Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (type 2 diabetes)
 57,723 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the US is rising at an alarming rate, with the largest increase among African-American populations. The key risk factors for kidney disease are hypertension and diabetes, which are both becoming more prevalent in the US, and particularly in African Americans. Although African Americans make up 12.6% of the US population, the incidence of diabetes-related ESRD is four times higher than for whites, and the prevalence of ESRD due to hypertension is twice that of white patients. Approximately 30 to 40% of all patients with diabetes will develop nephropathy and many will progress to ESRD, necessitating dialysis or kidney transplantation. Recent studies in patients with type 2 diabetes indicate a significant delay in progression or development of diabetic nephropathy following blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with the use of angiotensin receptor antagonists. Early intervention in patients with hypertension is necessary to prevent kidney damage, and data from the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are effective in this population. Although African-American patients receiving hemodialysis appear to have increased survival compared with whites, racial factors and poor access to medical care contribute to the increased risk of kidney disease in minorities. A concerted effort is necessary to raise awareness in minority populations and provide strategies for prevention and early treatment thereby attenuating the increasing prevalence of kidney failure in these groups.
 ...
PMID:Diabetes mellitus and hypertension: key risk factors for kidney disease. 1215 17

Obesity is a major public health issue, and hypertension is one of the most common associated comorbidities. Current guidelines for optimal blood pressure levels in obese patients or for the treatment of obesity-hypertension do not provide specific recommendations that go beyond the rather general recommendation to lose weight. Based on the strong ties between obesity, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes, and the similarity of complications that occur in obesity-related hypertension and in hypertension associated with type 2 diabetes, it seems appropriate to explore the optimal blood pressure levels for obese hypertensive patients. Recently published studies underline the importance of weight reduction to reach this goal. Several lines of reasoning support the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers as the appropriate first-line therapy in obese patients with uncomplicated hypertension. Nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, a-blockers, or low-dose diuretics may be added when necessary. Clearly, further studies are needed to define target blood pressure levels in obese patients and to clarify the value of established and newer drugs, like angiotensin receptor blockers, for the treatment of obese hypertensive patients. The role of antiobesity drugs in the management of the obese hypertensive patient also remains to be defined.
 ...
PMID:Optimizing blood pressure control in the obese patient. 1221 53

The available evidence on renal protection in type 2 diabetes mellitus favors the administration of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) more than that of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi). This evidence is based on recent studies showing that losartan and irbesartan can prevent the development of overt diabetic nephropathy in microalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients as well as slow the velocity of progression to end-stage renal disease in patients with overt type 2 diabetic nephropathy. These studies do not deny the possibility that ACEi are equally effective, but studies of an adequate magnitude are lacking. These findings on ARB administration do not preclude the importance of strict control of blood pressure and proteinuria and/or albuminuria to avoid or retard renal damage in type 2 diabetic patients.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin blockade in type 2 diabetic renal disease. 1241 Aug 57

Diabetes mellitus increases the risk for hypertension and associated cardiovascular diseases, including coronary, cerebrovascular, renal and peripheral vascular disease. The risk for developing cardiovascular disease is increased when both diabetes and hypertension co-exist; in fact, over 11 million Americans have both diabetes and hypertension. These numbers will continue to climb, internationally, since the leading associated risk for diabetes development, obesity, has reached epidemic proportions, globally. Moreover, the frequent association of diabetes with dyslipidemia, as well as coagulation, endothelial, and metabolic abnormalities also aggravates the underlying vascular disease process in patients who possess these comorbid conditions. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) are overactivated in both hypertension and diabetes. Drugs that inhibit this system, such as ACE inhibitors and more recently angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARBs), have proven beneficial effects on the micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes, especially the kidney. The BRILLIANT study showed that lisinopril reduces microalbuminuria better than CCB therapy. Numerous other long-term studies confirm this association with ACE inhibitors including the HOPE trial. Furthermore, the European Controlled trial of Lisinopril in Insulin-dependent Diabetes (EUCLID) study, showed that lisinopril slowed the progression of renal disease, even in individuals with mild albuminuria. In fact, there are now five appropriately powered randomized placebo-controlled trials to show that both ACE inhibitors and ARBs slow progression of diabetic nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes. These effects were shown to be better than conventional blood pressure lowering therapy, including dihydropyridine CCBs. In patients with microalbuminuria, ACE inhibitors and ARBs reduce the progression of microalbuminuria to proteinuria and provide a risk reduction of between 38 and 60% for progression to proteinuria. This is important since microalbuminuria is known to be associated with increased vascular permeability and decreased responsiveness to vasodilatory stimuli. Recently, increased AVP levels have been lined to microalbuminuria and hyperfiltration in diabetes. The microvascular and macrovascular benefits of ACE inhibition, ARBs and possible role of AVP antagonists in diabetic patients will be discussed, as will be recommendations for its clinical use.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of the diabetic patient: focus on cardiovascular and renal risk reduction. 1243 44

Diabetic nephropathy is the number one cause of endstage renal disease in the United States. Blockade of the renin angiotensin system (RAS) is important in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. With the reports of recently completed trials examining the role of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in type 2 diabetic nephropathy, the question has arisen as to which agents are best to block the RAS in type 2 diabetes. ACE inhibitors have been to preserve renal function in type 1 diabetics with nephropathy in large, randomized, placebo controlled trials, but such data is lacking in type 2 diabetes. Neverthelesss, ACE inhibitors have been recommended for use in type 2 diabetic nephropathy for some time. In type 2 diabetics, ACE inhibitors may have a role in preventing development of nephropathy, and, importantly, ACE inhibitors have been shown to reduce cardiovascular disease in diabetics with and without nephropathy. In addition, ACE inhibitors have beneficial effects on other diabetic complications such as retinopathy and neuropathy. Until better comparative data between ACE inhibitors and ARBs on nephropathy and cardiovascular outcomes is available, ACE inhibitors should remain an important consideration for treatment of diabetic nephropathy.
 ...
PMID:Therapeutic controversies in hypertension management: angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers for diabetic nephropathy? A case for ACE inhibitors. 1247 55

In the past few years diabetes has become the leading cause of end-stage renal disease in all Western countries. A correlation between blood pressure and rate of progression in diabetic nephropathy was noted very early, and increased local activity of the renin angiotensin system was identified as a major pathophysiological mechanism for proteinuria and nephrosclerosis in diabetic patients. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to slow progression of nephropathy in type 1 diabetic patients. The majority of diabetic patients with nephropathy, however, are suffering from type 2 diabetes and until last year there was no convincing evidence of ACE inhibitors being able to slow progression in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy. Three new studies now fill this gap, showing that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are nephroprotective in patients with type 2 diabetes, independently of blood pressure. This review provides an in-depth discussion of the results of these studies and provides recommendations for patient management.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin receptor antagonists in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. 1255 90

Angiotensin receptor blockers are a new class of agents that have made a major contribution to the treatment of hypertension. These agents effectively reduce blood pressure and are well tolerated. Other clinical trials have focused, however, on the much wider use of angiotensin receptor blockers in conditions such as congestive heart failure, postmyocardial infarction management, and diabetic nephropathy. Recent studies have provided evidence that these agents might confer target organ protection in hypertension that is equal to, and possibly better than, the benefits provided by conventional antihypertensive agents. Moreover, there is now little doubt that these drugs are effective alternatives to ACE inhibitors in heart failure and will become treatments of choice for patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Cardiovascular study outcomes have still not determined, however, whether high-risk patients would do better on angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or a combination of both, except in cases of intolerance to ACE inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:The angiotensin II receptor blockers: opportunities across the spectrum of cardiovascular disease. 1255 52

Where shall we place angiotensin receptor blockers in the scheme of the prevention of diabetic nephropathy? Only the results of a large, randomized double-blind trial with a comparable and appropriate alternative would prove therapeutic efficacy. The results of several trials with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have proven them to be the standard of care for diabetics and their kidneys. As reviewed in this article, the results of three large such clinical trials have recently been completed with angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Initial results appear favorable. However, whether angiotensin blockers have more to offer than ACE inhibitors is still speculative. The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Since alternative pathways to ACE have been uncovered in the formation of angiotensin II, inhibition at the final end point would provide favored blockade. Because angiotensin receptor blockers do provide this specific blockade, they offer far more promise than ACE inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin receptor blockers in diabetic nephropathy. 1264 9

Type 2 diabetes is becoming very common and is closely linked to physical inactivity and obesity. It is associated with clustering of coronary risk factors and 60-80% of cases have hypertension. The first therapeutic action is appropriate adjustment of life style. Anti-hypertensive therapies such as diuretics, ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists have been effective in reducing cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes, though calcium antagonists may be less effective than older therapies and ACE-inhibitors in reducing the risk of heart attacks and heart failure (but possibly more effective in stroke reduction). Beta-blockers (BBs) have a poor image as a potential therapy due to apparent adverse effects on surrogate end-points such as insulin-resistance. However large, controlled trials have shown BBs to be highly effective in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events and death in post myocardial infarction patients with diabetes. The UKPDS study in type 2 diabetics with hypertension showed first-line beta-blockade to be at least as effective as ACE-inhibition in preventing all primary macrovascular and microvascular end-points. The active ingredient appears to be beta-1 blockade, acting not only to lower blood pressure but also to prevent sudden death and cardiovascular damage stemming from chronic beta-1 stimulation associated with raised noradrenaline activity. By contrast, in the LIFE study atenolol was less effective than the angiotensin receptor antagonist losartan in reducing cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in mainly elderly hypertensives with diabetes. Thus the best beta-blocker results in reducing hard cardiovascular end-points occur in hypertension studies (including the UKPDS study) involving younger/middle aged (say less than 60-65 years) patients, with relatively high sympathetic activity, relatively compliant/elastic arteries (narrow pulse-pressure) and normally functioning beta-1 receptors. In elderly hypertensive patients beta-blockers may be given as second-line therapy on the back of a low-dose diuretic (but possibly as first line agent in elderly hypertensives with prior myocardial infarction). Thus inappropriate attention to surrogate end-points can lead to faulty prescribing habits. Beta-blockers, currently severely underprescribed, should be considered as a first line therapeutic option for all diabetics with ischaemic heart disease or younger/middle aged diabetics with hypertension (but co-prescribed with low dose diuretic therapy in the elderly). The active ingredient for cardiovascular protection appears to be beta-1 blockade; optimal efficacy in lowering blood pressure and safety e.g. reducing risk of bronchoconstriction, is achieved by choosing an agent with high beta-1 selectivity.
 ...
PMID:Beta-blockers and diabetes: the bad guys come good. 1265 16

High blood pressure in the setting of type 1 and type 2 diabetes is commonly associated with the earlier development of target-organ damage, including cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease and progressive renal insufficiency. The major goal of treating high blood pressure in this population is to prevent or reduce the likelihood of target-organ damage. The treatment goal for high blood pressure, therefore, has to be defined based on optimal means of preventing cardiovascular and renal events. The reduction of high blood pressure with pharmacologic therapy is associated with reduction of cardiovascular events, renal disease, and associated mortality. However, many questions remain. Some of the basic and important questions include the following: What should be the goal of treated blood pressure in the diabetic, and are there preferred agents that should be used in the hypertensive diabetic population? How do angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers fit in? Are there advantages of one class over the other? The goal of this review is to summarize the recent clinical trial findings and try to provide recommendations based on the evidence of these trials to help the clinician better choose blood pressure goals and treatment strategies in the diabetic population.
 ...
PMID:Optimizing target-organ protection in patients with diabetes mellitus: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers? 1272 50


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>