Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Felodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist, significantly reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension and has been associated with beneficial hemodynamic effects in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris or congestive heart failure (CHF). In hypertensive patients, felodipine does not appear to significantly affect glomerular filtration rate, creatinine clearance, glucose tolerance, or plasma lipoprotein concentrations. Studies comparing felodipine with other agents as monotherapy in mild to moderate hypertension have demonstrated felodipine to be at least as efficacious as hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and HCTZ plus amiloride hydrochloride in combination. Comparisons of felodipine with other agents as adjuncts to beta-blocker or diuretic therapy have shown felodipine to be at least as effective as HCTZ, propranolol hydrochloride, prazosin hydrochloride, and nifedipine. Evaluations of patients with chronic stable angina are limited, and additional studies are needed before felodipine can be recommended for the routine management of angina pectoris. Similarly, additional studies are essential to delineate the role of felodipine, if any, in the management of CHF. In the management of hypertension, felodipine 5-40 mg/d significantly reduces systolic and diastolic BP. Although some patients may be controlled throughout the entire dosing interval when felodipine is administered bid, many patients will require more frequent dosing to obtain adequate BP control. Adverse effects associated with felodipine are similar to those of other dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonists and include peripheral edema, headache, dizziness, flushing, and fatigue. A potentially clinically important drug interaction was observed when felodipine was administered concomitantly with theophylline aminopropanol; significant decreases in theophylline concentrations were noted. In summary, felodipine appears to be safe and effective for the management of hypertension when used alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. The efficacy of felodipine in the management of chronic stable angina pectoris and CHF requires further investigation.
 ...
PMID:Felodipine: a new dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist. 176 37

To date, there is no effective pharmacologic treatment for Chagas' cardioneuropathy, one of the most common causes of congestive heart failure and sudden death in the world. Fifty-eight adults with positive serology for Chagas' disease and abnormal autonomic nervous system tests participated in this placebo-controlled clinical trial with Cronassial (mixed gangliosides), 40 mg daily intramuscular injection for 4 or 8 weeks. We measured postural response (heart rate, systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure changes in response to standing); heart rate changes induced by cough and hyperventilation reflex tests; dizziness on standing; number of stress-induced arrhythmias; and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-positive T-lymphocyte percentage in blood samples. Cronassial is safe and significantly improves systolic blood pressure (p = 0.050) and double product responses to postural stress (p = 0.028), hyperventilation heart rate response (p = 0.007), frequency of dizziness episodes (p less than 0.001), number of arrhythmias (p = 0.033), and percentage of PAS-positive T-lymphocyte counts (p less than 0.001) compared with placebo.
 ...
PMID:Chagas' cardioneuropathy: effect of ganglioside treatment in chronic dysautonomic patients--a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study. 187 55

Quinapril hydrochloride is a nonsulfhydryl angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor that has been extensively tested and found effective when administered once-a-day to hypertensive patients of both sexes and all degrees of hypertension and cardiac compromise, including those with left ventricular hypertrophy, with and without congestive heart failure. Observations with earlier ACE inhibitors led to reports that this class of drugs was relatively ineffective in older hypertensive patients. To ascertain the role of quinapril (greater than or equal to 10 mg/day) in older patients, its blood pressure-lowering effects in 1,175 hypertensive patients less than or equal to 65 years of age were compared with those in 304 patients greater than 65 years of age. An excellent response was observed in patients greater than 65 years of age with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic BP, 95 to 105 mm Hg) and moderate to severe hypertension (diastolic BP, 106 to 115 mm Hg). The reductions in blood pressure achieved with quinapril were at least comparable to those obtained in the younger hypertensives, and were numerically (but not statistically) greater in the mild to moderate group (-14 mm Hg v-12 mm Hg). In addition, the percentage of patients who experienced adverse experiences was lower in the greater than 65 group than in the less than or equal to 65 group (15% v 19%). The main adverse experiences reported included dizziness, headache, cough, fatigue, and hypotension. These findings indicate that quinapril is at least as safe and effective in older hypertensives as in younger patients.
 ...
PMID:Use of quinapril in the elderly patient. 226 Nov 46

Key safety parameters of sotalol were examined in 1,288 patients entered into recent controlled trials of ventricular (85% of patients) or supraventricular arrhythmias (15%). Most patients were middle-aged male Caucasians with significant heart disease. The most serious adverse event was proarrhythmia, occurring in 56 patients (4.3%). Of these, 27 had hemodynamic compromise due to malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Most had a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure (CHF) or cardiomyopathy, or a combination of these. The other 29 had nonsevere events; 38% continued taking sotalol. Proarrhythmia was manifested by torsades de pointes in 24 of the 56 patients. No universal causal relation was found with commonly associated factors such as bradycardia, hypokalemia and long QT interval. The mean QT and QTc at baseline within 1 week of a severe proarrhythmic event were greater than those of patients not having proarrhythmia. Nineteen patients (1%) discontinued therapy with sotalol because of drug-related CHF. Predisposing conditions included low initial baseline ejection fraction, history of CHF, cardiomyopathy or cardiomegaly, or both, male gender and age greater than 65 years. Heart failure usually occurred within 7 to 30 days of initiating therapy. The most common reason for premature discontinuation of the drug in patients treated for sustained ventricular tachycardia was ineffectiveness (39%), whereas adverse effects were the most common reasons among patients treated for complex ventricular ectopy (21%). Dyspnea and bradycardia were the most common cardiovascular effects, and fatigue, dizziness and asthenia the most common noncardiac, adverse effects. Although frequently reported, these adverse effects resulted in discontinuation of only 1 to 4% of the patients at risk.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Clinical safety profile of sotalol in patients with arrhythmias. 240 37

The safety and tolerability of lisinopril were assessed in 1,476 patients [1,165 hypertensives and 311 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF)] and 211 normal volunteers. The duration of lisinopril therapy ranged from 1 day to 16 months, with a mean duration of 105 days. In the hypertensive population, the most frequent clinical adverse experiences on lisinopril alone were headache, dizziness, cough, and diarrhea. Not all of these adverse experiences were thought to be drug related. Five percent of patients were discontinued because of adverse clinical experiences; cough and dizziness were the most common reasons for discontinuation. Two of 1,165 (0.17%) hypertensive patients treated with lisinopril died, compared to 0.41% of hypertensive patients on other therapies. Neither case was considered to be drug related. In patients with CHF, the most frequent clinical adverse experiences were dizziness, diarrhea, hypotension, fatigue, headache, and rash. Not all of these adverse experiences were thought to be drug related. The percent of CHF patients discontinuing because of an adverse clinical experience was 7.4%; the most frequent causes for discontinuation were hypotension, dizziness, or renal impairment. Twelve deaths occurred in 311 CHF patients treated with lisinopril (3.9%) compared to 4/104 (3.8%) of CHF patients treated with placebo and 2/65 (3.1%) treated with captopril. Hypotension, orthostatic effects, or dizziness following the initial lisinopril dose occurred infrequently in patients treated with lisinopril. In hypertensive patients with normal renal function, including those treated previously or concomitantly with diuretic therapy, a first-dose hypotensive episode was reported in six of 955, or 0.6%. The incidence was higher (6.7%) in hypertensive patients with impaired renal function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:The safety and tolerability of lisinopril in clinical trials. 244 61

To investigate the safety of labetalol in the treatment of hypertension in patients with heart failure, sixteen hypertensive patients with a history of congestive heart failure and an ejection fraction at rest less than 45%, had measurements of ejection fraction and cardiac output by first pass radionuclide angiography at baseline, at the end of 2 weeks maintenance with labetalol (titrated to the effective antihypertensive dose of 200-1600 mg daily), and in the post-treatment placebo period. On labetalol, heart rate and blood pressure were significantly lower than placebo at rest and the ejection fraction was higher (30 vs 25%) (p less than 0.05). At maximal exercise on labetalol the heart rate and blood pressure were lower than at placebo maximal exercise (p less than 0.05) and the ejection fraction was higher (32 vs 27%) (p less than 0.01). Exercise tolerance was not changed by labetalol. No patient was discontinued from the study because of worsening heart failure. Dizziness was reported in 5 of 16 patients usually at one visit. Dyspnea that was reported in 4 of 16 patients improved with minor adjustments in digitalis or diuretic dose. In conclusion, labetalol reduces blood pressure in hypertensive patients with left ventricular dysfunction without reducing cardiac performance.
 ...
PMID:Hemodynamic effects of labetalol in patients with combined hypertension and left ventricular failure. 246 9

Throughout the developed world, populations are growing older. Blood pressure, especially systolic blood pressure, increases with aging, and this increase leads to increased risks of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials demonstrate that treatment of hypertension in the elderly reduces overall cardiovascular mortality, cardiac mortality, nonfatal cardiovascular events, congestive heart failure, progression to severe hypertension, and strokes. Drug treatment has been well tolerated, but diuretic therapy has been known to increase plasma glucose, uric acid, and creatinine. Therapeutic trials of nonpharmacologic treatment may be indicated in those with mild elevation in blood pressure and no serious end organ disease. However, most people up to age 80 will require drug treatment. Many drugs are effective in the elderly, but, some like beta-blockers, may not be as effective as in younger patients. Controlled clinical trials demonstrate that nitrendipine, a calcium channel blocking drug, significantly reduced mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure in older hypertensive patients, (successfully controlling pressure in a high percentage) and was well tolerated. Drug effects persist for 12 h or more. The drug decreased the exercise-induced rise in the rate-pressure product. Although there is a temporary increase in heart rate, this returns to baseline after a short time. Side effects include headache, flushing, dizziness, edema, and palpitations. Therefore, nitrendipine offers a reasonable and useful alternative to many other drugs in the treatment of combined systolic and diastolic hypertension in the elderly.
 ...
PMID:Epidemiologic aspects of elderly hypertensive patients and the results of treatment with nitrendipine. 248 68

The clinical features of an inner-city population of 304 patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI) with and without typical chest pain, were studied retrospectively. This population consisted of 172 men and 132 women; 155 (51%) were black, 88 (29%) hispanic, and 61 (20%) white, by self-identification. Typical ischemic chest pain was the presenting symptom in 85% (258); 15% (46) presented with nonchest symptoms, most frequently shortness of breath, abdominal pain, and dizziness. But the frequency of such nonchest symptoms was similar in both groups. When patients were grouped by the presence or absence of chest pain, the proportions of those without chest pain were significantly higher for blacks (22.7%) than hispanics (9.1%, P = 0.001) or whites (4.9%, P less than 0.01). Patients without chest pain also had higher admission systolic (P less than 0.01) and diastolic (P less than 0.01) blood pressures and more frequent histories of congestive heart failure (P less than 0.05), and more often presented with pulmonary edema (P = 0.001) than those with chest pain. Both groups were similar in age, sex, history of hypertension, and presence of hypertension on admission, defined as greater than or equal to 160/95 mmHg, prevalence of diabetes, history of smoking, previous MI, type of MI, history of angina, and mortality rates. Patients without chest pain were characterized by black race, history of congestive heart failure, elevated blood pressure and pulmonary edema than those with typical ischemic chest pain. Thus significant delays in the diagnosis and treatment of this important clinical entity may be reduced by alerting clinicians to these features and by educating selected patient groups.
 ...
PMID:Clinical features of patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting with and without typical chest pain: an inner city experience. 252 Aug 50

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind assessment of 130 patients with congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association functional classes II to IV) was undertaken to assess the therapeutic efficacy of lisinopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. All the subjects received concurrent therapy with digoxin and diuretics. Assessments performed periodically over 12 weeks revealed that the active treatment was associated with significant improvements in treadmill exercise time, cardiothoracic ratio, ejection fraction, functional status and clinical signs and symptoms of heart failure. Lisinopril exhibited a mild first-dose effect on blood pressure that was not significantly different from that observed with placebo. The incidence of adverse experiences was not markedly different in the 2 study groups, with only mild hypotension and dizziness occurring more frequently in association with the active medication.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of lisinopril versus placebo for congestive heart failure. 253 60

Although an abundance of short-term clinical trials has evaluated the use of enalapril in congestive heart failure (CHF), there has been a paucity of data regarding the long-term effects of this angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Moreover, a question has arisen as to whether a once- or twice-daily dosing schedule is preferable. To address these issues, a multicenter trial was conducted with the objective of obtaining long-term (48 weeks) experience with enalapril in 142 patients with CHF. A subgroup of patients (n = 88) were randomized to receive enalapril in a dosing schedule of either 20 mg once daily or 10 mg twice daily. Of the overall group, 96 patients completed the 48 weeks of follow-up. Improvement in New York Heart Association functional class, exercise duration and left ventricular ejection fraction was observed. Improvement in clinical status was seen in 68% of all patients, whereas conditions in 5% worsened with enalapril therapy. The most frequent adverse experiences were dizziness and hypotension. There were no obvious differences between the effects of the once- and twice-daily dosing regimens, with doses of 20 mg/day and 2.5 to 15 mg/day being given to about 70 and 30% of patients, respectively. Enalapril appears to provide well-tolerated and effective long-term therapy for CHF.
 ...
PMID:Long-term effects of a once-a-day versus twice-a-day regimen of enalapril for congestive heart failure. 253 61


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>