Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011881 (diabetic nephropathy)
 10,836 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Occupational pollutants may have a role in development of chronic renal failure (CRF). Most epidemiological studies have been cross-sectional, limited to certain renal diagnoses, or concentrated on early transient renal effects. In a case-control study, we examined the association between CRF and occupational exposure. Occupational histories of 272 men and women with CRF (of all types) were compared with those of 272 controls matched for age, sex, and region of residence. Exposures were assessed and degree and frequency were scored independently by three industrial hygienists unaware of case/control status. Significantly increased risks of CRF were found for exposure to lead (odds ratio 2.11 [95% CI 1.23-4.36]), copper (2.54 [1.16-5.53]), chromium (2.77 [1.21-6.33]), tin (3.72 [1.22-11.3]), mercury (5.13 [1.02-25.7]), welding fumes (2.06 [1.05-4.04]), silicon-containing compounds (2.51 [1.37-4.60]), grain dust (2.96 [1.24-7.04]), and oxygenated hydrocarbons (5.45 [1.84-16.2]). The frequencies of various occupational exposures were high among patients with diabetic nephropathy. This epidemiological study confirms previously identified risk factors and suggests that additional occupational exposures, for which there is some other experimental evidence, may be important in the development of CRF. The role of grain dust and the association between occupational exposure and diabetic nephropathy merit further investigation.
 ...
PMID:New occupational risk factors for chronic renal failure. 760 80

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is currently proposed for measuring blood pressure in type I, insulin-dependent diabetic subjects with incipient diabetic nephropathy. However, the value of this method, in comparison with conventional ones in detecting blood pressure differences between normotensive type I, insulin-dependent diabetic subjects with or without microalbuminuria, is questionable. We obtained systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures (SBP/DBP/MBP) in 10 hospitalized normotensive type I, insulin-dependent diabetic subjects with microalbuminuria, and in 29 others without, using a mercury sphygmomanometer (method 1) and an automatic device (Dinamap; method 2) to obtain morning (9 to 11 AM) measurements, and ABPM (SpaceLabs 90207; method 3) to obtain daytime (7 AM to 10 PM) and nighttime (10 PM to 7 AM) measurements. During the daytime, SBP/DBP/MBP values were higher in microalbuminuric than in normoalbuminuric patients, whatever the blood pressure measurement method used (P = .034/.061/.033, two-factor ANOVA). Analysis of 24-h ABPM also showed higher SBP/DBP/MBP in microalbuminuric than in normoalbuminuric patients (P = .022/.040/.016), and demonstrated a defect in nocturnal SBP decrease in microalbuminuric compared with normoalbuminuric patients (P = .028). Stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated nocturnal SBP as the only independent factor determining for microalbuminuria (F = 6.72). Thus ABPM, in relation to other methods, indicates above all that the most relevant blood pressure change in type I insulin-dependent diabetic subjects with microalbuminuria is a defect in nocturnal SBP decrease.
 ...
PMID:Value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with incipient diabetic nephropathy. 800 72

Antihypertensive therapy reduces the rate at which glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declines (delta GFR) in diabetic nephropathy; however, the optimal blood pressure is unknown. The quantitative relationship between treated blood pressure and delta GFR was analyzed retrospectively in 59 patients with established diabetic nephropathy and treated hypertension using weighted univariate and weighted multivariate regression. The GFR was calculated using the Cockcroft and Gault formula. More rapid GFR loss correlated most strongly with higher diastolic blood pressures (r = 0.70; P < 0.0001); for each millimeter of mercury of diastolic blood pressure, the GFR decreased by 0.69 mL/min/yr. This relationship remained present if those individuals with diastolic pressures greater than 90 mm Hg were eliminated from the study (r = 0.50; P < 0.001). The correlation for systolic blood pressure was weaker (r = 0.30; P < 0.05) and explained completely by covariance between systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The correlation for mean blood pressure (r = 0.59; P < 0.0001) fell between the correlations for diastolic and systolic blood pressures. Proteinuria, serum albumin concentration, and serum cholesterol concentration also correlated with delta GFR. In multivariate analysis, neither these indices of disease severity nor the initial GFR explained the correlation between delta GFR and diastolic blood pressure. Age, sex, race, type of diabetes, and percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin did not correlate with delta GFR.
 ...
PMID:The quantitative relationship between treated blood pressure and progression of diabetic renal disease. 825 25