Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This phase I study investigated flavone acetic acid (FAA) given as a 12-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks in the absence of urinary alkalinisation. Cohorts of three patients were treated at doses of 7, 10 and 13 g/m2. One subject had colon cancer; 5, renal cancer; and 3, lung cancer. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 0 in four patients, 1 in two subjects and 2 in three cases. The maximum tolerated dose was 13 g/m2. The dose-limiting toxicities were WHO grade 3 hypotension and grade 3 diarrhoea. Other toxicities included lethargy and dizziness, nausea, temperature fluctuation, myalgia and dry mouth, but no significant myelosuppression was encountered. One patient receiving 10 g/m2 for renal cancer showed a partial response that lasted for 3 months and included the resolution of pulmonary and cutaneous metastases. The pharmacokinetics showed large interpatient variability. At 12-16 h post-infusion, the plasma elimination profile entered a plateau phase, with frequent increases in concentration suggesting enterohepatic recycling. Neither peak FAA levels nor AUC values were dose-dependent at the doses studied. Peak plasma levels were 101-402 micrograms/ml and AUC (0-48 h) values were 75-470 mg ml-1 min. Plasma protein binding varied with total concentration. Two metabolites were detected in the plasma, and both also underwent apparent enterohepatic recycling. Repeat dosing resulted in decreases of up to 48% in peak levels and AUC values for FAA in three of six patients. Of the total FAA dose, 39%-77% was excreted in the urine as FAA or metabolites within 2 days. The dose recommended for further phase II studies is 10 g/m2.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992
PMID:A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 12-h infusion of flavone acetic acid. 155 Nov 73

Forty cancer patients receiving parenteral chemotherapy were assessed for characteristics associated with the development of anticipatory nausea and vomiting (ANV). The patients who developed ANV were more likely to have increased pretreatment anxiety (p less than 0.05), greater posttreatment dizziness/lightheadedness (p less than 0.01), more severe postchemotherapy vomiting (p less than 0.01), and a delayed onset of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting (PCNV) compared to the patients who developed neither ANV nor PCNV. However, when patients who did not develop PCNV were excluded from the analysis, the difference between the ANV and non-ANV patients remained significant only for postchemotherapy dizziness/lightheadedness (p less than 0.05). In an attempt to identify a group of variables that better predict the development of ANV, we analyzed the data for combinations of variables. Two indices were found to correctly classify ANV and non-ANV patients 71% of the time (p less than 0.05). Index A refers to the presence of at least two of the following variables, pretreatment anxiety, posttreatment dizziness/lightheadedness, and latency of PCNV. Index B refers to the presence of at least two of the following variables: pretreatment anxiety, severity of nausea, and severity of vomiting. The identification of characteristics associated with the development of ANV could lead to new intervention strategies.
 ...
PMID:Variables contributing to anticipatory nausea and vomiting in cancer chemotherapy. 159 Feb 83

Fifty-four patients with advanced malignancies were treated on this phase I trial of coumarin and cimetidine. The dose of coumarin was escalated, with three patients treated at each dose level, while the cimetidine dose was held constant at 300 mg four times daily. Patients received coumarin alone as a single daily oral dose for 14 days; on day 15, cimetidine was added and both drugs were continued until progression of disease. This trial was initiated with patients receiving coumarin at 400 mg daily and closed at 7 g daily with four of five patients on this dose experiencing nausea and vomiting. Treatment was generally well tolerated over a wide range of coumarin doses. Symptomatic side effects were few, mild, and usually self limited. Side effects included insomnia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and dizziness. Two patients withdrew from therapy because of daily nausea and vomiting. Typically, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness occurred 2.5-3 hours after a dose of coumarin. In most patients, these side effects abated spontaneously with continuation of therapy. There was no significant hematologic or renal toxicity. Hepatotoxicity occurred in only one patient and was manifested by asymptomatic abnormal elevations of serum hepatic transaminases. This toxicity was reversible upon interruption of therapy. Objective tumor regressions were observed in six patients with renal cell carcinoma. Responses occurred at coumarin doses ranging from 600 mg to 5 g daily. Coumarin is a relatively nontoxic, oral, outpatient therapy that warrants further investigations for the treatment of human malignancies. Because of its low toxicity, there is potential for combining coumarin with chemotherapeutic and/or biological agents in an attempt to improve on efficacy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Phase I evaluation of coumarin (1,2-benzopyrone) and cimetidine in patients with advanced malignancies. 176 68

The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, assay methodologies, adverse effects, and dosage of levamisole are described, and the clinical studies of levamisole therapy in patients with colorectal carcinoma are reviewed. Levamisole is a synthetic, orally active agent that has antihelmintic and immunomodulatory properties. It is capable of inducing T-cell differentiation and restoring depressed effector functions of peripheral lymphocytes and phagocytes to normal. The drug is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract after oral administration and is extensively metabolized by the liver. Gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography are the most common methods used to measure concentrations of levamisole in biologic fluids. Levamisole combined with fluorouracil has been associated with a one-third reduction in recurrence and risk of death in patients with surgically resected Dukes stage C colon cancer; this combination is now recommended as standard therapy in these patients. Uses in patients with rectal carcinoma, Dukes stage B colon cancer, metastatic colon cancer, other malignancies, or nonmalignant disorders remain investigational. Common adverse effects include nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, metallic or altered taste, flulike symptoms, mood elevation, insomnia, hyperalertness, dizziness, and headache. The most serious adverse effect associated with levamisole is granulocytopenia. The FDA-approved dosage of levamisole is 50 mg orally every eight hours for three days every two weeks. Levamisole therapy is to be initiated no earlier than 7 and no later than 30 days after surgery and is to be continued for one year. Levamisole combined with fluorouracil has been associated with a one-third reduction in recurrence and risk of death in patients with resected stage C colon cancer. Further research is needed to more clearly define the mechanism of action, optimum dose and scheduling, and clinical efficacy of levamisole in treating other malignancies.
 ...
PMID:Levamisole in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. 200 37

The efficacy and side-effects of megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer were compared in a prospectively randomized study. The dosage of MA was 2 X 80 mg p.o. or MPA 2 X 500 mg p.o. daily, given as a secondary hormonal treatment, mostly after previous treatment with tamoxifen. Ninety-eight patients entered the study and 92 were evaluable for effect, 48 patients on MA and 44 on MPA. Age, main tumor site and prior treatment were not different, but there was a preponderance of ER-negative tumors in the MA group. Responses appeared to be more frequent in the MPA-treated group (25% vs. 43%), predominantly in bone lesions, 12% for MA and 45% for MPA. Median progression-free survival was comparable, 15 vs. 10 months, and overall survival was not different (20 vs. 16 months). Toxicity was frequent, occurring in 83% vs. 74% of patients: increased appetite, nausea and dizziness in more than 20%, and a preponderance of pyrosis and breathlessness on MA and hot flashes, sweating and tremors on MPA. Cushingoid symptoms were present in about a quarter of the patients treated for more than 3 months. The occurrence of thrombo-embolic episodes and cardiovascular events was evenly distributed. Patients on MPA had more often increase in body weight, systolic blood pressure and serum creatinine than those treated with MA. It is concluded that MPA may be more effective for treatment of bone metastases, at the expense of more progestational side-effects. The occurrence of Cushingoid effects is frequent but similar in both arms, while the incidence of cardiovascular or thrombo-embolic events cannot be related to the use of either compound.
Eur J Cancer 1990 Mar
PMID:A randomized comparison of megestrol acetate (MA) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in patients with advanced breast cancer. 214 91

To determine a dose-response relationship of ondansetron for the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin and to study the efficacy of the extended dosing schedule of ondansetron during 20 hours after cisplatin administration, 36 patients with malignant neoplasms who had not previously received chemotherapy but who were currently receiving cisplatin were treated. These patients received a six-dose regimen of 0.01 mg/kg (low dose) or 0.18 mg/kg (high dose) of ondansetron. Seven (41%) patients in the high-dose group had no emesis and four (24%) patients had one or two episodes. One (5%) patient in the low-dose group had no emesis and four (21%) patients had one or two episodes. The difference in the number of emetic episodes was significant (P less than 0.02). Fifty percent of the high-dose patients reported no nausea or mild nausea, compared with 11% of the low-dose patients. Clinical adverse events included mild, transient headache and dizziness in the high-dose group and headache and diarrhea in the low-dose group, with no significant laboratory abnormalities. There is a parallel relationship between the ondansetron doses and the antiemetic efficacy. The response rate for the six-dose regimen of 0.18 mg/kg was not superior to that for the previously reported 0.18 mg/kg regimen given in a three-dose schedule in a similar clinical setting.
Cancer 1990 Sep 15
PMID:Ondansetron for the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin. A multi-center dose-response study. 214 88

Nineteen patients receiving cancer chemotherapy were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either (a) dronabinol, 10 mg plus placebo q.i.d.; (b) prochlorperazine, 10 mg plus placebo q.i.d.; or (c) dronabinol plus prochlorperazine, each 10 mg q.i.d. There were six evaluable patients in each of the two single-agent groups and five in the combination group. The median duration and severity per episode of nausea was significantly greater in the group receiving prochlorperazine alone versus the other two groups. The median duration per episode of vomiting was also significantly greater in the prochlorperazine group than in the other two groups. The proportion of patients vomiting was the same in all groups; however, only one patient in the combination group versus three each in the single-agent groups experienced nausea (p = NS). The majority of side effects were associated with the CNS, including somnolence, dizziness, and confusion. Side effects were somewhat more common in both groups receiving dronabinol, though they were not statistically different from the side effects in the group receiving prochlorperazine as a single agent. Efficacy, as measured by duration of nausea and vomiting and by severity of nausea, was significantly greater in both groups receiving dronabinol.
 ...
PMID:Dronabinol and prochlorperazine alone and in combination as antiemetic agents for cancer chemotherapy. 217 91

Anorexia, cachexia, and resultant weight loss are major clinical problems in a substantial proportion of patients with advanced cancer. Effective means of alleviating these problematic symptoms are lacking. Extensive clinical data demonstrate a weight enhancing effect for the serotonin antagonist, cyproheptadine, in several clinical situations. In addition, sound basic research suggests that cyproheptadine may be helpful in patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia. Because of this, the authors performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial using cyproheptadine, 8 mg orally three times a day in 295 patients with advanced malignant disease. Patients assigned to cyproheptadine had less nausea (P = 0.02), less emesis (P = 0.11), more sedation (P = 0.07), and more dizziness (P = 0.01) than placebo patients. Patients' appetites, measured by serial patient-completed questionnaires, appeared to be mildly enhanced by cyproheptadine. Unfortunately, cyproheptadine did not significantly abate progressive weight loss in these patients with advanced malignant disease; patients assigned to cyproheptadine lost an average of 4.5 pounds per month compared to 4.9 pounds per month for patients assigned to a placebo (P = 0.72).
Cancer 1990 Jun 15
PMID:A controlled trial of cyproheptadine in cancer patients with anorexia and/or cachexia. 218 85

Preclinical data showed that the cytotoxic effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are augmented by interferon (IFN). In a small study, 13 of 17 patients with advanced colorectal cancer responded to a regimen of 5-FU with IFN. Using the same dose and schedule as in this pilot study, 38 previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated with continuous intravenous (IV) infusion of 5-FU 750 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, followed by weekly bolus 5-FU at 750 mg/m2 and subcutaneous IFN at 9 million units three times per week. Of 35 evaluable patients, nine (26%) had a partial response (95% confidence limit, 11% to 41%), with a median response duration of 7.5 months (range, 4.4 to greater than 11.7 months). Seven patients (20%) had a minor response, and ten (28%) had stable disease. The most common toxicities observed were stomatitis (52%) and diarrhea (43%). Neurotoxicity was seen in 34% of patients and consisted of gait disturbance, dizziness, confusion, memory loss, and dementia. Because of toxicity, 84% of patients required a reduction of the IFN dose by at least 50%, and 63% required reduction of the 5-FU dose by at least 25%. Although the combination of 5-FU and IFN in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma has some activity, the regimen was toxic, and the observed response rate (26%) was not substantially superior to alternative 5-FU programs.
Cancer 1990 Dec 15
PMID:Interferon alpha-2a and 5-fluorouracil for advanced colorectal carcinoma. Assessment of activity and toxicity. 224 87

Aminoglutethimide (AG) was administered as palliative therapy in 112 patients with metastatic breast cancer. In 36 patients, the dose level was 1000 mg/day; 76 patients received a dose level of 500 mg/day. Patients with brain or liver metastasis were excluded, as were patients with tumors determined to be negative for estrogen receptors. Objective regression was observed in 35 (31%) patients, with the duration of response ranging from 4 to 36 + months (mean, 12 months; median, 10 months). Response was observed in 11 of 31 (35%) patients with soft tissue metastasis; 16/59 (27%) patients with osseous metastasis; and 8 of 22 (36%) having visceral metastasis. In 93 patients with positive estrogen receptor (ER), 33 responded (35%), whereas in 19 patients with unknown ER status, two responded (11%). Response to previous treatment with tamoxifen (TAM) had occurred in 31 patients; of these, response to AG was noted in 11 (35%). Of 24 patients failing to respond to prior treatment with tamoxifen, four (17%) responded to subsequent therapy with AG. Thirteen patients had previously received combination chemotherapy, and response to AG was noted in two (15%). The side effects observed in this study included skin rash in ten patients, fever in eight, somnolence in three, weakness and dizziness in one, headache in one, insomnia in one, dyspnea in one, and ataxia in one. Treatment had to be discontinued in eight patients, due to the severity of the side effects. As expected, patients receiving AG at the lower dose level of 500 mg/day experienced fewer and less severe side effects than those treated with the higher dose. The response rate in the 1000 mg/day group was 10/36 (28%) and in the 500 mg/day group, it was 25/76 (33%). The lower dosage was better tolerated without apparent compromise in therapeutic efficacy.
Cancer 1989 May 01
PMID:Aminoglutethimide in patients with metastatic breast cancer. 246 35


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>