Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A new antidepressant, amoxapine, which is a dibenzoxazepine deprivative, was compared with amitriptyline in a randomised double-blind trial. Forty-eight patients were included and 41 completed a 4-week treatment. Most of the patients were maintained on 150 mg daily. Assessments were made by the Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), Nurses' Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale and Patient's Self-Evaluation. The total HAM-D score was considerably reduced in the majority of the patients. Amitriptyline was the most effective with regard to symptoms included in the factor Sleep Disturbances and-secondary maybe-towards some items included in the factor Somatization. For the remaining items,including the items of the factors Anxiety/Depression and Apathy, the last score was lower in the amoxapine group than in those treated with amitriptyline. Among the unipolar cases the amoxapine treated patients were more satisfied with regard to efficacy (P = 6.3%). The frequency of side effects such as tremor and dizziness was considerably lower in the amoxapine group. In total, the side effects lasted longer in the amitriptyline group. We conclude that amoxapine seems to be an effective antidepressant with a low frequency of side effects.
 ...
PMID:Amoxapine versus amitriptyline in endogenous depression. A double-blind study. 38 Feb 69

Two hundred thirty patients with generalized anxiety and Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) scores greater than or equal to 18 were subdivided at random, according to a double-blind design, into one group treated with 5-10 mg of oral buspirone t.i.d. or one group treated with 10-20 mg of oral oxazepam t.i.d. for 6 weeks. No anxiolytic treatment was allowed 3 months prior to trial entry. Analysis of demographic variables revealed no significant imbalance between the two treatment groups. Twenty patients were excluded from efficacy analysis because of treatment withdrawal before the first efficacy evaluation on Day 7. Another 4 patients were excluded because they were taking concomitant psychotropic medication. The remaining 206 patients displayed a decrease in HAM-A scores (mean +/- SD) from 23.9 +/- 4.1 to 10.6 +/- 7.7 in the buspirone group and from 23.9 +/- 4.2 to 11.5 +/- 8.0 in the oxazepam group. The two treatment groups were also found to be virtually identical in an "intent to treat" analysis of all 230 patients as well as in other ratings (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Raskin Depression Scale, Covi Anxiety Scale, Physicians Questionnaire, global ratings, and Hopkins Symptom Checklist [HSCL]-56). However, oxazepam was never superior to buspirone in any of the efficacy analyses. Of the 230 patients, 127 spontaneously reported adverse events, including drowsiness, dizziness, headache, nausea, and nervousness. Adverse events were relatively similar in the two groups. In conclusion, buspirone and oxazepam appear to be equally effective in the treatment of generalized anxiety encountered by general practitioners. This outcome, in addition to a previously documented absence of any dependency liability, makes buspirone a clinically important anxiolytic drug.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind, controlled trial in primary care patients with generalized anxiety: a comparison between buspirone and oxazepam. 221 67

One hundred forty outpatients with major depression were admitted to an 8-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of buspirone. Entry criteria included a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (25-item [HAM-D]) score of greater than or equal to 18 and a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), score of greater than or equal to 18. A flexible dose schedule ranging from 5-90 mg/day was employed. The mean dose of buspirone was 41-54 mg/day from Week 2 to the end of the study. Sixty-four percent of buspirone patients and 50% of placebo patients were melancholic; 64% of buspirone patients and 74% of placebo patients discontinued treatment before the end of the study. Extender data analysis showed that buspirone patients had significant (p less than .05) HAM-D score reductions compared with the placebo group at Weeks 2, 3, 4, and 6. The HAM-D retardation factor trended toward significance over placebo at Weeks 3, 4, and 6. HAM-D change scores for the subgroup of melancholic patients taking buspirone were significantly (p less than .02) better than those of the placebo-treated melancholic subjects at Weeks 2, 3, 4, and 6. Most other efficacy parameters also favored the buspirone-treated group over the placebo-treated group. The most common adverse experiences for the buspirone group were CNS effects (74% in the buspirone group vs. 21% in the placebo group) and gastrointestinal effects (55% in the buspirone group vs. 37% in the placebo group). Side effects consisted of dizziness, light-headedness, nausea, and headache. No serious or unexpected adverse effects occurred.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Buspirone in the management of major depression: a placebo-controlled comparison. 221 70

Sixty (60) out-patients with DSM III generalized anxiety disorder were treated after a 1-week placebo washout in a 4-week double-blind study with buspirone, diazepam and placebo; after which they were withdrawn abruptly from medication or assigned to a 2-week period of placebo. The HAM-A score was significantly lower in the diazepam group at week 2 (p less than .02) and the buspirone group at week 3 (p less than .04) as compared to the placebo group. A similar pattern was evident in the female group, but not in the male group. Dizziness was the most prominent adverse effect in the buspirone group, whereas the diazepam group had more adverse effects including sedation, fatigue, dizziness and impaired concentration. Withdrawal symptoms were more evident in the diazepam group than the buspirone group.
 ...
PMID:Buspirone: anxiolytic? 286 95

Fluoxetine and trazodone were compared in a double-blind, randomized, parallel, 6-week trial in 43 outpatients with major depression after a 1-week single-blind placebo period. Thirty-five patients completed at least 3 weeks of active medication, while 25 patients completed all 6 weeks. Response rates, whether defined by end-of-treatment Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score less than 10 or by a 50% reduction in HAM-D scores, were equivalent for the two medications. For fluoxetine, HAM-D scores were significantly lower at Weeks 1 and 2 compared with those of trazodone. Trazodone improved sleep significantly more than fluoxetine. Fluoxetine was associated more frequently with weight loss (p = .002) and less frequently with dizziness (p = .04) than trazodone.
 ...
PMID:Fluoxetine versus trazodone in the treatment of outpatients with major depression. 305 68

Two groups of 30 outpatients, each with various types of anxiety and sleep-disturbance, were treated with 7-chloro-1-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-1,5-benzodiazepine-2,4(3H,5H)-dione (Clobazam, Frisium 20) for 28 days. The double-blind, randomized study was designed to find out whether there is a significant difference between the application of the drug in the morning (group A) or at night (group B). The results of 22 patients of group A and 24 of group B could be evaluated. The following tests had been made at the beginning, after 1,2 and 4 weeks of treatment, respectively: 1. Clinical global impression (CGI) of therapeutic effect and side-effects. 2. Symptoms of psychic and somatic anxiety (HAM-A). 3. Sleep (documented by self-rating and investigator). 4. Daytime-drowsiness/dizziness (self-rating scale). 5. Choice reaction time (CRT) tested between 8 and 9 a.m. on the same day once a week. 6. Critical flicker fusion (CFF) tested between 8 and 9 a.m. on the same day once a week. Sleep and daytime-drowsiness/dizziness have been tested daily within the first week. Significant therapeutic improvement could be stated after 4-week treatment by the CGI-test. The CFF-frequency as indicator for vigilance rose to a significantly higher level while the reaction time in the CRT-test was simultaneously reduced. This result was in accordance with earlier studies. Both groups compared with each other, however, did not differ significantly in any of the parameters used. Symptoms of psychic and somatic anxiety have been reduced significantly in both groups after the first, second and fourth week. There was however one remarkable difference between both groups: this refers to the psychic anxiety factor (HAM-A) only. Here the patients of group B (clobazam in the morning) showed better results than the others. This phenomenon may be due to elevated serum levels during daytime. Therefore we recommend in case of predominant psychic anxiety clobazam to be taken in the morning or in divided doses in the morning and in the evening.
 ...
PMID:[Effect on vigilance of a single administration of clobazam]. 612 58

In a 6-week double-blind study, 220 patients with major depression (mostly outpatients) were randomly assigned to receive a fixed dose of brofaromine 150 mg daily (n = 111) or placebo (n = 109) after a 1-week single-blind placebo washout. Except for the HAM-D sleep items, brofaromine was superior to placebo on measures of depression as determined by the four methods of assessing drug efficacy: (1) psychiatric symptom rating (HAM-D 17-item less the three sleep items); (2) self-rating scale (Beck Depression Inventory); (3) Clinical Global Assessment of Efficacy; and (4) drop-out rate due to lack of efficacy. Most commonly reported adverse events with brofaromine were: headache, nausea, dizziness and sleep disturbance. Brofaromine was found to be an effective antidepressant, superior to placebo with a good tolerability profile.
 ...
PMID:A Canadian multicentre placebo-controlled study of a fixed dose of brofaromine, a reversible selective MAO-A inhibitor, in the treatment of major depression. 782 62

Safety aspects [adverse events, blood pressure and heart rate, weight, and laboratory tests (liver parameters, hemoglobin, leukocytes)] of long-term treatment in 1,120 patients are discussed. Adverse events during this long-term treatment were also compared with those of a subgroup of these patients who, before long-term treatment, were treated on a short-term basis (n = 706). Efficacy [Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Clinical Global Impression of Efficacy (CGI), and occurrence of relapses and recurrences] in a homogeneous sample of 485 patients is also discussed. The adverse events most frequently observed during long-term treatment were insomnia, headache, and dizziness. Insomnia and headache were also most often occurring in the compared sample of patients with short-term treatment, whereas dizziness during this treatment period ranked at the fifth position. Supine and standing mean blood pressure did not consistently change during long-term treatment, the most prominent increases in comparison with baseline were seen in the period > 1 year of treatment (6.3 mm Hg supine/7.2 mm Hg standing). Comparison of blood pressure values in the hypertensive range at baseline and during long-term treatment revealed no statistical difference (McNemar test p = 0.07829). Mean heart rate slightly decreased during long-term treatment (by a maximum of 6.3 beats/min supine, 8.2 beats/min standing). Mean weight did not change between baseline and treatment end point. There were 23 patients with a weight loss of 10 kg or more and 16 patients with a weight gain of 10 kg or more. For none of the laboratory parameters tested was there a statistical significance regarding shifts from normal to pathological values. HAM-D mean total scores in the above-mentioned subgroup of patients decreased from 25.05 points at baseline (n = 485) to 7.88 points after 1 year of treatment (n = 139). Seventy-five patients who had favorably responded to treatment (total responders n = 300) relapsed during the first 6 months of treatment. During the second half-year of treatment the recurrence rate was 14.8%, and during the third 6 months the recurrence rate was 12.2%. CGI in the same subsample of patients in whom HAMD was evaluated (n = 485) compared with those patients who did not drop out during the short-term period up to 44 days and entered long-term treatment (n = 401) showed that the percentage of the ratings "no change/worse" was higher in the sample that also included patients who withdrew from treatment during the short-term period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Safety and efficacy during long-term treatment with moclobemide. 795 86

We present a case of HAM with severe orthostatic hypotension. A 62-year-old woman was admitted to Mito Red Cross Hospital because of orthostatic dizziness and severe gait disturbance. Physical examination revealed a severe orthostatic hypotension (142/90 mmHg (supine) vs. 84/70 mmHg (standing)). Neurological examination revealed weakness and hyperreflexia in the lower extremities, as well as extensor plantar response and spastic gait. In tests of autonomic nervous system, there was no reflex bradycardia in Aschner eye ball pressure test and carotial sinus reflex, no overshoot in Valsalva test, and electrocardiogram revealed a low value in CVR-R. The imprint techniques under 1% pilocarpine subcutaneous administration revealed a marked disturbance of sudomotor function. Blood cell counts, blood chemistry and urinalysis were unremarkable. The serological examination revealed a high titer value of anti-HTLV-1 antibody. Anti-HTLV-1 antibody and oligoclonal IgG band were detected in the cerebrospinal fluid. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cerebrum demonstrated multiple small high intensity areas in the white matter, but these lesions showed no gadolinium enhancement. Since the test of the autonomic nervous system revealed both sympathetic and parasympathetic disturbance, it is important to investigate the autonomic disturbance including orthostatic hypotension in cases of HAM.
 ...
PMID:[HTLV-1 associated myelopathy (HAM) with severe orthostatic hypotension--a case report]. 799 95

Compounds active at the serotonin (5-HT)1A receptor (mostly azapirones) have shown some evidence of antidepressant effect. We report here the results of an antidepressant trial with zalospirone, a novel cyclic imide with 5-HT1A partial agonist activity. Two hundred eighty-seven outpatients (mean age 44 years, 55% men, 45% nonfertile women) who met criteria for unipolar major depression with a minimum 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score of 20 were randomly assigned to receive 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with either placebo or one of three fixed doses of zalospirone (6, 15, or 45 mg/day), administered three times daily. The high dose (45 mg) of zalospirone produced a significant antidepressant effect compared with placebo from week 2 on with mean improvement (change from baseline) in HAM-D total score of 12.8 versus 8.4 (p < 0.05) at week 6. Clinical improvement with the high dose of zalospirone was consistent across all outcome measures, however, only in the observed cases and not the last-observation-carried-forward analyses. Improvement with the 6-mg or 15-mg doses was greater than that with placebo, but not significantly so, suggesting a dose-response effect. Although the 45-mg dose of zalospirone seemed to have significant antidepressant efficacy, it was not well tolerated. Dizziness and nausea were noted in almost half of the patients, and by week six, 51% of patients in the high-dose group had dropped out. Whether or not tolerance to this high dose might be improved by gradual drug titration, only future research can answer.
 ...
PMID:Zalospirone in major depression: a placebo-controlled multicenter study. 878 52


1 2 3 4 Next >>