Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (
dizziness
)
9,689
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel study, the antihypertensive effects of betaxolol (20 mg once daily) and/or chlorthalidone (25 mg once daily) were analyzed in 186 patients with
essential hypertension
. Following a 2- to 4-week placebo baseline period, patients were randomized to one of two treatment groups (betaxolol or chlorthalidone) and studied for 6 weeks while receiving single therapy and an additional 6 weeks with a combination of the two agents. Significant decreases from baseline supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) were observed in both groups at the end of the single-therapy phase (11 mm Hg in SDBP for betaxolol and 12 mm Hg in SDBP for chlorthalidone); a further significant decrease (7 mm Hg for betaxolol and 8 mm Hg for chlorthalidone in SDBP) was observed from the end of the single-therapy phase to the end of the combination-therapy phase. Changes in supine systolic blood pressure (SSBP) from baseline to the end of the single-therapy phase were 10 mm Hg for the betaxolol and 16 mm Hg for the chlorthalidone group. In all cases, within-group changes were statistically significant. From the end of single therapy to end of combination therapy there was an additional 14-mm Hg and 13-mm Hg reduction in SSBP in the betaxolol and chlorthalidone groups, respectively. Overall, 89% of the randomized patients completed the single-treatment phase (phase I), and 89% of those patients completed the combined therapy phase (phase II). There was no significant difference between treatment groups in the clinical response rate (SDBP at or below 90 mm Hg or a decrease from baseline of at least 10 mm Hg). A substantial percentage of patients completing phase I responded to either single agent (58% for betaxolol and 65% for chlorthalidone). Among patients completing phase II therapy, the combination of the two agents produced a greater response rate (83% for the betaxolol-first group and 85% for the chlorthalidone-first group). In conclusion, both agents were effective and well tolerated. The most frequent adverse events in the single-therapy phase were headache, arthralgia, and
dizziness
, while bradycardia, rhinitis, arthralgia, and
dizziness
were most frequent in the combination-therapy phase. The combination of betaxolol (20 mg) and chlorthalidone (25 mg) once daily produced an additive antihypertensive effect regardless of which drug was administered first.
...
PMID:Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of betaxolol and chlorthalidone as monotherapy and in combination. 268 73
Urapidil is a postsynaptic alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist with a pharmacodynamic profile similar to prazosin. Unlike prazosin, however, urapidil also has some central activity which may explain the apparent improved tolerability of urapidil, including the absence of first-dose syncope. In clinical trials urapidil therapy resulted in significant reductions in blood pressure in patients with mild to severe
essential hypertension
, with little influence on heart rate. It is an effective antihypertensive when administered as monotherapy or in combination with beta-blockers and thiazide diuretics. In the few patients with cardiac dysfunction who have been studied to date, urapidil has improved myocardial oxygen consumption, systemic vascular resistance, left ventricular function, cardiac output and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; however, further study is needed to assess the full therapeutic potential of urapidil in these patients. Urapidil has also been used successfully in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies, including eclampsia and pre-eclampsia, hypertensive crisis and hypertension occurring during general and cardiac surgery, rapidly lowering blood pressure without altering heart rate. Urapidil does not affect lipid or glucose metabolism, nor does it impair renal function. In addition, urapidil may be beneficial to patients with pulmonary hypertension, in whom it dilates pulmonary vascular beds to a greater extent than systemic vasculature, although therapeutic trials have not examined this effect. The most common adverse effects associated with urapidil therapy are
dizziness
, nausea, headache, fatigue and palpitations; however, these tend to be mild and transient and usually do not require discontinuation of treatment. Thus, urapidil offers a useful alternative to currently available drugs for the treatment of mild to severe hypertension, either as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs.
...
PMID:Urapidil. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the treatment of hypertension. 269 46
The long-term antihypertensive efficacy of a combination of ketanserin (20 mg), an S2 antagonist with alpha 1 blocking activity, and chlorthalidone (25 mg), given o.d., was evaluated in fifteen patients with
primary hypertension
of mild to moderate degree, aged 45-65 years, up to a 12-month observation period. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, and heart rate (HR) were measured by an automatic recorder (Sentron Bard Biomedical) twice at rest after 5 min in a supine position and after 2 and 5 min in an upright position, 24 h after the last antihypertensive dose. Thirteen patients completed the study whilst two were lost to the follow-up. A significant reduction was observed in both SBP and DBP at rest. In particular, SBP was reduced from 167 +/- 17 mmHg to 152 +/- 21 mmHg (p less than 0.01) after 1 month of therapy and was kept constant at this level throughout the observation period. DBP was also reduced from the first control [99 +/- 7 vs. 90 +/- 9 mmHg (p less than 0.01)] without any increase during the follow-up. HR was unchanged throughout the study. Four patients had
dizziness
and orthostatic hypotension after the first dose of the drug combination but were able to continue the study without further adverse reactions. These data support the conclusion that long-term treatment with the combination of a small dose of ketanserin and chlorthalidone is able to reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure, without remarkable untoward side-effects.
...
PMID:Long-term antihypertensive efficacy of ketanserin plus chlorthalidone. 270 Mar 22
In an eight-week, multicenter open-label study of enalapril monotherapy for mild-to-moderate
essential hypertension
, data for 115 of the 276 participants between the ages of 55 and 75 years (whites, n = 90; blacks, n = 25) were analyzed. These data were compared with similar data for the study subset of 92 younger patients between the ages of 21 and 45 years (whites, n = 58; blacks, n = 34). The most striking finding was the overall lack of significant differences in response between older and younger patients. There were, however, significant differences in response to therapy between the two racial groups studied. In the older group, normotension was achieved in 66% of white patients and 60% of black patients with a single daily dose of enalapril ranging from 5 to 40 mg; the group means, 13 +/- 1 mg in whites vs 22 +/- 2 mg in blacks, differed significantly (P less than 0.05). Thirty-one percent of older white patients attained normotension with a daily dosage of 5 mg, whereas only 4% of black patients in this age group did so. Only 4% of the older white patients but 24% of the older black patients reached the highest recommended daily dosage of 40 mg of enalapril. Adverse reactions occurred in 11% of the older white patients and 16% of the older black patients (a nonsignificant difference), consisting mostly of gastrointestinal discomfort, malaise,
dizziness
, and pruritus. There were no significant biochemical abnormalities, the only consistent change being a slight increase in mean plasma potassium from 4.34 to 4.45 mEq/L in older whites (P less than 0.05). Enalapril appeared to be generally effective and well tolerated in the management of mild-to-moderate hypertension in the older subset of patients in this study. Efficacy and tolerability data for older and younger patients were comparable.
...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of enalapril monotherapy in mild-to-moderate hypertension in older patients compared to younger patients. 283 Sep 74
The effectiveness of enalapril 10-40 mg/day as first choice treatment of mild (90-104 mmHg, n = 37), moderate (105-114 mmHg, n = 21), or severe (115-130 mmHg excluding accelerated hypertension, n = 16)
essential hypertension
was studied in an open multicentre trial. Enalapril alone controlled the hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 90 mmHg or less) in 25 patients (34%). Of these, 20 had mild and 5 had moderate hypertension. The remaining patients required either enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 or 25 mg/day (n = 30), or a third drug of the physician's choice (n = 9). A relationship was present between baseline blood pressure and the number of drugs required to achieve blood pressure control. Plasma creatinine increased beyond the limits of laboratory error in 3 patients, and from 100-108 mumol/l (p less than 0.05) on enalapril alone in a subgroup of patients who ultimately required a diuretic. Enalapril was well tolerated; 60 (73%) had no drug related side effects during active treatment. Tiredness (n = 5), headache (n = 4),
dizziness
(n = 4) and palpitations (n = 3) were the most frequent side effects. Cough was a feature in 3 patients and 1 patient had a rash. This study suggests that enalapril is an effective and well tolerated anti-hypertensive agent in mild, moderate or severe hypertension, but that caution may be required in patients with impaired renal function.
...
PMID:Enalapril as first choice treatment of mild, moderate and severe essential hypertension: results of an open multicentre clinical trial. New Zealand Hypertension Study Group. 283 97
Lisinopril is a new, nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor approved for the treatment of hypertension. After oral administration, 25-29 percent of the dose is absorbed intact; biotransformation is not required for pharmacological activity. Onset of action occurs one to two hours after administration, with effects still present 24 hours later. The major route of elimination is through renal excretion and an elimination half-life of 12.6 hours has been reported in normotensive individuals. In patients with impaired renal function (creatinine clearance less than or equal to 30 ml/min) a longer half-life and accumulation have been observed. Lisinopril 20-80 mg/d has been shown to be as effective as hydrochlorothiazide, nifedipine, and beta-blocking agents in the treatment of
essential hypertension
. Its efficacy in renovascular hypertension has also been demonstrated. In congestive heart failure (CHF) doses of 2.5-20 mg/d appear to provide hemodynamic effects comparable to those of captopril.
Dizziness
and cough have been the most frequently reported side effects; rash and proteinuria have also been reported in a small number of patients. Interactions with diuretics, potassium supplements, and possibly with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents may occur. Lisinopril appears to be similar in efficacy to other antihypertensive agents in the treatment of
essential hypertension
and to captopril in the treatment of CHF. Whether lisinopril is safer or more effective than captopril or enalapril in the treatment of hypertension or CHF requires further investigation. Prolonged duration of action of lisinopril allows once daily dosing, unlike captopril for which dosing is required every 8-12 hours or enalapril which may necessitate twice daily dosing.
...
PMID:Lisinopril: a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. 283 26
Multiclinic controlled studies have shown that enalapril alone 10 to 40 mg/day orally is effective in lowering blood pressure in patients with
essential hypertension
. Enalapril has been compared with thiazides and beta-blockers (propranolol, metoprolol and atenolol). The effect on systolic blood pressure has been greater with enalapril than with beta-blockers. The proportion of patients who respond to enalapril alone with a decrease in diastolic blood pressure (greater than or equal to 10mm Hg) is around 70%. When a thiazide is added to the treatment, the proportion is above 90%. Enalapril improves the signs and symptoms associated with congestive heart failure. Patients increased their exercise tolerance by an average of 148 sec and improved in their NYHA cardiac status and prognosis classification. The overall incidence of side effects is similar to that seen in the placebo control groups. Side effects such as agranulocytosis, taste loss, rash, proteinuria were not characteristic of enalapril. This supports the hypothesis that the improved safety profile of enalapril is the result of being a nonsulphydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. The most common side effects reported were
dizziness
, headache and asthenia. Abnormalities in electrolytes, uric acid, glucose or in lipids have generally not been associated with enalapril.
...
PMID:Enalapril in hypertension and congestive heart failure. Overall review of efficacy and safety. 286 29
The safety of terazosin, an effective agent for the treatment of hypertension, was assessed by analyzing data from 1,006 hypertensive patients who were enrolled in short-term and/or long-term studies. The total experience with terazosin in this article represents 422.5 patient-years. Changes in pulse rate measurements from pretreatment to posttreatment were not significantly different between the terazosin- and placebo-treated patients (-1.0 beat per minute for the terazosin group and -1.0 beat per minute for the placebo group, in the supine position).
Dizziness
, headache, and asthenia were the most commonly reported adverse experiences among all terazosin-treated patients, although the incidence of headache in placebo-controlled trials was not significantly different between the terazosin and placebo groups. As a whole, patients receiving terazosin had a tendency to gain small amounts of weight (2 pounds). In addition, there was a trend for slight decreases in hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cell count, total protein, and albumin levels in those patients who received terazosin, suggesting hemodilution. Overall, terazosin was shown to be safe in patients with mild to moderate
essential hypertension
.
...
PMID:Overall safety of terazosin as an antihypertensive agent. 287 12
The side-effect profile of labetalol was assessed in 34 patients with mild to moderate
essential hypertension
who had previously experienced side effects during beta-blocker therapy. The most frequently reported beta-blocker side effects were fatigue, impotence, cold extremities, and depression. After discontinuing their previous beta-blocker for 4 weeks, labetalol was titrated (100-400 mg b.i.d.) to achieve blood pressure control. Twenty-seven of 34 patients did not have a recurrence of a beta-blocker related side effect while receiving labetalol. The most common new side effect with labetalol was
dizziness
(3 patients). As judged by the attending physician and the patient, labetalol was better tolerated than conventional beta-blocker therapy in 30 of 34 patients (88%). Twenty-four of 34 patients (71%) preferred labetalol over previous therapy. Labetalol controlled blood pressure in 30 of 34 patients (88%). At equal antihypertensive doses, some side effects common to beta-blockers are seen less frequently with labetalol.
...
PMID:Comparative tolerability of labetalol versus propranolol, atenolol, pindolol, metoprolol, and nadolol. 287 65
The antihypertensive efficacy of bevantolol, a selective beta 1-adrenoreceptor antagonist, was evaluated in 17 patients with
essential hypertension
, using continuous ambulatory intraarterial blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The study compared a twice-daily regimen (titrated dose of 200 to 600 mg/day) with the same amount given in a single daily dose. Within-patient comparisons of mean hourly systolic and diastolic BPs and heart rate showed a highly significant effect with twice-daily therapy (p less than 0.001) for all of the 24 hours. Similar significant results were obtained with a single morning dose. There was no difference between the pattern or extent of BP reduction with the 2 regimens. The decrease in BP after bevantolol persisted during the physiologic tests (rest, tilt, isometric and dynamic exercise). Four patients developed minor side effects with the single morning dose, and only 1 patient with the twice-daily regimen. These effects included tiredness, fatigue and
dizziness
. Unlike pure beta-blocking agents, bevantolol controlled the early morning increase in BP, lending support to the belief that it possesses vasodilatory properties in addition to beta blockade. These results suggest that bevantolol may be useful as first-line therapy in a once-daily dosage for the treatment of
essential hypertension
.
...
PMID:Once- and twice-daily bevantolol for systemic hypertension using 24-hour ambulatory intraarterial blood pressure recording. 287 95
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>