on the HAM-D, CGI, and Zung scales. On the HAM-D, citalopram patients exhibited significantly greater improvement than placebo patients after 1 week of double-blind treatment and at all subsequent study visits. Endpoint analyses of the HAM-D subscales demonstrated that citalopram produced significant improvement of the psychomotor retardation, cognitive disturbance, sleep disturbance, and melancholia symptom clusters. Nausea, dry mouth, somnolence, dizziness, and increased sweating were reported at higher rates by citalopram-treated patients than by placebo-treated patients, but there were no significant citalopram-placebo differences in the incidence of activation (e.g., anxiety, nervousness, insomnia) or sexual dysfunction. Analysis of electrocardiograms, vital signs, and laboratory tests did not reveal any clinically significant effects of citalopram treatment. The results of this study indicate that citalopram is safe and effective in the treatment of depressed patients with melancholia, and is associated with a favorable side effect profile and a potentially rapid onset of action.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind comparison of citalopram and placebo in depressed outpatients with melancholia. 1020 59

Recent evidence suggests that the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are safe and efficacious in treating juveniles with depression. However, citalopram has not been reported in adolescents with depression. This study assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of citalopram in all adolescents with depressive disorders treated naturalistically in a community mental health center during a 1-year interval. Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed for 21 adolescents treated with citalopram for major depression (n = 14), bipolar depression (n = 4), or dysthymia (n = 3). An independent rater compared last visit to baseline depression using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Improvement scales. Adolescents received citalopram for an average of 128.5 +/- 84 days at a final average dose of 26.5 +/- 13.1 mg/day. Sixteen of these 21 adolescents (76%) exhibited much to very much improvement as measured by the CGI, and severity of depression diminished significantly (z = 3.007, p < 0.0026). Mild side effects, including headaches, dizziness, nausea, sedation, agitation, and sweating were reported by 7 (33%) of the patients. These data suggest that citalopram may be effective, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of adolescents with depressive disorders and that controlled trials are warranted in this population.
 ...
PMID:A retrospective study of citalopram in adolescents with depression. 1143 55

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), with antidepressant and anxiolytic activity. In 6- to 24-week well designed trials, oral paroxetine 10 to 50 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo, at least as effective as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and as effective as other SSRIs and other antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Relapse or recurrence over 1 year after the initial response was significantly lower with paroxetine 10 to 50 mg/day than with placebo and similar to that with imipramine 50 to 275 mg/day. The efficacy of paroxetine 10 to 40 mg/day was similar to that of TCAs and fluoxetine 20 to 60 mg/day in 6- to 12-week trials in patients aged > or =60 years with major depression. Paroxetine 10 to 40 mg/day improved depressive symptoms to an extent similar to that of TCAs in patients with comorbid illness, and was more effective than placebo in the treatment of dysthymia and minor depression. Paroxetine 20 to 60 mg/day was more effective than placebo after 8 to 12 weeks' treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), panic disorder, social anxiety disorder (social phobia), generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Improvement was maintained or relapse was prevented for 24 weeks to 1 year in patients with OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder or GAD. The efficacy of paroxetine was similar to that of other SSRIs in patients with OCD and panic disorder and similar to that of imipramine but greater than that of 2'chlordesmethyldiazepam in patients with GAD. Paroxetine is generally well tolerated in adults, elderly individuals and patients with comorbid illness, with a tolerability profile similar to that of other SSRIs. The most common adverse events with paroxetine were nausea, sexual dysfunction, somnolence, asthenia, headache, constipation, dizziness, sweating, tremor and decreased appetite. In conclusion, paroxetine, in common with other SSRIs, is generally better tolerated than TCAs and is a first-line treatment option for major depressive disorder, dysthymia or minor depression. Like other SSRIs, paroxetine is also an appropriate first-line therapy for OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, GAD and PTSD. Notably, paroxetine is the only SSRI currently approved for the treatment of social anxiety disorder and GAD, which makes it the only drug of its class indicated for all five anxiety disorders in addition to major depressive disorder. Thus, given the high degree of psychiatric comorbidity of depression and anxiety, paroxetine is an important first-line option for the treatment of major depressive disorder, OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, GAD and PTSD.
 ...
PMID:Paroxetine: an update of its use in psychiatric disorders in adults. 1189 34

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), with antidepressant and anxiolytic activity. In 6- to 24-week well designed trials, oral paroxetine 10 to 50 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo, at least as effective as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and as effective as other SSRIs and other antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Relapse or recurrence over 1 year after the initial response was significantly lower with paroxetine 10 to 50 mg/day than with placebo and similar to that with imipramine 50 to 275 mg/day. The efficacy of paroxetine 10 to 40 mg/day was similar to that of TCAs and fluoxetine 20 to 60 mg/day in 6- to 12-week trials in patients aged > or = 60 years with major depression. Paroxetine 10 to 40 mg/day improved depressive symptoms to an extent similar to that of TCAs in patients with comorbid illness, and was more effective than placebo in the treatment of dysthymia and minor depression. Paroxetine 20 to 60 mg/day was more effective than placebo after 8 to 12 weeks' treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), panic disorder, social anxiety disorder (social phobia), generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Improvement was maintained or relapse was prevented for 24 weeks to 1 year in patients with OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder or GAD. The efficacy of paroxetine was similar to that of other SSRIs in patients with OCD and panic disorder and similar to that of imipramine but greater than that of 2'chlordesmethyldiazepam in patients with GAD. Paroxetine is generally well tolerated in adults, elderly individuals and patients with comorbid illness, with a tolerability profile similar to that of other SSRIs. The most common adverse events with paroxetine were nausea, sexual dysfunction, somnolence, asthenia, headache, constipation, dizziness, sweating, tremor and decreased appetite. In conclusion, paroxetine, in common with other SSRIs, is generally better tolerated than TCAs and is a first-line treatment option for major depressive disorder, dysthymia or minor depression. Like other SSRIs, paroxetine is also an appropriate first-line therapy for OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, GAD and PTSD. Notably, paroxetine is the only SSRI currently approved for the treatment of social anxiety disorder and GAD, which makes it the only drug of its class indicated for all five anxiety disorders in addition to major depressive disorder. Thus, given the high degree of psychiatric comorbidity of depression and anxiety, paroxetine is an important first-line option for the treatment of major depressive disorder, OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, GAD and PTSD.
 ...
PMID:Spotlight on paroxetine in psychiatric disorders in adults. 1202 88


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>