Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011881 (diabetic nephropathy)
 10,836 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Diabetic nephropathy is one of the major causes of end-stage renal disease and is often associated with other macrovascular complications such as ischemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disease. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (AIIR) have both been shown to have a protective effect on the progression of diabetic nephropathy and have thus become the first choice for treatment of hypertension and/or renal involvement in patients with diabetes. However, most of these patients, especially those with type 2 diabetes, require two of more medications in order to reduce their blood pressure to the levels, which have been proposed in recently published consensus papers. These target blood pressure levels are 130/80 mm Hg in diabetic subjects with proteinuria of up to 1 g/day and 125/75 mm Hg in those with proteinuria in excess of 1 g/day. Combinations of different medications may have a synergistic effect. Some of the early studies using a combination of either a nondihydropyridine or a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker with ACE-I demonstrated a synergistic effect on proteinuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy. However, these studies have not been substantiated, but calcium channel blockers, with their proven ability to reduce blood pressure, play an important role in the treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypertension. The combination of ACE-I with AIIR may have several theoretical advantages. Many studies using this combination have been performed in animal models of diabetes and in patients with diabetic and nondiabetic renal disease. Some of these studies have demonstrated a synergistic effect of the combination on proteinuria or hypertension, but the results have not been consistent in all studies. It may be concluded that, until additional studies provide more convincing evidence, this combination could be used in patients whose proteinuria or hypertension has not responded to either one of the agents as monotherapy or to a combination of other medications.
 ...
PMID:Combination antihypertensive therapy in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. 1216 70

Imidapril hydrochloride (imidapril) is a long-acting, non-sulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, which has been used clinically in the treatment of hypertension, chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and diabetic nephropathy. It has the unique advantage over other ACE inhibitors in causing a lower incidence of dry cough. After oral administration, imidapril is rapidly converted in the liver to its active metabolite imidaprilat. The plasma levels of imidaprilat gradually increase in proportion to the dose, and decline slowly. The time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) is 2.0 h for imidapril and 9.3 h for imidaprilat. The elimination half-lives (t(1/2)) of imidapril and imidaprilat is 1.7 and 14.8 h, respectively. Imidapril and its metabolites are excreted chiefly in the urine. As an ACE inhibitor, imidaprilat is as potent as enalaprilat, an active metabolite of enalapril, and about twice as potent as captopril. In patients with hypertension, blood pressure was still decreased at 24 h after imidapril administration. The antihypertensive effect of imidapril was dose-dependent. The maximal reduction of blood pressure and plasma ACE was achieved with imidapril, 10 mg once daily, and the additional effect was not prominent with higher doses. When administered to patients with AMI, imidapril improved left ventricular ejection fraction and reduced plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. In patients with mild-to-moderate CHF [New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II-III], imidapril increased exercise time and physical working capacity and decreased plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and BNP levels in a dose-related manner. In patients with diabetic nephropathy, imidapril decreased urinary albumin excretion. Interestingly, imidapril improved asymptomatic dysphagia in patients with a history of stroke. In the same patients it increased serum substance P levels, while the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan was ineffective. These studies indicate that imidapril is a versatile ACE inhibitor. In addition to its effectiveness in the treatment of hypertension, CHF, and AMI, imidapril has beneficial effects in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy and asymptomatic dysphagia. Good tissue penetration and inhibition of tissue ACE by imidapril contributes to its effectiveness in preventing cardiovascular complications of hypertension. The major advantages of imidapril are its activity in the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases and lower incidence of cough compared with some of the older ACE inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:Protection of the cardiovascular system by imidapril, a versatile angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. 1217 88

A cumulative incidence of diabetic nephropathy of 25% to 40% has been documented after duration of diabetes of at least 25 years in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetic nephropathy has become the leading cause (25%-44%) of end-stage renal failure in Europe, the United States, and Japan. Until the early 1980s, no renoprotective treatment was available for use in diabetic nephropathy. Death occurred on average 5 to 7 years after the onset of persistent proteinuria. The two main treatment strategies for prevention of diabetic nephropathy are improved glycemic control and blood pressure lowering, particularly using drugs blocking the renin-angiotensin system. Megatrials and meta-analyses have clearly demonstrated the beneficial effect of both the above-mentioned treatment modalities. Secondary prevention, that is, treatment modalities applied to diabetic patients at high risk for developing diabetic nephropathy (eg, those with microalbuminuria) has been documented, applying angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockade. The renoprotective effects of these drugs are independent of their beneficial reduction in blood pressure.
 ...
PMID:Microalbuminuria in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: evidence with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for treating early and preventing clinical nephropathy. 1221 58

Several treatment guidelines have made strong recommendations to physicians that treatment of nephropathy and hypertension should be based on the use of a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor if tolerated. The recently published clinical trials, based on angiotensin II receptor blockers' effects on diabetic nephropathy and essential hypertension, have also shown significant endpoint reduction. Perhaps the time has come to broaden the recommendations to include the use of a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system altering drug. But what if the treatment goal cannot be reached, and incessant proteinuria and high blood pressure levels persist despite high dosage treatment of either drug? How should this be handled? The dual blockade principle can possibly provide the solution by obtaining the broadest and most efficient blockade of circulating angiotensin II by using the combination of an ACE inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor blocker. But large clinical trials are yet to come, and at present large endpoint trials have not been published. This article provides an overview of how far we have come with dual blockade treatment in hypertension and nephropathy.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers: evidence for and against the combination in the treatment of hypertension and proteinuria. 1221 59

Diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States, accounting for about 50% of all new cases. Although we previously established the renoprotective benefits of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with coexisting hypertension and type 1 diabetes, evidence of the renoprotective effect of ACE inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes is less clear. We conducted the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) to determine whether the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) irbesartan slows the progression of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes independently of its blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect. In this randomized, controlled trial, we found that irbesartan was associated with a 20% reduction in the risk for the primary composite end point (doubling of the baseline serum creatinine concentration, development of end-stage renal disease, or death from any cause) compared with placebo (P =.02) and a 23% reduction compared with amlodipine therapy (P =.006). These results were not explained by differences in the BP that was achieved. In a separate study, losartan was shown to reduce the risk for progression of renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy has also been demonstrated to slow the progression to overt nephropathy when initiated early in the course of type 2 diabetic renal disease (ie, in patients with microalbuminuria). Based on these studies, ARBs are clearly effective in protecting against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. This protection is independent of their BP-lowering effect. Preclinical studies with the newest ARB, olmesartan medoxomil, suggest that this agent may provide renoprotective benefits as well.
 ...
PMID:The role of angiotensin II receptor blockers in preventing the progression of renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. 1238 93

Several recent randomized trials and clinical studies demonstrated that as well as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors angiotensin II receptor blockers(ARB) exerted renoprotective effect on diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy. This renoprotective effect appears to be independent of the reduction of blood pressure, and be derived mainly from the suppression of renal renin-angiotensin system. Several mechanisms have been proposed regarding this renoprotective effect of ARB; e.g. hemodynamic effect in the intraglomerular pressure, reduction of proteinuria, decrease of collagen formation. Further investigation is required to clarify the precise mechanism.
 ...
PMID:[Renoprotective effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker--does blood pressure play a pivotal role?]. 1239 98

Experimental studies have demonstrated that proteins filtered by the glomerulus induce a proliferation of proximal tubular cells accompanied by an increased synthesis of many vasoactive and proinflammatory substances. The appearance of interstitial cellular infiltrates, a well-known finding in proteinuric diseases, precedes progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Activation of the transcription factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) plays a pivotal role in the renal damage induced by proteinuria. In this scenario, any therapeutic intervention that reduces proteinuria should be beneficial for the kidney. Drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system [angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARA)] have repeatedly shown striking antiproteinuric and renoprotective properties, both in experimental and clinical studies. Studies in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetic nephropathy as well as in non-diabetic nephropathies have confirmed that the renoprotection obtained with ACEI/ARA is closely related with their antiproteinuric effect and is largely independent of blood pressure changes. However, resistance to the antiproteinuric effect of ACEI/ARA is a common clinical observation. Several therapeutic measures (that is, adequate blood pressure control, early introduction of ACEI/ARA, dietary protein restriction, low salt diets, weight loss in overweight patients, addition of a diuretic, increasing ACEI/ARA dose titrated against proteinuria levels, combined therapy ACEI plus ARA, addition of drugs with antiproteinuric effect such as non-dihydropiridine calcium channel blockers or NSAIDs) may increase the proteinuria reduction induced by ACEI and ARA.
 ...
PMID:Renal damage associated with proteinuria. 1241 Aug 54

Aggressive treatment of hypertension is effective in reducing both microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes, and target BP less than 130/85 or 130/80 mmHg are now recommended. Inhibition of renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) plays an essential role in the treatment of hypertension and diabetes-related complications. Studies focusing on renal end-points suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) are more effective than other traditional agents in reducing the onset of clinical proteinuria in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients with incipient nephropathy, mainly in normotensive ones (secondary prevention). However, several small trials in type 2 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy (tertiary prevention) failed to demonstrate a specific renoprotective role for ACE-I, at variance with type 1 diabetes. Three recent large trials address the question of whether angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) prevent the development of clinical proteinuria or delay the progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes. The IRMA study showed that irbesartan is more effective than conventional therapy in preventing the development of clinical proteinuria and in favoring the regression to normoalbuminuria for comparable BP control in patients with incipient nephropathy. The IDNT and RENAAL trials showed that ARB are more effective than traditional antihypertensive therapies in reducing progression toward end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in type 2 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy independently of changes in BP. Moreover, a reduction in hospitalizations for heart failure was demonstrated for ARB-treated patients compared with placebo. Furthermore, the LIFE study showed that losartan is more effective than conventional therapy in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a cohort of diabetic patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. In conclusion, ARB seem to be effective in both preventing renal damage and reducing progression toward ESRF in type 2 diabetic patients. Thus, the guidelines for the prevention and treatment of diabetic nephropathy are now changed. In type 1 diabetes ACE-I are the first-choice drug; in type 2 diabetes, ARB are considered first-choice drugs in secondary prevention as well as ACE-I and have been now elected the unique first-choice drug in tertiary prevention of ESRF. Finally, ARB should be considered as the first-choice drug in cardiovascular prevention too, as well as ACE-I.
 ...
PMID:Renal and cardiovascular protection in type 2 diabetes mellitus: angiotensin II receptor blockers. 1246 18

The administration of angiotensin II receptor antagonist(AIIA) to patients with advanced chronic renal failure(CRF) is not actively recommended. This study was performed to verify the appropriateness of this situation and to determine if there are any substantial differences between patients with a serum creatinine(SCr) level higher than 3 mg/dl and those with a lower SCr level in terms of the clinical effects such as renal function, serum potassium level and systemic blood pressure(BP) after the administration of AIIA. Sixteen patients with advanced CRF who were admitted to the out-patient clinic in Jikei University Hospital(1998/1-1999/12) were enrolled(average age: 65 years, underlying renal disease: diabetic nephropathy 6, CGN 5, and other 1). They had never been administered AIIA before. The patients were classified into two groups in accordance with their level of SCr: group A(SCr lower than 3.0 mg/dl; n = 11), and Group B(SCr higher than 3.0 mg/dl; n = 5). Losartan(50 mg/day) administration was started in order to examine parameters such as the SCr, potassium, BP at the out-patient clinic, and urinary protein excretion at the 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 month time points. Although the 1/SCr values provided negative slopes with time in both groups, no significant difference was found between the two slopes. There were no changes in the serum potassium levels or urinary protein excretion during the study period in either group, and no statistical difference was found between the two groups. Although the serum potassium level exceeded 5.5 mEq/l in two patients each in both groups, the level was controlled by diet therapy with restricted potassium. BP was reduced significantly in both groups during the study period, and no statistical difference in BP reduction was observed between the two groups. In conclusion, the results indicate there were no differences in the effect on renal function, serum potassium levels or systemic BP between the patients with a SCr level higher than 3.0 mg/dl and those with a lower level. The results also support the notion that patients with advanced renal dysfunction are not precluded from AIIA administration.
 ...
PMID:[Effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonist (losartan) on renal function, serum potassium and blood pressure in patients with advanced renal failure: differences between patients with a serum creatinine (SCr) level higher than 3 mg/dl and those with a lower SCr level]. 1247 89

Combined antihypertensive therapy plays a crucial role in achieving targeted blood pressure reductions and renoprotection. We therefore compared the antihypertensive and antiproteinuric effects of combined therapy with either a calcium channel blocker (CCB) plus an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) or an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) plus an ARB in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by overt nephropathy and mild to moderate hypertension. After a 12-week dietary control period, diabetic patients with mildly to moderately impaired renal function were randomly assigned to either a CCB (amlodipine 5 mg once daily) or an ACE-I (temocapril 2 mg once daily) for 12 weeks (monotherapy period). Both groups then received add-on therapy with an ARB (candesartan 4 mg once daily) for an additional 12 weeks. During the monotherapy period, blood pressure was decreased equally well in both groups. Daily urinary protein excretion remained unchanged in the CCB-treated group (control period, 4.0 +/- 1.8 g/day vs. CCB period, 4.1 +/- 1.9 g/day; ns; n = 8), but decreased in the ACE-I-treated group (control period, 4.3 +/- 1.8 g/day vs. ACE-I period, 3.5 +/- 1.7 g/day; p < 0.05; n = 9). After the combined therapy period, blood pressure was decreased to the same degree in both groups. Although ARB plus CCB significantly reduced urinary protein excretion (to 3.5 +/- 1.5 g/day; p < 0.05 vs. control period; n = 8), a more profound reduction was achieved with ARB plus ACE-I (to 2.6 +/- 1.3 g/day; p < 0.01 vs. control period; n = 9). Monotherapy with the ACE-I increased the serum potassium concentration, and this elevation was sustained after addition of the ARB. In contrast, the serum potassium concentration was not influenced by monotherapy with the CCB, but was significantly increased after addition of the ARB. A decreased hematocrit was observed in the ARB plus ACE-I group. The present study suggests that combined antihypertensive therapy with either a CCB plus an ARB or an ACE-I plus an ARB exerts an antiproteinuric effect in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy with mildly impaired renal function. Although the latter combination had a more profound effect, it was associated with an increased serum potassium concentration and worsening of renal anemia. Thus, the combination of a CCB and an ARB should be the first line antihypertensive therapy in those with overt diabetic nephropathy. The long-term efficacy of these combined antihypertensive therapies will need to be further addressed in a future study.
 ...
PMID:Antiproteinuric effects of combined antihypertensive therapies in patients with overt type 2 diabetic nephropathy. 1248 8


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>