Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011881 (diabetic nephropathy)
 10,836 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system is recognized as an effective approach for the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure. It is possible to antagonize the effects of angiotensin II (AngII) by blocking its receptors, using nonpeptide receptor antagonists. Six angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) have been approved for the treatment of hypertension: losartan, valsartan, irbesartan, candesartan, telmisartan, and eprosartan. These new drugs are highly selective for the AT1 receptor subtype and induce dose-dependent inhibition of the BP response to exogenous AngII. Numerous double-blind, placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated that ARB are efficacious for treating mild, moderate, and severe hypertension. When compared with other classes of antihypertensive agents, ARB are as effective as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium antagonists, thiazide diuretics, and beta-blockers. One advantage of ARB as a class is their excellent tolerability and side effect profile. Several large clinical trials of ARB are now under way to demonstrate their benefits in hypertension, heart failure, and type II diabetic nephropathy.
 ...
PMID:Comparative antihypertensive effects of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. 1020 83

The role of genetic investigations in diabetes one can describe in aspect of their role in the pathogenesis of type 1 and type 2 as well as in pathogenesis of chronic complications and gene therapy of diabetes. There is not only one gene responsible for type 1 diabetes. Similarly there are many gene-candidates in type 2 diabetes. Only in 6 types of MODY the genes responsible for beta-cell dysfunction were described. In diabetic complications some role e.g. in retinopathy may be played by genes of growth factors, heparan sulfate synthesis as well as genes of adrenergic receptor beta 3. In diabetic nephropathy the genes of renin synthesis, converting enzyme, aldose reductase or angiotensin receptor can be of importance. It should be emphasized that identification of human genome and genes responsible for diabetes can contribute to introduction of gene therapy in diabetes.
 ...
PMID:[The role of genetic studies in finding the etiopathogenesis of diabetes mellitus]. 1129 31

Microalbuminuria (MA) is defined as persistent elevation of albumin in the urine, of 30-300 mg/day (20-200 microg/min). These values are less than the values detected by routine urine dipstick testing, which does not become positive until protein excretion exceeds 300-500 mg/day. Use of the albumin-to-creatinine ratio is recommended as the preferred screening strategy for all diabetic patients. MA is measured in spot morning urine obtained from the patient in the office and sent for measurement of both albumin and creatinine. A value above 0.03 mg/mg suggests that albumin excretion is above 30 mg/day and therefore MA is present. MA should be checked annually in everyone, and every 6 months within the first year of treatment to assess the impact in patients started on antihypertensive therapy. MA is an established risk factor for renal disease progression in type 1 diabetes and its presence is the earliest clinical sign of diabetic nephropathy. In addition, a number of studies suggest that MA is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and defines a group at high risk for early cardiovascular mortality in both type 2 diabetes and essential hypertension. MA also signifies abnormal vascular permeability and the presence of atherosclerosis. Among nondiabetic patients with essential hypertension, MA is associated with higher blood pressures, increased serum total cholesterol, and reduced serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Thus, taken together these data support the concept that the presence of MA is the kidney's notice to the physician/patient that there is a problem with the vasculature. MA can be reduced, and progression to overt proteinuria prevented, by aggressive blood pressure reduction. The National Kidney Foundation recommends that blood pressure levels be maintained at or below 130/80 mm Hg in anyone with diabetes or renal disease. This should be accomplished with antihypertensive agents that prevent the rise in MA and hence prevent development of proteinuria. Such agents are angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and, to a lesser extent, Beta blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, and diuretics. In summary, the presence of MA is a marker of endothelial dysfunction and a harbinger of markedly enhanced cardiovascular risk. All patients with diabetes and/or hypertension should be screened for the presence of microalbuminuria with use of spot morning urine. To maximize prevention of MA development, the following goals should be instituted: 1) blood pressure should be maintained at less than 130/80 mm Hg and a low-salt, moderate-potassium diet instituted; 2) in diabetics, HbA1c should be kept at less than 7%; 3) in obese patients, a weight loss program should be implemented, with a goal BMI of less than 30; and 4) the physician and patient, working together, should maintain low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at less than 120 mg/dL, and less than 100 mg/dL if diabetes is present. (c)2001 by Le Jacq Communications, Inc.
 ...
PMID:Microalbuminuria: what is it? Why is it important? What should be done about it? 1141 91

The role of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the regulation of blood pressure and the pathogenesis of both hypertension and renal complications involves an intricate interplay of genetic and environmental factors. In the case of diabetic nephropathy, the genes governing the RAS are an obvious choice in the search for contributing factors. These genetic components can reflect polygenetic mechanisms or a major gene effect. During recent years, polymorphisms of the genes governing both angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and angiotensinogen have been studied, with varying outcomes. Investigation of the interaction between ACE inhibition and the glycemic state yields equally interesting results. In healthy subjects on a high salt diet, the hyperglycemic state produced significant increases in renal plasma flow (RPF) in response to administration of the ACE inhibitor captopril. A similar study using the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) eprosartan demonstrated again that the agent had little effect on RPF in subjects in a normal glycemic state; however, when administered during a hyperglycemic state, a marked increase in RPF occurred. Implications for the prevention of nephropathy and endstage renal disease (ESRD) in diabetics with hypertension are significant. Until recently, pharmacologic intervention in the RAS has focused on the ACE step, with documented success being reported in the prevention of diabetic nephropathy and ESRD using ACE inhibitors. Despite this success, data suggest that greater therapeutic benefit might be accomplished by blocking the deleterious effects of angiotensin II at the receptor site. From a renoprotective perspective, the ARB appear to have tremendous potential in the management of hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Renal implications of angiotensin receptor blockers. 1145 12

The Reduction in End Points in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study and the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) are two recently reported trials with hard end points, conducted in patients in advanced stages of diabetic nephropathy. Two other studies--the Irbesartan Microalbuminuria Study (IRMA)-2 and the Microalbuminuria Reduction with Valsartan study (MARVAL)--were trials conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes with microalbuminuria, a cardiovascular risk factor associated with early-stage diabetic nephropathy. These trials all had a common theme--that is, does an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) interfere with the natural history of diabetic nephropathy in a blood pressure-independent fashion? Without question, the results of these trials legitimatize the use of the ARB class in forestalling the deterioration in renal function, which is almost inevitable in the patient with untreated diabetic nephropathy. These data can now be added to the vast array of evidence supporting angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor use in patients with nephropathy associated with type 1 diabetes. It now appears a safe conclusion that the patient with diabetic nephropathy should receive therapy with an agent that interrupts the renin-angiotensin system. These studies have not resolved the question as to whether an ACE inhibitor or an ARB is the preferred agent in people with nephropathy from type 1 diabetes, though the optimal doses of these drugs remain to be determined. Head-to-head studies comparing ACE inhibitors to ARBs in diabetic nephropathy are not likely to occur, so it is unlikely that comparable information will be forthcoming with ACE inhibitors. An evidence-based therapeutic approach derived from these trials would argue for ARBs to be the foundation of therapy in the patient with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.
 ...
PMID:Type 2 diabetes: RENAAL and IDNT--the emergence of new treatment options. 1182 41

Recent trials have helped to clarify indications for the initial pharmacological therapy of hypertension. Both the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) and World Health Organization-international Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) recommendations should be revised. The more recent trials indicate that: (1) diuretics and beta-blockers appear to be as effective in reducing overall morbidity/ mortality as other agents (Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension [STOP-2], United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study [UKPDS], Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment [INSIGHT], Nordic diltiazem [NORDIL]); (2) the use of an a-blocker results in more cardiovascular events, especially congestive heart failure, when compared with a diuretic (Antihypertensive Therapy and Lipid Lowering Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT]); (3)the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor results in fewer myocardial infarctions and episodes of heart failure than calcium channel blockers in the elderly and in diabetic patients (Fosinopril vs. Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial [FACET], Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes [ABCD], STOP-2) - other data (Captopril Prevention Project [CAPPP]) suggest that the use of an ACE inhibitor is preferred in diabetic patients; (4) overall cardiovascular events are similar with calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic - however, there are fewer strokes with non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NORDIL) and a trend towards an increase in heart failure and myocardial infarctions with either a dihydropyridine or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic (INSIGHT, NORDIL); (5) angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) will decrease proteinuria and slow progression of renal disease in type 2 diabetic patients when compared with regimens that do not include an ARB or an ACE inhibitor (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan [RENAAL], Irbesartan Type II Diabetic Nephropathy Trial [IDNT], Irbesartan Type II Diabetes with Microalbuminuria [IRMA Il]). The debate over initial therapy may be moot. High-risk hypertensive patients should probably be treated initially with combination therapy, one of which should be a diuretic. The use of diuretics and beta-blockers as well as ACE-inhibitors alone or with a diuretic should be considered as initial therapy (a change from JNCVI). Alpha-blockers should be reserved for special situations, i.e. prostatic hypertrophy (in contrast to WHO-ISH recommendations). An ACE-inhibitor or ARB, usually along with a diuretic, can be considered as preferred therapy in hypertensive diabetic patients. Some data suggest equal or greater reduction in strokes with a calcium channel blocker than other medications.
 ...
PMID:Current recommendations for the treatment of hypertension: are they still valid? 1199 97

The coexistence of hypercholesterolaemia and diabetes dramatically and synergistically increases the risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications in patients. A single unifying mechanism of increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by angiotensin II (Ang II) may serve as a causal link between hyperglycaemia and hypercholesterolaemia and many of the major pathways responsible for atherogenic and diabetic disorders. Several lines of evidence suggest a crucial role for Ang II-mediated oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of hyperglycaemia- and hypercholesterolemia-associated endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial dysfunction in these scenarios may be due to impaired nitric oxide (NO) synthesis and/or inactivation of endothelium-derived NO by ROS. That Ang II plays an important role in the development of atherosclerosis and glomerulosclerosis is supported by numerous studies indicating that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) retard the progression of these diseases in both experimental animal models and humans. Evidence indicates that Ang II contributes to atherogenesis at both transcriptional and translational levels by upregulating adhesion molecule mRNA and protein synthesis. The recent demonstration of Ang II AT(2) receptors in the adult kidney and their potential to oppose the vasoconstrictive, antinatriuretic, and profibrotic properties of AT(1) receptors suggests that the balance of intrarenal AT(1) and AT(2) receptors may be important in determining the cellular responses to Ang II in diabetic nephropathy. Results of these studies suggest that hypercholesterolaemia and hyperglycaemia can induce a pro-inflammatory response within coronary arteries and the kidney glomerulus. This response involves production of well described macrophage chemotactic and adhesion molecules, which results in macrophage recruitment and the development of acute and chronic injury. Glomerular macrophage recruitment in experimental diabetes occurs via Ang II-stimulated monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 expression, suggesting that the renin-angiotensin system is an important regulator of local MCP-1 expression, and strongly implicating macrophage recruitment and activation in the pathogenesis of early diabetic glomerular injury. Diabetes-associated vascular complications may also involve an activation of the nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB by hyperglycaemia. NF-kappaB activation is related to AT(1) receptor-mediated pathways, and is believed to be dependent on activation of the Rho proteins belonging to the superfamily of low molecular weight guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) that regulate intracellular signalling. Preincubation of vascular smooth muscle cells with insulin doubled NF-kappaB transactivation stimulated by Ang II and hyperglycaemia, suggesting a potential mechanism for crosstalk between the renin-angiotensin system and hyperglycaemia. Taken together, these data suggest that activation of the renin-angiotensin system is a mechanism for the initiation and progression of inflammatory cell infiltration found in early changes common to both hypercholesterolaemia and hyperglycaemia. While the base of information regarding ARBs in high-risk patients with diabetes and hypercholesterolemia is lacking, preclinical and pilot trial data suggest that the ARBs are reno- and vasculoprotective in these patients. Therapeutic blockade of Ang II AT(1) receptors in diabetic and hypercholesterolaemic humans by ARBs, with concomitant elevation in plasma and tissue Ang II levels, may provide vascular and renal protection not only by reducing AT(1) receptor-mediated pro-oxidative effects, but also by unopposed AT(2) receptor stimulation.
 ...
PMID:[Pathophysiological and clinical implications of AT(1) and AT(2) angiotensin II receptors in metabolic disorders: hypercholesterolaemia and diabetes]. 1203 87

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AAIIs) are the most specific inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. There are two types of angiotensin II (Ang II) receptors, the AT(1) receptor, which is responsible for all the classical physiological properties of Ang II, and the AT(2) receptor, whose function in humans remains unclear. The different AAIIs used in clinical practice vary depending on their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and, for some of them, depending on their metabolism in vivo into an active metabolite. AAIIs are relatively well tolerated, and, unlike angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), do not induce cough. AAIIs are indicated in mild, moderate and severe essential hypertension, where their efficacy has been proven in many studies. The maximal antihypertensive effect is obtained in a few days or weeks, and is somewhat retarded when compared with ACEIs. Their effect is independent of age and sex, but does depend to a certain extent on ethnic origin, since Afro-American patients are less sensitive to AAIIs than Caucasians. In general, the antihypertensive and haemodynamic response to blockers of the renin-angiotensin system is potentiated in presence of a negative salt balance and attenuated in case of a positive salt balance. This means that AAII efficiency is improved by salt depletion induced by a salt-free diet or thiazide diuretics. AAIIs induce short-term improvement of haemodynamic parameters in cardiac insufficiency. Several ongoing clinical trials have been designed to compare their efficacy in cardiac insufficiency and myocardial infarction with those of reference treatments. Valsartan has been recently shown to improve morbimortality in patients with cardiac insufficiency and receiving a conventional treatment including an ACEI. It has been convincingly shown that blockade of the renin-aldosterone system by ACEIs decreases proteinuria and slows down the progression of renal insufficiency, especially in type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Recent trials have shown that AAIIs share the same properties as ACEIs in these indications. It appears that the beneficial effect of AAIIs and ACEIs is not entirely explained by the blood pressure lowering effect of these drugs. AAII administration increases renin release and Ang II production, which may overcome Ang II blockade. On this basis, the combination of an AAII and an ACEI has been proposed to achieve a maximal renin-angiotensin system blockade. Several experimental studies in animals and preliminary clinical studies all indicate that the combination of the two drugs may be more beneficial than either drug used alone in hypertension, cardiac insufficiency and post-myocardial infarction. Clinical trials are necessary to further document the putative advantages of such a combined therapy. The future of AAIIs depends on the following: progress made in the understanding of the molecular and cellular activities of angiotensin (angiotensin receptor signalling, receptor dimerisation, presence of other angiotensin receptor subtypes, role of AT(2) receptor, etc.);a comprehensive view of the role of the local renin system in various organs (local generation and effect of Ang II on cellular proliferation, fibrosis, inflammation, angiogenesis, etc.);predictability of the response to AAII treatment (genetic predisposition to AAII treatment, in conjunction with environmental factors); andresults of the ongoing clinical trials designed to assess the long-term effects of AAIIs in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, in comparison with reference treatments.
 ...
PMID:[Angiotensin II receptor blockers: current status and future prospects]. 1203 89

The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study is a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial which was recently published. It was aimed to evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The primary efficacy measure was the time to the first event of the composite end point of a doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death. The conclusion was that losartan led to significant improvement in renal outcomes, that was beyond that attributable to blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The perusal of the report raises concern, regarding to both the patient population as well as the outcome measures. At randomization, the placebo group included more patients with angina, myocardial infarction and lipid disorders than the losartan group. Information on glucose metabolism was disregarded, and data on antihyperglycemic therapy--which may have undesirable influences on cardiac performance--were not included in a multivariate analysis. In addition, only data on first hospitalization were reported, whilst information on total specific-cause hospitalizations was disregarded, thus potentially masking further unfavorable events. Furthermore, creatinine seems not to be a reliable surrogate end point. Based on its mechanism of action, losartan may possess favorable renoprotective properties. However, due to the methodological flaws and the incomplete data in the RENAAL study, the question of the effectiveness and safety of this drug in diabetic nephropathy remains yet unanswered.
 ...
PMID:Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study. 1211 58

It is unknown whether the angiotensin receptor antagonist valsartan exerts a renoprotective effect on patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy independent of its hypotensive effects. Forty patients with type 2 diabetes participated in this study. All patients received valsartan 40 mg, a dose with no clinical effect on blood pressure levels. Blood pressure, urinary albumin excretion (UAE), and creatinine clearance were determined at baseline and at the end of the 6-month treatment period. Antihypertensive and/or antidiabetic drugs, including insulin, were permitted throughout the study. After 6 months of valsartan therapy, mean UAE decreased from 86.8 +/- 196 to 46.9 +/- 97 microg/min (n = 37). In addition, a significant decrease was observed in the UAE of the subgroup of patients displaying diabetic nephropathy (UAE > 20 microg/min, n = 14), from 219.4 +/- 275 to 102.7 +/- 141 microg/min, (P < 0.01). Changes in UAE for valsartan correlated significantly with UAE at baseline (r = -0.935, P < 0.0001). Serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearance remained stable before and after treatment with valsartan. No significant differences were observed between pre- and post-treatment body mass index, glycosylated hemoglobin, or systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy, 6 months of treatment with low dose valsartan, an angiotensin-II receptor antagonist, thus reduced UAE with no reduction in systemic blood pressure. The drug may be safely administered in this subset of type 2 diabetic patients. The long-term benefits in terms of risk reduction must still be evaluated in further trials.
 ...
PMID:Renoprotective effects of low-dose valsartan in type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. 1212 67


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>