Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (type 2 diabetes)
 57,723 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients are those patients who do not require insulin for survival and do not have gestational, secondary, or malnutrition-related diabetes. They may require insulin to maintain good health. Therapy in NIDDM should attempt to reverse the coexisting defects of insulin deficiency and insulin resistance that lead to hepatic glucose over-production and diminished glucose tissue utilization. Both sulfonylureas and insulin can achieve near normal FPGs and HbA1c concentrations in mild to moderately severe NIDDM. Both can reduce insulin resistance and both increase insulin availability. Evidence exists, however, showing that prevention of post-prandial hyperglycemia, whose significance is unknown, may require soluble preprandial insulin. Treatment goals should be realistic and discussed with the patient. In younger patients, the aim should be to achieve normoglycemia, while in those who have other significant medical or social problems, or who are of advanced age, diabetic control may, out of necessity, need to be relaxed. At presentation a diet and exercise program should be initiated and the patient observed if clinically well. If diet fails to reduce the FPG below 108 mg/dl, additional therapy should be used. In mild to moderate NIDDM, sulfonylurea or basal insulin (given as once daily long- or intermediate-acting insulin) can be equally successful without the need for rigid dietary habits. More severe degrees of NIDDM or patients with sulfonylurea failure not caused by dietary indiscretion will require more complex insulin regimens. The socially dependent patient requiring insulin should have as simple a regimen as possible. The insulin-resistant patient undergoing surgery or with an intercurrent illness is most easily managed with a variable rate insulin infusion that allows prediction of subsequent subcutaneous insulin requirements. Combination insulin-sulfonylurea therapy should be reserved for patients failing to achieve acceptable glycemic control when insulin and sulphonylurea are used separately. It may improve control or lessen insulin requirements.
 ...
PMID:Insulin: either alone or combined with oral hypoglycemic agents. 305 69

Recent studies have shown that plasma concentrations of vitamin A (retinol) and its carrier proteins, retinol-binding protein (RBP), and transthyretin (TTR), are decreased in human subjects with insulin-dependent (IDDM) but not with noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Rats made diabetic with streptozotocin (STZ) have also been shown to have reduced levels of plasma vitamin A while its hepatic concentrations elevate. The circulatory vitamin A levels remained low while its hepatic concentrations were further elevated following supplementation of the vitamin. The reduced circulatory status of vitamin A in diabetic animals was not caused by its impaired intestinal absorption. Further experimental studies have pointed to the fact that IDDM is associated with a deficiency of vitamin A, which is secondary to an impaired transport mechanism of this vitamin from its hepatic storage to the target site, such as retina of the eyes. The diabetes-associated changes in vitamin A metabolism were reserved to normal by insulin treatment. The underlying cause for decreased metabolic availability in uncontrolled diabetes, is not clearly understood. It appears that the increased hepatic store of vitamin A is attributed to a decreased availability of its carrier proteins. Subnormal vitamin A status in poorly controlled diabetic subjects may not respond to vitamin A supplementation, rather it may increase its load in the liver leading to hepatoxicity. These results clearly suggest that there is need for further research identifying the importance of vitamin A in diabetes mellitus.
 ...
PMID:Vitamin A homeostasis and diabetes mellitus. 999 May 81

Troglitazone, a new antihyperglycemic agent, is approved for use alone, with oral sulfonylureas, or with insulin in the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus. Rather than stimulating insulin secretion, it enhances insulin sensitivity. Potential advantages of troglitazone over oral sulfonylureas include decreased endogenous insulin concentrations, decreased exogenous insulin requirements, reduced hypoglycemic risk, and convenient once/day administration. The effect on morbidity and mortality from lowering endogenous and exogenous insulin concentrations remains to be determined. Troglitazone also has potential disadvantages. It induces cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4, although few drug interactions have been identified to date. Serum transaminases must be monitored routinely because of rarely reported cases of idiosyncratic hepatocellular injury. In addition, the cost of troglitazone is much higher than that of other oral antihyperglycemic agents or insulin. Given the available information, troglitazone has limited benefit over oral sulfonylureas or metformin as monotherapy or in combination with oral sulfonylureas. Until additional combination and comparative studies have been done, the agent should be reserved for patients with poor glycemic control receiving high daily doses of insulin.
 ...
PMID:Troglitazone in type II diabetes mellitus. 962 Jan 5

The importance of glycemic control in reducing the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes has been clearly demonstrated with a long-term prospective, randomized interventional trial. The data are not as strong with regards to type 2 diabetes. The results of several prospective studies and one interventional study, however, all report benefits of improved glycemic indices on reducing microvascular complications. The available literature evaluating the relationship between glycemic control and macrovascular disease in type 1 and type 2 diabetes demonstrates the importance of glucose control. One could make rational scientific arguments or criticize the design and interpretations of any one individual study. Yet collectively the evidence is powerful. Additionally, there have been no negative studies reported. Lowering the glycosylated hemoglobin to less than 2 percentage points above the upper limit of normal should be the first glycemic goal for most patients with diabetes. Obviously, some patients cannot obtain this degree of control for a variety of reasons. Moreover, the intensity of therapy needs to be individualized and tailored to each patient. In addition, intensive glycemic control does not necessarily mean multiple injections or insulin pumps or home glucose monitoring 10 times a day. Intensive glycemic control means that the glycohemoglobin (hemoglobin and A1C and blood glucose values are in a normal or near-normal range, no matter how simple or how complex the treatment regimen. The most controversial issue is with regards to the relationship between hyperinsulinemia and accelerated atherosclerosis. This association is not consistently found in many of the large prospective studies, and certainly there has never been a direct cause-and-effect relationship proven. Most experts in the field recommend that insulin be reserved for patients with type II diabetes when oral therapy cannot achieve near-normal glycemic control. Weight gain and hypoglycemia are adverse effects of sulfonylurea and insulin therapy. These adverse effects are dwarfed, however, by the acute and chronic complications of poorly controlled diabetes. Lastly, estimates on the economic benefits of reducing long-term microvascular and macrovascular complications in populations are staggering. Based on the available literature, all patients with diabetes should be educated and have access to an appropriate individualized treatment regimen with the goal to normalize or near-normalize glycemic control. This should be the standard of care until proven otherwise.
 ...
PMID:Importance of glucose control. 970 16

Obesity management includes primary weight loss, prevention of weight regain, and the management of associated risk factors, such as smoking, hyperlipidaemia and hypertension. All these require lifestyle modification. The success or failure of management will depend on the characteristics of both the patient and the physician (or therapeutic team). Thus, direct statistical comparisons between methods of management may be misleading. Weight loss of 5-10% (usually 5-10 kg and equivalent to 5-10 cm waist reduction for most patients) is generally achievable within 3-4 months. Attempts to achieve weight loss over longer periods of time are usually unsuccessful. Improved clinical, symptomatic and biochemical benefits are very significant with this degree of weight loss. It is therefore unreasonable to pursue an 'ideal' bodyweight. In reported studies, the weight decrease over the first 3-4 months represents the total weight loss. Data collected after this time reflect both the initial weight loss and the ability of the patient and the programme to maintain weight loss. Many reports and study designs do not make this distinction. The principal goal of weight management, whether in primary prevention or in treatment of the obese, is weight maintenance. This goal has to be viewed in the context of a normal tendency to gain weight through adult life. In good hands, dietary and behavioural techniques can maintain significant weight loss for 1 year or longer in about 40% of patients. This increases to about 70% for patients receiving appetite modifying drugs; professional resource requirements are also lower. Surgical approaches are reserved for those with more serious clinical risks. Weight loss in individuals with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) can be achieved in newly diagnosed patients and non-diabetics with comparable success. The goal of interventions in established NIDDM patients should be improved weight maintenance evaluated over 1-2 years, not acute loss achieved in 3 months.
 ...
PMID:Obesity--what are the current treatment options? 979 77

Obesity increases the risk of several serious health problems, including heart disease, type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and osteoarthritis. Patients taking certain psychotropic medications may gain a significant amount of weight (as much as a 5% increase in body weight within 1 to 2 months), placing them at risk for obesity. Body weight monitoring and prudent drug selection are the best approaches to preventing weight gain in patients taking psychotropic drugs. When weight gain (> 5% of initial body weight) is unavoidable, intervention counseling should begin. Nonpharmacologic measures for managing weight gain include a balanced deficit diet of 1000 calories and higher, depending on the patient's weight; 30 to 60 minutes of physical activity daily; and behavioral training to restrain excess caloric intake. Each of these measures requires a considerable commitment on the part of the patient and works best with support from the physician and weight-loss support groups. Drug therapy for weight loss is available (at present, sibutramine is the only approved appetite suppressant in the United States); however, for most patients already being treated with a psychotropic agent, the risks (such as drug interactions, adverse events, compliance problems) of adding an antiobesity agent probably outweigh the benefits. Surgical intervention for obesity should be reserved for morbidly obese patients whose disease is intractable to medical therapy.
 ...
PMID:Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic management of weight gain. 1054 40

The influence of hypertension on the clinical course and complications of type 2 diabetes is well established. With a special focus on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, this paper will review recently published results of prospective studies addressing two important aspects: the degree of blood pressure control, and the choice of antihypertensive regimen, in the prevention of complications in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. None of the recent studies have shown worse outcomes in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based regimens compared with alternative treatments. Some studies have suggested that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based antihypertensive regimens may be superior to alternative treatments in reducing the risk of micro- and macrovascular complications, whereas other studies found similar effects for beta-blockers or calcium antagonists. Several trials showed beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors over calcium antagonists, and have raised concerns about the use of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists in these patients. However, it remains to be determined whether there should be more reserved use of calcium antagonists in such patients, in the light of more major trials showing the safety and efficacy of calcium antagonists in preventing cardiovascular and renal endpoints. The degree of reduction of blood pressure rather than the choice of a particular drug may be the most important factor. Studies focusing on renal endpoints suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have a better antiproteinuric effect than other agents, but this phenomenon is not always reflected by a more beneficial effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the decline in glomerular filtration rate. In many ways, the question of whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are the best class of agent in these patients is academic. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are sufficiently safe, and, according to recent evidence, equally or more effective than other classes of agents. Tight blood pressure control is usually achievable only with a combination of agents. On the basis of available evidence, it appears that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, together with a low-dose cardioselective beta-blocker and a diuretic, should be used in most hypertensive type 2 diabetes patients, with calcium antagonists serving as reserve drugs in case of insufficient blood pressure control.
 ...
PMID:Are angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors the best treatment for hypertension in type 2 diabetes? 1075 23

Severe obesity is associated with multiple comorbidities and is refractory to dietary management with or without behavioral or drug therapies. There are a number of surgical procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity, including purely gastric restrictive, a combination of malabsorption and gastric restriction or primary malabsorption. The purely gastric restrictive procedures, including vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding, do not provide adequate weight loss. African-American patients do especially poorly after the banding procedure with the loss of only 11% of excess weight in one study. Gastric bypass (GBP) is associated with the loss of 66% of excess weight at 1 to 2 years after surgery, 60% at 5 years and 50% at 10 years. For unknown reasons, African-American patients lose significantly less weight than Caucasians after GBP. There is a risk of micronutrient deficiencies after GBP, including iron deficiency anemia in menstruating women, vitamin B12, and calcium deficiencies. Prophylactic supplementation of these nutrients is necessary. Recurrent vomiting after bariatric surgery may be associated with a severe polyneuropathy and must be aggressively treated with endoscopic dilatation before this complication is allowed to develop. The malabsorptive procedures include the partial biliopancreatic bypass (BPD) and BPD with duodenal switch (BPD/DS). The BPD appears to cause severe protein-calorie malnutrition in American patients; the BPD/DS may be associated with less malnutrition. Weight loss failure after GBP does not respond to tightening a dilated gastrojejunal stoma or reducing the size of the gastric pouch. These patients may require conversion to a malabsorptive distal GBP, similar to the BPD. However, because of the risk of severe protein-calorie malnutrition and calcium deficiency BPD should be reserved for patients with severe obesity comorbidity. The risk of death following bariatric surgery is between 1% and 2% in most series but is significantly higher in patients with respiratory insufficiency of obesity. In most patients, surgically induced weight loss will correct hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, obesity hypoventilation syndrome, gastroesophageal reflux, venous stasis disease, urinary incontinence, female sexual hormone dysfunction, pseudotumor cerebri, degenerative joint disease pains, as well as improved self-image and employability.
 ...
PMID:Bariatric surgery for severe obesity. 1185 Dec 1

Both infections and injuries activate the immunity system, leading to a series of metabolic changes which place the organism at a disadvantage and contribute to its elimination, thus facilitating the repair of the injured tissue. The study of the actions of tumour necrosing factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), classically implicated in inflammatory processes and in fighting infection, has revealed numerous metabolic effects. Some gene polymorphisms of TNF-alpha and IL-6 (associated with a different TNF-alpha or IL-6 transcription rate) and the plasma concentrations of the soluble TNF-alpha receptor are found to be simultaneously associated with resistance to insulin, the proportion of body fat and with the mortality linked with different chronic infections. Therefore, it seems that the immune system is designed to fight infections effectively and to provide certain survival advantages during periods of intermittent fasting so frequent in the past. By inducing a resistance to insulin in the muscles, the energy substrates would thus be reserved for neuronal metabolism. In the presence of an insulin-resistance genotype and a westernization of the environment (carbohydrate-rich diet, an increase in saturated fat, low fibre and sedentary lifestyle), a genotype with a high cytokine response will contribute to a worsening of the resistance to insulin and, finally, to type 2 diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis. The advantages for our ancestors of a large cytokine response (eradication of the lesion) or moderate resistance to insulin (protection against food shortage) have led in the present day to the development of atherosclerosis now that the characteristics of the environment have changed. It is contended that these changes constitute examples of good adaptation to the environment or poor concordance between our current lifestyle and our genome.
 ...
PMID:[Insulin resistance and evolution]. 1192 38

Recent trials have helped to clarify indications for the initial pharmacological therapy of hypertension. Both the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) and World Health Organization-international Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) recommendations should be revised. The more recent trials indicate that: (1) diuretics and beta-blockers appear to be as effective in reducing overall morbidity/ mortality as other agents (Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension [STOP-2], United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study [UKPDS], Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment [INSIGHT], Nordic diltiazem [NORDIL]); (2) the use of an a-blocker results in more cardiovascular events, especially congestive heart failure, when compared with a diuretic (Antihypertensive Therapy and Lipid Lowering Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT]); (3)the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor results in fewer myocardial infarctions and episodes of heart failure than calcium channel blockers in the elderly and in diabetic patients (Fosinopril vs. Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial [FACET], Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes [ABCD], STOP-2) - other data (Captopril Prevention Project [CAPPP]) suggest that the use of an ACE inhibitor is preferred in diabetic patients; (4) overall cardiovascular events are similar with calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic - however, there are fewer strokes with non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NORDIL) and a trend towards an increase in heart failure and myocardial infarctions with either a dihydropyridine or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic (INSIGHT, NORDIL); (5) angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) will decrease proteinuria and slow progression of renal disease in type 2 diabetic patients when compared with regimens that do not include an ARB or an ACE inhibitor (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan [RENAAL], Irbesartan Type II Diabetic Nephropathy Trial [IDNT], Irbesartan Type II Diabetes with Microalbuminuria [IRMA Il]). The debate over initial therapy may be moot. High-risk hypertensive patients should probably be treated initially with combination therapy, one of which should be a diuretic. The use of diuretics and beta-blockers as well as ACE-inhibitors alone or with a diuretic should be considered as initial therapy (a change from JNCVI). Alpha-blockers should be reserved for special situations, i.e. prostatic hypertrophy (in contrast to WHO-ISH recommendations). An ACE-inhibitor or ARB, usually along with a diuretic, can be considered as preferred therapy in hypertensive diabetic patients. Some data suggest equal or greater reduction in strokes with a calcium channel blocker than other medications.
 ...
PMID:Current recommendations for the treatment of hypertension: are they still valid? 1199 97


1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>