Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A double-blind, randomized study of parallel group design comparing remoxipride and thioridazine (dose range 150-600 mg/day of either drug) was undertaken at 11 Australian centres. A total of 144 patients (remoxipride = 73, thioridazine = 71) with DSM-III-R schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder commenced the study, and 89 patients (remoxipride = 45, thioridazine = 44) completed the 6 weeks of the trial. The mean daily doses at last rating were 404 mg (remoxipride) and 378 mg (thioridazine). Initial Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores decreased by a mean 8.7 points in both remoxipride and thioridazine groups. Equivalent treatment responses were also confirmed by Clinical Global Impression. During the study, sedatives or hypnotics were needed by 68% of the remoxipride patients and 51% of the thioridazine patients. Thioridazine was associated with more postural hypotension, drowsiness, increased sleep, headache, dizziness on rising, dry mouth, sexual dysfunction and weight gain, while remoxipride patients reported more insomnia. There were no differences between remoxipride and thioridazine on dystonia, hypokinesia, dyskinesia, rigidity and akathisia. The results indicate that remoxipride has similar antipsychotic efficacy to thioridazine but causes fewer side effects.
...
PMID:The Australian multicentre double-blind comparative study of remoxipride and thioridazine in schizophrenia. 787 41

Data from three placebo-controlled and 11 active-controlled studies of tizanidine were combined to permit analysis of the subsets, which were too small to evaluate within the individual studies. Overall analysis of placebo-controlled data confirms the effectiveness of tizanidine in reducing muscle tone in patients with spasticity of spinal cord origin. Subset analyses suggest that patients with more severe spasticity are more likely to respond, but age, sex, and race were not predictive of response. Comparisons of tizanidine with active controls showed no differences in efficacy compared with baclofen or diazepam. However, when compared with controls, patients treated with tizanidine did not experience increased weakness. Furthermore, patients tolerated tizanidine better than the control medications. More patients experienced adverse events during tizanidine treatment than did patients receiving placebo. The most common adverse events reported were dry mouth, somnolence, asthenia, and dizziness. Mild elevations in liver function tests were noted occasionally, but improved in all patients with dose reduction or withdrawal. Three patients from the double-blind database reported formed visual hallucinations. All three cleared; two continued tizanidine, and one discontinued.
...
PMID:Summary of combined clinical analysis of controlled clinical trials with tizanidine. 797 13

In a double-blind multi-centre study of general practice patients with DSM-III-R major depressive disorder, sertraline (50 or 100 mg/day) was compared with dothiepin (75 or 150 mg/day) and with placebo. There were 83, 96 and 90 patients evaluated in the respective treatment groups; treatment lasted 6 weeks. Patients were assessed on the MADRS, CGI, and Leeds Self-rating Scales. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between sertraline and placebo were found on MADRS and CGI but not the Leeds Scales. In the mild subgroup analyses, there were no significant differences between sertraline and placebo. However, clear significant differences (p < 0.05) between sertraline and placebo were present in the severe subgroup. Dothiepin failed to achieve a statistically significant difference from placebo on any analyses. Seventy-six per cent of patients were treated with 50 mg sertraline and 81% of patients received 150 mg dothiepin. Both sertraline and dothiepin were generally well tolerated; the most frequent side effects with sertraline were nausea, dizziness and headache; with dothiepin the most frequent side effects were dry mouth, somnolence and headache.
...
PMID:A double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of sertraline and dothiepin in the treatment of major depression in general practice. 805

Twenty-one healthy, caucasian, male volunteers completed this randomized single blind, multiple-dose, crossover bioavailability study during which either phentermine HCl capsules (Minobese Forte, reference product) or phentermine base capsules (Duromine, test product) were ingested once daily for 14 days. A washout period of 14 days was allowed between the two treatment phases. On profile days (day 14 of each treatment phase) subjects remained recumbent for 24 hours after drug administration. Serial venous blood samples were drawn over the 24 hour dosing interval for plasma phentermine assay by gas chromatography. The 90% confidence intervals for the "test/reference" mean ratios of the pharmacokinetic variables Cmax,norm, Cmin,norm, AUCnorm (normalized for difference in the dose of phentermine base), %PTF and T75% Cmax, all fell within the bioequivalence range of 80% to 125%. With the aid of trough plasma phentermine concentrations, it was established that steady-state was reached after 14 days of once daily administration of either product. Adverse events experienced on both treatments included prolonged or recurrent episodes of insomnia, nausea, headache, dry mouth and dizziness. No clinically relevant changes in clinical chemistry or hematology variables occurred during the study.
...
PMID:Steady-state pharmacokinetics of phentermine extended-release capsules. 822 80

Efficacy and safety of NK 622 (toremifene citrate) were compared with tamoxifen (TAM) by a double blind test in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer. NK 622 and TAM were given orally for 12 weeks or more at daily doses of 40 and 20 mg/body, respectively. Eligible cases in NK622 and TAM groups were both 57 patients. No significant difference was observed in patient characteristics between either group. Response rates were 26.3% (8 CR and 7 PR, 15/57) in the NK 622 group and 28.1% (3 CR and 13 PR, 16/57) in the TAM group. Median values of duration to onset of CR were 91 days in the NK 622 group and 169 days in the TAM group. The duration was significantly shorter with the NK 622 group. Median duration of efficacy in CR and PR cases was 155 days in the NK 622 group and 154.5 days in the TAM group. Adverse effects were encountered in 7 patients (12.3%) of each of the 2 groups. The side effects were fatigue, hot flush, WBC decrease, abnormal values in liver function tests, etc. in the NK 622 group and anorexia, nausea, eruption, feeling of warmth, sweating, dry mouth, dizziness, abnormal values in liver function tests, etc. in the TAM group. Administration was discontinued in one patient with eruption and another patient with abnormal values of liver function tests in the TAM group, while there was no such case in the NK 622 group. Including the discontinued cases, the side effects were moderate and reversible in both groups. The patients in whom a drug was determined as useful or more numbered 24/57 (42.1%) in the NK 622 group and 23/57 (40.4%) in the TAM group. There was not significant difference between the 2 groups in the above results except the duration to onset of CR. From these results, NK 622 is expected to show comparable efficacy, safety, and usefulness in patients undergoing TAM treatment for advanced or recurrent breast cancer.
...
PMID:[Clinical evaluation of NK 622 (toremifene citrate) in advanced or recurrent breast cancer--a comparative study by a double blind method with tamoxifen]. 843 63

Current antidepressants achieve similar efficacy, with 60% to 80% of patients responding adequately. Clinical response is gradual, and differential response factors are difficult to discern. However, side effect profiles and toxicity vary substantially, so the choice of medication depends primarily on tolerability and safety. Dry mouth is prevalent with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), whereas nausea occurs more frequently with a serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Long-term unwanted effects tend not to be a major problem, with a dropout rate of approximately 5% due to side effects. The relationship between suicidality and antidepressants remains under debate. Many TCAs are highly toxic in overdose whereas the SSRIs appear much safer. Nefazodone is a unique antidepressant with demonstrated efficacy. It is different from other antidepressants because of its two actions in the serotonin system, moderate serotonin selective reuptake blocking properties and direct 5-HT2 antagonism, which also can enhance 5-HT1 neurotransmission. The 5-HT2 antagonist properties may limit serotonin-mediated effects and, as a result, nefazodone may be more anxiolytic than other antidepressants. Nefazodone also moderately inhibits norepinephrine reuptake and blocks alpha 1-adrenergic receptors. The data base on the safety of nefazodone currently comprises approximately 3,500 patients from all research trials, which include controlled trials that allow comparisons of nefazodone treatment with several hundred patients taking TCAs or SSRIs and nearly 900 patients receiving placebo. The most frequent adverse experiences with nefazodone as compared with placebo treatment are nausea (21% vs. 14%), somnolence (19% vs. 13%), dry mouth (19% vs. 13%), dizziness (12% vs. 6%), constipation (11% vs. 7%), asthenia (11% vs. 6%), light-headedness (10% vs. 4%), and amblyopia (blurred vision; 6% vs. 3%). Approximately 12% of nefazodone-treated patients dropped out because of adverse experiences, as compared with 7.4% on placebo, 10.4% on SSRIs, but 21.8% on imipramine after short-term exposure in placebo-controlled trials. Long-term safety data include nearly 1,300 patients; nefazodone was well tolerated. Nefazodone was evaluated in normal subjects by the author and was found to produce less impairment than imipramine and was less likely to interact with alcohol. In summary, nefazodone has a favorable adverse-event profile as compared with the TCAs and a rather different one from the SSRIs. It appears to be safe and well tolerated after both acute and long-term use.
...
PMID:Tolerability and safety: essentials in antidepressant pharmacotherapy. 862 62

MK-462 is a potent, selective 5HT1D receptor agonist which may be useful in treating acute migraine. We conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled inpatient study to assess the preliminary efficacy and safety of oral doses of MK-462 20 mg (n = 8) and 40 mg (n = 36) vs placebo (n = 21), administered to 65 male and post-menopausal female migraine patients aged 22-51 with moderate or severe migraine headache. Headache severity and functional disability were measured at 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 h post-dose. The 20 mg dose was well tolerated and 4/8 patients obtained relief in headache severity at the 2 h time point. The 40 mg dose was well tolerated and was significantly (p < 0.05) superior to placebo at the 1.5 and 2 h time points (with 27/36 or 75% obtaining relief at 2 h compared to 7/21 or 33% for placebo). Adverse events occurred in 50% of patients on 20 mg MK-462, 72% of those on 40 mg MK-462, and in 52% of placebo-treated subjects. The most common adverse events associated with MK-462 were drowsiness (20 mg 12%; 40 mg 44%; placebo 24%), dry mouth (40 mg 36%; placebo 19%), and lightheadedness/dizziness (40 mg 17%; placebo 10%). Based on these preliminary results, MK-462 appears worthy of continued study for the treatment of acute migraine.
...
PMID:Pilot study of MK-462 in migraine. 866 77

Efficacy and safety of a PCA protocol, without loading dose or background infusion, was investigated in 40 consenting patients after osteotomy of the foot. All patients had intrathecal lidocaine 5% 1.8 ml preoperatively. Postoperative pain relief was provided with morphine from a Baxter Travenol infusor with PC module. The morphine concentration was 2 mg/ml or 3 mg/ml. In order to reach the analgesic blood concentration as quickly as possible, the patients were instructed to start PCA from the very first moment pain occurred. The patients breathed room air. The nursing staff evaluated respiratory and cardiovascular parameters, pain and side effects. Although mean VAS scores were higher than 3 in the early postoperative phase, no supplementary analgesics were required. One patient had urine retention. One patient had a drop in blood pressure at the start of morphine, which was quickly restored with the administration of colloids. Oxygen saturations were lower (SpO2 < 95%) the first hours postoperatively, especially at the first assessment where no morphine was administered. Pain or relative hypovolaemia could be an explanation. Dry mouth and sleepiness were the most frequently reported side-effects, followed by dizziness, vomiting and nausea. Sweating and itching were less frequently reported. The occurrence of the side effects was the highest during the first postoperative day. We conclude that even when morphine is used in PCA without loading dose or background infusion after opiate-free locoregional analgesia, close monitoring is necessary for at least 5 hours.
...
PMID:Evaluation of morphine for patient controlled analgesia with the Infusor system after opiate-free locoregional anesthesia for osteotomy of the foot. 866 16

The efficacy and safety of fluvoxamine maleate, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, was compared with placebo and imipramine in patients with major depressive disorder. Previous literature has cited a dose range of 100 to 300 mg/day of fluvoxamine maleate for the treatment of major depression; however, this study demonstrates that a dose range of 50 to 150 mg/day is as effective as imipramine (80-240 mg/day). After a 1- to 2-week, single-blind, placebo washout phase, 150 depressed outpatients were randomized to double-blind treatment with fluvoxamine maleate (50-150 mg/day), imipramine (80-240 mg/day), or placebo for 6 weeks. Fluvoxamine produced a significant therapeutic benefit over placebo (p < or = 0.05) as assessed by the total score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; imipramine (80-240 mg/day) produced similar results. The secondary outcome variables (i.e., Clinical Global Impression severity of illness item and 56-Item Hopkins Symptom Checklist depression factor) also showed significant differences between fluvoxamine maleate and placebo during three of the four final weeks of the study. Both fluvoxamine maleate and imipramine appeared to be safe and well tolerated by the majority of patients. As expected from the pharmacology of these agents, the imipramine groups reported more anticholinergic effects (dry mouth, dizziness, and urinary retention) and electrocardiographic effects, whereas the fluvoxamine group reported more nausea, somnolence, and abnormal ejaculation. The majority of these adverse events were mild to moderate and, with the exception of dry mouth (imipramine) and abnormal ejaculation (fluvoxamine), were transient. The data clearly demonstrate the antidepressant activity and tolerability of fluvoxamine maleate (50-150 mg/day) as compared with placebo; it is also as effective as the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine (80-240 mg/day) in patients with major depressive disorder.
...
PMID:Fluvoxamine maleate in the treatment of depression: a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with imipramine in outpatients. 869 Aug 26

The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical efficacy of nefazodone hydrochloride, a new antidepressant, are described. Nefazodone enhances serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]) synaptic transmission by acting as an antagonist at 5-HT2 receptors and by inhibiting the reuptake of 5-HT. These two mechanisms combined may enhance 5-HT1A-mediated transmission. In addition, nefazodone weakly inhibits the reuptake of norepinephrine. Nefazodone is a structural analogue of trazodone but is pharmacologically distinct. In placebo-controlled trials, nefazodone was as effective as imipramine for the treatment of major depression and produced clinical benefits in patients with depression-related anxiety and sleep disturbances. More than 2000 patients have received nefazodone in clinical trials. The most commonly reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are asthenia, somnolence, dry mouth, nausea, constipation, dizziness, lightheadedness, confusion, abnormal vision, and blurred vision. The incidence of sexual-dysfunction ADRs may be less than that reported for other antidepressants. Nefazodone does not inhibit rapid-eye movement sleep. Nefazodone, an inhibitor of the hepatic P-450 isoenzyme CYP3A4, may increase concentrations of drugs metabolized by this isoenzyme, such as terfenadine, astemizole, triazolam, alprazolam, and midazolam. Caution should be exercised in administering nefazodone hydrochloride with triazolobenzodiazepines, and coadministration with terfenadine or astemizole is contra-indicated. The dosage should start at 100 mg twice daily and then be increased, depending on occurrence of ADRs and the patient's clinical response, to 300-600 mg daily. In elderly or debilitated patients, the initial dosage should be half the usual dosage. Nefazodone hydrochloride is as effective as other available antidepressants and may cause fewer ADRs.
...
PMID:Nefazodone: a new antidepressant. 889 78


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>