Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011881 (diabetic nephropathy)
 10,836 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Renin angiotensin(RA) system is deeply involved in the pathophysiological conditions of essential hypertension. To inhibit RA system is supposed to be induced cardiovascular protective effect. ACEIs and ARBs are used as first choice of drugs in the treatment of hypertension. Clinical evidence shows that ACEIs have protective effects on heart, kidney and brain. Several large clinical trials suggest that ARBs have also protective effects on heart and diabetic nephropathy. Furthermore, recent study has demonstrated that an ARB prevents more cardiovascular morbidity and death than a beta blocker and is better tolerated in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Now accumulated evidence indicates that ARBs are useful drugs in the treatment of hypertension.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical application of ARB and ACEI]. 1239 95

Combination therapy with angiotensin receptor antagonist(ARB) plus angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor(ACE-I) (ARB/ACE-I) was efficacious in reducing proteinuria in patients with progressive renal disease. However, this therapy may be associated with the worsening of anemia and hyperkalemia. The present study addressed whether or not triple therapy with low-dose ARB, low-dose diuretic (D) and calcium channel blocker(CCB) (ARB/D/CCB) is as effective as therapy with low-dose ARB/ACE-I in retarding the progression of overt diabetic nephropathy. In the triple therapy, the patients were initially subjected to monotherapy with CCB for 24 weeks. Low-dose ARB and low-dose D were added to the treatment for an additional 24-week period. In parallel, patients undergoing double therapy were initially treated with low-dose ACE-I alone for 24 weeks, and then low-dose ARB was added for an additional 24-week period. The results were as follows: 1) In the triple therapy, blood pressure was reduced by 9 mmHg in systole and 5 mmHg in diastole (not significant) compared to monotherapy with CCB. There was a significant decline in proteinuria (3.3 +/- 1.2 g/day in the CCB-treated period vs. 2.1 +/- 1.0 g/day in the ARB/D/CCB-treated period, n = 12, p = 0.0143). Furthermore, a significant improvement in the slope of reciprocal serum creatinine concentration(1/Cr) was found in response to triple therapy(1/Cr: -0.0118 +/- 0.0009 in the CCB-treated vs. -0.0035 +/- 0.0028(I/mg/dl/month) in the ARB/D/CCB-treated period, n = 12, p < 0.001). There was neither a worsening of anemia nor an increase in the serum potassium(K) concentration. 2) In the double therapy, blood pressure was reduced by 12 mmHg in systole(p = 0.0079, n = 11) and 6 mmHg in diastole(n = 11, p = 0.0037) compared to the monotherapy with ACE-I. A significant improvement in the slope of 1/Cr was found in the double therapy(1/Cr: -0.0095 +/- 0.0052 in the ACE-I treated period vs. -0.0029 +/- 0.0028(I/mg/dl/month) in the ARB/ACE-I, n = 11, p < 0.001). In addition, there was a substantial reduction in hematocrit and increase in serum K concentration. The present result suggests that triple therapy consisting of ARB/D/CCB is as efficacious as double therapy with ARB/ACE-I in protecting the kidney from the progression in patients with diabetic overt nephropathy. The former may be expected to have less adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:[Renoprotective effect of triple therapy with low-dose angiotensin receptor blocker, low-dose diuretic and Ca-antagonist in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy]. 1280 73

Even well-conducted randomized controlled trials can only reduce uncertainty, not eliminate it. The trials presented in this article all have gaps, and like many studies, some raise more questions than answers. A summary of the current trials, however, can be presented as follows. For patients with essential hypertension who are at high risk for cardiovascular disease, the use of diuretic therapy (excluding simultaneous use of ACE or CCB) resulted in outcomes at least equivalent to the use of either ACE or CCB without diuretics. Naturally, the dilemma for clinicians is that these drugs are most often used in combination with thiazide diuretics, as indicated by the RENAAL trial where 80% of ARB were used with diuretics in patients with type II diabetes and known nephropathy. The increased risk of heart failure observed with ACE and CCB in that trial may be relevant only to patients in whom diuretics were not also used. The study does raise important awareness, however, that ACE or CCB use without diuretic therapy is no better than diuretic therapy, and may be associated with higher risk of certain outcomes. A substantial number of patients with essential hypertension might achieve adequate blood pressure control with diuretic monotherapy. If so, that certainly has important implications for the cost of medical care in this country. For African Americans with essential hypertension, ACE may have advantages as a component of therapy in comparison with CCBs or beta-blockers, although diuretics should probably be the cornerstone of therapy for them and supported by the Seventh Joint National Committee. For patients with proteinuric renal disease, whether associated with diabetes or hypertension, it should be considered inappropriate to use DHP CCB as monotherapy in any setting, whether as part of a clinical trial or in clinical practice. These drugs should not be considered as ethical placebo arms in trials, most especially in diabetic nephropathy, nor should they be used without an ACE or ARB in patients with proteinuric renal disease in the absence of documented contraindications or intolerance to ACE, ARB, or non-DHP CCB (which are now considered second-line agents for proteinuric renal disease, and are acceptable placebo or comparison arms in clinical trials). For patients with type I diabetes, ACE remain the cornerstone of therapy. Because of recent RENAAL and IDNT trial results, the greatest benefit for slowing progression of renal disease in type II diabetic nephropathy now belongs to ARBs. In contrast, however, the HOPE trial showed that ACE, specifically ramipril, had the greatest evidence for prevention of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with renal insufficiency, regardless of diabetic status. Cardiovascular outcomes were secondary end points in the RENAAL and IDNT trials, and with the exception of heart failure for losartan, no benefits on cardiovascular outcomes were statistically significant. Progression of renal disease has only been studied in a relatively small cohort of Israeli patients comparing enalapril with nifedipine. These gaps lead to a classic dilemma in medical decision-making. Because evidence has shown that patients with elevated serum creatinine (greater than or equal to 1.4 mg/dL) are just as likely to die from cardiovascular disease as they are to reach end-stage renal disease, which outcome should be the focus for clinicians, or for researchers? Using a strictly evidence-based approach, this question can only be answered by yet another large, long, randomized, controlled trial. Given the similarity of actions between the ARB and ACE, it is likely there is considerable overlap of both benefits and side-effects between the two, although ARB may have a lower incidence of cough and hyperkalemia. The decision of which antihypertensive agents to use will have to be tailored carefully to the needs of the patient and careful consideration of both medical and economic factors. Regardless of the choice between an ACE or ARB, however, post hoc analysis of clinical trials [21,47] and observational data clearly indicate that patients with chronic kidney disease, even if considered mild (ie, serum creatinine greater than or equal to 1.4 mg/dL) are at significantly greater risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared with those with better kidney function. As stated in a recent review by the authors of the HOPE trial [50], "the frequent practice of withholding ACE [or ARB] in patients with mild renal insufficiency is unwarranted," because not only are these patients precisely those who might benefit most from their use, but safety and tolerability are generally excellent. Based on the results of the AASK trial, the authors add the same for the use of ACE inhibitors in African Americans.
 ...
PMID:What have we learned from the current trials? 1487 Oct 59

Diabetic nephropathy affects both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients with a frequency of 20-30%. The first sign is microalbuminuria within a range of 30-300 mg/24h, frequently evolving towards frank proteinuria and renal failure. Tight glucose control, control of arterial hypertension with the use of ACEi or ARB can retard progression. Once renal failure is established, kidney transplantation can be considered for type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Quality of life and survival are improved with this procedure. In type 1 diabetes, simultaneous grafting of a kidney and pancreas considerably improves quality of life and diabetic complications. Surgical and infectious complications are sporadic drawbacks of this procedure. Pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) remains controversial, since a retrospective study in 2003 by Venstrom concluded that survival for PTA patients is worse than for comparable patients remaining on the waiting list. PTA can be considered for type 1 diabetic patients without advanced renal failure with severe and frequent metabolic instability (hypoglycaemia, ketoacidosis). Islet transplantation is still an experimental but promising procedure in highly selected patients, avoiding major abdominal surgery.
 ...
PMID:Transplantation as a therapeutic option for diabetic nephropathy. 1546 8

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers; ARBs) and thiazide diuretics have an accepted place in the management of hypertension. Most patients require combination therapy with two or more drugs to adequately control blood pressure to targets recommended by European and international guidelines. ARBs and the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide have complementary modes of action. Fixed-dose combinations of an ARB and low-dose hydrochlorothiazide provide a convenient and effective treatment option for patients who do not achieve blood pressure targets on monotherapy, without compromising the placebo-like tolerability of ARBs. In Europe, fixed-dose combinations with hydrochlorothiazide currently are available for the ARBs candesartan, eprosartan, irbesartan, losartan, telmisartan, and valsartan. Recently, a number of studies have focused on the use of ARBs in monotherapy and in combination therapy, in conditions including congestive heart failure, post-myocardial infarction management, hypertension with cardiovascular risk factors, and diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy. Evidence from these studies suggests a beneficial role beyond the antihypertensive effect of these therapies in providing protection against cardiovascular, renovascular, and cerebrovascular events.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin II receptor antagonists alone and combined with hydrochlorothiazide: potential benefits beyond the antihypertensive effect. 1590 Dec 5

Despite the beneficial effects of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in diabetic nephropathy (DN), albuminuria and progression of renal disease are not completely halted by these agents. Therefore, it is necessary to explore potential antiproteinuric and renoprotective effects of innovative therapeutic approaches. This study tested the hypothesis that the combination of pentoxifylline (PTF) with angiotensin II receptor blockers in normotensive patients with type 2 diabetes produces an additive antiproteinuric effect. Sixty-one patients with DN and residual albuminuria despite treatment with the recommended doses of ARB for >1 yr were randomly assigned to receive the addition of 1200 mg of PTF daily (n = 30) or to a control group (n = 31). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, and correlation analysis showed a significant association between urinary albumin excretion (UAE) and urinary TNF-alpha (R = 0.53, P < 0.001). After 4 mo, albuminuria showed a significant decrease in patients who received PTF, from 900 mg/24 h (466 to 1542 mg/d) to 791 mg/24 h (309 to 1400 mg/d; P < 0.001), whereas no significant changes were observed in the control group: 920 mg/24 h (450 to 1489 mg/d) at baseline, and 900 mg/24 h (428 to 1800 mg/d) at the end of the study. The mean percentage variation of UAE in the treatment and control groups was -16.7 and 5.5%, respectively (between-group comparison, P < 0.001). This additive antiproteinuric effect was not dependent on changes in BP or metabolic control. However, both serum and urinary levels of TNF-alpha also decreased in patients who received PTF, from 6.4 pg/ml (2.1 to 9.7) and 16 pg/mg (8 to 29) at baseline to 4.6 pg/ml (0.4 to 9) and 14.2 pg/mg (3 to 26) at the end of the study, respectively (P < 0.01), without significant variations in control patients. Moreover, regression analysis at the end of the study showed a correlation between the change in UAE and the change in urinary TNF-alpha in patients who were treated with PTF (R = 0.49, P < 0.001). In conclusion, administration of PTF to patients who have type 2 diabetes and are under long-term treatment with an ARB produces a significant additive antiproteinuric effect associated with a reduction of urinary TNF-alpha excretion.
 ...
PMID:Additive antiproteinuric effect of pentoxifylline in patients with type 2 diabetes under angiotensin II receptor blockade: a short-term, randomized, controlled trial. 1591 36

Blood pressure and genetic factors are important factors for diabetic nephropathy. We investigated the relationship between the efficacy of renin angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genotypes. Patients with type 2 diabetes without proteinuria, were treated with RAS inhibitors, the first being an ACE inhibitor (ACEI) and the second, an angiotensin II (ATII) receptor blocker (ARB) for 8 weeks each. There was no significant difference (except serum ACE activity) between the two treatments. However, by analysis segregated with ACE gene polymorphism, ARB significantly decreased transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta) compared to ACEI in patients with the I/I genotype but not in patients with the D/I+D/D genotype. DeltaATII and DeltaTGF-beta have a negative correlation with the I/I genotype and a positive correlation with the D/I+D/D genotypes. These correlation coefficients are significantly different. We suggest that in I/I patients, TGF-beta was reduced by ARB via effects on (ATII) type 2 receptors (AT2). In our experiments, the effect of ARB on TGF-beta reduction was only detected by segregation of ACE genotypes. This indicates that the selection of medicine in light of a patient's genotype is important in treating diabetic nephropathy.
 ...
PMID:Differential effects of RAS inhibitors associated with ACE gene polymorphisms in type 2 diabetic nephropathy. 1629 Jan 23

We tested the hypothesis that blockade of angiotensin II type 1 receptors reduces oxidative stress markers in parallel with urinary albumin and type IV collagen excretions. Sixty-six diabetic patients with nephropathy were randomly assigned to either the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB; n=33) or trichlormethiazide (n=33) group. The majority of patients had been treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or calcium channel blockers for > or =1 year before the present study. Reduction of blood pressure was not different between the 2 groups, and HbA1c levels did not change over the study period (8 weeks). Treatment with ARB (candesartan 8 mg/day, n=11 or valsartan 80 mg/day, n=22) for 8 weeks reduced the levels of plasma monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, interleukin 6, urinary 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, albumin, and type IV collagen, whereas the levels of these markers were not altered with trichlormethiazide (2 mg/day). Significant correlation was observed between the reduction of the urinary 8-epi- prostaglandin F2alpha and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine and those of the urinary albumin and type IV collagen. Subjects with large oxidative stress had large reduction rates because of ARB administration and showed large urinary albumin suppression. These results suggest that ARBs reduce oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetic patients independent of their effects on blood pressure. In addition, increases in oxidative stress caused by angiotensin II may play an important role in the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Our results may help to explain the clinical observation that ARB reduces urinary albumin excretion very efficiently in some patients but not in others.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers reduce urinary oxidative stress markers in hypertensive diabetic nephropathy. 1650 7

Diabetic nephropathy occurs in 20-40% of diabetic patients, making it one of the most important causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It has a large impact in terms of associated morbidity and mortality for the individual patient and in terms of costs for healthcare. Several studies have demonstrated that micro- and macroalbuminuria predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus.Current nephroprotective therapies for diabetic nephropathy include the pursuit of normoglycemia and normotension, and a consensus is emerging that there is a necessity to also achieve as low a level of albuminuria as possible. However, the search for innovative and ancillary approaches to the prevention and treatment of this diabetic complication is warranted since strict metabolic control can be difficult, and sometimes dangerous, to achieve and even diabetic patients responding to ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers; ARBs) and metabolic control show progressive renal damage and eventually ESRD. A number of drugs are currently being investigated; glycosaminoglycans are particularly interesting since, in theory, they target the generalized endothelial dysfunction and metabolic defect in matrix and basement membrane synthesis which, according to the Steno hypothesis, are responsible for diabetic nephropathy and macroangiopathy.Treatment with glycosaminoglycans, and with sulodexide in particular, significantly improves albuminuria in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients with micro- or macroalbuminuria. The albuminuria-lowering effect of sulodexide enhances the effect of ACEI/ARB therapy. Most studies have shown that the effect of sulodexide on albuminuria is sustained, strongly suggesting that favorable chemical and anatomic remodeling is induced by exogenous glycosaminoglycans in renal tisues, as observed in the experimental model.
 ...
PMID:The role of glycosaminoglycans and sulodexide in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. 1687

Diabetic nephropathy is a major cause of end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Many factors such as genetic and non-genetic promoters, hypertension, hyperglycemia, accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), dyslipidemia, albuminuria and proteinuria influence the progression of this disease. It is important to determine pathogenesis and treatment of this disease. However, it is difficult to investigate since human diabetes is a heterogeneous and multifactorial disease. Therefore, most of these mechanisms have been investigated in animal experiments. KK/Ta mice have a clearly different genetic background in terms of body weight, blood glucose, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), urinary albumin excretion and serum triglyceride than BALB/c mice. Renal lesions of KK/Ta mice closely resemble those in human early diabetic nephropathy. Thus, the KK/Ta mouse may serve as a suitable model for the study of type 2 diabetes and early diabetic nephropathy in humans. We reviewed genetic susceptibility using genome-wide linkage analysis and differential display polymerase chain reaction (DD-PCR) or Northern blot analysis, and treatment of diabetic nephropathy using angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers (ARB) or thiazolidinediones (TZDs) in KK/Ta mice.
 ...
PMID:Pathogenesis and treatment of type 2 diabetic nephropathy: lessons from the spontaneous KK/Ta mouse model. 1822 Jun 4


1 2 3 Next >>