Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0012739 (disseminated intravascular coagulation)
8,673 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The aim of this study is to evaluate the hematological differences between septic and traumatic disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) using the rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM).This retrospective study includes all sepsis or severe trauma patients transported to our emergency department who underwent ROTEM from 2013 to 2014. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence of DIC diagnosed by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) DIC score. We statistically analyzed the demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, ROTEM findings (EXTEM and FIBTEM), and outcome.Fifty-seven patients (30 sepsis and 27 severe trauma) were included in primary analysis. Sepsis cases were significantly older and had higher systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) scores, whereas there were no significant differences in other parameters including Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. Twenty-six patients (14 sepsis and 12 severe trauma) were diagnosed with DIC. The Septic DIC (S-DIC) group was significantly older and had higher DIC scores than the traumatic DIC (T-DIC) group. Hematologic examination revealed significantly higher CRP, fibrinogen, lower FDP, DD, and higher FDP/DD ratio were found in the S-DIC group in comparison with the T-DIC group. ROTEM findings showed that the A10, A20, and MCF in the FIBTEM test were significantly higher in the S-DIC group. However, no statistical differences were confirmed in the LI30, LI45, and ML in EXTEM test.The plasma fibrinogen level and fibrinogen based clot firmness in whole-blood test revealed statistical significance between septic and traumatic DIC patients.
...
PMID:The thromboelastometric discrepancy between septic and trauma induced disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosed by the scoring system from the Japanese association for acute medicine. 2749 6

: Coagulopathy has a high incidence in critically ill patients and is often caused by disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Although the clinical picture of DIC ranges from a prothrombotic state to severe consumption coagulopathy with an increased bleeding tendency, there are no clinical tests that reflect of in-vivo hemostatic profile. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may be able to indicate whether a patient has a hypocoagulable or hypercoagulable profile and possibly be able to discriminate patients with and without DIC. The aim of this article was to study the diagnostic ability of thromboelastometry to detect DIC. A predefined subgroup analysis of a clinical trial in critically ill patients with a coagulopathy was done. ROTEM and markers of coagulation and levels of natural anticoagulants were measured in patients with and without DIC. Twenty-three patients were included, 13 fulfilled criteria for overt DIC. Patients with DIC had lower platelet count, lower levels of fibrinogen, factors II, VII and VIII compared with those without DIC. Antithrombin, protein C and S were also reduced in DIC patients. Receiver operator characteristic analyses showed that EXTEM CFT, alpha angle and MCF were capable of discriminating patients with and without DIC. Combination of ROTEM values with protein C or antithrombin further improved discriminatory ability. In patients with DIC, thromboelastometry profiles were more hypocoagulable compared with those without DIC. ROTEM correlates well with ISTH DIC score, diagnostic strength improves when ROTEM values are combined with antithrombin or protein C levels. Thereby, ROTEM may be a useful tool in diagnosing DIC in the critically ill.
...
PMID:Thromboelastometry in critically ill patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation. 3115 82