Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Fifty-seven hospital out-patients with depressive symptoms were studied in a double-blind manner for up to 4 weeks, 30 whilst being treated with intramuscular flupenthixol decanoate (5 to 10 mg/fortnight) and 27 with oral amitriptyline (75 to 150 mg/day). The results of assessment using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, the Leeds Self-Rating Scale for Depression and the Clinical Global Impressions severity scale showed that both therapies were effective in resolving depression in the patients studied. The two treatments were well tolerated and side-effect profiles were similar, dry mouth, faintness/dizziness and drowsiness being the most frequently reported adverse events. Extrapyramidal signs were seen in similar numbers of patients in each treatment group. One patient from each of the two groups was withdrawn from therapy before the end of the study because of adverse events.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind comparison of oral amitriptyline and low-dose intramuscular flupenthixol decanoate in depressive illness. 218 97

In a double-blind, random-assignment, parallel-group trial, outpatients with major depression received either the new antidepressant clovoxamine, the tricyclic amitriptyline, or placebo for 6 weeks. By an "improvement" criterion of 50% or greater improvement in the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) total score, 88% of clovoxamine completers improved versus 75% with amitriptyline and 43% with placebo; however, due to small numbers, the differences failed to reach statistical significance. Diminished salivary flow was significantly greater with amitriptyline, as were complaints of dry mouth, somnolence, dizziness, and headache. Nausea and vomiting were more common in the clovoxamine-treated group. With amitriptyline, but not with clovoxamine, memory performance declined over a month. However, psychomotor performance was not affected.
 ...
PMID:Clovoxamine in the treatment of depressed outpatients: a double-blind, parallel-group comparison against amitriptyline and placebo. 220 81

Patients (n = 150) were randomized to a 6-week, double-blind study to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of mirtazapine, amitriptyline, and placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder symptoms. Average daily modal doses were mirtazapine, 18 mg; amitriptyline, 111 mg; and placebo, 4.6 capsules. Mirtazapine- and amitriptyline-treated patients had statistically significantly greater mean Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score reductions (weekly visits 1, 2, 4, and endpoint) compared to placebo. These findings were supported by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS); the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS); and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scales. Somnolence and weight gain were the only adverse clinical experiences (ACEs) reported substantially more often by mirtazapine-treated patients than by those in the placebo group. However, more amitriptyline-treated patients reported decreased visual accommodation, dry mouth, dyspepsia, constipation, tachycardia, hypertension, hypotension, discoordination, dizziness, and tremor than mirtazapine- or placebo-treated patients. Results of this study indicate that mirtazapine is more effective than placebo in the treatment of these patients, and superior to amitriptyline in respect to anticholinergic and cardiovascular effects.
 ...
PMID:Mirtazapine vs. amitriptyline vs. placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder. 223 55

Safety aspects were compared in 2203 patients given moclobemide and 1214 who received other antidepressants or placebo. A total of 2294 adverse events were reported by patients on moclobemide, mainly subjective symptoms (28.6%). Adverse events such as dry mouth, tremor, sweating, dizziness and constipation occurred much more frequently among 681 patients treated with various tricyclic antidepressants than in the 694 moclobemide patients with whom they were compared. Among 271 placebo-treated patients there were 287 adverse events, compared with 386 events in the 285 moclobemide patients in the same studies. Hypertensive episodes or food-drug interactions were reported by 19 patients on moclobemide and 5 on other antidepressants, but in only 2 of the former was ingestion of cheese a possible cause of headache. The assessment of tolerance on moclobemide was essentially the same as for placebo. Of the 1401 moclobemide patients in the electronic database, only 3.2% stopped treatment prematurely because of poor tolerance; the rates were higher for tranylcypromine, nomifensine, desipramine, clomipramine, amitriptyline and imipramine. During treatment, 6 patients attempted suicide with moclobemide alone (950-2000 mg) or together with imipramine (300 mg and 1200 mg). None of the intoxications was life-threatening.
 ...
PMID:Moclobemide (Ro 11-1163) safety in depressed patients. 224 78

In a placebo-controlled double-blind crossover pilot study of acute Coriolis-induced motion sickness treatment/prevention in humans employing an anticonvulsant dose of phenytoin, a mean increase in tolerance to motion stress from 4.87 min (S.D. = 5.55) to 46.87 min (S.D. = 32.6) was obtained. This represents a greater than fourfold improvement in efficacy over any currently available single agent and is more than twice as effective as the scopolamine/dexadrine combination. There were none of the usual side effects of blurred vision, dizziness, dry mouth, or sedation.
 ...
PMID:Use of phenytoin in the prevention of motion sickness. 225 75

Although many of us don't like to admit it, most of us have experienced the unmistakeable feeling of "the morning after." Dry mouth, nausea, dizziness, and headache are just a few of the consequences of overindulgence. Medically, this is known as acute alcohol withdrawal, but to us it's just a hangover.
 ...
PMID:Alcohol consumption and hangover. 227 69

Guanfacine, an alpha 2 adrenoceptor agonist, was compared with prazosin hydrochloride for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension in an 8-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel evaluation to determine efficacy and safety. The study consisted of a 2-week screening/weaning period (phase I), a 3-week treatment period with chlorthalidone 25 mg every morning (phase II), and an 8-week double-blind treatment period with diuretic plus prazosin or guanfacine (phase III). Those who had an average seated diastolic blood pressure (BP) of 95 to 114 mm Hg at the end of the phase II period were eligible to enter the phase III period and were randomly assigned to chlorthalidone plus either guanfacine, 1 mg every night, or prazosin, 1 mg three times a day. Of the 102 patients who were randomly assigned to guanfacine or prazosin, 80% completed the entire study. Guanfacine and prazosin appeared to be equally effective and reduced seated as well as standing diastolic and systolic BP. The mean seated systolic and diastolic BP were reduced 11/9 mm Hg by guanfacine and 11/10 mm Hg by prazosin. The mean reduction in seated pulse was 3 beats/minute for guanfacine and no change with prazosin. Similar changes occurred in the standing position. Very few adverse effects were reported during the study. Adverse effects with an incidence of 5% or greater for either drug group were dizziness (6% guanfacine, 8% prazosin), xerostomia (6% guanfacine, 2% prazosin), and somnolence (0% guanfacine, 6% prazosin). Three patients (6%) in the prazosin group experienced symptoms of orthostasis requiring premature discontinuation of the drug and termination from the study.
 ...
PMID:Antihypertensive efficacy of guanfacine and prazosin in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. 227 80

The majority of cases of acute, nonspecific diarrhea are of short duration, can be treated symptomatically with nonprescription medications and adequate hydration, and do not require a visit to the physician's office. If the family practitioner can determine via telephone that the patient, or the caller's child, is not experiencing certain signs and symptoms often associated with diarrheal illness that may indicate a more severe condition (e.g., high fever, vomiting, persistent diarrhea, or diarrhea accompanied by blood or severe abdominal or rectal pain), self-treatment may be allowed without an office visit. In addition, if the physician determines that the patient is not suffering from diarrheal dehydration, indicated by dry mouth, excessive thirst (or for children, inadequate fluid intake), wrinkled skin, little or no urination, dizziness, or lightheadedness, the physician may also allow the patient to be treated without an office visit. If, however, the patient is experiencing any of these symptoms, an office visit is required to facilitate further evaluation by the physician.
 ...
PMID:Family practitioner's guide to patient self-treatment of acute diarrhea. 235 47

The clinical effectiveness and safety of propiverine hydrochloride (P-4, 20 mg tablet) were studied on 29 patients with nervous pollakisuria, neurogenic bladder or unstable bladder, whose chief complaints were urinary frequency and/or urinary incontinence. The clinical efficacy was "good" or better in 62.1% and "fair" or better in 86.2%. Patients' impressions were "good" or better in 79.3%. There were a total of 4 cases (13.8%) of adverse reactions, namely, two cases of decreased urinary stream, one dry mouth, and one dizziness. These reactions disappeared rapidly after the completion or discontinuance of drug administration, and therefore, did not constitute significant safety problems. The clinical efficacy in the treatment of subjective symptoms was 74.1% for diurnal pollakisuria, 50.0% for nocturnal pollakisuria, 83.3% for urinary incontinence and 69.0% for urgent feeling of micturition. For objective symptoms, P-4 increased significantly the volume of maximum desire to void (MDV); however it did not increase significantly the residual urine volume. The results of this study suggest that propiverine hydrochloride is very useful for the treatment of urinary frequency and/or incontinence.
 ...
PMID:[Experience in the use of propiverine hydrochloride (P-4) for patients suffering from urinary frequency and/or incontinence]. 237 10

The clinical experience of 763 medical practitioners who treated 3,708 hypertensive patients (51% men) with indoramin, administered alone or in combination with diuretics and/or beta-adrenergic antagonists, is reported. All patients had baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 95 mm Hg or greater, even though most of the patients (62%) already were receiving optimum doses of diuretics (20%), beta-adrenergic antagonists (15%), or diuretics and beta-adrenergic antagonists (27%). After 6 to 10 weeks of indoramin therapy, the DBP of 70% of the patients was 90 mm Hg or lower; another 17% had treated DBP between 91 and 95 mm Hg. Response rates were similar among patients treated with indoramin alone and those who received concomitant antihypertensive treatment. Indoramin doses of 50 mg/day or less (dose range, 12.5 to 125 mg/day) were required in approximately 70% of the patients. Weight gain and reflex tachycardia were not observed. The most frequently reported side effects were drowsiness/tiredness, dizziness, and dry mouth. Only 6% of the patients discontinued indoramin treatment because of side effects. The results of this study indicate that indoramin, administered alone or in combination with diuretics and/or beta-adrenergic antagonists, is a safe and effective antihypertensive agent when used in relatively low doses in clinical practice.
 ...
PMID:Antihypertensive therapy in the Federal Republic of Germany: clinical practice experience with indoramin (Wydora). 242 96


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>