UMLS:C0011881 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0011881 (diabetic nephropathy)
10,836 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease in the United States. The majority of these cases are attributed to those with type 2 diabetes. Elevated blood pressure, proteinuria, and increased activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) play a major role in the development and progression of chronic kidney disease attributed to diabetes mellitus. Moreover, drugs that inhibit angiotensin II synthesis or block the angiotensin II type I receptor lower blood pressure, reduce proteinuria, and improve outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease caused by diabetes. This article highlights improvements in the current management of diabetic nephropathy afforded by agents that inhibit the RAAS, discusses their limitations, and considers novel strategies to prevent onset and progression of diabetic nephropathy. Current opinions concerning combination drug therapy with agents that block the RAAS at multiple sites, as well as combining calcium channel blockers with either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists, are also discussed.
...
PMID:Appropriate drug therapy for improving outcomes in diabetic nephropathy. 1264 62

Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease in western or westernised countries and the largest contributor to the total cost of diabetes care around the world. In addition to the development of diabetic nephropathy and end-stage renal failure, diabetic patients with evidence of albuminuria have a much higher risk of developing myocardial infarctions, cerebrovascular accidents, severe progressive retinopathy, and peripheral and autonomic neuropathy. A cumulative incidence of diabetic nephropathy has been documented after duration of diabetes of at least 25 years in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, although more recent studies have demonstrated a substantial reduction of its incidence. Before the onset of overt proteinuria, there are several renal functional changes, including renal hyperfiltration, hyperperfusion, and increasing capillary permeability to macromolecules. Basement-membrane thickening and mesangial expansion have long been recognized as pathological hallmark of diabetic nephropathy. It has been postulated that diabetic nephropathy occurs as a result of the interplay of metabolic and haemodynamic factors in the renal microcirculation. Hyperglycaemia plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of diabetic renal disease, but genetic factors are also of crucial importance. The accumulation of advanced glycosilation end products (AGEPs), the activation of isoforms of protein kinase C (PKC) and the acceleration of the aldose reductase pathway may explain how hyperglycaemia damages vessels. Growth factors (i.e. TGF-b, IGF-1, VEGF) may also play an important role in the pathogenesis. There is a familial clustering of diabetic kidney disease: a number of gene loci have been investigated to try to explain the genetic susceptibility to this complication. The two main treatment strategies for prevention of diabetic nephropathy are improved glycaemic control and blood pressure lowering, particularly using drugs such angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Many potential treatment modalities in preventing and treating diabetic nephropathy are presently being evaluated; some of them will possibly be available in the near future in order to try to modify the natural course of kidney involvement and disease in patients with diabetes.
...
PMID:Kidney involvement and disease in patients with diabetes. 1268 18

Diabetic nephropathy is the most common cause of end-stage renal failure in the Western world. It accounts for 15-25% of all renal failure in patients requiring chronic dialysis. About 20% of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes and less than 15% of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes develop clinically significant nephropathy. The prevalence of diabetic nephropathy in pregnant patients with insulin-dependent diabetes is estimated to be 6%. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are the drug of choice in treating women with diabetic nephropathy. In addition, many of these drugs may be started before conception. Unfortunately, these agents might be fetotoxic when taken during pregnancy. This article reviews the epidemiology and natural history of diabetic nephropathy, discusses the renoprotective effect of ACE inhibitors, reviews the effect of ACE inhibitors on fetomaternal outcome when used prior to and during pregnancy in women with diabetic nephropathy and discusses the new class of drugs, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, in the management of diabetics who have or are prone to developing diabetic nephropathy.
...
PMID:Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with diabetic nephropathy. 1268 51

Renal disease in older diabetic patients is costly in terms of morbidity, mortality and expenditure. Therefore, prevention and treatment of diabetic nephropathy has become a prominent goal in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus. Preventive treatment should begin no later than at the stage of microalbuminuria, and regular screening for microalbuminuria is recommended for all patients with diabetes, irrespective of age. Improved metabolic control has been demonstrated to lower urinary albumin excretion. Target glycosylated haemoglobin levels should be below 7%, or 1% above the upper limit of normal of non-diabetic subjects. The use of an intensified treatment regimen is recommended. Insulin therapy has no adverse effects on renal indexes. To preserve renal function in older diabetic patients, blood pressure should be kept at or below 130/80 mm Hg. Treatment with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists (angiotensin II receptor blockers; ARBs) is superior to other pharmacological therapy, and should be initiated as first-line treatment. Most of the calcium channel antagonists have been found to increase or to have no effect on microalbuminuria despite blood pressure reduction. Moreover, there is substantial controversy as to whether they may be associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity. Non-dihydropyridine derivatives and calcium channel antagonists, such as nitrendipine, may be nephroprotective and have favourable effects on patients outcomes. A renoprotective action of diuretics may be confined to indapamide. Although beta-adrenoreceptor blockers are effective antihypertensive agents, they may not adequately preserve kidney function in older diabetic patients. However, as add-on treatment to ACE inhibitors or ARBs, they are particularly beneficial in nephropathic patients at risk of cardiovascular disease or with arrhythmias, in whom they may prove life-saving.
...
PMID:Prevention and treatment of diabetic nephropathy in older patients. 1271 Aug 62

In recent years, new drug development and late-breaking research data have put treatment guidelines for diabetic nephropathy in a state of flux. In particular, trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), coupled with enhanced understanding of the renin-angiotensin pathway, have influenced recommendations for patient care. Here, Dr Bakris highlights both the steadfast features and the recent refinements of treatment guidelines for diabetic nephropathy. He describes their backing in research findings and outlines practical antihypertensive and renoprotective therapies to curtail risks of nephropathy and cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes.
...
PMID:The evolution of treatment guidelines for diabetic nephropathy. Strategies integrate JNC VI, more recent protocols. 1276 95

In this article, 2 leading physicians debate the strength of outcome data on the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for reducing the incidence of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renovascular events. Dr. Stephen G. Ball notes that the efficacy of ACE inhibitors for reducing the risk for myocardial infarction independent of their effects on blood pressure is controversial. In the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study, ramipril treatment in high-risk patients was associated with a 20% reduction in the risk for myocardial infarction; mean reduction in blood pressure was 3 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and 1 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure. The HOPE investigators propose that the 20% reduction was much greater than would be expected based on the observed blood pressure reduction. However, a meta-regression analysis of blood pressure reduction in >20 antihypertensive therapy outcome trials found that the reduction in myocardial infarction risk with ramipril observed in HOPE was consistent with the modest blood pressure reduction seen with that agent. Nevertheless, there are convincing data for prevention of myocardial infarction with ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure, including those with heart failure after myocardial infarction, as well as supportive evidence from studies in patients with diabetes mellitus and concomitant hypertension. On the other hand, Dr. William B. White takes the position that ARBs are well-tolerated antihypertensive agents that specifically antagonize the angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor and provide a more complete block of the pathologic effects of angiotensin II-which are mediated via the AT(1) receptor-than ACE inhibitors. The Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE) II study and the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (ValHeFT) suggest that ARBs reduce the risk for mortality in patients with congestive heart failure. The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint (LIFE) Reduction in Hypertension trial also demonstrated beneficial effects of ARBs in the prevention of stroke events. The Irbesartan in Patients with Diabetes and Microalbuminuria (IRMA) study, the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT), and the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study demonstrated significant reductions in the rate of progression of renal disease in patients receiving ARBs, independent of effects on blood pressure. These data support the use of ARBs, in addition to the standard of care, in hypertensive patients with heart failure who are intolerant of ACE inhibitors, and also provide compelling evidence for their use in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.
...
PMID:Debate: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin II receptor blockers--a gap in evidence-based medicine. 1451 6

Blood pressure reduction and intensive antihypertensive treatment are effective in reducing both microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes. Blood pressure target levels < 130/85 or 130/80 mmHg are now recommended. Antagonism of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system seems to be an important goal in the treatment of hypertension and diabetes-related complications. The renoprotective role of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors has been well documented in type 1 diabetes; in type 2 diabetes ACE-inhibitors have been deemed more effective than other traditional drugs in reducing the onset of overt nephropathy in microalbuminuric patients (secondary prevention) but not in reducing renal dysfunction in patients with clinical proteinuria (tertiary prevention). Recently, four large trials performed on type 2 diabetes showed that angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) prevent the development of clinical proteinuria in microalbuminuric patients (IRMA and MARVAL studies) and delay the progression of nephropathy towards end-stage renal failure in patients with overt nephropathy (IDNT and RENAAL studies). Moreover, ARBs have been deemed more effective in reducing hospitalizations for heart failure compared to placebo (IDNT and RENAAL studies) and in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared to conventional therapy (LIFE study) in type 2 diabetes. In conclusion, ARBs are effective in preventing and delaying renal damage in type 2 diabetes. Thus, the recent guidelines for the prevention and treatment of diabetic nephropathy state that ACE-inhibitors are the first-choice drugs in type 1 diabetes while ARBs are considered as the first-choice drugs in secondary prevention, the same as ACE-inhibitors, and are the unique first-choice drug in tertiary prevention of end-stage renal failure in type 2 diabetes. Finally, ACE-inhibitors and ARBs are both first-choice drugs in cardiovascular prevention in type 2 diabetes.
...
PMID:[The role of angiotensin II AT1-receptor antagonists in renal and cardiac protection in type-2 diabetes mellitus]. 1278 55

The increased activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is an important pathogenetic factor in the development of nephropathy in diabetic patients. The damaging factor of this system is the end-product, angiotensin II, and the damaging effects are vasoconstriction, increase of aldosterone secretion, growth, fibrosis, thrombosis, inflammation and oxidation. Theoretically, on this basis, blockade of the RAAS should have a beneficial effect on the development of diabetic nephropathy. The main goal in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy is control of the glycaemic status and aggressive antihypertensive therapy, primarily with RAAS-blocking agents. It was demonstrated recently that angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have a slowing effect on the progression of diabetic nephropathy (RENAAL and IDNT trials) or on the development of proteinuria (IRMA) in type 2 diabetes. These effects are specific and independent of the decrease in blood pressure. Theoretically, the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and an ARB can lead to a more complete blockade of the RAAS. A new study (ONTARGET) has now started to investigate whether treatment with a combination of an ACEI and an ARB has a more potent beneficial effect on the cardiovascular events and the nephropathy in type 2 diabetic patients as compared with separate treatment with the two agents.
...
PMID:Treatment of diabetic nephropathy with angiotensin II blockers. 1281 61

In previous studies, the synergistic antiproteinuric effect of the combination therapy of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ATRAs) has been inconsistent in relation to underlying renal diseases. The influence from the blood pressure (BP) - reducing effect in some studies might also contribute to this inconclusiveness. To examine the possibility of the benefit being different according to underlying renal diseases, we undertook a crossover therapeutic trial of the combination therapy in two selected homogenous groups of patients with diabetic and non-diabetic renal diseases. The BP-reducing effect was excluded during the study. Nineteen biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy, as examples of non-diabetic renal diseases, and 24 type 2 diabetic nephropathy patients were selected as the study subjects. The subjects had to meet the follow criteria: a creatinine clearance (Ccr) between 25 - 90 ml/min/1.73 m2, 24-hr urinary protein excretion rate over 1.0 g/day and a BP maintained at less than 130/80 mmHg, with more than six-month therapy of ramipril, (5.7 +/- 0.4 mg/day, 13 +/- 2 month). The baseline data between the two groups showed no significantly differences. After a 12-week stabilization period (control period), 4 mg, once daily, dose of candesartan (combination period) followed by a placebo (placebo period), or vice versa, were administered in addition to the ramipril, for 12 weeks. The combination, with candesartan, did not change the Ccr, BP, serum and urinary electrolytes or the urea. The 24 hour urinary protein excretion rate was significantly reduced by the combination therapy in the patients with IgA nephropathy (3.1 +/- 0.3 g/day in combination, 4.2 +/- 0.3 in control, and 4.3 +/- 0.2 in placebo; p < 0.05). However, the patients with diabetic nephropathy showed no reduction in their proteinuria with the combination therapy (3.8 +/- 0.2 g/day in combination, 3.9 +/- 0.3 in control, and 4.1 +/- 0.3 in placebo; p=NS). The changes in proteinuria showed no relationship with the changes in the BP in IgA nephropathy. In conclusions, the benefit of combination therapy of its antiproteinuric effect was different between IgA and diabetic nephropathy over the 12-week trial. The difference in the pathophysiological role, and the importance of the renin- angiotensin system, between the two diseases might contribute to the discrepancy in the result. We suggest the discrimination of the underlying renal diseases in the study subjects is an important prerequisite for future studies on this issue.
...
PMID:Additive antiproteinuric effect of combination therapy with ACE inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor antagonist: differential short-term response between IgA nephropathy and diabetic nephropathy. 1283 84

Outcome studies in diabetic nephropathy have focused on strategies to prevent progression of diabetic nephropathy, the leading cause of ESRD in the United States. Once diabetics develop overt nephropathy, prognosis is poor. Risk factors for diabetic nephropathy are discussed, and include hyperglycemia, hypertension, angiotensin II, proteinuria, dyslipidemia, smoking, and anemia. Major outcomes as well as outcome studies in diabetic nephropathy for patients with microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria are reviewed. Furthermore, the role of therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists as well as selected combination therapy are discussed. Recommendations for therapy with ace inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers are made based on this evidence.
...
PMID:Outcome studies in diabetic nephropathy. 1283 94

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>