Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

ReN1869 (NNC 05-1869) is a novel, selective H1 receptor antagonist that has been developed for analgesic purposes. In a first human dose administration study, the safety and pharmacokinetics of seven single oral doses in the range of 3.5 to 95 mg ReN1869 were studied. The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating study in 56 healthy subjects. No serious or severe adverse events were reported. After active doses, an average of 0.6 adverse events (AEs) was reported per subject in comparison to 0.5 AEs per subject after placebo, and the frequency of subjects reporting AEs was not related to dose level. The most frequently reported adverse events were dizziness, fatigue, and somnolence, and their occurrence was not proportional to dose. Vital signs, ECG recordings, and clinical laboratory results showed no changes of clinical relevance. During telemetric monitoring at all dose levels until 4 hours after dosing, no clinically relevant abnormalities were observed. A maximally tolerated dose was not identified. ReN1869 was rapidly absorbed after dosing. The overall mean value of t1/2 and oral clearance was 4.7 hours and 11.7 L/h, respectively. The parameters Cmax and AUC increased proportionally with dose level, whereas all other pharmacokinetic parameters were independent of the dose. In conclusion, single-dose administration of ReN1869 in doses up to 95 mg exhibited very few adverse events and no clinically relevant effects on any of the observed safety parameters. The pharmacokinetics points to simple first-order pharmacokinetics for ReN1869. All together, it makes ReN1869 a potential new drug candidate for the treatment of chronic pain and inflammatory conditions of neurogenic origin.
...
PMID:Safety and pharmacokinetics of ReN1869: a first human dose study in healthy subjects after single-dose administration. 1252 Jun 30

Chronic pain is a debilitating problem for many Americans. It affects physical, social, and emotional health. This study addresses the potential differential effects of chronic pain cross-culturally in younger Americans. A retrospective analysis of persons younger than 50 years of age presenting for chronic pain management in a multidisciplinary pain center was done. White and black American adults aged 18 to 50 years (N = 3669) were compared to determine whether there were differences in (1) psychologic functioning, (2) pain characteristics, (3) pain disability, and (4) comorbidities. Our results suggest that black Americans had more depressive symptoms and symptoms consistent with post-traumatic stress disorder when compared to white Americans. These results showed that on initial assessment, black Americans with chronic pain report significantly more pain and sleep disturbance as well as more symptoms consistent with post-traumatic stress disorder and depression than white Americans. They also experience a higher prevalence of self-identified comorbidities, including dizziness, chest pain, and high blood pressure. In conclusion, considerable diminution in the overall physical and emotional health of black Americans 18 to 50 years of age with chronic pain was noted. These data support the need for further study of the chronic pain experiences of racial and ethnicity minority persons.
...
PMID:Race and chronic pain: A comparative study of young black and white Americans presenting for management. 1462 1

The treatment of patients with unexplained medical symptoms is difficult because there is neither a clear etiology for the symptoms, nor a useful paradigm with which to understand and treat them. Patients with such symptoms are often referred to psychiatry with vague diagnoses of "somatization" or "hypochondriasis." Rather than considering somatoform diagnoses based on the number or diversity of physical symptoms, evolving research suggests an emphasis on the type of physical symptom as an indicator of Axis I pathology. This article links specific symptomatic complaints, such as chronic pain, chest pain, and dizziness, to the respective Axis I disorders associated with them, such as depression, panic disorder, and anxiety disorders.
...
PMID:Medically unexplained physical symptoms: toward an alternative paradigm for diagnosis and treatment. 1497 60

(1) First-line treatment for both acute and chronic pain is paracetamol or, if necessary, ibuprofen, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug. If relief is inadequate, the best option is a combination of paracetamol with codeine (a weak opiate). (2) A fixed-dose combination of paracetamol (325 mg) and tramadol (37.5 mg), a weak opiate, arrived on the French market in May 2003. (3) In the acute setting, three trials in a total of 1197 patients showed that a single dose of the paracetamol 650 mg + tramadol 75 mg combination after dental surgery was no more effective than ibuprofen 400 mg. Compared with each drug used alone, the paracetamol + tramadol combination prolongs the analgesic effect but does not increase its intensity. (4) A trial after gynaecological surgery and another trial after orthopaedic surgery showed that a single dose of paracetamol 975 mg + tramadol 112.5 mg had similar efficacy to tramadol alone at 112.5 mg. (5) In the chronic setting, we found no trials comparing the paracetamol + tramadol combination with each drug used alone. A comparative double-blind trial in 462 patients with low back pain or osteoarthritic pain showed no difference in efficacy between paracetamol 325 mg + tramadol 37.5 mg and paracetamol 300 mg + codeine 30 mg. (6) The main adverse effects of the paracetamol + tramadol combination are the same as other weak opiates: nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, drowsiness and constipation. Tramadol carries a higher risk of drug interactions than codeine. (7) In practice, the paracetamol + tramadol combination offers patients no advantages relative to standard analgesics.
...
PMID:Paracetamol + tramadol: new preparation. No advance. 1498 89

Migraine is a chronic headache disorder manifesting in attacks lasting 4-72 hours. Characteristics of headache are unilateral location, pulsating quality, moderate or severe intensity, aggravation by routine physical activity, and association with nausea, photophobia and phonophobia. The migraine aura is a complex of neurological symptoms, which occurs just before or at the onset of migraine headache. Botulinum toxin A represents a completely new option for patients with chronic pain conditions. Numerous retrospective open-label chart reviews and 4 double-blind, placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated that botulinum toxin type A is significantly effective in migraine prophylaxis and reduces the frequency, severity, and disability associated with migraine headaches. Studies have generally reported a good and consistent efficacy. The differential therapeutic use of botulinum toxin appears to be worth attempting in migraine patients with the following characteristic features: (1) Muscular stress as migraine trigger, e. g., in craniocervical dystonia, pericranial painful muscular trigger points or tender points, oromandibular dysfunction, (2) concurrent chronic tension-type headache with the aggravating factors of muscular stress or oromandibular dysfunction, (3) chronic migraine with frequent migraine attacks on more than 15 days per month for longer than 3 months and if other therapeutic options have been either ineffective or have not been tolerated. The use of the agent does not cause CNS side effects. Migraine patients in particular, often suffer greatly, as a result of the adverse effects of the drugs used, from fatigue, dizziness, reduced concentration, loss of appetite, weight gain, hair loss and changes in libido. These side effects are not known in association with botulinum toxin A. To date, neither organic damage nor allergic complications have been reported. Thus, both the tolerability and the safety of this therapeutic measure are high. The mode of action by which botulinum toxin is effective in migraine prophylaxis is not fully understood and is under investigation. Currently, a number of other randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials are being conducted to evaluate the efficacy, optimal dosing, and side-effect profile of botulinum toxin type A in the prophylaxis of migraine and other headache entities.
...
PMID:Botulinum toxin in migraine prophylaxis. 1499 36

Opiates are the primary treatment for pain management in cancer patients reporting moderate to severe pain, and are being increasingly used for non-cancer chronic pain. However, prolonged administration of opiates is associated with significant problems including the development of antinociceptive tolerance, wherein higher doses of the drug are required over time to elicit the same amount of analgesia. High doses of opiates result in serious side effects such as constipation, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, somnolence, and impairment of mental alertness. In addition, sustained exposure to morphine has been shown to result in paradoxical pain in regions unaffected by the initial pain complaint, and which may also result in dose escalation, i.e. 'analgesic tolerance'. A concept that has been gaining considerable experimental validation is that prolonged use of opioids elicits paradoxical, abnormal pain. This enhanced pain state requires additional opioids to maintain a constant level of antinociception, and consequently may be interpreted as antinociceptive tolerance. Many substances have been shown to block or reverse antinociceptive tolerance. A non-inclusive list of examples of substances reported to block or reverse opioid antinociceptive tolerance include: substance P receptor (NK-1) antagonists, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists, nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors, protein kinase C inhibitors, competitive and non-competitive antagonists of the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor, AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4 isoxazolepropionic acid) antagonists, anti-dynorphin antiserum, and cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor antagonists. Without exception, these substances are also antagonists of pain-enhancing agents. Prolonged opiate administration indeed induces upregulation of substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) within sensory fibers in vivo, and this is accompanied by an enhanced release of excitatory neurotransmitters and neuropeptides from primary afferent fibers upon stimulation. The enhanced evoked release of neuropeptides is correlated with the onset of abnormal pain states and opioid antinociceptive tolerance. Importantly, the descending pain modulatory pathway from the brainstem rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) via the dorsolateral funiculus (DLF) is critical for maintaining the changes observed in the spinal cord, abnormal pain states and antinociceptive tolerance, because animals with lesion of the DLF did not show enhanced evoked neuropeptide release, or develop abnormal pain or antinociceptive tolerance upon sustained exposure to opiates. Microinjection of either lidocaine or a CCK antagonist into the RVM blocked both thermal and touch hypersensitivity as well as antinociceptive tolerance. Thus, prolonged opioid exposure enhances a descending pain facilitatory pathway from the RVM that is mediated at least in part by CCK activity and is essential for the maintenance of antinociceptive tolerance.
...
PMID:Is paradoxical pain induced by sustained opioid exposure an underlying mechanism of opioid antinociceptive tolerance? 1621 2

Safety and efficacy data from a study of slow intrathecal (IT) ziconotide titration for the management of severe chronic pain are presented. Patients randomized to ziconotide (n = 112) or placebo (n = 108) started IT infusion at 0.1 microg/hour (2.4 microg/day), increasing gradually (0.05-0.1 microg/hour increments) over 3 weeks. The ziconotide mean dose at termination was 0.29 microg/hour (6.96 microg/day). Patients' baseline Visual Analogue Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) score was 80.7 (SD 15). Statistical significance was noted for VASPI mean percentage improvement, baseline to Week 3 (ziconotide [14.7%] vs. placebo [7.2%; P = 0.036]) and many of the secondary efficacy outcomes measures. Significant adverse events (AEs) reported in the ziconotide group were dizziness, confusion, ataxia, abnormal gait, and memory impairment. Discontinuation rates for AEs and serious AEs were comparable for both groups. Slow titration of ziconotide, a nonopioid analgesic, to a low maximum dose resulted in significant improvement in pain and was better tolerated than in two previous controlled trials that used a faster titration to a higher mean dose.
...
PMID:A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of intrathecal ziconotide in adults with severe chronic pain. 1671 70

Worldwide a large number of patients suffer from severe chronic pain even after treatment with opioids following the 3-step analgesic ladder developed by the WHO. Intraspinal agents, including morphine, have been tried as a fourth step. However, approximately 20% of cases remain refractory. Ziconotide, an intrathecal analgesic with orphan drug status, is a novel alternative for the management of chronic intractable pain. Ziconotide is a synthetic peptide based on the toxin of the fish-hunting marine snail, Conus magus. It is the first therapeutic agent in a new pharmacological class of "topically" active analgesics that selectively target neuron-specific (N-type), voltage-gated calcium channels. Ziconotide produces potent analgesia by interruption of Ca-dependent primary afferent transmission of pain signals in the spinal cord. Ziconotide was significantly more effective than placebo in the treatment of chronic malignant (p < 0.001) and non-malignant pain (p < 0.001). In several clinical studies morphine dosages could be substituted by ziconotide. The drug has a lag-time for the onset and offset of analgesia and adverse effects. Initial doses should therefore be low (2.4 microg/day) and titrated slowly (increasing up to a maximum of 21.6 microg/day in increases of 2.4 microg/day no more than twice weekly). The gradual increase in dose helps to reduce the incidence and severity of adverse events which affect primarily the central nervous system (e.g. dizziness, nausea, confusion). Ziconotide maintains its analgesic efficacy over months and does not cause tolerance, dependence or respiratory depression. Following intrathecal infusion ziconotide is distributed within the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) where its clearance (0.38 ml/min) corresponds to the rate of turnover of the CSF. Negligible amounts of ziconotide are present in the systemic circulation where it is rapidly degraded by proteolysis. In conclusion, ziconotide is a new and valuable alternative analgesic for the acute and long-term treatment of severe pain, especially in patients refractory to opioids.
...
PMID:Ziconotide--a novel neuron-specific calcium channel blocker for the intrathecal treatment of severe chronic pain--a short review. 1706 78

Tramadol is a synthetic, centrally acting opioid analgesic. An extended-release tablet formulation of tramadol (tramadol ER) allows gradual release of the active drug, permitting once-daily administration. Tramadol ER administered once daily is equivalent in bioavailability to immediate-release tramadol administered four times daily, with prolonged absorption and lower peak plasma concentrations. Tramadol ER was significantly more effective than placebo in the treatment of moderate to moderately severe chronic pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and/or hip in randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. In a flexible-dose trial in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, the mean reduction from baseline in pain intensity scores over 12 weeks was significantly greater in recipients of tramadol ER than in placebo recipients. In a fixed-dose trial in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and/or hip, the mean improvements from baseline in the pain and physical function subscale scores of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index over 12 weeks were significantly greater in tramadol ER than placebo recipients. Common adverse events reported in patients with moderate to moderately severe chronic pain treated with tramadol ER 100-300 mg once daily were dizziness (excluding vertigo), nausea, constipation, somnolence and flushing.
...
PMID:Tramadol extended-release tablets. 1710 Apr 15

Studies of populations with chronic cancer pain have shown a high prevalence of breakthrough pain (BTP), defined as transitory, severe flares of pain that occur on a background of otherwise controlled, persistent pain. High BTP prevalence rates have also been reported in patients with chronic noncancer pain, although data in these patient populations are more limited. The incidence of BTP appears to be associated with progression of chronic disease, with more than 80% of patients reporting BTP with far-advanced, end-stage cancer and noncancer terminal conditions (1). The most widely accepted therapeutic approach for the management of BTP involves use of short-acting opioids taken as needed in addition to the around-the-clock opioid regimen being used for the continuous component of the persistent pain syndrome. For some patients, an optimal treatment outcome for BTP may be unattainable because of a mismatch between the time course of the BTP episode and the onset of analgesia of short-acting opioids. Breakthrough pain typically reaches peak intensity within a few minutes, whereas the onset of analgesia with traditional, orally administered short-acting opioids is between 30 and 60 minutes (2-7). Consequently, treatment outcomes for BTP are likely to be improved with agents that have a more rapid onset of analgesia. Fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) is a new formulation of fentanyl indicated for the management of BTP in patients with cancer who are already receiving, and who are tolerant to, opioid therapy for their underlying persistent cancer pain. The FBT formulation uses OraVescent (Cephalon, Inc., Frazer, PA, USA) drug delivery technology to provide rapid absorption of fentanyl through the buccal mucosa. In pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers, FBT demonstrated high, early systemic absorption. In addition, FBT delivered a larger proportion of the fentanyl dose transmucosally and produced a greater early systemic exposure than oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC), which is also indicated for the management of BTP in opioid-tolerant cancer patients. A number of short-term studies have evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of FBT in the management of BTP in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic pain. All these studies included an open-label dose-titration phase prior to randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind treatment. Pain Intensity of a BTP episode was measured using an 11-point scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain), and the primary outcome measure was the Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) at a specified time point. Secondary efficacy measures included Pain Relief, Pain Intensity Differences, and the proportion of BTP episodes demonstrating >or=33% and >or=50% improvement in Pain Intensity scores at each time point postdose, and the proportion of BTP episodes requiring supplemental medication. In a pivotal study of opioid-tolerant patients with cancer-related chronic pain and BTP, the primary outcome measure, SPID at 30 minutes (SPID(30)), significantly favored FBT compared with placebo (mean +/- SE: 3.0 +/- 0.12 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.18, p<0.0001). Better efficacy was also observed with FBT compared with placebo for pain relief, Pain Intensity Differences, and the proportion of episodes showing >or=33% and >or=50% improvement in Pain Intensity Scores. Treatment with FBT was generally well tolerated. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and typical of those associated with opioid use (e.g., nausea, dizziness) (8). Similar results have been observed in studies of opioid-tolerant patients with BTP in association with noncancer-related chronic pain. In a study of patients with chronic low back pain, the primary outcome measure, SPID(60), significantly favored FBT over placebo (mean +/- SE: 8.3 +/- 0.66 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.57, p <0.0001). All secondary efficacy measures were similarly improved, with Pain Intensity Differences and Pain Relief scores showing significant differences versus placebo as early as 10 and 15 minutes, respectively. As in the study of cancer patients, treatment with FBT was well tolerated (9). Across all studies, there was no simple linear relationship between the effective dose of FBT and the dose of the around-the-clock opioid regimen or the previous supplemental opioid, indicating that doses of FBT should be individually titrated to effectiveness rather than calculated as a percentage of existing opioid regimens. This monograph summarizes current data on the clinical pharmacology, efficacy, safety and tolerability of FBT relating to the management of opioid-tolerant patients with BTP in association with chronic pain.
...
PMID:Fentanyl buccal tablet. 1830 3


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>