Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012833 (dizziness)
 9,689 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

One hundred and two patients with either rheumatoid arthritis or osteo-arthrosis were treated for prolonged periods with diclophenac sodium (Voltaren; Geigy) to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the drug. Fifty-seven patients completed a trial of 12 months. A total of 70% showed an improvement in functional class, and 40% of the total had complete functional capacity by the end of the trial. The drug was well tolerated. The side-effects (heartburn, abdominal cramps, headache and dizziness) were mild and in most cases did not require cessation of treatment. In 9 patients the Coombs test became positive during the trial, but this did not require cessation of therapy.
 ...
PMID:A long-term study of diclophenac sodium in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and osteo-arthrosis. 35 28

Data from four double-blind studies of the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis were combined. For 4 to 12 weeks, 747 patients received Arthrotec, a combination of 50 mg of diclofenac and 200 micrograms of misoprostol, and 754 patients received 50 mg of diclofenac; the drugs were given twice or three times daily. The five most commonly reported adverse events were abdominal pain by 23.2% of the diclofenac/misoprostol patients and 19.8% of the diclofenac patients; diarrhea by 19.9% and 11.3%; nausea by 11.8% and 6.5%; dyspepsia by 11.2% and 7.8%; and flatulence by 8.0% and 3.1%. Other adverse events, reported by similar proportions of both treatment groups, included headache, gastritis, dizziness, vomiting, and constipation. In the diclofenac/misoprostol-treated patients, the abdominal pain and diarrhea were rated mild in 30.6% and 24.3%, moderate in 49.1% and 51.4%, and severe in 20.2% and 24.3%. Serious adverse events occurred in eight of the diclofenac/misoprostol-treated patients and in 13 of the diclofenac-treated patients; 12.6% and 10.1%, respectively, were withdrawn from the study because of adverse events. Results of laboratory tests of hepatic and renal function were similar in the two treatment groups.
 ...
PMID:Overall safety of Arthrotec. 143 22

Patients suffering from active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were examined for the analgesic effect of tramal. All the patients were administered basic therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Tramal produced a beneficial effect in 79% of the patients. The stable analgesic effect ensued on days 3-5 since the onset of continuous treatment. Provided the drug was administered for a short period of time (not more than 14 days), addiction to tramal was not recorded. Only 11% of the patients demonstrated tramal-induced side effects (drowsiness, dizziness, skin itch), seen in cases where the daily dose exceeded 300 mg.
 ...
PMID:[The preliminary results of using tramal in rheumatoid arthritis patients]. 145 76

A prospective phase II trial was conducted to assess the feasibility, tolerance, and efficacy of a device designed for selective removal of rheumatoid factor from the plasma of rheumatoid arthritis patients. The device contained terpolymer hydrogel-coated plates with chemically attached, aggregated human immunoglobulin G, and it operated as an immunoaffinity column. Sixty-one patients aged 25 to 73 underwent weekly plasmapheresis treatments (the primary therapy phase). During the trial, patients continued current rheumatoid arthritis medications without dose adjustments. All patients received two to six treatments (primary therapy). Responding patients were eligible to continue apheresis treatment every 2 to 6 weeks (maintenance therapy). No serious, untoward side effects were noted in the course of this study; of 640 treatments, only 2 (in different patients) were aborted, one because of complaints of dizziness and angioedema and the other because of chest tightness and shortness of breath. Except for a significant (p less than 0.05) decrease in serum iron, no significant changes in complete blood count, serum electrolytes, renal and hepatic function tests, or serum C3 and C4 were noted. Although the trial was not designed to determine clinical efficacy, patients noted less morning stiffness, longer time to onset of fatigue, and improved global pain assessment (p less than 0.004); significant objective improvements were noted in joint pain, tenderness, swelling, and the number of affected joints (p less than 0.001). One-half of the treated patients had at least a 50 percent improvement in objective measures of antirheumatic activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Selective in vivo removal of rheumatoid factor by an extracorporeal treatment device in rheumatoid arthritis patients. 199 91

The purpose of this study was to develop a high-risk clinical profile of patients with autoimmune (immune-mediated) inner-ear disease. The records of 52 patients diagnosed over the past 5 years were reviewed. Age, sex, bilateral versus unilateral involvement, otologic symptoms, concomitant systemic immune disease, and presenting clinical diagnoses were recorded. The presenting diagnoses were Cogan's syndrome, Meniere's syndrome, Dandy's syndrome without hearing loss, or progressive sensorineural hearing loss without dizziness. Because Cogan's and Dandy's syndromes were relatively uncommon, the typical high-risk clinical profile was a middle-aged patient (often female) with bilateral, asymmetric, progressive sensorineural hearing loss, with or without dizziness, and occasional systemic immune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis. When a more common clinical diagnosis cannot be reached in suspicious patients, immune laboratory tests should be obtained and a trial of immunotherapy offered. Positive test results and beneficial response to therapy support a presumptive diagnosis of immune inner-ear disease.
 ...
PMID:Clinical diagnosis of immune inner-ear disease. 334 73

A 4-week parallel-group, double-blind comparison of isoxicam 200 mg once daily and naproxen 250 mg 3 times daily was carried out on 30 patients with classic or definite rheumatoid arthritis. Fifteen patients were randomly assigned to each treatment group. The articular index, scoring on a pain scale and morning stiffness were significantly reduced after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment with both drugs. Grip strength was significantly increased after 4 weeks of naproxen treatment. The mean increase in grip strength was also comparable in isoxicam-treated patients, but did not reach statistical significance. Joint swelling and walking times showed improvement in both groups. One patient withdrew from isoxicam treatment with a pruritic rash considered to be drug-related and another stopped taking isoxicam because of dizziness, nausea and vomiting--also probably drug-related. Eight other patients, 4 treated with isoxicam and 4 with naproxen, reported adverse reactions associated with the digestive system. In this study isoxicam 200 mg taken once daily was similar in efficacy to and was associated with a similar incidence of adverse reactions as naproxen 250 mg taken 3 times daily. Both drugs were effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and were well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:A comparative study of isoxicam and naproxen in rheumatoid arthritis. 388 24

Data collected from more than 1,800 patients with rheumatoid arthritis or degenerative joint disease in Phase 3 clinical studies of isoxicam (Maxicam) indicated that the drug is well tolerated on both a short-term and a long-term basis. The most common type of adverse reaction to all medications (isoxicam, aspirin, and indomethacin) was gastrointestinal: 22.6 percent with isoxicam, at a dosage greater than 200 mg per day; 14.2 percent with isoxicam at 200 mg per day; 31.6 percent with buffered aspirin at 3,600 to 4,800 mg per day; 24.6 percent with indomethacin at 150 mg per day; and 7.2 percent with placebo. The incidence of tinnitus and deafness was significantly greater with buffered aspirin than with isoxicam, and the number of patients who had at least one episode of dizziness, vertigo, or headache was significantly greater with indomethacin than with isoxicam. In open-label, long-term studies, in which approximately 70 percent of the patients participated, the types and frequencies of adverse effects were similar to those observed with isoxicam during the controlled studies. The overall frequency of withdrawal for adverse reactions during the long-term studies was 11.5 percent, similar to that during the controlled studies. At the recommended dosage for isoxicam of 200 mg per day, the incidence of gastrointestinal ulcers was 0.81 percent, well within the range expected among arthritic patients receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. From the data collected in Phase 3 clinical studies, it may be concluded that isoxicam is better tolerated than either aspirin or indomethacin and should not create unusual problems in the short-term or long-term treatment of rheumatoid arthritis or degenerative joint disease.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of the safety of isoxicam. 390 36

Forty-four patients with definite or classical rheumatoid arthritis were entered in a 48-week open study, comparing the long-term effects of Timegadine and D-penicillamine. Twenty-three and 21 patients were respectively allocated to the Timegadine and D-penicillamine groups. Two patients of the former group were lost for follow-up, soon after the first baseline. Thus data were available only for 42 patients, 21 in each group of whom eleven completed the 48-week period in each group. Seven patients in the Timegadine group stopped because of ineffectiveness, 2 because of skin eruption and 1 because of acute interstitial pneumonitis. In the D-penicillamine group, 9 patients dropped out: 3 because of proteinuria, 2 because of stomatitis, 1 because of dizziness and 1 because of headache. Pain (visual analogue scale), number of swollen and painful joints improved significantly in both groups (p less than 0.05). The acute phase reactants alpha1-acid-glycoprotein and ESR and the thrombocyte count significantly decreased in the penicillamine group (p less than 0.05). The other clinical, hematological and immunological tests did not change; neither did the liver and kidney function tests. The clinical results suggest that Timegadine is as effective as D-penicillamine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. D-penicillamine takes advantage over Timegadine by decreasing significantly the acute phase reactants. However, Timegadine has a low profile of side-effects.
 ...
PMID:A comparative trial of timegadine and D-penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis. 667 97

The pharmacokinetics, efficacy and tolerance of a new formulation of slow-release indomethacin tablet were compared with those of a conventional indomethacin capsule in 30 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The slow-release tablet was absorbed more slowly than the capsule (tmax 3.7 h and less than 2 h, respectively) and produced more even serum drug levels in 10 subjects. Side-effects, especially dizziness and diarrhoea, were less frequent after the slow-release tablet than during the capsule period.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of slow-release indomethacin tablets in rheumatoid arthritis. 717 4

The efficacy and safety of minocycline was investigated in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had already received more than three disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Minocycline was administered at 100 mg twice a day to fifteen patients with active RA. The drug efficacy was evaluated by the clinical variables including the number of painful and/or swollen joints, the duration of morning stiffness, grip strength, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum concentrations of C-reactive protein, and the titer of rheumatoid factor. Three patients experienced adverse effects such as dizziness and abdominal pain or discomfort, but only one patient with abdominal pain and dizziness was discontinued. Fourteen RA patients, who had taken minocycline for at least 6 months, were subjected to the clinical evaluation. Among them, 8 patients (54%) showed a significant improvement of clinical valuables for disease activity, beginning even at 4 weeks of the therapy. The continued effects were observed in 8 patients with over 1 year-minocycline therapy. Intriguingly, an active patient with a history of multiple DMARDs-resistancy showed a marked favorable response to this drug. The present study indicates that minocycline may be an effective DMARD with highly safe performance for patients with active and refractory RA. This is the first demonstration of the benefit of minocycline in the Japanese patients.
 ...
PMID:[An evaluation of efficacy of minocycline as an anti-rheumatic drug in patients with active and refractory rheumatoid arthritis]. 1004 18


1 2 3 4 Next >>