Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (type 2 diabetes)
 57,723 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Aggressive therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal disease is warranted given the natural history of this disease. Although antagonizing the renin-angiotensin system is clearly important, how this is accomplished is of considerable controversy. On the one hand, recent clinical trials of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with renal disease demonstrate unequivocally the renal protective effect of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). Although the results of the recently published LIFE trial are encouraging, inconsistencies have been observed with ARBs in reducing cardiovascular end points. On the other hand, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have a dramatic effect in reducing cardiovascular events but have not been shown convincingly to reduce progression of renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These studies leave us in a quandary as to the optimal initial treatment regimen for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal disease despite the recent recommendations from the American Diabetes Association (Alexandria, Va). Given the fact that many of these individuals will require administration of multiple antihypertensive agents, perhaps the initial treatment with a combination of an ARB and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor affords optimal cardiovascular and renal protection for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal disease. Future clinical trials should be designed to address this issue.
 ...
PMID:Combination therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1274 99

Guidelines for medical treatment are becoming increasingly popular and many guidelines have been produced by various societies in diabetes, hypertension, and renal disease as well as general medicine. By their nature, they are outdated considering the rapid and efficient publication of many papers related to the treatment of hypertension in diabetes. Increased blood glucose causes vascular damage and abnormal vascular structure all over the body, an abnormal structure that is especially vulnerable to high blood pressure, even within the so-called normal range. There is now more and more evidence, especially in diabetics, that blood pressure should be as low as possible. In this context, it is important to stress that the so-called J-shaped relationship between blood pressure and mortality may not be so relevant. Major epidemiological studies came from the Framingham and the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) Diabetic Cohort. The MRFIT Cohort showed that cardiovascular mortality was increased by a factor of 2-4 in diabetic patients, and there was a clear association between systolic blood pressure and complications without any threshold value. It could be suggested that since diabetes is an important cardiovascular risk factor, a lower value (130/85 mmHg) than for non-diabetics (140/90 mmHg) should be proposed. The tight blood pressure control arm of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study was <150/85 mmHg (achieved 144/82 mmHg) and the aim in the less tight control arm was <180/105 mmHg (achieved 154/87 mmHg). In the tight control group, 29% needed three or more antihypertensive drugs. In the Hypertension Optimal Treatment study, the frequency of major cardiovascular disease events in the group with target <80 mmHg (achieved 144/81 mmHg) was 11.9/1000 patients/year, which was significantly lower than the event rate (24.4/1000 patients/year) in the group with target <90 mmHg (achieved 148/85 mmHg). A reduction in the frequency of diabetic nephropathy by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor treatment in normotensive lean microalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients has been shown. However, it is impossible from the present data to draw any conclusions with respect to effect on the main composite endpoint of ACE inhibition in microalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients without previous cardiovascular events or without hypertension. Recent published studies have also demonstrated beneficial effects with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Diuretics form a very important basis for antihypertensive treatment, also often in combination with agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system. Several studies show that treatment with the diuretic indapamide reduces the level of microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diuretics were used as an adjunctive to reduce blood pressure in all studies; it is therefore understandable that many guidelines suggest that diuretics form part of the treatment of hypertension in diabetics. Many studies of an epidemiological nature and follow-up studies in diabetic patients show that blood pressure control is of vital concern in the prevention of diabetic complications, and indeed the usual criteria for good blood pressure control may not be stringent enough in diabetic patients. Many classes of antihypertensives may be used, but it appears that diuretics, such as indapamide sustained release (SR), constitute an important proposal in all treatment strategies.
 ...
PMID:New treatment guidelines for a patient with diabetes and hypertension. 1276 64

Hypertension is a nutritional-hygienic disease. Long-term caloric intake in excess of energy expenditures, chronic supraphysiological intake of dietary sodium, excessive alcohol consumption, and psychosocial stressors all contribute to the development of hypertension throughout the world. Elevated BP, particularly systolic BP, has been linked to multiple adverse clinical outcomes including stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency/failure, peripheral vascular disease, retinopathy, dementia, and premature mortality. These undesirable clinical outcomes are typically, although not invariably, preceded by pressure-related target-organ injury such as left ventricular hypertrophy, renal insufficiency and proteinuria. The relation of BP and CKD and, in turn, the prevention of CKD or forestalling its progression by hypertension treatment, will be the focus of this manuscript. In hypertensive persons with reduced kidney function and/or proteinuria, lowering BP with multidrug therapy that is inclusive of pharmacologic modulators of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-kinin system is an effective strategy to forestall the progressive loss of kidney function. The totality of data support low therapeutic BP targets for persons with proteinuria >1 g/d. Nevertheless, in persons with CKD, even those with proteinuria below the dipstick positive level (approximately 300 mg/d or urine protein to creatinine ratio of 0.22), aggressive BP control also may be warranted because of the high risk of nonrenal cardiovascular disease. Multiple antihypertensive drugs will be required in the vast majority of patients with diabetes and/or reduced kidney function to attain BP goal. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) modulator therapy is indicated among persons with diabetes mellitus and CKD. Available data support the use of angiotensin receptor blockers in persons with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy for preservation of kidney function. Among persons with type I diabetes with or without overt nephropathy, type 2 diabetes without overt nephropathy and in nondiabetic CKD, the available clinical data support the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as the RAS modulator of choice. Low therapeutic target BP levels <130/80 mmHg in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus also appear warranted based on available data mostly for reducing the risk of nonrenal cardiovascular disease and overall mortality.
 ...
PMID:Prevention of hypertension and its complications: theoretical basis and guidelines for treatment. 1281 10

To determine the effect of a low-dose angiotensin receptor blocker, candesartan, on early kidney damage associated with diabetes. Fifty-two patients with type 2 diabetes with normo- and microalbuminuria participated in this study. Nineteen patients with high-normal and mildly high blood pressure received low-dose candesartan cilexetil at 4 mg daily (candesartan group), and 33 patients did not receive candesartan (control group). Blood pressure, urinary excretion of albumin, transferrin, and type IV collagen (expressed as urinary creatinine index) and plasma parameters were determined at baseline and at 2, 6, 12 and 18 months after the start of candesartan therapy. Baseline urinary albumin, transferrin, and type IV collagen excretions was similar in the control and candesartan groups. The higher baseline systolic blood pressure was decreased by candesartan treatment to a level similar to that in the control group, such that blood pressure was comparable between the control and candesartan groups during the run-in period. In the control group, urinary albumin excretion was significantly increased at 18 months when compared with baseline, while urinary albumin excretion did not increase in the candesartan group throughout the study. Urinary transferrin excretion was significantly increased at 6, 12, and 18 months when compared with baseline in the control group, while it did not increase in the candesartan group during the study. In both groups, urinary type IV collagen excretion did not change significantly during the study. Hemoglobin A1c, serum urea nitrogen, creatinine, albumin, and lipids were comparable between the two groups throughout the study. In conclusion, low-dose candesartan can prevent early kidney damage in type 2 diabetic patients with mildly higher blood pressure independently of its hypotensive action.
 ...
PMID:Low-dose candesartan cilexetil prevents early kidney damage in type 2 diabetic patients with mildly elevated blood pressure. 1286 1

Hypertension increases the renal and cardiovascular risks in diabetic patients. The beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on renal and cardiovascular outcomes are discussed in this paper, with a particular focus on their optimal use in the hypertensive diabetic patient, with or without evidence of renal or cardiovascular disease. Although the mechanism of action of the two drug classes is not entirely similar, there is no evidence of differences in their clinical effects. Importantly, the achieved risk reduction with either drug is not similar across subsets of diabetic patients. Overt nephropathy of type 2 diabetes appears poorly responsive even to maximized renin-angiotensin system inhibition. This urgently calls for new interventions that may decrease renal and cardiovascular risk through other mechanisms than blood pressure lowering alone. Improving the outcome of type 2 diabetics is the major clinical challenge for the beginning of the third millennium.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition or angiotensin receptor blockade in hypertensive diabetics? 1294 27

Type 2 diabetes is an ever-growing problem worldwide. Approximately 40% of the patients with type 2 diabetes will develop diabetic kidney disease. In the United States, diabetes has become the most common single cause of endstage renal disease defined by the need for dialysis or transplantation. Patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy have a dramatically increased cardiovascular risk. The Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial was designed to determine whether the use of irbesartan or a calcium channel blocker would provide protection against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes beyond that attributable to the lowering of blood pressure. In that study, 1715 hypertensive patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to irbesartan 300 mg/day or amlodipine 10 mg/day, or placebo. All patients randomized in this trial had more than 900 mg of protein in their urine and serum creatinines between 1.0 mg/dl and 3.0 mg/dl. The target blood pressure was 135/85 mmHg or less in all groups. The primary outcome was time to a combined endpoint of doubling of their baseline serum creatinine concentration, the development of endstage renal disease, or death from any cause. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.6 years. Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a risk of the primary composite endpoint that was 20% lower than that in the placebo group ( P = 0.02) and 23% lower than that in the amlodipine group ( P = 0.006). The risk of doubling of the serum creatinine concentration was 33% lower in the irbesartan group than in the placebo group ( P = 0.003) and 37% lower in the irbesartan group than in the amlodipine group ( P < 0.001). Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a relative risk of endstage renal disease that was 23% lower than that in both other groups. These differences were not accounted for by differences in the blood pressures that were achieved. Proteinuria was reduced on average by 33% in the irbesartan group as compared with 6% in the amlodipine group and 10% in the placebo group. The angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan was shown to be effective in protecting against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. In a study done in patients with type 2 diabetes and early nephropathy as manifested by microalbuminuria, 590 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria were randomized to receive either irbesartan 150 mg/day or irbesartan 300 mg/day and followed for 2 years. The primary outcome in that trial was the time to the onset of diabetic nephropathy, defined by persistent albuminuria in overnight specimens, with a urinary albumin excretion rate that was more than 200 mg/min or at least 30% higher than the baseline level. The irbesartan 150 mg/day group demonstrated a 39% relative risk reduction versus the control group in the development of overt proteinuria. The irbesartan 300 mg/day group demonstrated a highly significant 70% risk reduction versus the control group ( P < 0.001). The albumin excretion rate was reduced in the two irbesartan groups throughout the study (-11% and -38% at 24 months compared with baseline in the irbesartan 150-mg and 300-mg groups, respectively). The albumin excretion rate remained unchanged in the control group. Irbesartan was demonstrated in the above study to be renoprotective, independent of its blood pressure-lowering effect, in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Thus, irbesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, was demonstrated to be significantly renoprotective in patients with type 2 diabetes with either early nephropathy (microalbuminuria) or late nephropathy (proteinuria). The renoprotective effects of irbesartan were above and beyond the effects irbesartan had on systemic blood pressure. Patients with type 2 diabetes and either early or late diabetic nephropathy should be treated with the angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of diabetic nephropathy with angiotensin II receptor antagonist. 1458 37

There is a worldwide epidemic of type 2 diabetes, with numbers predicted to reach over 210 million by the year 2010. Important risk factors for type 2 diabetes are obesity, physical inactivity and dietary factors. Recent evidence shows that type 2 diabetes can certainly be delayed, and possibly prevented, by intensive lifestyle intervention, and therapies including acarbose, metformin, orlistat and the glitazones in selected populations. However, the UK has not had a successful record in trials which aim to prevent diabetes, and therefore implementation of effective and successful intensive lifestyle intervention to prevent diabetes may prove difficult in the UK. Other 'non-glucose lowering' agents, such as statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, may have a role to play in the prevention of diabetes.
 ...
PMID:The prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1470 48

During the past decade, the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has risen dramatically, primarily due to an increase in the incidence of diabetes. In patients with diabetes, both hyperglycemia and hypertension are independent risk factors for renal disease. Hypertension is also a risk factor in nondiabetic renal disease and contributes to renal dysfunction by increasing glomerular pressure, glomerular capillary damage, and proteinuria. The resultant nephron damage increases glomerular pressure and damage within remnant functional nephrons, further contributing to deterioration of renal function. In addition to its role in systemic hypertension, angiotensin II has direct effects on the kidney through elevation of glomerular capillary pressure and upregulation of components of the renal injury response. These direct effects of angiotensin II on the kidney support the inclusion of agents that target the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) into treatment regimens for patients at risk for renal disease. Several clinical trials have established the benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with diabetes. The ACE inhibitors have been shown to delay renal decline in patients with type 1 diabetes, whereas the renoprotective effect of these agents in patients with type 2 diabetes is less clear. The ARBs have been shown to provide significant benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes, both at early (microalbuminuria) and late (proteinuria) stages of renal decline. In the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study, ARB therapy significantly reduced the progression of overt nephropathy (composite of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, and death), a benefit that has not been shown for ACE inhibitors. Moreover, in RENAAL, losartan significantly reduced the incidence of the individual end point of ESRD. The benefits of ARB therapy in IDNT and RENAAL were associated with significant reductions in proteinuria and were independent of blood pressure reductions. In RENAAL, proteinuria was a strong predictor of both renal and cardiovascular events. These findings underscore the importance of RAS blockade as a strategy for improving clinical outcomes in patients with renal disease.
 ...
PMID:Recommendations for the management of special populations: renal disease in diabetes. 1462 61

Hypertension, impaired renal function, and proteinuria are commonly associated to the presence of diabetes. They play a major role in the development of cardiovascular and renal damage. Effective antihypertensive treatment reduces the progression of diabetic nephropathy and improves cardiovascular prognosis. Accordingly, tight BP control (<130/80 mmHg) is currently recommended in diabetic patients. Achieving BP targets represents the most important determinant of cardiovascular and renal protection. However, it has been suggested that specific classes of antihypertensive drugs may exert additional organ protection beyond their BP control. The pharmacologic blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system has been shown to convey greater renal and cardiovascular protection compared with other classes of drugs. In particular, studies focusing on renal end point suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are the first-choice drugs in type 1 diabetes. Both ACEI and angiotensin II receptor blockers prevent the progression from microalbuminuria to clinical proteinuria in type 2 diabetes, but angiotensin blockers provide better renoprotection in patients with overt nephropathy. Regarding cardiovascular protection, several studies (but not all) have shown that ACEI exert a protective effect on diabetic patients. Recently, interesting results in favor of angiotensin receptor blockers have been reported in the IDNT, RENAAL, and LIFE studies. It should be noted that to achieve maximal renal and cardiovascular protection, most diabetic patients require integrated therapeutic intervention, including not only several antihypertensive drugs, but statins and antiplatelet therapy as well.
 ...
PMID:Optimizing therapy in the diabetic patient with renal disease: antihypertensive treatment. 1468 64

Chronic renal disease is characterized by a gradual loss of renal function and an increased cardiovascular risk. Renin-angiotensin system blockade by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition or angiotensin receptor blockade has distinct renoprotective and cardiovascular protective effects, but which of the two drug classes confers more protection is still a matter of debate. This review highlights and compares the effects of the two drug-classes in nondiabetic renal disease and in overt or incipient nephropathy of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Both renal and cardiovascular outcomes are considered. Regardless of their relative efficacy, both drug classes have a dose-response relationship for intermediate renal and cardiovascular parameters. Moreover, combined treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin receptor blockade seems to provide better long-term renoprotection than monotherapy. Actually, in most patients, achieving maximal renal and cardiovascular protection requires a multidrug regimen, usually including several antihypertensives. Within this approach, full dose titration of either RAS blocker followed by add-on with the second drug is more important than the choice of the initial drug.
 ...
PMID:ACE inhibition versus angiotensin receptor blockade: which is better for renal and cardiovascular protection? 1468 76


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>