Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011881 (diabetic nephropathy)
 10,836 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The presence of immunoreactive endothelin (IR-ET) was studied by radioimmunoassay in human kidney with and without clinical renal failure, and the levels were compared with those of three natriuretic peptides: atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP). Kidney tissues were obtained at autopsy from three subjects with renal disorders (diabetic nephropathy, renal tubular necrosis, and end-stage kidney disease). Normal renal tissue was obtained at surgery from two patients with renal cell carcinoma. IR-ET was detected in three diseased kidneys obtained at autopsy (0.101 +/- 0.043 pmol/g wet weight, mean +/- SD) but not in tissues of two normal kidneys obtained at surgery (< 0.015 pmol/g wet weight). Reverse-phase HPLC showed that most of the IR-ET in the kidney (> 90%) was eluted in the position of ET-1. IR-ANP (0.23 +/- 0.06 pmol/g wet weight), IR-BNP (1.15 +/- 0.94 pmol/g wet weight), and IR-CNP (0.44 +/- 0.16 pmol/g wet weight) were detected in all samples examined. Higher concentrations of IR-BNP were found in three diseased kidneys obtained at autopsy (1.70 +/- 0.83 pmol/g wet weight vs. mean in two normal kidney tissues, 0.32 pmol/g wet weight). Such increases were not observed in IR-ANP or IR-CNP. These findings indicate that IR-ET is present in the human diseased kidney even in end-stage disease, with high concentrations comparable to those of natriuretic peptides. This raises the possibility that the production of ET-1 and BNP is increased in kidneys of patients with renal disorders.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995
PMID:Immunoreactive endothelin in the human kidney: comparison with natriuretic peptides. 858 63

Microalbuminuria is a predictor of overt diabetic nephropathy and macrovascular disease. Thirty-one diabetic patients with persistent urinary albumin excretion rate (AER) of 20-200 mu g min-1 were randomised to receive indapamide 2.5 mg or captopril 37.5 mg daily for 12 weeks. After a 4-week washout, patients received the alternate agent for 12 weeks. Resting blood pressure (BP), AER, cholesterol, triglycerides, and HbA1c were measured at baseline, after 6 and 12 weeks of each treatment, and after a 4-week washout period following each treatment arm. Results from patients who completed at least one treatment arm were analysed by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). AER (median value and interquartile range) decreased significantly from baseline after treatment with indapamide and captopril [60(27-106) vs. 40(14-112) and 33(17-100); p < 0.005], but there was no difference between the effects of the two agents. Mean systolic BP (SBP) was also significantly reduced with treatment, and no difference was noted between the effects of the two agents. No correlation between changes in AER and SBP was noted with either agent. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), cholesterol, triglycerides, and HbA1c did not change during the study. These results suggest that indapamide is an effective alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the treatment of diabetic patients with microalbuminuria.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1996 Mar
PMID:Indapamide is as effective as captopril in the control of microalbuminuria in diabetes. 890 5

An activated renal endothelin (ET) system is implicated in the pathogenesis of renal fibrosis, as recently shown in ET-1 transgenic mice. Because progressive renal fibrosis is also a major finding in diabetic nephropathy, we analyzed the activity of the renal ET system in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus and the effect of blocking the ETA receptor, using the orally active ETA antagonist LU 135252. The effects of long-term treatment with LU 135252 were compared with those of an ACE inhibitor. Plasma and urinary ET-1 concentrations were measured. Progression of diabetic nephropathy was analyzed by measuring urinary albumin and protein excretion. Urinary ET-1 excretion was significantly elevated as early as 7 days after induction of diabetes and increased further. The daily urine volume was significantly correlated with urine ET-1 excretion. Treatment with LU 135252 significantly decreased the ET-1 excretion by more than 50%, whereas ACE inhibition resulted only in a mild decrease. Albumin excretion was significantly decreased after ACE inhibition, whereas ETA inhibition resulted in a nonsignificant decrease. Urinary ET and albumin excretion probably reflect independent mechanisms of renal damage in diabetes.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1998
PMID:Renal endothelin system in diabetes: comparison of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and endothelin-A antagonism. 959 22

Increasing worldwide rates of diabetes mellitus, combined with the significant micro- and macrovascular complications that accompany the disease, point to a heightened need to develop simple, rational strategies to protect against end-organ damage, particularly diabetic nephropathy. Although simple strategies do exist, i.e., early diagnosis of microalbuminuria (MAU) followed by nephroprotective therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, the use of these techniques should be increased. This is especially true for primary care physicians, who will continue to handle the majority of diabetic patients. To combat the underuse of this dual approach, this article reviews a stepwise approach to identifying early MAU so that therapeutic measures can be undertaken before the disorder progresses to diabetic nephropathy and, consequently, to end-stage renal disease in the majority of patients. Once a diagnosis of MAU is made, a variety of trials have demonstrated that ACE inhibitor therapy should be considered the standard therapy to retard worsening albuminuria and subsequent renal disease. ACE inhibitors can retard the progression of microalbuminuria and can lower the percentage of patients who progress to end-stage renal disease and death. Significant data indicate that ACE inhibitors should be used in MAU diabetics regardless of the level of blood pressure. In particular, the ACE inhibitor fosinopril may offer advantages because of its dual route of elimination, thus simplifying dosing in renally impaired patients. The newly developed angiotensin II receptor antagonists should be considered in patients intolerant to ACE inhibitors because of the similar effect on the interruption of the renin-angiotensin system.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1998
PMID:Relationships among diabetes, microalbuminuria, and ACE inhibition. 973 36

A protective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has been shown in patients with diabetic nephropathy but has not been clearly established in nondiabetic renal disease. A multicenter European study was designed to determine whether the ACE inhibitor benazepril was safe and effective in protecting residual renal function in patients with various renal diseases and mild to moderate renal failure. The trial involved 583 patients from 49 centers in Italy, France, and Germany. The patients were randomized to receive benazepril or placebo plus other antihypertensive agents, the target being a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg. Thirty-one patients in the benazepril group and 57 patients in the placebo group reached the end point [the time elapsed from entry to (a) doubling of serum creatinine (SCr) concentrations and (b) start of renal replacement therapy; p < 0.001 at 3 years]. The associated reduction in the relative risk of reaching the end point was 53% in benazepril-treated patients, with actuarial renal survival probability significantly better at 3 years. The best survival of renal function was observed in patients with chronic glomerular diseases and proteinuria greater than 1.0 g/24 h. Benazepril is effective in slowing the rate of progression and improving the survival of renal function in patients with renal diseases of various origins. This protective effect is associated with a clinically relevant decrease in both blood pressure and proteinuria.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1999
PMID:Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and kidney protection: the AIPRI trial. The ACE Inhibition in Progressive Renal Insufficiency (AIPRI) Study Group. 1002 49

The management of hypertension and nephropathy, in both diabetes and other forms of renal disease, is usually based on blood pressure reduction through an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-based treatment regimen. With particular respect to the choice of ACE inhibitor drug, there are no definitive direct comparisons in the treatment of renal disease. In terms of blood pressure reduction, however, there is evidence that spirapril is at least as effective as the reference ACE inhibitor, enalapril. However, patients with diabetic nephropathy and/or chronic renal failure are at potential risk from drug accumulation if the preferred agent relies predominantly on glomerular filtration for its elimination. In this respect spirapril may have an advantage because it has been shown that there are no clinically relevant increases in the spirapril(at) concentrations (24 h post-dose) even in the setting of advanced renal failure (creatinine clearance <20 ml/min). Thus, there is no requirement to modify the dose and no concerns about drug accumulation or the potential for exaggerated therapeutic or adverse effects. In summary, an ACE inhibitor drug is seen as an integral component of the drug treatment regimen for patients with nephropathy. Where there is renal failure it may be prudent to administer a drug, such as spirapril, which also has alternative elimination mechanisms.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1999 Aug
PMID:ACE inhibition in chronic renal failure and in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy: focus on spirapril. 1049 62

Proliferation of mesangial cells and expansion of mesangial matrix is a hallmark of glomerular disease leading to end-stage renal failure and requiring renal replacement therapy. Independently from the type of injury, e.g. in glomerulonephritis or diabetic nephropathy, the response to injury is remarkably uniform. Chronic glomerular disease is frequently associated with increases in systemic blood pressure and altered intraglomerular hemodynamics. Furthermore, reduction of systemic blood pressure and inhibition of the vasoconstrictor peptide angiotensin II have been shown to delay end-stage renal failure in various types of human kidney disease. Since vasoconstrictors of mesangial cells and efferent glomerular arterioli, such as angiotensin II, are thought to be detrimental for the progression of chronic glomerular disease, we propose that vasodilatory factors which antagonize the effects of angiotensin II, might have beneficial effects during the course of progressive kidney disease. To support this concept we will summarize currently available data on the role of vasodilatory signaling molecules such as natriuretic peptides (ANP, BNP and CNP), nitric oxide (NO), the prostaglandines PGE2 and prostacycline, and the purine mediator adenosine in the regulation of mesangial function.
Cardiovasc Res 2001 Aug 15
PMID:Regulation of mesangial cell function by vasodilatory signaling molecules. 1147 36

SR121463 is a selective, orally active, non-peptide antagonist of vasopressin (AVP) V(2) receptors with powerful aquaretic properties in various animal species and humans. SR121463 belongs to a new class of drugs, called aquaretics, which are capable of inducing free-water excretion without affecting electrolyte balance. SR121463 displays high affinity for animal and human V(2) receptors and exhibits a remarkably selective V(2) receptor profile. SR121463 and [(3)H]SR121463 are used, therefore, as selective probes for characterization and labeling of V(2) receptors. In various functional studies in vitro, SR121463 behaves as a potent antagonist. It inhibits AVP-stimulated human renal adenylyl cyclase and dDAVP (1-desamino, 8-D arginine-vasopressin)-induced relaxation of rat aorta. SR121463 also behaves as an inverse agonist in cells expressing a constitutively activated human V(2) receptor mutant. In vitro, SR121463 rescued misfolded V(2) AVP receptor mutants by increasing cell surface expression and restoring V(2) function. In normally hydrated conscious rats, dogs and monkeys, SR121463, by either i.v. or p.o. administration, induced a dose-dependent aquaresis with no major changes in urinary Na+ and K+ excretion (unlike classical diuretics). In cirrhotic rats with ascites and impaired renal function, a 10-day treatment with SR121463 totally corrected hyponatremia and restored normal urine excretion. In a model of diabetic nephropathy in rats, SR121463 strongly reduced albumin excretion. SR121463 was also effective at extrarenal V(2) (or V(2)-like) receptors involved in vascular relaxation or clotting factor release in vitro and in vivo. In the rabbit model of ocular hypertension, SR121463 by either single or repeated instillation, decreased intraocular pressure. After acute and chronic administration to rats, dogs or healthy human volunteers, SR121463 was well absorbed and well tolerated. In all species studied the drug produced pronounced aquaresis without any agonist effect. Thus, SR121463 is a potent, orally active and selective antagonist at V(2) receptors with powerful aquaretic properties. It is a useful tool for further exploration of function of renal or extrarenal V(2) receptors. Pure V(2) receptor antagonists are likely to be therapeutically useful in several water-retaining diseases such as hyponatremia, Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone secretion (SIADH), congestive heart failure, liver cirrhosis, and other disorders possibly mediated by V(2) receptors (e.g., glaucoma).
Cardiovasc Drug Rev 2001
PMID:An overview of SR121463, a selective non-peptide vasopressin V(2) receptor antagonist. 1160 38

The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study is a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial which was recently published. It was aimed to evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The primary efficacy measure was the time to the first event of the composite end point of a doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death. The conclusion was that losartan led to significant improvement in renal outcomes, that was beyond that attributable to blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The perusal of the report raises concern, regarding to both the patient population as well as the outcome measures. At randomization, the placebo group included more patients with angina, myocardial infarction and lipid disorders than the losartan group. Information on glucose metabolism was disregarded, and data on antihyperglycemic therapy--which may have undesirable influences on cardiac performance--were not included in a multivariate analysis. In addition, only data on first hospitalization were reported, whilst information on total specific-cause hospitalizations was disregarded, thus potentially masking further unfavorable events. Furthermore, creatinine seems not to be a reliable surrogate end point. Based on its mechanism of action, losartan may possess favorable renoprotective properties. However, due to the methodological flaws and the incomplete data in the RENAAL study, the question of the effectiveness and safety of this drug in diabetic nephropathy remains yet unanswered.
Cardiovasc Diabetol 2002 Apr 08
PMID:Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study. 1211 58

Imidapril hydrochloride (imidapril) is a long-acting, non-sulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, which has been used clinically in the treatment of hypertension, chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and diabetic nephropathy. It has the unique advantage over other ACE inhibitors in causing a lower incidence of dry cough. After oral administration, imidapril is rapidly converted in the liver to its active metabolite imidaprilat. The plasma levels of imidaprilat gradually increase in proportion to the dose, and decline slowly. The time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) is 2.0 h for imidapril and 9.3 h for imidaprilat. The elimination half-lives (t(1/2)) of imidapril and imidaprilat is 1.7 and 14.8 h, respectively. Imidapril and its metabolites are excreted chiefly in the urine. As an ACE inhibitor, imidaprilat is as potent as enalaprilat, an active metabolite of enalapril, and about twice as potent as captopril. In patients with hypertension, blood pressure was still decreased at 24 h after imidapril administration. The antihypertensive effect of imidapril was dose-dependent. The maximal reduction of blood pressure and plasma ACE was achieved with imidapril, 10 mg once daily, and the additional effect was not prominent with higher doses. When administered to patients with AMI, imidapril improved left ventricular ejection fraction and reduced plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. In patients with mild-to-moderate CHF [New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II-III], imidapril increased exercise time and physical working capacity and decreased plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and BNP levels in a dose-related manner. In patients with diabetic nephropathy, imidapril decreased urinary albumin excretion. Interestingly, imidapril improved asymptomatic dysphagia in patients with a history of stroke. In the same patients it increased serum substance P levels, while the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan was ineffective. These studies indicate that imidapril is a versatile ACE inhibitor. In addition to its effectiveness in the treatment of hypertension, CHF, and AMI, imidapril has beneficial effects in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy and asymptomatic dysphagia. Good tissue penetration and inhibition of tissue ACE by imidapril contributes to its effectiveness in preventing cardiovascular complications of hypertension. The major advantages of imidapril are its activity in the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases and lower incidence of cough compared with some of the older ACE inhibitors.
Cardiovasc Drug Rev 2002
PMID:Protection of the cardiovascular system by imidapril, a versatile angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. 1217 88


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>