Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The purpose of this paper is to review the rationale for a new class of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) known as selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors and to present preliminary clinical data on 2 COX-2 inhibitors that are approved for use in the United States. The primary mechanism of NSAIDs in the treatment of inflammation is the inhibition of COX, which exists in 2 forms. COX-I appears to regulate many normal physiologic functions, and COX-2 mediates the inflammatory response. Theoretically, an NSAID that inhibits COX-2 selectively should decrease inflammation but not influence normal physiologic functions and thus should cause fewer gastrointestinal side effects. Preliminary data suggest that celecoxib, a highly selective COX-2 inhibitor, is superior to placebo and similar to traditional NSAIDs in the short-term treatment of pain due to osteoarthritis, although it has been associated with adverse effects such as headache, change in bowel habits, abdominal discomfort, and dizziness. Celecoxib also has been shown to be as effective as traditional NSAIDs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, but it may cause fewer adverse effects, including endoscopically documented ulcers. Celecoxib is metabolized in the liver by the cytochrome P-450 isozyme CYP2C9, and thus serious drug interactions are possible. In the treatment of osteoarthritis, rofecoxib has been shown to be as effective as traditional NSAIDs and may cause fewer endoscopically documented ulcers, but its complete adverse-effect profile is not known. Until the selective COX-2 inhibitors are widely used and more clinical as well as pharmacoeconomic studies are published, the exact role of COX-2 therapy cannot be determined. words: cyclooxygenase, celecoxib, rofecoxib, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis.
...
PMID:Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors for the treatment of arthritis. 1046 13

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most frequently prescribed drugs, despite their well-established association with gastroduodenal injury. Recent discovery of the cyclooxygenase (COX) isoenzymes COX-1 and COX-2 has improved our knowledge of the action of NSAIDs. COX-1 is continuously expressed in almost all tissues, where it converts arachidonate to the prostaglandins (PGs) important in homeostatic function; COX-2 is present in immune cells, blood vessel endothelial cells, and synovial fibroblasts. Classic NSAIDs inhibit both COX isoenzymes by occupying the cyclooxygenase-active site, preventing access by arachidonic acid. In theory, a drug such as celecoxib that selectively inhibited COX-2 might block inflammation, pain, and fever while reducing the side effects (gastric erosions and ulcers) associated with inhibition of COX-1. In animal models of inflammation and pain, celecoxib has shown marked suppression of PG production and inflammation compared with indomethacin, the standard COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor. In clinical trials, celecoxib dosed at 100, 200, and 400 mg BID was found to significantly reduce the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis. In one RA study, celecoxib was found to be as clinically effective as diclofenac after 24 weeks of treatment; at the end of the study, gastroduodenal ulcers occurred significantly more frequently in the diclofenac group (15%) than in the celecoxib group (4%). In a 1-week endoscopy study comparing celecoxib with naproxen and placebo, the incidence of gastric erosions/ulcers was significantly greater in the naproxen group than in the celecoxib or placebo group. The most common adverse effects of celecoxib in clinical studies were headache, diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, and dizziness. Celecoxib has shown significant equivalent anti-inflammatory and analgesic efficacy and has produced less endoscopically apparent gastrointestinal (GI) ulceration or erosion than have 3 classic NSAIDs. Whether it will have long-term GI adverse effects or interact with other medications to cause serious adverse responses (eg, increased GI bleeding or rash in conjunction with other sulfonamide-like drugs) is unknown and remains to be established.
...
PMID:Celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. 1050 45

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting about 1% of the adult population. The pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis remains incompletely understood. An infectious aetiology of the disease has long been postulated, but not proved. Despite insufficient evidence for the infectious nature of this disorder, several antibacterials, such as sulfa compounds, tetracyclines and rifampicin, have been investigated in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In the last few years, minocycline, a semi-synthetic derivative of tetracycline, has been extensively studied as a therapeutic agent for rheumatoid arthritis. The antirheumatic effect of minocycline can be related to its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory, rather than to its antibacterial properties. Its efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis has been reported in 2 open trials and in 3 double-blind controlled studies. The first 2 double-blind studies, 1 in The Netherlands and 1 in the US, were performed in patients with advanced disease. Both studies showed a modest, but statistically significant improvement in the clinical parameters of disease activity and in the erythrocyte sedimentation rate in the minocycline-treated patients. The US study also reported that patients in the minocycline group developed fewer erosions than those in the placebo group. This finding supports the role of minocycline as a disease modifying agent. The common adverse effects of minocycline reported in these 2 studies included gastrointestinal adverse effects, dizziness, rash and headaches. Less common adverse effects were intracranial hypertension, pneumonitis, persistent skin and mucosal hyperpigmentation, lupus-like syndrome and acute hepatic injury. The third double-blind study enrolled only seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients with early disease (less than 1 year duration), and showed very encouraging results of significant improvement in the disease activity parameters in the minocycline treated group of patients. The same authors later reported that about half of these patients were in or near remission after 3 years of follow up. No adverse effects were reported in this study. Summarising the data of these 3 double-blind studies, we may conclude that minocycline may be beneficial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, especially when given early in the disease course or in patients with a mild disease.
...
PMID:Benefits and risks of minocycline in rheumatoid arthritis. 1083 Feb 56

Rofecoxib is a selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor which has little or no effect on the COX-1 isoenzyme at doses up to 1000 mg/day. Rofecoxib has greater selectivity for COX-2 than celecoxib, meloxicam, diclofenac and indomethacin. In well-controlled clinical trials, rofecoxib 12.5 to 500 mg/day has been evaluated for its efficacy in the treatment of osteoarthritis, acute pain and rheumatoid arthritis [lower dosages (5 to 125 mg/day) were generally used in the chronic pain indications]. In the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis, rofecoxib was more effective in providing symptomatic relief than placebo, paracetamol (acetaminophen) and celecoxib and was similar in efficacy to ibuprofen, diclofenac, naproxen and nabumetone. Overall, both the physician's assessment of disease status and the patient's assessment of response to therapy tended to favour rofecoxib. In patients with postsurgical dental pain, pain after spinal fusion or orthopaedic surgery, or primary dysmenorrhoea, rofecoxib provided more rapid and more sustained pain relief and reduced requirements for supplemental morphine use after surgery than placebo. Rofecoxib was more efficacious than celecoxib in patients with acute dental pain and pain after spinal fusion surgery, although celecoxib may have been used at a subtherapeutic dose. In comparison with traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) ibuprofen, diclofenac and naproxen sodium, rofecoxib was similar in efficacy in the treatment of acute pain. Although naproxen sodium provided more rapid pain relief than rofecoxib in patients with primary dysmenorrhoea, the reverse was true after orthopaedic surgery: rofecoxib provided more rapid pain relief and less supplemental morphine was needed. Rofecoxib was as effective as naproxen in providing symptomatic relief for over 8700 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Compared with traditional NSAID therapy, rofecoxib had a significantly lower incidence of endoscopically confirmed gastroduodenal ulceration and, in approximately 13,000 patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, a lower incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Rofecoxib was generally well tolerated in all indications with an overall tolerability profile similar to traditional NSAIDs. The most common adverse events in rofecoxib recipients were nausea, dizziness and headache. In conclusion, rofecoxib is at least as effective as traditional NSAID therapy in providing pain relief for both chronic and acute pain conditions. Rofecoxib provides an alternative treatment option to traditional NSAID therapy in the management of symptomatic pain relief in patients with osteoarthritis. Initial data from patients with primary dysmenorrhoea and postoperative pain are promising and further trials may confirm its place in the treatment of these indications. Rofecoxib has also shown promising results in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and is likely to become a valuable addition to current drug therapy for this patient population. Importantly, rofecoxib is associated with a lower incidence of GI adverse events than traditional NSAIDs making it a primary treatment option in patients at risk of developing GI complications or patients with chronic conditions requiring long term treatment.
...
PMID:Rofecoxib: a review of its use in the management of osteoarthritis, acute pain and rheumatoid arthritis. 1139 14

Etanercept is a subcutaneously administered biological response modifier that binds and inactivates tumour necrosis factor-alpha, a proinflammatory cytokine. In patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis, etanercept 25mg twice weekly was associated with a more rapid improvement in disease activity and a significantly greater cumulative response than methotrexate over 12 months of treatment in a randomised, double-blind trial. In addition, etanercept recipients showed a slower rate of radiographic progression and a more rapid improvement in quality of life than methotrexate recipients. The efficacy of etanercept was maintained at 3 years' follow-up. Etanercept was also significantly better than placebo at reducing disease activity in patients who had an inadequate response to previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in several well controlled trials. At study end (after 3 or 6 months' treatment), the percentage of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response with etanercept (25mg or 16 mg/m(2) twice weekly) was 59 to 75% as monotherapy and 71% in combination with methotrexate; corresponding placebo response rates were 11 to 14% and 27%, respectively. Response has been maintained in patients who continued treatment for up to 5 years. In patients with psoriatic arthritis, etanercept 25mg twice weekly significantly reduced disease activity and improved skin lesions in two double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12- to 24-week trials. In the 24-week study, ACR20 response rates (50 vs 13%), psoriatic arthritis response rates (70 vs 23%) and the median improvement in skin lesions (33 vs 0%) were significantly greater in etanercept than in placebo recipients. In patients with polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, etanercept resulted in improvements in all measures of disease activity and was significantly more effective than placebo at reducing disease flare. Eighty percent of patients receiving etanercept achieved a >or=30% reduction in disease activity over 7 months of treatment, and this was maintained for up to 2 years in a trial extension. Etanercept was generally well tolerated in children and adults in clinical trials; the most commonly occurring adverse effects included injection site reactions, infection, headache, rhinitis and dizziness. In conclusion, etanercept has emerged as an important new treatment option in inflammatory arthritis. Etanercept provides rapid and sustained improvements in disease activity in patients with early and DMARD-refractory rheumatoid arthritis and has been shown to inhibit radiographic progression in those with early disease. Well controlled studies have also demonstrated the efficacy of etanercept in patients with psoriatic arthritis or polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.
...
PMID:Etanercept: an updated review of its use in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. 1242 Nov 11

Etanercept (Enbrel) is a subcutaneously administered biological response modifier that binds and inactivates tumour necrosis factor-alpha, a proinflammatory cytokine. In patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis, etanercept 25mg twice weekly was associated with a more rapid improvement in disease activity and a significantly greater cumulative response than methotrexate over 12 months of treatment in a randomised, double-blind trial. In addition, etanercept recipients showed a slower rate of radiographic progression and a more rapid improvement in quality of life than methotrexate recipients. The efficacy of etanercept was maintained at 3 years' follow-up. Etanercept was also significantly better than placebo at reducing disease activity in patients who had an inadequate response to previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in several well controlled trials. At study end (after 3 or 6 months' treatment), the percentage of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response with etanercept (25mg or 16 mg/m(2) twice weekly) was 59-75% as monotherapy and 71% in combination with methotrexate; corresponding placebo response rates were 11-14% and 27%, respectively. Response has been maintained in patients who continued treatment for up to 5 years. In patients with psoriatic arthritis, etanercept 25mg twice weekly significantly reduced disease activity and improved skin lesions in two double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12- to 24-week trials. In the 24-week study, ACR20 response rates (50 vs 13%), psoriatic arthritis response rates (70 vs 23%) and the median improvement in skin lesions (33 vs 0%) were significantly greater in etanercept than in placebo recipients. In patients with polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, etanercept resulted in improvements in all measures of disease activity and was significantly more effective than placebo at reducing disease flare. Eighty percent of patients receiving etanercept achieved a > or =30% reduction in disease activity over 7 months of treatment, and this was maintained for up to 2 years in a trial extension. Etanercept was generally well tolerated in children and adults in clinical trials; the most commonly occurring adverse effects included injection site reactions, infection, headache, rhinitis and dizziness. In conclusion, etanercept has emerged as an important new treatment option in inflammatory arthritis. Etanercept provides rapid and sustained improvements in disease activity in patients with early and DMARD-refractory rheumatoid arthritis and has been shown to inhibit radiographic progression in those with early disease. Well controlled studies have also demonstrated the efficacy of etanercept in patients with psoriatic arthritis or polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.
...
PMID:Spotlight on etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. 1264 92

Sulfasalazine (salazosulfapyridine) [Azulfidine, Salazopyrin] is a well established disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) used in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical trials with sulfasalazine have used an array of measures of disease activity, such as the number of tender and swollen joints, Ritchie articular index (RAI) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). In randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, sulfasalazine was associated with statistically significant benefits for various measures of disease activity, according to results of individual trials and/or meta-analysis. Sulfasalazine was associated with broadly similar efficacy to that of various other DMARDs in several randomised, double-blind, comparative trials. Promising results have also been demonstrated with sulfasalazine in combination with other DMARDs (e.g. methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and in those with more established disease. Sulfasalazine was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, the most frequently reported adverse effects being adverse gastrointestinal effects, headache, dizziness and rash; myelosuppression can also occur. Sulfasalazine has a relatively short lag time until its onset of action and is often considered to be among the more efficacious traditional DMARDs. Based on considerations of safety, convenience and cost, many rheumatologists (particularly outside of the US) select sulfasalazine as initial therapy, although preferred first-line treatment options vary between countries.
...
PMID:Sulfasalazine: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. 1611 81

Patients with widespread pain or fibromyalgia syndrome have many symptoms besides musculoskeletal pain: e.g. fatigue, sleep difficulties, a swollen feeling in tissues, paresthesia, cognitive dysfunction, dizziness, and symptoms of overlapping conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome, headaches and restless legs syndrome. There is evidence for central sensitization in these conditions, but further studies are needed. Anxiety, stress and depression are also present in 30-45% of patients. Other factors that may contribute to symptoms include endocrine dysfunction, psychosocial distress, trauma, and disrupted sleep. Evaluation of a patient presenting with widespread pain includes history and physical examination to diagnose both fibromyalgia and associated or concomitant conditions. Fibromyalgia should be diagnosed by its own characteristic features. Some patients with otherwise typical symptoms of fibromyalgia may have as few as four to six tender points in clinical practice. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus should be evaluated for fibromyalgia, since 20-30% of them have associated fibromyalgia, requiring a different treatment approach.
...
PMID:Role of central sensitization in symptoms beyond muscle pain, and the evaluation of a patient with widespread pain. 1760 95

Thalidomide, in development by Celgene, inhibits the effects of elevated TNFalpha and may consequently be of use in a range of diseases including cachexia, bacterial meningitis, rheumatoid arthritis, septic shock, AIDS, tuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, ulcerative colitis, graft-versus-host disease and systemic lupus erythematosus. In July 1998, Celgene received clearance from the US FDA to market and sell Thalomid (thalidomide) for the treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum (a severe and debilitating condition associated with leprosy) [291919], following a recommendation for approval by the FDA advisory committee in September 1997 [261846,263970]. In that same month, Celgene filed an IND for the treatment of the chronic autoimmune disorders Behcet's disease, and aphthosis [264366]. The trial will be conducted by investigators at the Mayo Clinic and Bowman Gray School of Medicine. It will be divided into two phases, the first phase lasting 4 weeks in which patients will receive 100 mg thalidomide or placebo, and a second open-label phase which will call back all patients to receive the same dose of thalidomide over a 24-week period. It will be determined whether the drug significantly reduces existing ulcerations and inhibits the formation of new lesions. Positive results of a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases trial for aphthous ulceration of the mouth in HIV-infected patients prompted Celgene to commence a pivotal trial for the same indication. A total of 84 patients will be randomized to 100 mg, 200 mg or 400 mg thalidomide/day for 4 weeks. Patients achieving a full response after 4 weeks will be re-randomized on 100 mg thalidomide or placebo for up to another year [248356]. The company has also completed the pivotal phase III trial for AIDS-related cachexia [225437]. Results from a pivotal phase II/III trial showed that the drug significantly increased body weight in AIDS patients, but also increased viral load initially. A total of 99 patients, who had lost more than 10% of their body weight due to HIV infection, received either 100 or 200 mg/day of thalidomide or placebo orally for 8 weeks. Although there was a significant increase in body weight associated with the 100 mg dose (p = 0.025), there was no difference in body weight changes between patients treated with 200 mg doses and those on placebo. There was a 55% dropout rate at the higher dose due to side-effects such as somnolence, rash, neutropenia, neuropathy and dizziness. Viral load was significantly increased after 4 weeks of treatment. However, there was no further increase in viral load at 8 weeks, and patients were not receiving triple combination antiviral therapy [243943]. In April 1996, Celgene initiated a phase II trial of thalidomide in London for the treatment of chronic intractable diarrhea in HIV positive patients. The double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will involve up to 120 patients, aged 18 to 65 inclusive, at three centers for 28 days of therapy; those on drugs will be orally dosed with 100 mg of thalidomide daily at bedtime. The primary endpoint is reduction in the occurrence of diarrhea [205006,206218]. The trial will be conducted in the US, the UK and Mexico [210069]. The company expanded its clinical trial program in June 1996, for use of thalidomide in graft versus host disease and AIDS complications, such as debilitating ulcers of the digestive system [212461]. A phase II trial for the treatment of cachexia in cancer patients was carried out at St George's Hospital, London. Ten patients received thalidomide (100 mg) orally for 8 weeks and ten received placebo. The study was structured to determine the ability of thalidomide to reduce or stabilize the symptoms of cachexia. Quality of life and levels of disease markers will also be assessed. Results showed that after a 3-week treatment period, patients who received thalidomide gained an average 4.5% in overall body weight versus 0.9% with placebo [190161]. Results from a 65 patient multicenter phase II/III trial for cachexia are still awaited [221227]. Celgene is also conducting a double-blind, placebo-controlled pivotal trial for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis at New York University's Hospital of Joint Diseases. Levels of TNFalpha are increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Indicators for the trial will be joint swelling and pain and levels of serological markers [177618]. A separate study is being conducted by the US National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, of thalidomide in combination with Chiron's IL-2 for the treatment of HIV infection [192218]. In vitro evidence suggests that thalidomide can inhibit the replication of HIV type 1 [169245]. In addition to the associated patent, WO-09214455, which discloses the use of thalidomide in TNF-related diseases, another Celgene patent, US-05463063, discloses a scaleable process to make high purity thalidomide [194937].
...
PMID:Thalidomide Celgene Corp. 1846 84

Atrioventricular (AV) block is rare in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but it is usually of complete type. A 55-year-old woman had complaints of fatigue, dizziness, and light-headedness, all of a week history. She had been receiving treatment for RA for about six years, and had been on methylprednisolone 5 mg/day for a year. On physical examination, her heart rate was 32 bpm, blood pressure was 160/80 mmHg. She had a grade 1-2/6 apical systolic ejection murmur. The electrocardiogram showed complete AV block. Transthoracic echocardiography showed grade I mitral regurgitation. No rheumatoid nodule was noted on transesophageal echocardiography. Coronary arteries appeared normal on coronary angiography. A temporary pacemaker was implanted in the coronary care unit, after which complete AV block improved to a second-degree Mobitz type II block. Her heart rate was 45 bpm. As no further improvement was observed in the AV block during a 10-day monitoring, she underwent DDD-R permanent pacemaker implantation.
...
PMID:[Complete atrioventricular block in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis]. 1876 72


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>